[ Science/Technology ] [ Main Menu ]
7217
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: U.S. to announce fusion energy 'breakthrough'
URL: https://www.sfgate.com/business/article/U-S-to-announce-fusion-energy-breakthrough-17647336.php
|
U.S. to announce fusion energy 'breakthrough' Evan Halper and Pranshu Verma, The Washington Post Dec. 11, 2022 The Department of Energy plans to announce Tuesday that scientists have been able for the first time to produce a fusion reaction that creates a net energy gain - a major milestone in the decades-long, multibillion-dollar quest to develop a technology that provides unlimited, cheap, clean power. The aim of fusion research is to replicate the nuclear reaction through which energy is created on the sun. It is a "holy grail" of carbon-free power that scientists have been chasing since the 1950s. It is still at least a decade - maybe decades - away from commercial use, but the latest development is likely to be touted by the Biden administration as an affirmation of a massive investment by the government over the years. Huge amounts of public and private funds have been funneled into the fusion race worldwide, with the aim of ultimately manufacturing fusion machinery that could bring electricity to the grid with no carbon footprint, no radioactive waste and far fewer resources than it takes to harness solar and wind power. Beyond the climate benefits, promoters say it could help bring cheap electricity to impoverished parts of the world. "To most of us, this was only a matter of time," said a senior fusion scientist familiar with the work of the National Ignition Facility at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, where the discovery was made. The development was first reported by the Financial Times on Sunday. It was confirmed by two people familiar with the research, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid getting ahead of the official announcement. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm was slated to make the announcement Tuesday at a media event billed as the unveiling of "a major scientific breakthrough." The department and the lab declined to comment. A lab official said researchers there are still finalizing their analysis and will not be releasing any official findings before Tuesday. The science of nuclear fusion relies on smashing two atoms together at incredibly high speeds and transforming the energy from that reaction into electricity that can power homes and offices without emitting carbon into the air or dumping radioactive waste into the environment. In the decades scientists have been experimenting with fusion reactions, they had not until now been able to create one that produces more energy than it consumes. While the achievement is significant, there are still monumental engineering and scientific challenges ahead. Creating the net energy gain required engagement of one of the largest lasers in the world, and the resources needed to re-create the reaction on the scale required to make fusion practical for energy production are immense. More importantly, engineers have yet to develop machinery capable of affordably turning that reaction into electricity that can be practically deployed to the power grid. Building devices that are large enough to create fusion power at scale, scientists say, would require materials that are extraordinarily difficult to produce. At the same time, the reaction creates neutrons that put a tremendous amount of stress on the equipment creating it, such that it can get destroyed in the process. And then there is the question of whether the technology could be perfected in time to make a dent in climate change. Even so, researchers and investors in fusion technology hailed the breakthrough as an important advancement. "There is going to be great pride that this is something that happened in the United States," said David Edelman, who leads policy and global affairs at TAE, a large private fusion energy company. "This is a very important milestone on the road toward fusion energy." It comes as the Biden administration is prioritizing fusion energy research in its climate and energy agenda. The projects are among the front of the line for the tens of billions of dollars in subsidies and grants authorized through the major climate package President Joe Biden signed over the summer, called the Inflation Reduction Act. Over the past several decades, the United States, Russia and various European nations have allocated billions in government dollars trying to master the science, believing that if they could, it would be a boon for the world. |
7223
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: U.S. to announce fusion energy 'breakthrough'
URL: https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/physicists-discuss-bay-area-fusion-breakthrough-17657480.php
|
We talked to physicists about the fusion breakthrough at a Bay Area lab SFGATE columnist Drew Magary on why this isn't the holy grail — but it's still a cause for celebration Drew Magary Dec. 16, 2022 Nuclear fusion on the surface of the sun DrPixel/Getty Images Since the beginning of time, mankind has yearned to create the sun. And for over 70 years, scientists have known how to create an artificial nuclear fusion reaction, forcing positively-charged particles to slam together and fuse, generating an enormous amount of heat. It’s something that the sun has been doing for roughly 4.6 billion years. But whenever humans have tried it in the past, it’s taken enormous amounts of energy to heat up the protons and get them moving fast enough to overcome their natural repulsion to one another — far more than has been generated by the reactions themselves. Containing the reaction — that is, keeping it from turning into a bomb — has also proven dicey. Achieving those two goals has been a holy grail, a dream that holds enormous promise for clean energy, long-distance space flight and other sci-fi advances. It’s also been “20 years away” for as long as the concept has been around. That all changed on Dec. 5, at 1:03 a.m., when a handful of night-owl scientists at the National Ignition Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory bombarded a tiny capsule of frozen hydrogen with 192 intense lasers, forcing the atoms to bounce around the container at an incredibly high speed. The protons in these atoms were positively charged, which means they repel each other. But when they moved fast inside a relatively confined space…well, sometimes they couldn’t help but bump into each other. And forcing the protons together triggered them to fuse, emitting a burst of gamma rays with 1.5 times the energy the lasers had put into the capsule. It was the first time scientists ever managed to trigger a process called ignition, the