Science/Technology

[ Science/Technology ] [ Main Menu ]


  


7373


Date: December 06, 2023 at 21:34:44
From: georg, [DNS_Address]
Subject: so much has been said to be "impossible" because of dating technology


but what if Ellenberger is right and decay rates are not
constant ... it is suggested from the study of
radiohalos that elements might be "reset" by impinging
magnetic fields and exchange of charge from one body to
the other ... all is not as it seem ... or so it seems
to me ... I still think back to the wooly mammoth quick
frozen in Siberia ... the meat still fresh and the
animal had buttercups in its mouth


Responses:
[7375] [7376] [7374]


7375


Date: December 06, 2023 at 22:13:25
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: so much has been said to be "impossible" because of...

URL: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/07/27/younger-dryas-myths-flash-frozen-mammoths-edition/


re frozen mammoths...it seems you might be off track and that too...but i do agree with you about killinger...


Younger Dryas Myth-Busting: Flash-Frozen Mammoths Edition
2 years ago
David Middleton

Guest “Pleistocene elephant hunting” by David Middleton

“The body of this mammoth was found perfectly preserved in the Siberian tundra with food still in its mouth and stomach indicating that it froze instantly while grazing.”
The Day After Tomorrow, 2004

The Day After Tomorrow is one of my all-time favorite bad science fiction movies. It ranks right up there with another Roland Emmerich masterpiece, 2012. These movies manage to be superbly entertaining, while getting the science even wronger than Armageddon, the greatest bad science fiction movie ever made. The Day After Tomorrow was based on Art Bell’s The Coming Superstorm. The late Art Bell was the originator of the late night (early morning to me) radio program Coast to Coast AM.

The notion of “flash-frozen” mammoths is so wide-spread, that in some circles (particularly Art Bell, Immanuel Velikovsky, Charles Hapgood, Randall Carlson fans) it is considered common knowledge. It is often cited as “evidence” to support claims that a sudden catastrophic event plunged the Earth back into an “ice age,” instantly freezing Mammoths and other megafauna, while they were eating.

The source of this myth is quite elusive. Author Jason Colavito, did a pretty good job of unpacking it in these blog posts:

Flash-Frozen Mammoths and Their Buttercups: Yet Another Case of Repetition and Recycling of Bad Data

2/6/2016

I wasn’t planning on doing more on frozen mammoths after yesterday’s discussion of dining on them, but I found myself increasingly intrigued by the fact that so many fringe history claims for flash-frozen mammoths and eating mammoth steaks trace back to a single 1960 article by Ivan T. Sanderson in the Saturday Evening Post. He was not the first to report the claims (having apparently learned of them from Immanuel Velikovsky, according to secondary sources), but his piece directly or indirectly bequeathed the story to biblical creationists like Donald Patten (who claimed Alaskan restaurants served mammoth in the twentieth century), Charles Hapgood (a close friend of Sanderson’s), David Childress, Graham Hancock, and a host of others. So I went to the library to get a copy to find out exactly what Sanderson said.

[…]

Sanderson also asserted that the mammoth had been frozen so quickly that its last meal of buttercups were still freshly in bloom in its mouth. “Upon the [tongue] and between the teeth, were portions of the animal’s last meal, which for some incomprehensible reason it had not had time to swallow.” This one fact gave rise to a 56 years of speculation about “instant” freezing of the mammoths in some catastrophist disaster. The scientist who studied the mammoth in situ, Dr. Otto Herz, had written that “more [food] is found on the tongue and between the teeth,” and he assumed that the mammoth died while he was eating, tumbling off a cliff or down a slope to his death. He wrote that the mammoth was not flash-frozen, but rather likely died in a mud pit that froze over shortly after the animal’s death and became buried under layers of dirt. The decrepit state of the flesh reported by the explorers is more than enough to refute Sanderson’s misimpression that the mammoth was fresh enough to eat.



It’s interesting that the report of finding the remains of buttercups in the mammoth’s stomach gradually morphed under catastrophist and creationist influence into something it was never intended to be. Modern writers routinely claim that the mammoth died instantly with “buttercups in its mouth,” or some variation thereof.

[…]
Jason Colavito

After a bit more research, Mr. Colavito determined that the origins of the myth were even older than he thought:

The Claim of Flash-Frozen Mammoths Is Older Than I Thought

10/13/2018

A publisher has asked me to assemble a proposal for a short book on the myths and legends associated with the Giza Pyramids, notably the medieval legends of the Muslim world, so I am going to be taking some time today to work on this. In the meantime, I wanted to share something interesting I ran across in reading about Graham Hancock’s new book, America Before. Do you remember the popular claim that there were wooly mammoths flash-frozen in the Arctic as a result of a catastrophic change in climate, perhaps due to a shifting of the poles? It turns out that this claim is much older than I had imagined.

[…]

It goes back all the way to 1822, when George Cuvier—the many who was among the first to suggest that fossil elephant bones had been mistaken in ancient times for the bones of Giants—could not fathom how well-preserved wooly mammoths might have been extracted from the Siberian ice. In his Discours sur les Révolutions du Globe, Cuvier, a committed catastrophist who believed that massive disasters caused extinctions, wrote about his belief that the mammoths had been frozen instantly…

[…]

From there, the claim was picked up by none other than Louis Figuier, the geologist who later identified the eruption of the Thera volcano with the destruction of Atlantis. Figuier explicitly cites Cuvier among his sources, but in his World Before the Deluge, he is decidedly less catastrophist in explaining the origins of the frozen mammoths than his predecessor…

[…]

So how did these nineteenth century ideas end up in Velikovsky’s work and Sanderson’s? That answer is depressingly familiar. Ignatius Donnelly selectively cited both accounts in his lesser-read book Ragnarok: The Age of Fire and Gravel. He omits the last half of the Figuier quotation to eliminate the reasonable explanation for the mammoths’ frozen state, and he places this before a part of the quotation from Cuvier, suggesting (wrongly) that Cuvier was right and a great catastrophe—a comet strike, whose effects he calls “the Drift”—instantly flash-froze the mammoths. “These citations place it beyond question that the Drift came suddenly upon the world, slaughtering the animals…” he wrote.



From here it is child’s play to see how generations of fringe writers have recycled Donnelly’s deceptive presentation of evidence and thus reproduced Cuvier’s archaic catastrophism by ignoring the two centuries of scholarship that followed.
Jason Colavito

Here’s a classic example:

The Mammoths
Northeast Siberia, which was not covered by ice in the Ice Age, conceals another enigma. The climate there has apparently changed drastically since the end of the Ice Age, and the yearly temperature
has dropped many degrees below its previous level. Animals once lived in this region that do not live there now, and plants grew there that are unable to grow there now. The change must have occurred quite suddenly. The cause of this Klimasturz has not been explained. In this catastrophic change of climate and under mysterious circumstances, all the mammoths of Siberia perished.

[…]

However, if geological processes are slow, the mammoths would not have been trapped on the isolated hills. Besides, this theory cannot be true because the animals did not die of starvation. In their stomachs and between their teeth undigested grass and leaves were found. This, too, proves that they died from a
sudden cause. Further investigations showed that the leaves and twigs found in their stomachs do not now grow in the regions where the animals died, but far to the south, a thousand or more miles away. It is apparent that the climate has changed radically since the death of the mammoths; and as the bodies of the animals were found not decomposed but well preserved in blocks of ice, the change in temperature must have followed their death very closely or even caused it.
Immanuel Velikovsky, 1950, 1965

Add Immanuel Velikovsky to the very long list of “geo-mythologists,” who have waxed eloquently about the geological principle of Uniformitarianism, without bothering to look it up.

Uniformitarianism

The concept that the present is the key to the past; and that past geologic events are to be explained by the same physical principles that govern the present.
Dictionary of Geological Terms, Anchor Books, 1976

This bit is priceless:

The climate there has apparently changed drastically since the end of the Ice Age, and the yearly temperature has dropped many degrees below its previous level.
Velikovsky

There have been times during the Pleistocene Epoch when NE Siberia was warmer than today. Unfortunately, those were the “super-interglacials”… The most recent of which, MIS-11c, occurred about 400,000 years ago (Melles et al., 2012). Yes, I realize Velikovsky died long-before this was published, but he did have access to the vast majority of “the two centuries of scholarship that followed” Cuvier.
Well-preserved mammoth carcasses

The “funny thing” is that almost all of the well-preserved mammoth carcasses date back older than 20,000 years ago.
Name Location of discovery Date of discovery Age (14C yr BP)
Adams mammoth Siberia 1799[1][2] 35,800±1200[1][3]
Beresovka Mammoth Siberia 1900[4] 44,000±3,500[4]
Fairbanks Creek Mammoth (Effie)[5] Alaska 1948[5] 21,300±1,300[5][6]
Fishhook Mammoth[7] Siberia 1990-1992[7] 20,620±70[7]
Jarkov Mammoth[8][9] Siberia July 1997[8] 20,390±160[8]
Kirgilyakh (Magadan) Mammoth (Dima)[8][10] Siberia June 23, 1977[10] 41,000±900[10]
Lyuba Mammoth[11][12] Siberia May 2007[11] 41,700+700/-550[11]
Malolyakhovsky Mammoth[13] Buttercup[14] Siberia 2012[13] 28,610±110[13]
Yuka Mammoth[16][17] Siberia August 2010[17] 34,300+260/−240[17]
Sopkarga Mammoth (Zhenya)[18][19] Siberia August 28, 2012[18][19] 43,350±240[19]
Khroma Mammoth[20] Siberia October 2008[20] greater than 45,000[21]
Yukagir mammoth Siberia Autumn of 2002 22,500 cal. BP [22]
Wikipedia

The carcass that perpetuated the flash frozen myth was most likely the Beresovka (Beresovky) Mammoth, first unearthed in 1901.

Berezovsky Mammoth
Zoological Museum of the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Saint Petersburg, Russia
One of the most well-preserved mammoth specimens in the world.

MAMMOTHS ONCE ROAMED ACROSS THE Northern Hemisphere and their remains are scattered across the region. The Zoological Museum in Saint Petersburg, Russia contains a large collection of mammoth remains, including some very exclusive specimens. Most are skeletal remains or tusks.

[…]

The Berezovsky mammoth was discovered in 1900 near the Berezovka River in Russia. The body was excavated in 1901 and brought to Saint Petersburg. It had been inside the permafrost for about 44,000 years and was very well preserved.

The Berezovsky mammoth was a male who fell off a precipice and died immediately. The body has only a few marks and part of the trunk is missing along with most of the hair. His body is prominently displayed in a glass casket. Some samples of flesh from the Berezovsky mammoth can be found in the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History in Washington D.C.

[…]
Altas Obscura

I have not been able to locate an accessible scientific publication on the Beresovka (Beresovky) Mammoth; so I can’t provide the basis for the 44,000 year age. If I had to guess, it would be that it returned an infinite 14C age, if radiometric dating was attempted.

