[ Science/Technology ] [ Main Menu ]
6003
From: Jody/Concord,CA, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Paleontologists discover Human remains in Dinosaur Dung!
URL: http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/paleontologists-discover-human-remains-in-dinosaur-feces/
|
Here's the smoking gun er Dung that proves Dinosaurs and Humans co- existed on Earth at the same. Yes--I KNEW it! This discovery makes ALL Human History and timelines fraudulent. |
Responses:
[6004] [6005] [6007] [6014] [6016] [6022] [6026] [6028] [6029] [6056] [6103] [6023] [6033] [6027] [6032] [6024] [6031] [6030] [6020] [6025] [6017] [6008] [6009] [6010] [6011] [6012] [6013] [6061] [6018] [6019] [6006] [6015] [6021]
6004
From: Redhart, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Paleontologists discover Human remains in Dinosaur Dung!
|
I wanna hear the one about the Cotopaxi again lolol (see weird board). Same people (World News Daily Report) writing all the fiction you want to read. Entertainment value only. |
Responses:
[6005] [6007] [6014] [6016] [6022] [6026] [6028] [6029] [6056] [6103] [6023] [6033] [6027] [6032] [6024] [6031] [6030] [6020] [6025] [6017] [6008] [6009] [6010] [6011] [6012] [6013] [6061] [6018] [6019] [6006] [6015] [6021]
6005
From: Jody/Concord,CA, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Paleontologists discover Human remains in Dinosaur Dung!
|
Not so fast Mary Sunshine.... This is not the only example of Humans living alongside Dinosaurs. There are the side by side footprints in Texas--legitimate & real, and in Central and South America there is both pottery and art showing several different Dinosaurs depicted by indigenous peoples who had obviously SEEN them. Now one or the other is true...either Dinosaurs survived into more recent times or Humans have been existing on this planet longer than we are told. Then there is 'our' personal stories.. I had a past life regression done 20 years ago by a certified Hypnotherapist for a personal reason. I went back to the cause of my 'problem' and saw myself as an ancient hunter. While watching myself back then a huge Dinosaur raised it's head above the trees and saw me. I hid in the jungle but it found me by it's 'forked, heat- seeking tongue' and chomped down on the entire bush I was under. In short, I was eaten by a Dinosaur. So when I read this story, it was so in line with what I experienced under hypnosis that I posted it. I now know what it feels like to have my left leg severed and BIG teeth puncture through my torso. Yes I died by Dinosaur and that could've been MY former remains in that Dinosaur dung... Blessings, Jody |
Responses:
[6007] [6014] [6016] [6022] [6026] [6028] [6029] [6056] [6103] [6023] [6033] [6027] [6032] [6024] [6031] [6030] [6020] [6025] [6017] [6008] [6009] [6010] [6011] [6012] [6013] [6061] [6018] [6019] [6006] [6015] [6021]
6007
From: Redhart, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Paleontologists discover Human remains in Dinosaur Dung!
|
I don't know about your past life experiences, but I do know the site you copied the article from has this disclaimer to those who go there: ""All characters appearing in the articles in this website – even those based on real people – are entirely fictional and any resemblance between them and any persons, living, dead, or undead is purely a miracle." It's an entertainment/satire/fiction site, not a news site. And sorry, I do not believe dinosaurs and people coexisted. |
Responses:
[6014] [6016] [6022] [6026] [6028] [6029] [6056] [6103] [6023] [6033] [6027] [6032] [6024] [6031] [6030] [6020] [6025] [6017] [6008] [6009] [6010] [6011] [6012] [6013] [6061] [6018] [6019]
6014
From: Jody/Concord,CA, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Paleontologists discover Human remains in Dinosaur Dung!
|
Red, Like I stated in my previous post, this is not the 'only' example. I'm linking a short video on the Glen Rose Texas fossilized footprints of Dinosaur and man--side by side. It's been vetted by experts. Remember, a closed mind cannot learn anything. Keep it OPEN. Blessings, Jody |
Responses:
[6016] [6022] [6026] [6028] [6029] [6056] [6103] [6023] [6033] [6027] [6032] [6024] [6031] [6030] [6020] [6025] [6017]
6016
From: Akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: further analysis proves footprints were not human....
