Science/Technology

[ Science/Technology ] [ Main Menu ]


  


4773


Date: February 19, 2014 at 17:08:06
From: horst graben, [DNS_Address]
Subject: abiogenesis :: question never asked in evolution vs creation debate


science has a "priomordial soup" theory for the origin of life ... but a living organism has never been created in the laboratory

even so ... so-called "scientists" BELIEVE in this myth and take it as an "article of faith" in their "religion"

and they laugh at us for BELIEVING in a CREATOR and CREATION





abiogenesis

abiogenesis is "... the study of how biological life arises from inorganic matter through natural processes ..."

"The sequence of chemical events that led to the first nucleic acids is not known."

Pasteur and Darwin

"... on February 1, 1871 ... Charles Darwin addressed the question, suggesting that the original spark of life may have begun in a 'warm little pond, with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, lights, heat, electricity, etc. present, so that a protein compound was chemically formed ready to undergo still more complex changes.' He went on to explain that 'at the present day such matter would be instantly devoured or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed.' In other words, the presence of life itself makes the search for the origin of life dependent on the sterile conditions of the laboratory."

"primordial soup" theory

"... J. B. S. Haldane suggested that the Earth's prebiotic oceans-different from their modern counterparts-would have formed a 'hot dilute soup' in which organic compounds could have formed. This idea was called biopoiesis or biopoesis, the process of living matter evolving from self-replicating but nonliving molecules. ... In 1952, in the Miller-Urey experiment, a mixture of water, hydrogen, methane, and ammonia was cycled through an apparatus that delivered electrical sparks to the mixture. After one week, it was found that about 10% to 15% of the carbon in the system was now in the form of organic compounds, including amino acids, which are the building blocks of proteins. The underlying hypothesis held by Oparin and Haldane was that conditions on the primeval Earth favored chemical reactions that synthesized organic compounds from inorganic precursors."

current models

"There is no truly 'standard model' of the origin of life."


Responses:
[4774] [4776] [4786]


4774


Date: February 19, 2014 at 17:10:25
From: horst graben, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: oops "... science has a "primordial soup" theory ..." (NT)


(NT)


Responses:
[4776] [4786]


4776


Date: February 20, 2014 at 22:22:39
From: Steve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: oops "... science has a "primordial soup" theory...


I tried some primordial soup once but I just couldn't swallow it.


Responses:
[4786]


4786


Date: February 23, 2014 at 11:44:11
From: horst graben, [DNS_Address]
Subject: "... just couldn't swallow ... primordial soup ..." very funny stuff (NT)


(NT)


Responses:
None


[ Science/Technology ] [ Main Menu ]

Generated by: TalkRec 1.17
    Last Updated: 30-Aug-2013 14:32:46, 80837 Bytes
    Author: Brian Steele