However, I was able to locate full text versions of a few of the references cited in the Wikipedia table. Here are some summaries of the ages of the carcasses and likely causes of death where necropsies were feasible.:
Lyuba and Khroma

Last Terrifying Moments of Baby Mammoths Revealed
By Tia Ghose July 14, 2014

The frightening last moments of two baby mammoths that died thousands of years ago are now being revealed, thanks to CT scanning.

The 1- and 2-month-old woolly mammoth calves, which were discovered in different portions of Siberia, choked on mud after falling into water more than 40,000 years ago, new research suggests.

The mud was like a “really thick batter that they got clogged in their trachea and they were unable to dislodge by coughing,” said study co-author Daniel Fisher, the director of the University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology. “It basically prevented them from taking them another breath.”

[…]

The 1-month-old calf mummy, named Lyuba, was discovered in 2007 by a reindeer herder on the banks of a frozen river on the Yamal Peninsula in Siberia. Lactic acid-producing bacteria had colonized Lyuba’s body, essentially “pickling” her and making her unappetizing to would-be scavengers, Fisher said.

A mammoth-ivory hunter found the second mummy, which researchers named Khroma after the river in Yakutia in which she was found, frozen upright in permafrost. Scavengers — possibly Arctic foxes and ravens — devoured Khroma’s heart and lungs, as well as parts of the trunk and skull, between the time she was discovered in 2008 and the time scientists could retrieve her body, Fisher said.

[…]
Live Science

Fisher et al., 2012 provided the following radiometric age estimates for Lyuba:
AMS age estimates for Lyuba, Center for Isotope Research, Groninger University
Sample # 14C Age Material dated
GrA-35690 36,690 (+320, -280) Skin
GrA-35859 37,150 (+280, -250) Skin
GrA-41246 41,910 (+550, -450) Bone collagen (rib)
GrA-41861 41,700 (+700, -550) Plant remains from small intestines
Table 1 from Fisher et al., 2012

Lyuba was almost too old to be accurately dated by 14C.

Fisher et., 2012 had this to say about Lyuba’s cause of death:

We do not regard cause of death as a question that is necessarily, or even generally, answerable in studies of fossil material, but in this particular instance, data on the condition of Lyuba’s respiratory tract provide unusual detail. The single most important factor is the distribution of fine-grained vivianite in her bronchial passages. In drowning, inspired air is typically retained until build-up of carbon dioxide triggers a reflex to exhale and gasp for newair. If the body is submerged, this leads to aspiration of a large volume of water
(complete flooding rarely occurs; Edmonds, 1998). If particulate matter, such as the vivianite we are trying to explain, is drawn in with the water, it tends to be distributed throughout much of the lung, especially given the forcefulness of reflexive inhalation. This contrasts markedly with what we see in Lyuba. Following aspiration of water, there may be attempts to clear the airway of fluid, but consciousness is usually lost quickly (Edmonds, 1998). After this, passive flooding may bring some additional particulates into the lung, but the competence of this process for entrainment and transport of sediment is minimal. We have considered the suggestion that the fine-grained vivianite might have been introduced after death by current action, but this process, called “draught filling” (Seilacher, 1971) requires a path for through-going fluid movement (incompatible with the cul-de-sac geometry of the mammalian lung) and thus cannot fill a space completely.

As an alternative to drowning, we propose that Lyuba died of asphyxia or suffocation after forceful, reflexive inhalation of a viscous “mud” composed of the fine-grained vivianite that now occupies her trachea and bronchi. We treat below associated factors that may help to explain circumstances leading to this end, but our central tenet is that there is no force other than the reflexive inhalation of a frantic animal that would be capable of drawing a continuous column of sediment into the airway. If this material had been suspended in a liberal amount of water, it would have been carried more pervasively into peripheral parts of the lung. If that had happened, with sediment or without, we would describe the process as drowning, but if the material being transported is so viscous that it cannot penetrate beyond the bronchi, ending with fatal airway obstruction, then the process is better described as asphyxiation.
Fisher et al., 2012

Subsequent work (Fisher et al., 2014) determined that aspiration of sediment was the most likely cause of death. Khroma appears to have also died from aspirating sediment.

Both Lyuba and Khroma died from aspirating sediment, Lyuba in a lacustrine setting, and Khroma in some
setting that also resulted in a mid-thoracic fracture. Khroma, for example, could have been a victim of a mud flow or an instance of bank collapse that produced this trauma.

[…]

While climate and habitat may have been similar for these two animals, the populations to which
they belonged were separated by nearly 5,000 km. In addition, these mammoths clearly differed in geologic age, even if to an extent that is not well constrained.
Fisher et al., 2014

Khroma’s age can only be estimated to be greater than 45 ka.

Her AMS assay returned an ‘‘infinite’’ result, indicating only that her age is greater than 45,000 yrBP.
Fisher et al., 2014

Buttercup

Woolly mammoth ‘autopsy’ provides flesh and blood samples

‘Buttercup’ had at least 8 calves, may have had gallstones
Emily Chung · CBC News · Posted: Nov 26, 2014

A frozen woolly mammoth found with a pool of liquid blood last year in Siberia has undergone the animal version of an autopsy, revealing new information and providing blood and tissue samples that may be used to clone the extinct ancient mammal.

The well-preserved mammoth, nicknamed Buttercup, was discovered buried in the ice on Maily Lyakhovsky Island in May 2013. Researchers were particularly excited to find what looked like liquid blood in pockets of ice under the animal’s belly.

[…]

Like a ‘piece of steak’
What remained of the mammoth’s flesh was the highlight. While many mammoths found in permafrost are dried up and mummified, “this was really juicy,” said Herridge, who likened the appearance of the muscle to a “piece of steak — bright red when you cut into the flesh and then as it hit the air, it would go brown.”

[…]
CBC News

Grigoriev et al., 2017 determined that Buttercup died approximately 28,600 years ago.
Results of age analysis of the Malolyakhovsky mammoth
Sample # Material dated 14C Age
GrA-60021 hair 28,570 (±150)
GrA-60044 bone 28,650 (±160)
Table 2 from Grigoriev et al., 2017

While they were not able to determine a likely cause of death, they did estimate that Buttercup was ~50 years old at the time of death, and they were able to determine that she probably became mired in a water-filled depression.

The animal appears to have been trapped in a depression that accommodated about half the body volume. Water was probably already present in this depression and froze, preserving part of the carcass. The carcass remained in excellent condition for thousands of years because the severe climatic conditions of the Arctic islands kept it locked inside almost pure ice that never melted.
Grigoriev et al., 2017

Yuka

Woolly Mammoth Mummy Yields Well-Preserved Brain
By Agata Blaszczak-Boxe November 07, 2014

The mummified brain of a well-preserved woolly mammoth found in the Siberian permafrost is the only mostly intact mammoth brain known to science, which has been described in a new study.

The mummified carcass of the 39,000-year-old woolly mammoth, which included the brain with folds and blood vessels visible, was found in August 2010 on the Laptev Sea coast near Yukagir, Russia. The mammoth, named Yuka, was 6 to 9 years old when it died, the researchers found.

[…]
Live Science

Yuka lived and died near the end of the Kargin interstadial.

According to radiocarbon dating (34,300 + 260/−240 yr BP), the Yuka mammoth lived during the termination of the Kargin Interstadial. The presumed climatic optimum for the Kargin Interstadial in the Laptev Sea region occurred between ca. 44–32 kyr BP (see review in Wetterich et al., 2014).
Rudaya et al.,, 2014

Lost & Found: The Fishhook Mammoth

The Fishhook or Hook Mammoth is a 20,620 +/- 70 BP old woolly mammoth carcass. It was discovered in the estuary of the Upper Taimyra River, Taimyr Peninsula, Siberia, in 1990 and some parts of the carcass were removed in 1990 and 1992. After the site had been flooded for 8 years, it was rediscovered in 2000. In May 2001 the remains were excavated as a part of the CERPOLEX/Mammuthus program “Who or What Killed the Mammoths”. The remaining parts of the carcass, including soft tissue, fur and underfur were exctracted from the frozen ground together with the surrounding sediments to learn more about the environment and the time of death of the Fishhook Mammoth.
Mol et al., 2001

Jarkov Mammoth

This male individual of the woolly mammoth, Mammuthus primigenius, died at an age of 47–49 AEY, on the Taimyr Peninsula, ca. 20,380 BP.
Moi et al., 2006

Sopkarga Mammoth

The accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) dating of the mammoth remains at the University of
Georgia, United States (UGAMS12565, 12566, 12567: pelvis, muscles, and wool) and at Groningen
University, the Netherlands (GrA57 723: a fragment of tibia) gave 37,830 ± 160 BP [6].

Since the discovery of the Berezovka mammoth in 1901 [7], it has not been possible to comprehensively
investigate localities containing well-preserved bodies of woolly mammoths in permafrost. The Sopkarga
mammoth presents a rare opportunity for such a study. The geological age of the Sopkarga mammoth is from the Karginsky epoch. The site is located near the studied sections of this interval [3–5]. The Karginsky
interstadial corresponds to the Molotkov Horizon (thermochron) of northeastern Siberia (24,500–48,000 BP). It also regionally correlates with the Middle Valdai interglacial of the Russian Plain, corresponding to the Würm II of Western Europe and marine isotopic stadial-3 (MIS-3) [8].
Maschenko et al., 2014

FYI: Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) Dating

In another “first” since the Berezovka mammoth…

For the first time since the discovery of the Berezovka mammoth, a penis could be located on the body of an adult male of M. primigenius. Its position on the mammoth body in situ (along the anterior margin of the pubic bones and lower margin of the ishium) corresponded to the retracted state (Fig. 1b). The penis base was embraced by ligaments occurring immediately below the muscle ring around the anal part of the rectum. The total length of the penis is 980 mm (as measured on May 16, 2013).
Maschenko et al., 2014

Now, that’s some dedicated science!
And that’s all the time I have to dedicate to Pleistocene elephant hunting for now…

If any Immanuel Velikovsky, Charles Hapgood, Randall Carlson and/or Art Bell fans have any actual scientific references to mammoths having been flash-frozen during the Younger Dryas (or whenever), please list them in the comments section. I genuinely did try to find some… I even downloaded a PDF of Worlds in Collision… It’s a HOOT!
References

American Geological Institute. Dictionary of Geological Terms. Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1976.

Fisher, Daniel C., Alexei N. Tikhonov, Pavel A. Kosintsev, Adam N. Rountrey, Bernard Buigues, Johannes van der Plicht. “Anatomy, death, and preservation of a woolly mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius) calf, Yamal Peninsula, northwest Siberia”. Quaternary International. Volume 255, 2012. Pages 94-105. ISSN 1040-6182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2011.05.040.