URL: http://paleo.cc/paluxy/Farlow%20et%20al%202012%20Paluxy%20River%20tracksites.pdf
|
Really, the 16 inch ‘human’ footprints mentioned in the video didn’t give you pause, lol? excerpt "For many years claims were made by "young-earth" creationists (YECs) that human footprints or "giant man tracks" occur alongside fossilized dinosaur tracks in the limestone beds of the Paluxy River, near Glen Rose Texas. If true, such a finding would dramatically contradict the conventional geologic timetable, which holds that humans did not appear on earth until over 60 million years after non-avian dinosaurs became extinct. However, the "man track" claims have not stood up to close scientific scrutiny, and in recent years have been abandoned even by most creationists. The supposed human tracks have involved a variety of phenomena, including metatarsal dinosaur tracks, erosional features, and carvings. The largest number of "man tracks" are forms of elongate, metatarsal dinosaur tracks, made by bipedal dinosaurs that sometimes impressed their metatarsi (heels and soles) as they walked. When the digit impressions of such tracks are subdued by mud-backflow or secondary infilling, the resulting depressions often superficially resemble large human footprints. Other alleged "man tracks" including purely erosional features (often selectively highlighted to encourage human shapes), indistinct marks of undertain origin, and a smaller number of doctored and carved tracks (most of the latter occurring on loose blocks of rock).” article: http://paleo.cc/paluxy.htm study at link: Dinosaur Tracksites of the Paluxy River Valley (Glen Rose Formation, Lower Cretaceous), Dinosaur Valley State Park, Somervell County, Texas J. O. Farlow1, M. O’Brien2, G. J. Kuban3, B. F. Dattilo1, K. T. Bates4, P. L. Falkingham5, L. Piñuela6, A. Rose1, A. Freels7, C. Kumagai1, C. Libben1, J. Smith1 and J. Whitcraft1 Abstract Recibido el 9 de diciembre de 2010, aceptado el 20 de mayo de 2011. (1): Indiana-Purdue University, 2101 East Coliseum Boulevard, Fort Wayne, IN 46805 USA (2): Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, TX USA (3): Strongsville, OH 44136 USA (4): University of Liverpool, L69 3GE England (5): University of Manchester, M13 9PL England (6): Museo del Jurásico de Asturias, Colunga, Asturias, España (7): Manchester College, North Manchester, IN 46962 USA excerpt: "The “man tracks” fig- ured prominently in creationist publications, most notably Stanley Taylor’s 1970 film Footprints in Stone and Morris’ (1980) book. However, some creationists were skeptical of the “man track” claims (Neufeld, 1975), and in the 1980s, the scientific community also responded, providing evi- dence that those human prints that were not out-and-out fakes or the caprices of weathering were in fact preserva- tional variants of tridactyl dinosaur footprints, particularly of prints made during an unusual style of locomotion for the huge reptiles (see Milne and Schafersman, 1983; Cole and Godfrey 1985; Hastings, 1986, 1987; Kuban, 1986, 1989a, b; Farlow, 1987 and references cited therein), an in- terpretation that will be further documented in this paper...." |
Responses:
[6022] [6026] [6028] [6029] [6056] [6103] [6023] [6033] [6027] [6032] [6024] [6031] [6030] [6020] [6025] [6017]
6022
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: further analysis proves footprints were not human....
| science thought rogue waves were just sailors' salty tales too until a few years ago when they measured a 90 footer washing over a drill rig....scientists are always the last to know anything...lol... |
Responses:
[6026] [6028] [6029] [6056] [6103] [6023] [6033] [6027] [6032] [6024] [6031] [6030]
6026
From: Akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: further analysis proves footprints were not human....