same series of chain reactions that power the sun, producing more heat than they poured in. In other words, they f—king did it. The idea of tabletop fusion has been a white whale for both scientists and consumers for the bulk of my lifetime. But now, the promise looks a lot closer to reality: Truly clean energy. No uranium. No plutonium. No nuclear waste. No gas, no coal. Hydrogen in, energy (and maybe a bit of helium) out. The lab didn’t explode. No one died in the reaction, or transformed into a superpowered octopus. So congratulations. You lived to see the dawn of the fusion age. …Or did you? There are a lot of signs that the narrative around this discovery is a classic exercise in American salesmanship. First off, experiments like the one that NIF conducted do, in fact, produce radiation, in the form of stray neutrons. They can make anything they pass through radioactive, and not in the fun comic book way. More damning, the scientists only produced a net gain in energy if you count the power from those 192 lasers themselves, and not the power needed to run those lasers. These are very hot, concentrated lasers, which means that it takes an awful lot of power — hundreds of times the amount of energy produced in the reactor. So the official energy surplus announced this week is something of a trick of accounting. “Lasers are an incredibly inefficient way to do anything,” says Phillip Broughton, a health physicist (if you’re wondering what a "health physicist" is, Broughton says it’s actually a radiation safety specialist) and laser safety officer at UC Berkeley, who previously worked at the Livermore lab in a similar capacity. “It's so much more power at the wall to make the lasers… It's bulls—t for power. It's not a power generation thing, and never will be.” Broughton also noted that, while the scientists were able to produce an energy surplus from the fusion reaction, there was no way to HARNESS that energy. There was no water tank in their testing room that made steam to spin a turbine. There was just a brilliant burst of heat, and then nothing. Still, those limitations didn’t stop other physicists I spoke with from registering their excitement (or, at the very least, their admiration) for what the Lawrence Livermore team has accomplished. “This is huge,” said Matthew Bellis, associate professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy at Siena College and a member of the CMS Collaboration involving the Large Hadron Collider. “There's a running joke that fusion energy is always 20 years in the future. You go back to when they first started working on this, probably in the '50s or '60s, and they were like, ‘Well, it's 20 years down the road.’ Then 20 years later, ‘Well, just give us 20 more years, and we'll have this. We'll be able to create more energy out than in.' That's the holy grail.” Bellis, like Broughton, is well aware of the power requirements of those big honking lasers. He believes that what the NIF team did qualifies as ignition, and pointed out that the techniques used could be applied by other labs, with more efficient lasers. Clean nuclear power generation was never the priority of the Lawrence Livermore lab, which was clandestinely founded in conjunction with The Manhattan Project to ensure the safety of America’s now-aging nuclear arsenal. Other labs, particularly in the private sector, have already been dedicating enormous resources to this project; now, they have something much closer to a blueprint for striking atomic gold. There’s also the possibility that this is less of a scientific breakthrough, and more of a psychological one — one that Bellis believes could potentially accelerate a global race to producing fusion energy on a commercial scale. Let’s be frank: If something isn’t gonna happen in our lifetimes, we’re far less inclined to ever give a f—k about it, whether we’re investing in a technology or voting for our government to do so. Now, today, it feels possible — even reasonable — to give a f—k about fusion, because it might actually be coming. There’s a very big difference between something being theoretically possible and it being definitively so, and this event made the idea of fusion much more tangible, attainable, to a lot of very important and oddly useful people. “Funding agencies can show the general public that this money is being invested in something worthwhile. I think that's huge. I think it's really big to be able to show people like, ‘No, this is here. Now we just have to figure out how to scale it up,’” Bellis told me. “To do a proof of principle that mankind can produce the same conditions that happen in the sun, if only for like a millisecond, is huge in giving everybody the confidence that there is a path forward for this type of energy.” That confidence is no small matter. It has the potential to change both how the world sees fusion power and how aggressively it chases after it. You have been told, many times over, there’s no stopping the climate apocalypse, that democracy is on its deathbed, that guns will win, and on and on and on. It’s easy to forget that the future is unwritten, and that humankind is much more resourceful than we’re often given credit for. But listen. We went to the f—king MOON. We’ve put robots on Mars. We’ve launched two probes that are currently floating outside of our home solar system. Almost all of those breakthroughs were preceded by accidents, wrong guesses, opposition, tragedy, red herrings and false hopes. We kept trying anyway.What the scientists in Livermore did was a reminder that we have some measure of control over our destiny — and that we don’t have to choose our own demise as that destiny. We have to keep trying, and now, hopefully, we will. Because if we let reality hold us back, we’re all gonna f—king die. |
Responses:
None
7220
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: U.S. to announce fusion energy 'breakthrough'
|
Thanks....In this story am reminded of China's experimental fusion announcement from 2021. |
Responses:
[7222]
7222
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: U.S. to announce fusion energy 'breakthrough'
|
A link to an article regarding the 'breakthrough' announcement today: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-63950962 |
Responses:
None
7218
From: shatterbrain, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: U.S. to announce fusion energy 'breakthrough'
| I'd like to get one of those in my backyard. |
7219
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: U.S. to announce fusion energy 'breakthrough'
Responses:
[7221]
7221
From: shatterbrain, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: U.S. to announce fusion energy 'breakthrough'
|
Now that's what I call a 'breakthrough' 🤩 |
Responses:
None
[ Science/Technology ] [ Main Menu ]