Fisher, D., Shirley, E., Whalen, C., Calamari, Z., Rountrey, A., Tikhonov, A., . . . Lazarev, P. (2014). “X-ray computed tomography of two mammoth calf mummies”. Journal of Paleontology, 88(4), 664-675. doi:10.1666/13-092

Grigoriev, Semyon E., Daniel C. Fisher, Theodor Obadă, Ethan A. Shirley, Adam N. Rountrey, Grigory N. Savvinov, Darima K. Garmaeva, Gavril P. Novgorodov, Maksim Yu. Cheprasov, Sergei E. Vasilev, Artemiy E. Goncharov, Alexey Masharskiy, Viktoriya E. Egorova, Palmira P. Petrova, Eya E. Egorova, Yana A. Akhremenko, Johannes van der Plicht, Alexei A. Galanin, Sergei E. Fedorov, Evgeny V. Ivanov, Alexei N. Tikhonov. “A woolly mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius) carcass from Maly Lyakhovsky Island (New Siberian Islands, Russian Federation)”. Quaternary International. Volume 445, 2017. Pages 89-103. ISSN 1040-6182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.01.007.

Lacombat, Frédéric. (2016). Khroma: Autopsy of a story. Bulletin du Musée d’Anthropologie prehistorique de Monaco. 6. 149-154.

Melles M, Brigham-Grette J, Minyuk PS, Nowaczyk NR, Wennrich V, DeConto RM, Anderson PM, Andreev AA, Coletti A, Cook TL, Haltia-Hovi E, Kukkonen M, Lozhkin AV, Rosén P, Tarasov P, Vogel H, Wagner B. “2.8 million years of Arctic climate change from Lake El’gygytgyn, NE Russia”. Science. 2012 Jul 20;337(6092):315-20. doi: 10.1126/science.1222135. Epub 2012 Jun 21. PMID: 22722254.

Mol, D., Tikhonov, A.N., MacPhee, R.D.E., Flemming, C., Buigues,B., De Marliave, C., Coppens, Y., Agenbroad, L.D., 2001b. “The Fishhook Mammoth: rediscovery of a woolly mammoth carcass by the CERPOLEX/Mammuthus Team, Taimyr Peninsula, Siberia”. In: Cavarretta, G., Gioia, P., Mussi, M., Palombo, M.R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Congress La Terra degli Elefanti/The World of Elephants, Rome, October 16–20, 2001,
pp. 310–313.

Mol, Dick, Alexei Tikhonov, Johannes van der Plicht, Ralf-Dietrich Kahlke, Regis Debruyne, Bas van Geel, Guido van Reenen, Jan Peter Pals, Christian de Marliave, Jelle W.F. Reumer. “Results of the CERPOLEX/Mammuthus Expeditions on the Taimyr Peninsula, Arctic Siberia, Russian Federation”. Quaternary International. Volumes 142–143, 2006. Pages 186-202. ISSN 1040-6182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2005.03.016.

Rudaya, Natalia., Albert Protopopov, Svetlana Trofimova, Valery Plotnikov, Snezhana Zhilich. “Landscapes of the ‘Yuka’ mammoth habitat: A palaeobotanical approach”. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. Volume 214, 2015. Pages 1-8. ISSN 0034-6667, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2014.12.003.

Velikovsky, Immanuel (1950). Worlds in Collision, Macmillan. ISBN 1-199-84874-3. Delta printing—January, 1965.
4.5
Article Rating
Share this:

PrintEmailFacebookTwitterGETTRTelegram

Like this:
Loading...
Related
Study casts doubt on mammoth-killing cosmic impact
January 7, 2015

In "Paleoclimatology"
clip_image002
The Intriguing Problem Of The Younger Dryas—What Does It Mean And What Caused It?
June 19, 2012

In "Paleoclimatology"
Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis Takes Another Hit
August 1, 2020

In "Paleoclimatology"
Tags: Art Bell, Charles Hapgood, climate catastrophe, Extinction fail, Jason Colavito, Mammoth, myths, necropsy, paleoclimatology, Paleontology, Pleistocene, Uniformitarianism, Velikovsky, Woolly Mammoth, Younger Dryas
Post navigation
Hubble Finds First Evidence of Water Vapor at Jupiter’s Moon Ganymede
Old-school data suggests hurricanes in the Atlantic are not more frequent than in the past
201 Comments
Oldest
Clare Swift
July 27, 2021 2:29 am

If what you’re saying is true and I don’t doubt your research then I, for one, am gutted – I loved the whole Ben Davidson, Carlson, Hancock, Cuvier catastrophe idea of mammoths flash frozen because part of the atmosphere blew off. Oh well, I’m off to watch 2012 to cheer myself up.
13
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Clare Swift
July 27, 2021 2:35 am

The fun thing about myths, is that they never truly die… And bad science fiction movies, based on myths, are some of the most enjoyable movies ever made.
18
Richard Page
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 3:01 am

Everyone loves a good myth. It’s the ones that don’t know the difference between myth (or fantasy) and reality that I find disturbing.
6
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Richard Page
July 27, 2021 3:32 am

29
Bruce Cobb
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 5:57 am

Darryl is insulted by that supposed picture of him. For shame!
3
beng135
Reply to
Bruce Cobb
July 28, 2021 10:12 am

And his bigfoot brother, Darryl.
1
Joel O'Bryan
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 8:31 am

Well the CGIs of LA sliding as big slabs into the Pacific is still a fan favorite. If only…
LA-sliding-into-Pacific_2012.jpg
11
Clyde Spencer
Reply to
Joel O'Bryan
July 27, 2021 11:07 am

LA uses a special high-strength re-bar for their roads and buildings to resist earthquakes. That is why there are numerous slabs.

[To avoid starting any new myths, I’ll affirm that the above statement is sarcasm.]
4
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Clyde Spencer
July 27, 2021 11:52 am

Truth is sometimes stranger than science fiction!
4
MarkW
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 6:48 pm

It’s no wonder that truth is stranger than fiction. Fiction has to make sense.

Mark Twain
6
Bill Parsons
Reply to
David Middleton
July 28, 2021 12:20 pm

My daily constitutional is a two-mile loop around a reservoir in a suburb of Denver. The lake sits on a hill and when winter winds sweep over it they can cause the surface to harden up in a few days. Several years ago the Canadian geese that overwinter in the area were struggling after an Arctic front moved in, followed by a second. On two consecutive days in December I saw something I’ll never forget.

The first evening I recall the wind was blowing hard and the geese huddled in dark patches and narrowing arteries of open water as the ice coalesced and contracted around them – not solid yet, but turning opaque and hardening. The birds buried their beaks in their back feathers and drifted together.

That night the temperature dropped several more degrees below zero as another wave of the front blew through. By morning, the lake was glazed. Several geese were actually stuck in the ice surface as if they had gone to sleep and woke to find themselves captive. Two birds were flapping their wings in exhaustion, but unable to free themselves. Snow had drifted up along the lake margins where the meandering tracks of predators emerged from the cattails. The coyotes had made a bee-line for the stranded geese. When I arrived, two of the birds had already been dismembered and skeletonized, their feathers trampled around them in a ring like ashes kicked out of a campfire.

A park ranger told me later that some kind of avian flu was moving through our local geese, culling the weakened individuals. So I imagine that might have played a role in this bizarre sight, but since then I have no trouble believing in the expression “flash frozen”. I saw it happen. And it wasn’t just the geese… that ice was several inches thick and it supported my weight just fine as I walked out on it to see the birds firsthand. So…

A frozen mamoth with a mouthful of flowers? Why not?
1
JBP
Reply to
Bill Parsons
July 29, 2021 7:21 am

Because there was not an SUV within 5,000 years of that mammoth.
0
John Tillman
Reply to
Bill Parsons
July 29, 2021 4:50 pm

Because mammoths are much more massive than geese and don’t live in water.
0
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
John Tillman
July 29, 2021 6:18 pm

Plus… There’s a difference between freezing to death and instantly flash- frozen extinctions.
1
Bill Parsons
Reply to
David Middleton
July 30, 2021 10:09 am

Not claiming an extinction mechanism. But your post’s examples of individual animals getting “trapped”, possibly because of injury, and then frozen quickly, while a mammoth hyperbole, is not far off. If it if fast enough for the meat to look fresh 20,000 years later, that’s pretty fast.
0
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Bill Parsons
July 30, 2021 2:19 pm

I realize you weren’t generalizing. And some mammoths, like Buttercup, may very well have died in a similar manner to the birds you observed.

However, the fact that many mammoth carcasses were fairly quickly frozen 20-50 thousand years ago, is routinely cited as evidence for a catastrophic event 12,700 years ago that allegedly flash froze these mammoths while they were grazing in a temperate climate.

The purpose of this post was to try to identify the origin of the myth and to demonstrate that there is no scientific evidence to support it.
1
Bill Parsons
Reply to
David Middleton
July 31, 2021 12:20 pm

“Buttercup” What a name! It’s like that vicious dog in the Harry Potter books – Fuzzy.

Great posts, Dave. Keep up the good work.
0
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Bill Parsons
July 31, 2021 6:19 pm

😎🍻
0
beng135
Reply to
Joel O'Bryan
July 28, 2021 10:14 am

That’s one thing I despise about those movies is all the CGI. Might as well be watching a cartoon.
1
Greg
Reply to
Joel O'Bryan
August 5, 2021 5:50 am

Unlike Miami where they can’t even keep a condo together.
0
pHil R
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 10:19 am

The Blob, only because I used to live in Downingtown, PA and ate at the Downingtown diner (though the one in the movie I don’t think was actually in Downingtown).
3
Citizen Smith
Reply to
pHil R
July 27, 2021 1:27 pm

FYI, at the end of the movie the Blob was flown to the arctic. It can not be killed, but only put into a sort of suspended animation. If Al Gore is right, the blob will eventually thaw and eat us all. Reconsider your denialism.
8
beng135
Reply to
Citizen Smith
July 28, 2021 10:16 am

The blob — coming INTO a movie theater near you.
0
Ruleo
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 12:05 pm

Where exactly has Graham Hancock, Randall Carlson and Art Bell mention flash frozen mammoths?

I’ve listend to hours of all of them- tthis has never been mentioned…
2
Citizen Smith
Reply to
Ruleo
July 27, 2021 1:20 pm

I watched Carlson on YouTube tell the story and go into the estimated temperature required to flash freeze that size of body. I think it was in a series of interviews with Hancock by Joe Rogan. I took it as truth until now.
2
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Citizen Smith
July 27, 2021 1:47 pm

It was on the Joe Rogan show.