|
and thanks to science, some of those rogue waves appear to be increasingly predictable and avoidable. I'd say that's a good thing, but then I'd be accused of stating the obvious. Some scientists seem to be more open minded than others, on that I'd agree. I guess it's easier to be open mined when one's entire career isn't spent on something as unprovable like string theory. Same can be said for religious folks who's belief systems revolve around a religion with sky gods. |
6028
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: further analysis proves footprints were not human....
| 2 sides of the same coin...and devalued by infation... |
6029
From: Akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: further analysis proves footprints were not human....
|
Yeah, isn't that’s sort of what I said? If you or someone you cared about lived a life at sea, would you not appreciate the research, methodology and tools developed by scientists (not psychics, theologians, mystics or anarchs) to reliably predict rogue waves? Studies such as the one I linked are a first step. By the way, I’m the last person to dismiss the gifts true mystics, psychics, alternative healers and non-linear, unconventional problem solvers. I consider myself in that mix. That doesn’t nullify the value of science. Ideally the scientific community, as diverse as it is - and those involved in the supernormal/mystic arts need deeper collaboration, imo. |
6056
From: Dib, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: further analysis proves footprints were not human....
|
You can't have it both ways, Akira. Science and pseudoscience are at opposite poles. |
Responses:
[6103]
6103
From: Akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: further analysis proves footprints were not human....
|
I feel so misunderstood lol |
Responses:
None
6023
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: further analysis proves footprints were not human....
|
And once there was substantial evidence brought forth the scientists changed their minds and accepted those rogue waves as fact. THAT is what you anti-science twits don't get. Science only demands evidence and gladly rewrites the books when said evidence is presented. Scientists' minds ARE open or else they would reject that evidence. Can that be said about you anti-science twits? NO! You stick to your guns no matter HOW MUCH evidence is thrown at you, using all manner of dismissive tactics: "It's all a scam", "It's disinformation from TPTB", "You're a paid shill".... ad nauseum. (and nauseating it is) Why? Because your minds ARE NOT as open as much as you appeal to others to open theirs. You dismiss the evidence because it doesn't fit your preconceived notions of how you want to perceive things "to be". Science will always adapt and change as new evidence is presented. Science admits when it is wrong. You are a hundred times over every fault you allege towards science. BAH!!!! Brian |
6033
From: Logan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: further analysis proves footprints were not human....
| These days too many "scientists" are just whores for who ever will pay them to say anything. Check WOWOW for an article I posted on Monsanto whore "scientists". |
Responses:
None
6027
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: further analysis proves footprints were not human....
URL: http://earthboppin.net/talkshop/tech/messages/4033.html
| keep the personal crap out of the discussion brian... |
Responses:
[6032]
6032
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: further analysis proves footprints were not human....
|
Yeah, right, Bopp. Pot. Kettle. Black. You reap what you sow, Ryan. You bitch and complain about how people behave on your boards, yet you flat out refuse to buck up and do what it takes to control it. No, you even exhibit the same behavior yourself. Right when I think you're beginning to "get it", you remind me that you don't by showing what a hypocrite you are. And don't bother threatening to ban me, because I know that you know that I know that you can't ban anyone. Not with the way you choose to run things. Brian |
Responses:
None
6024
From: Listen'n2, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: further analysis proves footprints were not human....
|
wow Brian; be careful of how much of "their" science you swallow. Archeologists have be hiding suppressing and belittling those who question any evidence that runs contrary to what scientists have been declaring as fact, for many years. A guide for you; keep an open mind and question everything and listen to everyone (not just a select few), then you can arrive at your conclusion. If you do keep an open mind you will likely find your opinion changed. |
6031
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: further analysis proves footprints were not human....
