Science/Technology

[ Science/Technology ] [ Main Menu ]


  


6134


Date: November 03, 2015 at 10:57:02
From: blindhog, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Downed Russian Plane


Today's reported that a U.S. satellite detected a heat flash midair without the telltale streak that accompanies a missile strike.

The first news I read about the crash site was that someone, first on the scene, said the tail section was charred.

Looking at the overhead pictures of the major part of the crash that seemed to show an evenly, completely burned, midsection with corresponding, completely burned, wings, one can only conclude that it wasn't the engines that caused that heat flash in midair. It seems then that there must have been an explosion in the cargo hold.

Hopefully the char from the tail section will have evidence if that is the case.


Responses:
[6135] [6136] [6137] [6139] [6138] [6140] [6142]


6135


Date: November 03, 2015 at 12:59:52
From: Digby, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Downed Russian Plane


As it had just taken off it would have been full of fuel and the burnt
wreckage was from fuselage and wings exploding and burning on the
ground and this is what was likely detected by satellite.

As to was caused it to break apart in flight a small bomb would only need
to hole / rip apart the fueslage skin to cause it to rapidly depressurise
and fall from altitude - the tail section which landed seperately doesn't
appear burnt. (see pic)

Looking likely to be a small bomb in cargo hold detonated via altitude
sensor / or suicide bomber.

and just in...

"The disappearance of the Russian airliner which crashed in Sinai on
Saturday was preceded by sounds in the cockpit “uncharacteristic of a
standard flight”, according to Russian media.

The Interfax news agency quoted officials in Cairo as providing a first
insight into audio recordings from the Airbus 321’s “black box”
recorders.

They reported that after a period of routine discussions between crew
members, “the recordings show sounds uncharacteristic of a standard
flight precede the moment of the airliner’s disappearance”.

According to Interfax, the recordings also suggest "there was a sudden
emergency situation on board which took the crew by surprise, and the
pilots did not have time to send a distress signal".

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russian-plane-crash-
in-sinai-flight-recorders-reveal-unusual-sounds-moment-before-jet-
disappeared-a6718941.html


Responses:
[6136] [6137] [6139] [6138] [6140] [6142]


6136


Date: November 03, 2015 at 17:44:21
From: blindhog, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Downed Russian Plane


The news reported that the heat flash happened "midair". The news probably has it wrong, because how could a satellite so far in space figure out if the heat flash was midair or on the ground?

And the internet had a story about a man who supposedly saw the tail section and he said it was charred. Sometimes even the internet can be wrong.


Responses:
[6137] [6139] [6138] [6140] [6142]


6137


Date: November 05, 2015 at 07:01:45
From: Nasirah, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Downed Russian Plane


because how could a satellite so far in space figure out if the heat flash was midair or on the ground?

Satellites Space Based Infrared System (SBIRS) http://www.afspc.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=3675 to
pick up infra red heat of missile launches are sensitive enough to pick up forest fires - not sure if they actually
picked up the altitude of the explosion but they might be able to if a couple or three satellites with capability could
triangulate where in the depth of the atmosphere or even if only one satellite picked it up could maybe work out the
altitide from the filtering from the amount of atmosphere through where the radiation had to track.

Wreckage is looking almost certainly shrapnel damaged from an internal explosion on board. Wonder how Russians
will ultimately react as both Russians and Egypt seem keen to pass it off as just an 'accident'. Not as if Russia can
invade or bomb Egypt in retaliation, or even invade or bomb ISIS in Syria any more than they claiming to do so
currently.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3304921/Is-proof-Russian-jet-bombed-Photographs-wreckage-holes-
appear-result-shrapnel-plane.html

"And the internet had a story about a man who supposedly saw the tail section and he said it was charred"

Are you sure they were referring to the tail and not the front fuselage and wings which were very charred from
imagery.


Responses:
[6139] [6138] [6140] [6142]


6139


Date: November 05, 2015 at 09:01:45
From: anne redwood city, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Downed Russian Plane


The Lincoln image is a LOL! Perfect example of what it says.


Responses:
None


6138


Date: November 05, 2015 at 07:18:47
From: blindhog, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Downed Russian Plane


I was thinking this morning about who would benefit if this was considered a bomb on board and not an accident?

If the plane did indeed have the infamous tail section fail, there would be heads that rolled AND big bucks to pay. This airline bought this plane from someone who knew about the damage this tail incurred seven years ago when the tail hit the ground. Airbus supposedly fixed it. Can you imagine the cost insurance companies, from those in Ireland, to France, to Russia (and who knows who else) would incur if it was found to be a tail separation mid air?

I don't know either way, but in my opinion, there are a lot of corporations invested in this being a terrorist act.


Responses:
[6140] [6142]


6140


Date: November 05, 2015 at 09:23:20
From: Nasirah, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Downed Russian Plane


Russia would perversely benefit as it would buy them some world sympathy and distraction after they shot down
MH170. Still some are saying 7K9628 Metrojet Airbus is karma for that...

Also Putin would benefit if it was a bomb then his crackdown and any further military hit on ISIS would give him
greater justification and bring him greater prestige in his own country. Heck plausibly it could be a Russian false
flag to promote further military distractions to the shit militarily/economically /diplomatically that Putin is digging
himself and Russia ever deeper into.

Not necessarily Airbus repaired the plane's tail in 2001 (14 years ago not 7) there are aircraft repair shops not
always manufactures that fix em up and insurance will still have to pay up compensation wether its an accident or
terrorism.


Responses:
[6142]


6142


Date: November 06, 2015 at 07:14:54
From: blindhog, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Downed Russian Plane


After 9/11 there are insurance companies that refuse to cover terrorism in their policies.


Responses:
None


[ Science/Technology ] [ Main Menu ]

Generated by: TalkRec 1.17
    Last Updated: 30-Aug-2013 14:32:46, 80837 Bytes
    Author: Brian Steele