Art Bell wrote the book The Day After Tomorrow was based on.
2
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Ruleo
July 27, 2021 3:00 pm

https://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/graham-hancock-wants-your-help-proving-alaskan-mammoths-died-in-one-massive-catastrophe

Graham Hancock Wants Your Help Proving Alaskan Mammoths Died in One Massive Catastrophe
8/30/2017

Just days after recovering from a life-threatening seizure and coma, alternative history researcher Graham Hancock put out a call to crowdsource research for a forthcoming book. Hancock asked his fans to help him research the question of whether wooly mammoths faced a catastrophic extinction event in Alaska at the end of the Ice Age. Hancock is particularly interested in the work of Frank Hibben and Froelich Rainey from the 1930s and 1940s, and the articles that he cites sounded familiar to me. It turns out there was a good reason for that. The sources Hancock uses are the same ones that creationists have spent the better part of half a century using to allege that the mammoths were “flash frozen” by a catastrophic change in temperature. I explored those claims last year (here and here), but Hancock has now offered a slightly more sophisticated version of the earlier claim in defense of his current hobbyhorse, that a comet slammed into the Earth at the end of the Younger Dryas, destroying Atlantis.
Hancock has long been interested in flash-frozen mammoths. The story appears in Fingerprints of the Gods (1995), where Hancock first used it as evidence of a sudden and catastrophic “pole shift” that froze the mammoths in the space of an hour or two as the entire Earth’s crust slipped over the planet’s surface.

Hancock has long been interested in flash-frozen mammoths. The story appears in Fingerprints of the Gods (1995), where Hancock first used it as evidence of a sudden and catastrophic “pole shift” that froze the mammoths in the space of an hour or two as the entire Earth’s crust slipped over the planet’s surface.

The Joe Rogan Experience #961 – Graham Hancock, Randall Carlson & Michael Shermer

Randall: Yeah. We could look very quickly at slide 92. This is one of the more interesting anomalous events. This was the flash frozen woolly mammoth. Go to slide 93. It’s a much clearer. This was a mammoth, six-tonne mammoth that was, again, one of these river collapses.
The banks collapsed during a warm spring and exposed this remains of a woolly mammoth, with soft-tissue preserved, contents of the food in its stomach undigested. Actually, a mouthful of food. The hips of the mammoth were both broken, as if he was thrown back on his hunches very violently. He had an erect penis, which suggests that he was suffocated.

The Joe Rogan Experience #501 – Randall Carlson…

J01:36:17
clearly was catastrophic but that will only man but there’s only one of dozens of examples of flash frozen late pleistocene mammals that died under similar circumstances and these large graveyards of of mass extinctions of the thousands and thousands of animals what are the best examples of them cuz I know that I’ve I’ve seen some of them online but I can’t pull them up like I’m sure you can I’ve got some right here if I can get my laptop to

01:46:36
conservative to say that 99.99% of all species have become extinct in the one said and of course most of those had went extinct without any help from humans it all stops growing what is that f*cking thing that’s a lasma therium sibericum Jesus Christ walk the Rhino wow it’s insane how big that is a huge a woolly rhinoceros the size of an elephant and it’s a seal adanta which is the classic Willie rhinoceros there been quite a few species of these guys found that were flash frozen and this is twelve thousand years ago this thing existed only rhinoceros yes in North America this Christ that’s incredible and what is what’s the mainstream explanation for these things going away

The Coming Global Superstorm by Art Bell & Whitley Streiber

While other explanations beside a global meteorological event are possible, a correlating evidence set is presented in the woolly mammoth. Strieber and Bell assert that since mammoths have been found preserved with food still in their mouths and undigested in their stomachs, these animals must have been killed quickly, in otherwise normal conditions. They were preserved so well by quick freezing, which is taken as evidence of a rapid onset of a global blizzard or similar event.

1
Sara
Reply to
Clare Swift
July 27, 2021 3:29 am

Bad science fiction???? How about my favorite bad sci-fi movie of all time: THEM!!!!

Giant ants are found living in the desert, gigantic because they were exposed to atomic radiation during those southwestern desert nuke tests.

Better than “Day of the Trifids” by a country mile…..:)
13
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Sara
July 27, 2021 3:47 am

Those are GREAT science fiction movies… 👍👍👍
6
Carlo, Monte
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 8:17 am

Yor!

(look it up)
2
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Carlo, Monte
July 27, 2021 8:31 am

I’ll put it on the “to watch” list…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yor,_the_Hunter_from_the_Future
1
Pat Frank
Reply to
Carlo, Monte
July 27, 2021 6:14 pm

From the picture at IMDB, Yor seems to have been one of Darth Vader’s early triumphs. 🙂
1
Carlo, Monte
Reply to
Pat Frank
July 28, 2021 10:40 am

True story—my wife and I saw Yor during its very brief time in the theaters. We wanted to go to a movie, and it was the only one that generated any interest.

It was the first week it was out (turned out to be the only week), and there was a total of about seven people paying to watch, including us.

The opening scene had Yor the hunter running down a big rock, with a club raised toward the sky in one and dressed in animal skins. He had a perfect blow-dried quaff hanging over his ears, and I burst out laughing right there in the theater.

There are also some amusing edit failures involving the female star, Adrianne Barbeau.
0
Sara
Reply to
David Middleton
July 28, 2021 4:49 am

When Worlds Collide – wealthy man builds two ramp-launched rocket ships to carry scientists, engineers, etc., to the planet approaching Earth. At the last minute, the doors are slammed shut in his face and the rockets launch, and he gets out of his wheelchair. Waahhh! They left him behind, so he doesn’t get to rule this new world!!! The irony of that ending was priceless.
0
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Sara
July 28, 2021 5:28 am

We have the DVD… A George Pal classic!
0
Richard Page
Reply to
Sara
July 27, 2021 5:08 am

YES! Thank you – one of my absolute fave creature features! Atomic testing gave rise to loads of these films – very relevant in a post about myths. Just don’t watch the abysmal modern remake by mistake.
4
TonyG
Reply to
Richard Page
July 27, 2021 10:51 am

Atomic testing gave rise to loads of these films

Anyone remember “Crack in the World”?
3
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
TonyG
July 27, 2021 10:56 am

A classic!!!
0
beng135
Reply to
TonyG
July 28, 2021 10:29 am

Original (1953) Invaders from Mars:
https://youtu.be/WsHn9C-lc8c
0
Sara
Reply to
Richard Page
July 28, 2021 4:51 am

I am waiting for someone, some H’Wood genius to realize that a rubble asteroid approaching Earth could be redirected into a permanent orbit around the Earth, just outside the Moon’s own orbit. What? Anything’s possible these days…..
0
Felix
Reply to
Sara
July 27, 2021 7:19 am

There were two terrible Japanese science fiction movies I remember watching on KCRA/3 and KHSL/12 Creature Features with Bob Wilkins (I grew up in Paradise in the 50s and 60s). Both involved Japanese shipwrecked on an island which radiation had blessed, one with contagious mushrooms (the sailors turned into mushroom people) and the other with giant rats that were nibbling at their feet as they danced around an abandoned house with no floor boards.

Or something like that. They didn’t give us nightmares, but we did leave the light on when we went to sleep because no one wanted to be the one to turn them off and have to get in bed in the dark.
3
Lil-Mike
Reply to
Felix
July 27, 2021 9:25 am

ahh … Bob Wilkins and Night Comfort Theatre; the cure for insomnia. Bob had a bedding store, and advertised his wares on his (very rare then) all night (11PM to 5AM?) TV show.
3
Sara
Reply to
Felix
July 28, 2021 4:52 am

Mothra! Much sillier and more fun that Godzilla….
0
Jeff Alberts
Reply to
Sara
July 29, 2021 10:37 pm

I used to watch the Japanese monster movies every Sunday on Channel 20 (UHF) in Northern Virginia in the early and mid 70s. They were awesome!
0
MarkW
Reply to
Sara
July 27, 2021 8:47 am

Who can forget “The Blob”.
3
Mike McMillan
Reply to
MarkW
July 27, 2021 11:38 am

It was easy.
0
Sara
Reply to
MarkW
July 28, 2021 4:53 am

The original, with Steve McQueen, was priceless. I love stuff like this.
0
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Sara
July 28, 2021 5:30 am

Yep… And the theme song was written by Burt Bacharach… https://www.songfacts.com/facts/the-five-blobs/the-blob
0
Randle Dewees
Reply to
Sara
July 27, 2021 12:54 pm

Wasn’t the gimmick used to defeat the ants some sonic weapon? Providing inspiration for using Cowboy rodeling as the weapon against the martians in Mars Attack?
0
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Randle Dewees
July 27, 2021 3:24 pm

That was the giant grasshoppers in The Beginning of the End. I think they gassed the giant ants in Them!.
0
beng135
Reply to
Randle Dewees
July 28, 2021 11:01 am

Hilarious Twilight Zone episode — Mr Frisby, a chronic exaggerator, gets abducted by aliens in a flying saucer and plays his harmonica to stun & defeat them. Afterwards, of course nobody believes him and laughs at his story…
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0734573/
0
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
beng135
July 28, 2021 12:13 pm

Andy Devine! A classic!
0
DonM
Reply to
Sara
July 28, 2021 8:50 am

Truly bad SF (and not a classic in any way) is Battlefield Earth (L Ron Hubbard)

Silly SF; Scientology (L. Ron Hubbard)
0
beng135
Reply to
Sara
July 28, 2021 10:19 am

THEM scared me silly as a little kid. Then there was another one featuring giant crabs. Then another w/a giant praying mantis.
0
Bill Powers
Reply to
Sara
July 29, 2021 9:24 am

I recall seeing that in a double feature with “Gorgo” in the early 60s
0
John Tillman
Reply to
Clare Swift
July 29, 2021 4:45 pm

I don’t think that Cuvier ever imagined flash frozen mammoths.

Here’s a sad angle on the demise of the final, isolated woolies, last of all their genus:

Genomic damage wasn’t the only cause for their decline and fall, with last days around 4000 BP, but probably doomed them no matter what else.

Humans hunted the mainland mammoths to extinction. The insular survivors were to few on too little land to hang on for more than 6000 years, even with long mammoth generations.
1
ozspeaksup
July 27, 2021 3:01 am

velikovskys linking of global disaster folklore seemed good to me, so many places with similar stories. and poleshift did/do happen so changed rebuilt temple directions also seems valid
-3
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
ozspeaksup
July 27, 2021 3:21 am

Geomagnetic polarity reversals are real. Physical pole reversals, as suggested by Velikovsky, Hapgood, etc. are bad science fiction.
7
Nelson
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 7:54 am

David, Why did the CIA classify The Adam and Eve Story by Chan Thomas?

THE ADAM AND EVE STORY (cia.gov)

Also, I find it interesting that Einstein wrote the forward to Hapgood’s book on Earth Crust Displacement.

Not that I necessarily believe .any of this stuff but it did get my attention when I read Einstein’s forward.

As a geologist, what do you make of the Piri Reis map of 1513.
0
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Nelson
July 27, 2021 8:27 am

Why did the CIA classify The Adam and Eve Story by Chan Thomas?