|
"A guide for you; keep an open mind and question everything and listen to everyone (not just a select few), then you can arrive at your conclusion. If you do keep an open mind you will likely find your opinion changed. " Thank you for proving my point. Brian |
Responses:
None
6030
From: JTRIV, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: further analysis proves footprints were not human....
|
Hi Lars, > wow Brian; be careful of how much of "their" science you swallow. Archeologists have be hiding suppressing > and belittling those who question any evidence that runs contrary to what scientists have been declaring > as fact, for many years. Well that simply isn't true. I've heard much the same claims for years by supporters of people like Sitchin and Velikovsky and it is always because the actual scientists show their claims are false. You have to consider that when you talk about some conspiracy of scientists you are talking about many generations of scientists from nations and universities all over the world. All the major nations on Earth have archaeologists who study these things and none come to the conclusion that dinosaurs and humans are any closer than 50 million years. That is what the evidence says and we aren't talking about from one location but from all over the world as studied by archaeologists from all over the world. > A guide for you; keep an open mind and question everything and listen to everyone (not just a select > few), then you can arrive at your conclusion. If you do keep an open mind you will likely find your opinion changed. I would say that cuts both ways. What concerns me is that many simply come to the conclusions that want up front, such as that dinosaurs and humans lived side by side, yet they don't question these claims, they don't keep an open mind and they shut out anything that comes from scientists who actually study the subject. And that is the biggest factor IMHO. So many distrust science and refuse to listen to the science while repeating the empty mantra "keep an open mind". Keep an open mind has to be more than a slogan. Keeping an open mind and questioning everything are a loose description of critical thinking that everyone should be doing. Ignoring science as untrustworthy while embracing anything that aligns with one's worldview is pretty much the opposite of keeping an open mind and questioning. Cheers Jim |
Responses:
None
6020
From: Jody/Concord,CA, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: further analysis proves footprints were not human....
|
Akira, Oh yeah..it made me smile :) Humanoid/Giants are still human, not animal or Dinosaurs. They qualify. There were Giants all over the earth before 'us', read the Bible. I'm not into rewriting history, I'm into telling the truth and those feet are BIG! But, those same big feet are in Tibet, India, Turkey, Japan and here in the USA. Thanks Akira for pointing out the obvious :) Blessings, Jody |
Responses:
[6025]
6025
From: Akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: further analysis proves footprints were not human....
| Oh, well if it's in the bible.... |
Responses:
None
6017
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: further analysis proves footprints were not human....
| that is just another theory... |
Responses:
None
6008
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Fake News
|
"It's an entertainment/satire/fiction site, not a news site. That seems to be the case on numerous "news items" getting posted lately. There seems to be an ever increasing number of supposed "news sites" popping up on the web throwing out satire to fiction to outright lies. They gussy themselves up to look like your typical news source and that tricks people into believing the crap. Some folks lately have been posting so much stuff from these kinds of sites that, to borrow a common conspiracy theory, it makes one wonder if they're not paid shills to advertise those sites. Brian |
Responses:
[6009] [6010] [6011] [6012] [6013] [6061] [6018] [6019]
6009
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Fake News
| if you dig into to it you will find many if not most of them run by the government... |
6010
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Fake News
|
These sites are so obviously fake that if they are run by 'teh gubmit' then they must be shooting for the low hanging fruit... and I mean REALLY low hanging. Like on the ground after just falling off the tree low. But then, you have a point. If your forums are any way to judge, then most of the population fell off the tree a long time ago. Anyway, arming one's self with some good critical thinking skills and a dose of skepticism is all it takes to spot these fake stories. Brian |
6011
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Fake News
| well the gub ain't all that good at intelligence...lol... |
6012
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Fake News
|