Obviously to cover up the truth about Jesus and space aliens…

Jesus was a ‘scholar who lived in India and was picked up by a UFO on Easter Sunday’, claims newly-published book which was classified by the CIA for over 50 years
‘The Adam and Eve Story’ was written by US Air Force worker Chan Thomas
Thomas worked as a UFO researcher for an aerospace company in the 1960s
His book claims Jesus lived in India for several years not mentioned in the Bible
It also claims Jesus was then abducted by UFOs after his death by crucifixion

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6947201/Jesus-scholar-lived-India-book-classified-CIA-claims.html

Also, I find it interesting that Einstein wrote the forward to Hapgood’s book on Earth Crust Displacement.

I find Woody Harrelson’s discussion of it in 2012 to be interesting also.

As a geologist, what do you make of the Piri Reis map of 1513.

I think Piri Reis would have done well in a field geology class.
3
Yooper
Reply to
David Middleton
July 28, 2021 6:17 am

That story is older: https://reluctant-messenger.com/issa.htm#:~:text=Ancient%20scrolls%20reveal%20that%20Jesus%20spent%20seventeen%20years,know%20him%20and%20love%20him%20as%20St.%20Issa.
0
Jeff in Calgary
Reply to
Nelson
July 27, 2021 2:03 pm

I find it interesting how you live on conspiracy web pages.

Piri Reis map was very good work for 1513. However, it has many errors including depicting the far east located where NA is, and the mythical southern Antipode continent.
2
Bob Tisdale
Editor
July 27, 2021 3:16 am

Wow, David. That was a lot to take in first thing in the morning.

I think my brian is full.

Regards,
Bob
5
BallBounces
Reply to
Bob Tisdale
July 27, 2021 4:44 am

My brian is still trying to process the first cup of morning cofete!
4
Richard Page
Reply to
Bob Tisdale
July 27, 2021 5:11 am

Did Brian bring the morning coffee then?
6
Sara
Reply to
Bob Tisdale
July 27, 2021 5:43 am

Well, now I know where my Brian went….. 😉
6
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Bob Tisdale
July 27, 2021 5:46 am

Ok… So, when do the Life of Brian quotes kick in?
2
fretslider
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 5:56 am

Lets ask Bigus Dickus….
4
Richard Page
Reply to
fretslider
July 27, 2021 5:58 am

Now you’re being a very naughty boy.
4
fretslider
Reply to
Richard Page
July 27, 2021 6:13 am

I’m no Messiah.
4
Bob Tisdale
Editor
Reply to
fretslider
July 27, 2021 8:11 am

And for those wondering what fretslider was talking about we have a clip:

Regards,
Bob
5
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Bob Tisdale
July 27, 2021 8:33 am

+42×1042
6
Michael S. Kelly
Reply to
fretslider
July 27, 2021 9:28 am

980 mm?
2
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Michael S. Kelly
July 27, 2021 5:30 pm

Pleistocene Viagra?… 😉
0
Bob Tisdale
Editor
Reply to
Bob Tisdale
July 27, 2021 12:24 pm

Oh sure. Pick on the old guy for a typo he made before his first hot caffeinated beverage of the morning (he says while smiling). What a tough crowd!

Sheeesh,
Bob
6
MarkW
Reply to
Bob Tisdale
July 27, 2021 1:05 pm

If we can’t have fun with our friends, who are we going to have fun with?
5
Derg
July 27, 2021 3:23 am

Darn I thought you were referring to Edge of Tomorrow as your favorite 🤓
4
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Derg
July 27, 2021 3:46 am

A pretty good bad science fiction movie… 👍👍
1
David Kamakaris
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 5:57 am

How about adding Gasland to the list of good bad science fiction movies?
2
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
David Kamakaris
July 27, 2021 6:03 am

Gasland goes in the Michael Moore file.
1
D. J. Hawkins
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 6:27 am

My wife and I both loved Edge of Tomorrow. I think we’ve watched it at least 3 times.
1
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
D. J. Hawkins
July 27, 2021 6:36 am

I think we’ve seen it twice… It is entertaining… But not as entertaining as Battleship.

We’ve seen Battleship at least a dozen times. Bad science fiction featuring Arleigh Burke destroyers, the USS Ronald Reagan, F/A-18 Hornets, AC/DC’s Thunderstruck and the USS Missouri “crossing the T” before dropping all 9 16″ rifles on the aliens… Awesome!
6
D. J. Hawkins
Reply to
David Middleton
July 28, 2021 3:16 pm

Yes! Yes! Battleship is great bad science fiction. Did you notice how the bombs dropped on the deck mimicked the pegs from the game?
0
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
D. J. Hawkins
July 28, 2021 3:48 pm

I never thought about that. The game didn’t have as many pegs.

Battleship is one of my default movies. We have it recorded on our DirectTV box. If there’s nothing else on it’s either Battleship or a raunchy Adam Sandler movie, usually That’s My Boy.
0
TonyG
Reply to
D. J. Hawkins
July 27, 2021 10:53 am

I watched it over and over, I lost count how many times 🙂

I saw recently that they’re doing a sequel of sorts: Live, Die, Repeat and Repeat
No, that’s not a joke.
1
ironargonaut
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 10:28 pm

Super cyclone a bad bad science fiction movie
0
Sara
Reply to
Derg
July 27, 2021 5:44 am

The original movie titled “The Thing” was not too bad.
7
wsbriggs
Reply to
Derg
July 27, 2021 6:59 am

I was immediately seduced by “Forbidden Planet,” loved the Id Monster concept. Robbie the Robot was also cool, something about intelligent relays clicking.,.,
4
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
wsbriggs
July 27, 2021 11:01 am

But Earl Holliman as the cook, stole the show!
comment image
2
Clyde Spencer
Reply to
wsbriggs
July 27, 2021 11:24 am

FP received an Oscar for the animated special effects! State of the art for the 1950s.
0
MarkW
Reply to
Derg
July 28, 2021 8:35 am

How can anyone forget Sharknado 1 through 7.
0
paranoid gy
July 27, 2021 3:24 am

And so another favourite conversation piece dies…
4
Richard Page
Reply to
paranoid gy
July 27, 2021 5:18 am

Oh I doubt it. The true believers will continue regardless, the conspiracy theorists will blame the Russian/American/Whoever government or aliens for hiding the evidence, hoaxers will produce photographs ‘proving’ it actually happened, someone will make a film of it all and then some people will believe the film is actually real. It’ll never go away!
3
Ron Long
July 27, 2021 3:51 am

Good report, David. I was a summer geology assistant to Hanna Mining in 1967, and spent a week, living in a dormitory at the university of Alaska, in the Fairbanks flood which totally inundated downtown Fairbanks. One day two geologists and their faithful assistant went to visit a gold placer operation located 50 miles or so north of Fairbanks. The placer used large hydraulic monitors (water cannons) to wash out the placer gold. There was a black soil layer about 20 feet thick on top of the old river gravels which contained the gold. In the black soil layer were many mammoth tusks, and the miners told us they were making more money selling the ivory than extracting gold. Mammoth bones were rarely preserved, but the ivory tusks were remarkably preserved, and some as long as close to 10 feet.
11
alastair gray
Reply to
Ron Long
July 27, 2021 5:27 am

I have always been told that mammoth tusks occur in huge death assemblages in both Alaska and Siberia. The concentration of so many implied a catastrophic event such as a flash flood – more plausible than a flash cold blast,, and the Younger Dryas seemed as convenient time as any. However I am just passing on hearsay here. I would appreciate any comment on the death assemblage hypothesis
5
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
alastair gray
July 27, 2021 5:42 am

Flash floods are a very likely cause of death for many of the well-preserved mammoth carcasses.

Sink holes, glacial kettle holes and, surprisingly, the sudden warming of the Bølling oscillation have also been cited as contributing factors.

The second Wikipedia list, List of significant fossil or subfossil mammoth bone accumulations, is also very interesting, includes mass mortality examples and many are dated closer to the Younger Dryas.
1
John Tillman
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 6:16 am

When I access the link, it doesn’t show any accumulations.
1
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
John Tillman
July 27, 2021 6:20 am

I might have botched the embedded link…

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mammoth_specimens
1
John Tillman
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 6:23 am

Thanks, but still all I get are the column headings without any entries.
1
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 6:24 am

Name Location of discovery Date of discovery Age of remains in years BP Comments
Achchagyi–Allaikha mass accumulation[23][24] Siberia 1987[24] 12,490±80 to 12,400±60 BP., C14[24] The concentration of bones in the Achchagyi–Allaikha mass accumulation was likely result from the simultaneous deaths of a large number of animals within herd-family groups in one or several seasons. The formation of this mass accumulation is argued to be a direct consequence of short but strong climatic warming (Bølling oscillation) and associated unfavorable environmental conditions.[24]
Berelyokh mass accumulation[23][24][25] Siberia 1947[25] 12,720±100 to 11,900±50 BP., C14[24] The concentration of bones in the Berelyokh mass accumulation was likely result from the simultaneous deaths of a large number of animals within herd-family groups in one or several seasons. The formation of this mass accumulation is argued to be a direct consequence of short but strong climatic warming (Bølling oscillation) and associated unfavorable environmental conditions.[24][25]
Condover site[26] UK 1986[26] circa 12,300 BP., C14, Greenland Interstadial 1[26] Remains of several mammoths trapped in glacial kettle-hole[26]
The Mammoth Site[27] South Dakota 1974[27][28] Greater than 26,000 B.P, C14[29] As of 2016, the remains of 58 North American Columbian and 3 woolly mammoths have been found within pond sediments filling an ancient sinkhole.[28][29]
Waco Mammoth National Monument[30][31] Texas 1978[30] 66,800±5,000 BP, calendar[32] As of 2016, two bone beds have yielded 25 Columbian mammoths, a western camel, a saber-toothed cat, a coyote, a dwarf pronghorn, a bison, a horse, a peccary, an American alligator, a tortoise, various freshwater turtles, freshwater drum, and gar.[31]
Mammoth Central[33] Mexico 2020[34][35] Undated As of 2020, at least 200 Columbian mammoths as well as 25 camels and five horses.

2
John Tillman
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 6:36 am

¡Muchísimas gracias!
1
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
John Tillman
July 27, 2021 6:38 am

I was going to include this table in the post… But, I haven’t hunted down the references yet… And I didn’t want this to become a 10,000 word “opus”… 🙂
2
MarkW
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 7:34 am

Now that was a funny penguin.
3
Stuart Hamish
Reply to
John Tillman
July 31, 2021 12:48 am

John Tillman : ” When I access the link it doesn’t show any accumulations ” …….” all I get are the column headings without any entries ” The information was visible to you the entire time ….
0
John Tillman
Reply to
Stuart Hamish
July 31, 2021 4:29 pm

No, it wasn’t.
0
Caleb Shaw
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 10:50 am

I always wondered about that story of the woolly mammoth frozen with a mouth full of butter cups. Thanks for investigating. I first came across it in a paper that had about 50 other odd things listed, postulating a polar calamity occurred . One that I recall was that there were places where beneath the permafrost sediment was all churned up, with leaves down deep and more ancient soil near the top. Anyone else heard of that? Has it been refuted?

One thing I like about oddball theories is that they bring interesting factoids to our attention. Mammoths ate buttercups? They are poisonous and even my goats avoid them. Who knew?

Maybe these factoids launch theories that can’t fly, but it is no crime to have an idea, so long as you don’t mind seeing it go down in flames. Success usually comes after numerous failures. And those failures serve a purpose.

For example, many of Thor Heyerdahl’s ideas have been shot down in flames, but he sure shook up the ossified thought of the anthropological community when he sailed the Kon Tiki from Peru to Polynesia. And they needed it.

One of Winston Churchill’s aids purportedly said, “Winnie had 100 ideas a day, and three were good ones. In other words he had to surround himself with people able to tell him he was wrong, 97 times a day.

the problem with many climate scientists is not that they are wrong, but the can’t stand hearing it. They prefer synchophants to honest men. And counter-culture seeks to ban criticism altogether. It is juvenile. I’d rather be wrong and laugh about my blunder than be a big baby.
5
whiten
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 4:34 pm

Flash floods were and are a very likely cause of death en masse for many of the well-documented cases of wildebeest death by suffocation and drowning in large numbers in water… even in the case of simple river crossing.

Next best likely, following,
asteroid impact or atmosphere blow off… or imploding of universe!

Yes mammoths and their babies were equal to what a human and the human babies are!

No way the brilliant baby mammoths of this brilliant species, the mammoths, could have ever likely died by suffocation or drowning in water, unless due to some thing like flash floods, or;
asteroid impacts, or tsunamis or some other exotic fascinating kinda of similar thingy.

Oh well, the mammoth “sword” in the field… most likely came down from the sky, or something like that.

whatever
-2
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
whiten
July 27, 2021 4:55 pm

How—and when—did the animals die? New research found a likely answer within the sediments that entombed the creatures. The paper, which was recently published in Quaternary Research, concludes that the original 16 mammoths from the herd were likely standing in the wet, sandy sediment near the confluence of the two rivers when a storm hit. As floodwaters rose, the animals might have been trapped between the river and the ravine’s walls. At 12-to-14 feet tall and weighing seven to eight tons, Columbian mammoths weren’t exactly agile. Perhaps they couldn’t climb the steep slopes to escape in time. Some might have even been trapped in a mudslide. Other mammoths seem to have died in a similar storm while visiting the same area years later.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/waco-mammoth-national-monument-180957432/

Geologists have put out a call for teeth tusks, femurs and any and all other parts of extinct mammoths left by massive Ice Age floods in southeastern Washington. The fossils of Mammathus columbi, the Columbian mammoth, were deposited in the hillsides of what are now the Yakima, Columbia and Walla Walla valleys in southeastern Washington, where the elephantine corpses came to rest as water receded from the temporary but repeatedly formed ancient Lake Lewis.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070507090415.htm
1
whiten
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 6:13 pm

Yes of course, it is well documented that massive floods and land erosion are far more likely to successfully hit live mammoth herds in the move than courpses of already dead mammoths accumulated for ages in the very massively flooded land.
Yes of course!.
-3
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
whiten
July 27, 2021 6:16 pm

Clean your crack pipe.
2
whiten
Reply to
David Middleton
July 28, 2021 10:29 am

Dave.

I do not need your apology, or Mark’s.

But for the sake of clarity.

Don’t you think you may own to apologise to me.
And Mark too?

Just checking!

What do you think!
-3
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
whiten
July 28, 2021 10:52 am

Is this a sentence?

Don’t you think you may own to apologise to me.

2
whiten
Reply to
David Middleton
July 28, 2021 11:05 am

Does the error in that sentence changes the main subject?
-4
whiten
Reply to
whiten
July 28, 2021 11:07 am

Again, I am not asking or expecting any apology from you.
-4
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
whiten
July 28, 2021 12:13 pm

I sincerely apologize for the fact that your contribution to this thread has consisted of incoherent rambling comments that occasionally resemble English language sentences.
3
whiten
Reply to
whiten
July 28, 2021 11:09 am

Or Mark
-2
MarkW
Reply to
whiten
July 28, 2021 12:18 pm

Who’s apologizing to you?
I’m sorry I called you an idiot. I thought you already knew.
3
whiten
Reply to
MarkW
July 28, 2021 12:43 pm

Mark,
I know you will not believe this.

But;

Your response to me was
natural.
Well standing in a proper reason, not at all as a justification… in consideration of your own actions or choices.

You were sincere, in that response to me.
You were sincere to your self and your position.

I am not offended by either your response or David’s.

But as a crackpot that I am, I think Dave reason, the real Dave’s reason is quite eluding.
Maybe I am wrong, and I wish that I am wrong,
but still I consider that David facing some kinda of rejection crisis of responsibility, when it comes to David’s own choices and actions.

Oh well what are the chances that a crackpot being wrong in this one.
Most probably astronomical.

Well hopefully this does not add up to my already committed offence towards both of you.

You both in one way or another were challenged as gutless.

And both your responses showed how wrong I was… in considering you both gutless.

cheers
-3
whiten
Reply to
David Middleton
July 29, 2021 2:14 pm

🖕

Enjoy it, buttercup…
🖕
-3
MarkW
Reply to
whiten
July 27, 2021 7:05 pm

Tsunami’s in the middle of the Russian steppes?
Really?
1
Sara
Reply to
MarkW
July 28, 2021 5:03 am

Lots of evidence of flash floods in many, many places, including Siberia, but because it’s “dry land” now, you think it could not/did not ever happen???

Please do NOT ever move to a house near a river basin.
-1
MarkW
Reply to
Sara
July 28, 2021 8:36 am

A flash flood is not a tsunami.
1
Sara
Reply to
Ron Long
July 27, 2021 5:46 am

So mammoths are just like elephants, who seem to have “graveyards”… No surprise: they are all cousins.
1
John Tillman
Reply to
Sara
July 27, 2021 6:20 am

Elephants don’t really have graveyards.
0
Sara
Reply to
John Tillman
July 27, 2021 7:19 am

Well, no, not like we do, but they go visit the piles of old bones frequently.
3
MarkW
Reply to
Sara
July 28, 2021 8:39 am

https://globalelephants.org/elephant-myths-true-or-false-are-elephant-graveyards-real/
1
John Tillman
Reply to
Sara
July 29, 2021 2:36 pm

Elephants follow the same migratory paths for generations, so do sometimes encounter the remains of their loved ones who died at various random spots.
0
Lil-Mike
Reply to
Ron Long
July 27, 2021 9:36 am

I’m working just north of FB, and tusks sticking out of the perma-frost creek boundary is still a thing. I held the poorly preserved remnants of one last month. It looked like a fire cracker had gone off inside. The tusks are concentric conical layers. The expansion of the inner layers fragmented the outer layers.

And yes, miners make a lot on the tusks, I think around ten grand. But … and this is a big but. Tusks can only be collected from private land or patented mining claims.
1
Ed Hanley
July 27, 2021 3:54 am

Great research. If Art Bell were still doing Coast to Coast he’d have you on as a guest.
3
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Ed Hanley
July 27, 2021 4:59 am

The show is still running, and still entertaining. I occasionally catch the tail end of it on KTRH in Houston… But, I’m holding out for Joe Rogan… 😉
3
Carlo, Monte
Reply to
David Middleton
July 28, 2021 10:52 am

The two bestest guests on Art Bell were Richard CEEE Hoagland and Major Headgames Ed Dames.
1
fretslider
July 27, 2021 4:23 am

“a sudden cause”

And one that leaves the Mammoth apparently uninjured.

The only really quick way I can think of is suffocation. How likely that might be in the setting of the mammoth I have no idea, but one example I can think of is the Lake Nyos disaster in Cameroon, where a cloud of Carbon dioxide killed 1,700 people in 1986.

There may be other ways, other gases involved even, but it certainly is quick.
3
MarkW
Reply to
fretslider
July 27, 2021 7:35 am

The article detailed at least two cases where the mammoth died due to flash floods.
4
whiten
Reply to
MarkW
July 27, 2021 8:52 am

Which ones?

I missed that!
-6
whiten
Reply to
whiten
July 27, 2021 2:58 pm

Mark, has no guts to reply.

!
-7
MarkW
Reply to
whiten
July 27, 2021 7:07 pm

I take it then you have absolutely no interest in reading the article that you are responding to, and would rather insult others rather than do the work yourself.

Sheesh, whatever you are smoking, it has rotted your brain.
4
Shawn Marshall
July 27, 2021 4:38 am

What a Mammoth essay
6
M Courtney
Reply to
Shawn Marshall
July 27, 2021 6:19 am

It can be summarised as “Frozen Mammoths are a lot of Bull”.
3
Bruce Ploetz
July 27, 2021 4:44 am

One of L Ron Hubbard’s many lies was that he was served wooly mammoth steak at the Explorer’s Club in New York City. Sometime in the 30s I think. He even claimed that he had the power to rip the atmosphere off of a planet. Wonder why he never used his awesome powers to fix his own teeth….
7
fretslider
Reply to
Bruce Ploetz
July 27, 2021 5:15 am

He had the power to start a loony cult
6
John Endicott
Reply to
Bruce Ploetz
July 27, 2021 8:12 am

Because Xenu liked L Ron’s teeth just the way they were.
0
PCman999
Reply to
Bruce Ploetz
July 27, 2021 10:21 pm

The teeth were the source of his power! Wooooooo….

Gotta feel sorry and pity for people getting suckered into a religion invented by a science fiction writer!
0
Mark Whitney
July 27, 2021 4:52 am

Some myths even appear in college science courses, like the one told by one of my biology professors about a man dying from cyanide poisoning after eating half a cup of apple seeds. Never have seen any documentation to support the story, and I have frequently tested the myth with apple’s cousins apricot and cherry pits.
6
Adam Gallon
July 27, 2021 5:11 am

If only I’d known the claims of flash-frozen mammoths came from Velikovsky, I could have dismissed them instantly.
1
fretslider
Reply to
Adam Gallon
July 27, 2021 5:58 am

But can you get flash frozen Mammoth in Walmart?
0
Rory Forbes
Reply to
fretslider
July 27, 2021 12:22 pm

Only at certain locations … and in season.
0
Richard Page
Reply to
fretslider
July 27, 2021 1:44 pm

It’s Walmart – wouldn’t it just be an Elephant in a toupee?
1
Manny
July 27, 2021 5:12 am

Elephants are surprisingly clumsy. They cannot get out of holes. Google “elephant stuck in mud” for videos. It is easy to understand how a mammoth could be trapped and die in a cold mud hole. If it happens in the fall and that night is cold, it will remain frozen all winter. If that winter is colder than usual, it will end up surrouded by expanding permafrost. Nothing surprising.
4
John VC
Reply to
Manny
July 27, 2021 10:02 am

I visited the mammoth site in S.Dakota years ago. If I remember right–most of the remains were of young males, which to me made sense. Young males are encouraged to leave the the heard early in life, and so are denied the wisdom of the heard matriarchs—thus not being aware that the tasty pond plants the were after for dinner were really a trap they couldn’t escape. I have slept a few times since then, so my memory could be rather suspect
1
John VC
Reply to
John VC
July 27, 2021 10:03 am

wish I knew what the H happened to post my comment in such a crazy form
1
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
John VC
July 27, 2021 10:29 am

I fixed it. For some reason, the formatting was weird.
0
John Tillman
July 27, 2021 5:45 am

Cuvier used mammoths to confirm the fact of extinction, a controversial hypothesis in 1798. He argued that mammoths were too big to have gone unnoticed if still living, yet their teeth showed them to be a species distinct from extant Asian and African elephants.