That's kind of a senseless statement. If they're so dumb, then how come they are alleged to have so much power over the people? Why do they need then, for example, the fake news websites to what? spread lies and disinformation? All to maintain their superiority and control? Or are you saying the people are even dumber? They must be to believe that crap as truth. I don't give much credence to "'teh' powers that be" stuff. Yeah, there's some bad juju out there, and groups and factions have done some bad things. But the way most around here would say it is that EVERYTHING 100% the government does is bad, evil, deceitful, nefarious, etc... ad nauseum. Really? Does that even make any sense at all? I'm not saying the opposite, that they are ALWAYS 100% the good guys. But to take the tact that everything must be evil because a few things have been proven to be evil is just silly. That's a logical fallacy called "sweeping generalization". Some cops are racists, so are all cops racist? Some teachers are molesters, so are all teachers molesters? If you keep looking for conspiracies and evil everywhere you look, of course that's what you will find. You won't see the good or the truth because you're too busy looking for the bad evil guys. If you want to find the truth, you have to actually be looking for it! Brian |
6013
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Fake News
| the "truth" is pretty obvious brian, and it ain't pretty....by not intelligent i was referring to the short sightedness and lack of meaningful goals and aims....it appears you have not been paying attention....when the head of the cia states we will know we have achieved our goals when everyone believes our bullshit you kind of get the idea....i did not say the gub folks weren't skilled, they just aren't intelligent...the masses have been so deceived by gub bs they have no idea of what the truth is anymore....if and when they ever do figure it out all hell will break loose...but most are too busy with the survival struggle to spend any time thinking about it...there is a very small cadre of controllers with the power to say yea or nay...sure there are some good people trying to do good things....but they are very limited in what they can do... |
6061
From: Betty in Texas, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Fake News
|
You are so right on Ryan! The public has been so deceived over the decades, possibly millennia, that the truth is so obscured that we may never really find out what it is. But the sad thing is that the gubmint does have disinfo media deliberately designed to tell lies and lead the public astray. And the real question is WHY? What is it that they are hiding that they don't want the little guy to know? Are they hiding something in the first place? And why to they have internet police who are there to defend everything that they do if they weren't lying to us? Betty Maybe that fake news isn't so fake after all??? |
Responses:
None
6018
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Fake News
|
And what is the "truth"? Well, your version of it anyway. Brian |
Responses:
[6019]
6019
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Fake News
| i have no idea...only can surmise that it sucks... |
Responses:
None
6006
From: Listen'n2, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Paleontologists discover Human remains in Dinosaur Dung!
|
I don't doubt the story as I've seen pictures of petrified/fossilized (can't think of proper name) human footprints imprinted in mud alongside dinosaur footprints and also pictures of pottery depicting dinosaurs. I've never been regressed don't think I could lend myself to such a release. I've had many snippets of past lives though, none with dinosaurs. I don't think I've gone back any further than 1 thousand years; then again how would one know the era? Time is irreverent. |
6015
From: Jody/Concord,CA, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Paleontologists discover Human remains in Dinosaur Dung!
|
Hi Lar, I linked a video of the fossilized footprints in Texas of Dinosaurs & man. Regarding regression, it's not hard or difficult. You don't surrender your awareness..actually you become super-conscious and even MORE aware of your surroundings. How would I know how long ago? Hmmm well I was pretty much a Neanderthal..reddish brown hair--everywhere, wearing skins and carrying a spear. He had the most acute senses that I wish I had now! The climate was sweltering..thick steamy air, very humid and hot. I was in a lush jungle which fits with the era the Dinosaurs lived in. The Earth had very high CO2 levels then causing plants and animals to grow very large. Seeing that lifetime changed me. Blessings, Jody |
Responses:
[6021]
6021
From: Listen'n2, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Paleontologists discover Human remains in Dinosaur Dung!
|
Jody, I saw your post to Bev on Dreams, it was nicely put. It was good of you to bother to write as much as you did. Regression would be hard for me, I can't seem to lend my body over to someone. I have trouble with MD's dentists and such. Someone suggesting I do so would only result in me resisting Amazon warrior chick ... eh? ;) |
Responses:
None
[ Science/Technology ] [ Main Menu ]