Thomas Jefferson clung to the Great Chain of Being theory, in which every living thing had its place, and was perfect, since made by Nature’s God, so couldn’t die off. He thus urged Lewis and Clark to be on the lookout for mammoths and mastodons in the American West.

Subsequent discoveries, such as Mary Anning’s marine reptiles on England’s Jurassic Coast, convinced Jefferson that Cuvier was right. In a letter to Adams, he found a way to reconcile extinction with an omnipotent God.
2
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
John Tillman
July 27, 2021 6:09 am

It’s easy to lose sight of the context in which Cuvier and others were making their interpretations.

I ran across this when I was researching this post:

Early speculations about Earth expansion by Alfred Wilks Drayson 1827-1901)and William Thorp 1804-1860)

“But if the diagram which we constructed be correct, our planet must, at the period referred to as that at which the mammoths roamed over the polar regions, have been even smaller than Mercury, and consequently the year then might have been probably only 30 or 40 days in length, the earth then performing its revolution in that period of time. Is there any evidence to confirm this idea? We will now venture to tread on sacred ground, but in so doing, we disclaim any intention of seeking thereon a sanctuary, for the purpose of avoiding the criticism with which every new assertion ought to be examined. But with all reverence we will state that the Bible will be referred to, in order that certain passages therein, which may have appeared incomprehensible to many readers, may be cited in confirmation …

Drayson & Thorp may have discovered plate tectonics… They just interpreted it as an expanding Earth.
1
John Tillman
Reply to
John Tillman
July 27, 2021 6:11 am

Make that genus, not species.
1
PCman999
Reply to
John Tillman
July 27, 2021 10:24 pm

I don’t see how there would be any problem. It’s obvious to anyone paying attention to what happens in nature that it’s a huge competition.
0
John Tillman
Reply to
PCman999
July 29, 2021 2:44 pm

Before Cuvier, extinction was thought impossible because made creatures perfectly suited to their environments. Acceptance of the fact of extinction was an important milestone towards the discovery of evolution. It was preceded by realization of the age of the Earth and followed by recognition of “development”, ie that different kinds of living things existed at different times in our planet’s history. Then Darwin, among others discovered biogeographical lineages. All these insights preceded his insights into common descent and natural selection.
1
Steve Case
July 27, 2021 5:54 am

I didn’t read the 1960 Saturday Evening Post story but my long departed older brother related the details to me. And the part that is missing from the narrative above was that as the Siberian mammoths were flash frozen, those found in Alaska were ripped apart by super hurricane force winds. A huge down burst from the stratosphere was the suspected cause. Dunno, if my brother read that in the Post or some other source, perhaps Scientific American (both came to our house at the time).

That aside, what a fascinating 3600 word opus, thanks for posting.
5
goldminor
Reply to
Steve Case
July 27, 2021 10:14 am

I recall hearing similar said.
4
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Steve Case
July 27, 2021 5:34 pm

This may have inspired a sequel… 🍻
1
Peter Morris
July 27, 2021 6:03 am

Thank you for this.

I’ve heard the claims so often that I just figured it was actual science, but not requiring a catastrophic explanation. I just figured they got caught in blizzards during a migration, and, being stranded, were buried in the ice.

I never realized the claims came from Velikovsky.
1
harrie
July 27, 2021 6:56 am

Interesting; and I’ll go with it. Still, I was reminded of Solzhenitsyn’s story in The Gulag Archipelago how the zeks found a frozen mammoth in the tundra, but before the scientists could get there, the prisoners had eaten it.
Of course, those zeks were hungry and used to rotten meals.
2
John Endicott
July 27, 2021 8:16 am

“Never let the facts get in the way of a good story”
2
Dr. Phono Phons
Reply to
John Endicott
July 27, 2021 8:42 am

The Mammoth died instantly of a heart attack by eating to much butter?
1
Clyde Spencer
Reply to
Dr. Phono Phons
July 27, 2021 11:34 am

A cup is not very much. They must have had a genetic sensitivity to butter.
2
Len Werner
July 27, 2021 8:43 am

We must always be careful of accepting published age dates as gospel; the exercise requires a scientifically-intense multi-step process involving an almost-magic machine (mass spectrometer) requiring a lot of expertise in making it run properly and return good data. Not everyone runs them extremely well. It should be accepted as normal scientific evolution that some of these dates may change, but for now of course they are all we have.

During my graduate work I did all my own age dating, I would not turn the exercise over to the department technician; this forced me to become quite conversant with all the processes as I did them. I have seen some quite unscientific operation of a mass spectrometer that resulted in dates that should never have been published, and many of which have had to be subsequently changed when the errors were discovered after that technician left.

This is not in any way a criticism of any of Dave’s work, just a warning that dates always have the potential to change. Non-geologists are not always as aware of the limits of this technology, such as 50,000 years being an upper limit of carbon dating, and why.

But it came too late. I used to argue with my (non geologist) father about Velikovsky and could have used this to finally behead that sudden-pole-shifting monster once and for all if I had this article to refer to. But those arguments occurred long before Dad was the age that I am now.

Dave also points out (and followed) one of the most important aspects of proper research of this type–when researching something always go all the way back to the original source; never stop at someone quoting the source. If everyone did that they would realize, for example, that Wegener discovered nothing new; I have found the suggestion of continental drift in scientific publications as early as 1874. Scientific thought was quite naturally stimulated to consider the idea immediately following the sounding-derived discovery of the mid-Atlantic ridge. But it still took a lot more research to prove it was happening, the discovery of ocean-floor ‘magnetic striping’ being the clincher. To say that Alfred Wegener discovered continental drift is to say that Christopher Columbus discovered North America; both are as much myths as are flash-frozen mammoths and suicidal lemmings and walrus.
2
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Len Werner
July 27, 2021 9:19 am

You can definitely place more confidence in 14C dates younger than 35,000 years than those older. The closer you get to 50,000 years, the less reliable the estimate.

Every method of radiometric dating has a margin of error, some are fairly broad.

In most of the examples cited, they dated multiple samples from various parts of the carcasses and plant material.
2
Richard Page
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 1:50 pm

It’s not a process that gives answers with fine precision but, as you rightly point out, there are ways of gaining a little bit more accuracy.
1
John Larson
Reply to
David Middleton
July 27, 2021 2:38 pm

Wouldn’t the ostensible accuracy of C14 dates be predicated on the level(/nature?) of cosmic rays interacting with atmospheric nitrogen having been constant throughout the timespans involved?
1
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
John Larson
July 27, 2021 3:14 pm

14C years have to be converted to calendar years using calibration curves because the cosmic ray flux has not been constant.

https://c14.arch.ox.ac.uk/calibration.html
1
GTB
Reply to
Len Werner
July 27, 2021 6:30 pm

It is not only difficult to get good results from the magic machine, but interpreting the results is harder. Carbon 14 varies in the atmosphere depending on cosmic rays and cosmic ray conditions depend on the suns activity and the earth’s magnet field at the time. So it is a bit of a guess for the level of C14 at the time these animals lived.
0
MarkW
Reply to
GTB
July 28, 2021 8:42 am

C14 calibration curves have been around for almost as long as the C14 method of dating has been.
They are created by analyzing finds that have already been dated using other methods. From that you can work backwards to determine the levels of C14 in the atmosphere at the time the sample was alive.
1
Len Werner
Reply to
MarkW
July 28, 2021 6:50 pm

Everyone is theoretically absolutely correct if possibly a bit incomplete. Error bars are normally determined by the theoretical considerations stated but–

How well was the sample chamber cover tightened down to get the gold ring to seal? Geology students who have rebuilt car engines are actually better at that process than technicians who have not–they understand the benefit of more torque sequences (I was always able to attain about 2 orders of magnitude better vacuum than most due to that simple experience–10^-7 torr).

How well was the evacuation pumping performed, in that there is a progressive and time-costly sequencing of pumps from mechanical piston, to mercury diffusion, to Vacsorb, to ion pumps, and finally a ‘cold finger’. Was the liquid nitrogen in the cold finger or Vacsorb ever allowed to get low during the run?

How long was the run continued?–counting statistics normally improve with more runs through the cycles that the mass spec is programmed to run through. How well by magnet flux was each ion beam centered on the Farady cup? How stable was the magnet control circuitry?

These factors affect the accuracy of the result, but the effect that all had on the actual ratio determined is dumped in the waste basket and destroyed once the run on the mass spec is completed and the counting statistics printed out. How good the number is that ends up used in the probability calculation actually can be lost.

And that doesn’t even get into how well the sample was collected, whether contamination entered during processing, how well ion exchange column separations were performed…

Gee I hope that brought back memories for some others; it was a lot of fun.
0
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Len Werner
July 28, 2021 6:52 pm

+42×1042… 😎
0
philincalifornia
July 27, 2021 8:56 am

I remember being a bit intrigued by this myth when I read about how it could be explained by some catastrophic tectonic plate rupture that shot water into outer space and the resulting boulders of ice came right back down and killed mammoths instantly, including breaking lots of mammoth femurs. It was an interesting work of fiction that I could have written myself before getting out of bed. Last seen on a creationist site …. and no, still zero evidence of any mammoths having broken femurs. What’s this myth doing on a climate change site …. oh, hold on a sec.

Hey, but on the movies – there are whole episodes of Mystery Science Theater 3000 on Youtube. For example, Terror From the Year 5000:

1
Michael S. Kelly
July 27, 2021 9:37 am

Excellent post! I’ve wondered about the frozen mammoth stories on occasion, but only casually searched for information. I really appreciate the work you put into this, and the wealth of information you turned up.
4
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Michael S. Kelly
July 27, 2021 9:50 am

I started working on this a couple of months ago. I was inspired by some of the comments to this post, which adamantly insisted that mammoths had been flash-frozen during the Younger Dryas:

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/06/12/younger-dryas-impact-hypothesis-takes-another-self-inflicted-gunshot-wound/

I’ve run into the flash-frozen mammoth myth in other Internet forums. I was already familiar with the study of Lyuba; but hadn’t dug any deeper before.

It was actually easier, much easier, to find scientific references for the actual mammoth carcasses, than it was to find the source of the myth. I don’t think I would have been able to do that if I hadn’t stumbled on to Jason Colavito’s blog posts.
5
goldminor
July 27, 2021 10:12 am

Thanks for setting the record straight.
1
Clyde Spencer
July 27, 2021 11:02 am

I found the reference to vivianite mud to be interesting. [ https://www.mindat.org/min-4194.html ] Phosphate minerals are not all that common. However, I have read of vivianite crystals developed in cracks in the tusks of mammoths washed out of alluvial gold deposits in Alaska.

This leads me to wonder if phosphorus was extracted from the body of the mammoth and adsorbed by clays in the mud lodged in the throat and lungs of the animal, after death.

Human flesh, particularly on extremities, will freeze immediately upon exposure to air in environments that are very cold, such as Winter in the Arctic. However, I’m sure that it would take several hours for the core temperature to reach air temperature if the person died from exposure. However, we are talking about creatures adapted to living in such cold temperatures, with masses much larger than humans.

I ran across some pictures on YouTube that purport to be dogs and Arctic foxes ‘flash frozen’ standing upright. Again, these are animals superbly adapted to cold weather and with the common sense to curl up or burrow into the snow if it gets really cold. I don’t believe the claims associated with the pictures! More likely they are typical YouTube ‘click bait.’
1
MarkW
Reply to
Clyde Spencer
July 27, 2021 1:37 pm

Even “flash frozen” meets takes a minute or more to freeze.
Something the size of a mammoth, even if exposed to absolute zero, would still take several minutes for the cold to penetrate all the way to the core.
1
Clyde Spencer
Reply to
MarkW
July 27, 2021 2:34 pm

I presume you meant “meats.”

How does one get absolute zero on the surface of the Earth outside of a laboratory? I think it unlikely that something the size of a mammoth could be ‘flash’ frozen.

I understand that the life expectancy of someone going overboard without a environmental suit (at least a thick wet-suit, or preferably a heated dry-suit) is about 2 minutes in 28 deg F seawater. The muscles cease to work and one drowns well before becoming frozen. I find it very difficult to believe that well-adapted, large animals could be flash frozen naturally.
0
Yooper
Reply to
Clyde Spencer
July 28, 2021 6:54 am

This whole article raises a basic question: just what would it take to freeze an animal the size of a mammoth in such a short time? The conditions needed could not have existed naturally at the time, and I doubt NASA has an envioronmental test chamber big enough to try it on an elephant. The temperatures needed only exist outside our atmosphere.
2
pigs_in_space
Reply to
MarkW
July 27, 2021 10:45 pm

Our little poodle got flash frozen after being taken for a walk on new year’s eve (a bad idea) then running away after the fireworks went off..

It was a nice fresh URAL -30C that eve. The little thing clearly ran and ran until it ran out of energy.
How long it took to freeze I dunno, we didn’t C14 date it.

So, Russian new year parties made the mammoths freeze up.

A little bit of mammoth ivory is stuck on the end of my violin bow as a souvenir.
(elephant is now forbidden!)
0
Clyde Spencer
Reply to
pigs_in_space
July 28, 2021 12:47 pm

Was your poodle found in an upright-standing position as some of the Russian YouTube photos claim for dogs and foxes?
0
Randle Dewees
July 27, 2021 1:05 pm

Ok, since everyone threw out their favorite bad science fiction movie, mine is “Journey To The Center Of The Earth”. The 1959 one with James Mason, Arlene Dahl, and Pat Boone. Several geologist references in it, and I think the whole Jules Verne concept is so preposterous.
3
Richard Page
Reply to
Randle Dewees
July 27, 2021 1:57 pm

The hollow earth theory was a widely held scientific idea at one time. It’s preposterous now but disproving those preposterous ideas is how we expand our understanding of the universe.
1
Jeff in Calgary
Reply to
Randle Dewees
July 27, 2021 3:10 pm

Why were they not weightless at the center of the earth?
1
MarkW
Reply to
Jeff in Calgary
July 28, 2021 8:44 am

They were using one of those Star Trek gravity generators.
1
Herbert
July 27, 2021 5:46 pm

Great Post. Great fun.
After all those bad Sci-fi movies, how about a great one.
I refer of course to “The Day the Earth Stood Still”(1951)with Michael Rennie and Patricia Neal.
The re-make in 2006 with Keanu Reeves was good but could not top the original.
“Gort! Klaatu Barada Nikto!”
1
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Herbert
July 27, 2021 5:52 pm

+42×10Gort! Klaatu Barada Nikto!

😉
1
GUILLERMO SUAREZ
July 27, 2021 7:53 pm

” Most “Mammoths carbon dated to 20,000 years before the present.How many have been discovered carbon dated to the time of the YD (+/-) 1000 years?
1
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
GUILLERMO SUAREZ
July 28, 2021 2:03 am

A lot of mammoth fossils date to the YD and more recent. These tend to be bones and/or less intact, less well-preserved carcasses.
1
Robertvd
July 28, 2021 12:15 am

Question
Can mammoths survive the current climate conditions in Siberia and Alaska?
1
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Robertvd
July 28, 2021 2:13 am

Mammoths appear to have been extremely well-adapted to the Mammoth Steppe biome. This was the dominant continental biome during the last glacial maximum. The Mammoth Steppe vanished during deglaciation. I haven’t found a good reference for how or if the Mammoth Steppe survived prior interglacials.
1
Robertvd
Reply to
David Middleton
July 28, 2021 5:46 am

I can imagine they can live there in summer with long sun hours but in winter when days are short and cold where would they find the food for that big body. Would the fat reserves be enough or would all those herds move south ?
0
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Robertvd
July 28, 2021 6:22 am

I think the problem wasn’t so much related to temperature as it was the loss of the biome… But I have yet to find a truly compelling explanation for the loss of the Mammoth Steppe.

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12921.epdf?sharing_token=gm29vwsONkR9-R0zd4I5wNRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0M5ejGW8_tQHajxyxlJxkWCJFxYzjkCHC1hYt-mTNRtTcjwRtoDBIlbqt2kegFiiN0rCpZNKraohms_ipapHiVNr0qHJjoGHtzyU1seDfixMEoWqZujM_XDNcHRdZl4zom9ZNInOO3C3UszvMwF-YWqnhsw0CrI9C_4MqNr1pmIdKHbBeltQH6zXSSKR8hZ5ZU%3D&tracking_referrer=www.nationalgeographic.com
1
Robertvd
Reply to
David Middleton
July 28, 2021 1:41 pm

“Reconstruction of Arctic vegetation from permafrost
We collected 242 sediment samples from 21 sites across the Arctic”

All these sides is where we today find our landmass . During the LGM sea level was a lot lower and most mammoths most certainly would have been found there in summer because it would be warmer thanks to a higher atmospheric pressure and 24 hours of sunlight.
The plants examined in this study would have been eaten by the animals on their annual migration to winter camp or summer camp.

Do we have any idea if there ever has been glacier formation and an ice pack over Siberia during the ongoing 3.5 Ma old Ice Age ?
0
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
Robertvd
July 28, 2021 2:09 pm

I don’t know. The problem with glacial advances is that they tend to wipe out a lot of the evidence of previous advances. This paper combined the sparse empirical evidence with numerical models to reconstruct past glacial extents.

Intensity map of the number of times that each region was covered by ice sheets, produced by overlaying the best-estimate ice-sheet reconstructions from MIS 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16 and 20–24. Regions shaded dark red were subject to glaciation 8–10 times through the last 1 Ma. Ice-sheet reconstructions for the early Matuyama (Early Pleistocene) and late Gauss magnetic chrons (Late Pliocene) are omitted because of the broad time-spans and high uncertainty of these reconstructions. Background is ETOPO1 1 arc-minute global relief model of the Earth’s surface72

Based on this, the Mammoth Steppe was never glaciated.

The Mammoth Steppe papers, I have located, generally only go back ~50ka.

We know mammoths handled several glacial-interglacial transitions just fine. The oldest mammoth fossils are 1.2-1.65 million years old. So, presumably, the Mammoth Steppe survived those interglacials as well.
2
John Tillman
Reply to
Robertvd
July 29, 2021 2:52 pm

During glaciations, habitats get constricted. Woollies were adapted to the mammoth steppe-tundra, are now practically extinct biome. Before human hunters, they could find refugia or move onto grasslands to compete with steppe mammoths and their relatives in North America, the Columbia and Imperial mammoths.
0
David Middleton
Author
Reply to
John Tillman
July 30, 2021 2:53 pm

Deglaciations were probably also disruptive. Outwash streams, glacial lake floods, etc., probably caused problems too, particularly as our growing numbers of humans moved into the Americas.
1
John Tillman
Reply to
David Middleton
July 31, 2021 4:31 pm

Definitely humans in both Eurasia and North America, who didn’t apply pressure during the Eemian and previous deglaciations.
1
ATheoK
July 28, 2021 7:52 pm

I read about that flash frozen mammoth with food in it’s belly back in grade school, late 1950s.

“mammoth had been frozen so quickly that its last meal of buttercups were still freshly in bloom in its mouth. “Upon the [tongue] and between the teeth, were portions of the animal’s last meal, which for some incomprehensible reason it had not had time to swallow.”

Except:
Buttercups are of the Ranunculaceae family, same as monkshoods and delphiniums.

“The whole plant is toxic to livestock. Cursed crowfoot (R. sceleratus) is reported to be one of the most toxic6. The toxic component is an acrid volatile substance called anemoral and an irritant called protoanemonin, which is also reported to be a plant produced anibiotic6, 7. All buttercups have various amounts of these or related compounds. Symptoms of poisoning are drooling, diarrhea, increased heart rate, behavior changes such as weakness and depression, bleeding, and convulsions”

It’s no wonder the poor critter got confused and fell into a mud pit.

“this was really juicy,” said Herridge, who likened the appearance of the muscle to a “piece of steak — bright red when you cut into the flesh and then as it hit the air, it would go brown.”

Odd. That is opposite to how fresh meat and reacts.
The meat and blood are red because they are exposed to oxygen.
Many meats nowadays are vacuum or plastic wrapped denying the meat access to oxygen yet leave the meat exposed to light. It then turns brown.


Responses:
[7376]


7376


Date: December 06, 2023 at 23:10:39
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: so much has been said to be "impossible" because of...




Responses:
None


7374


Date: December 06, 2023 at 21:37:32
From: georg, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: so much has been said to be "impossible" because of...

URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_V._Gentry


the seeds that another man plants can often bear fruit
years after he is gone to dust


Responses:
None


[ Science/Technology ] [ Main Menu ]

Generated by: TalkRec 1.17
    Last Updated: 30-Aug-2013 14:32:46, 80837 Bytes
    Author: Brian Steele