| Health
|
[
Health ] [ Main Menu ] |
|
|
|
15012 |
|
|
Date: December 04, 2024 at 14:55:52
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Anthem Blue Cross Won’t Pay for the Complete Duration of Anesthesia |
URL: https://www.asahq.org/about-asa/newsroom/news-releases/2024/11/anthem-blue-cross-blue-shield-will-not-pay-complete-duration-of-anesthesia-for-surgical-procedures |
|
November 14, 2024
Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield Won’t Pay for the Complete Duration of
Anesthesia for Patients’ Surgical Procedures
"Another Example of Insurers Putting Profits Over Patients
CHICAGO – In an unprecedented move, Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield plans
representing Connecticut, New York and Missouri have unilaterally declared it
will no longer pay for anesthesia care if the surgery or procedure goes beyond
an arbitrary time limit, regardless of how long the surgical procedure takes. The
American Society of Anesthesiologists calls on Anthem to reverse this proposal
immediately.
Anesthesiologists provide individualized care to every patient, carefully
assessing the patient’s health prior to the surgery, looking at existing diseases
and medical conditions to determine the resources and medical expertise
needed, attending to the patient during the entire procedure, resolving
unexpected complications that may arise and/or extend the duration of the
surgery, and working to ensure that the patient is comfortable during recovery.
Payment for anesthesia services is based on several factors, including the
exact amount of time for anesthesiologists to deliver care preoperatively, during
the operation, and when transitioning the patient to the recovery unit
afterwards. With this new policy, Anthem will arbitrarily pre-determine the time
allowed for anesthesia care during a surgery or procedure. If an
anesthesiologist submits a bill where the actual time of care is longer than
Anthem's limit, Anthem will deny payment for the anesthesiologist’s care. With
this new policy, Anthem will not pay anesthesiologists for delivering safe and
effective anesthesia care to patients who may need extra attention because
their surgery is difficult, unusual or because a complication arises.
“This is just the latest in a long line of appalling behavior by commercial health
insurers looking to drive their profits up at the expense of patients and
physicians providing essential care,” said Donald E. Arnold, M.D., FACHE, FASA.
“It’s a cynical money grab by Anthem, designed to take advantage of the
commitment anesthesiologists make thousands of times each day to provide
their patients with expert, complete and safe anesthesia care. This egregious
policy breaks the trust between Anthem and its policyholders who expect their
health insurer to pay physicians for the entirety of the care they need.”
ASA urges people concerned about Anthem’s proposal to contact their state
insurance commissioner or their state legislator.
In June 2024, Elevance Health, the corporate name for Anthem, reported a
24.12% increase in its year-over-year net income to $2.3 billion and a 24.29%
increase in its year-over-year net profit margin.
THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGISTS
Founded in 1905, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) is an
educational, research and scientific society with more than 59,000 members
organized to advance the medical practice of anesthesiology and secure its
future. ASA is committed to ensuring anesthesiologists evaluate and supervise
the medical care of all patients before, during, and after surgery. ASA members
also lead the care of critically ill patients in intensive care units, as well as treat
pain in both acute and chronic settings.
For more information on the field of anesthesiology, visit the American Society
of Anesthesiologists online at asahq.org. To learn more about how
anesthesiologists help ensure patient safety, visit
asahq.org/madeforthismoment. Like ASA on Facebook and follow ASALifeline
on X."
###
Date of last update: November 14, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[15020] [15021] [15022] [15018] [15014] |
|
15020 |
|
|
Date: December 06, 2024 at 12:04:18
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Anthem says nevermind... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[15021] [15022] |
|
15021 |
|
|
Date: December 06, 2024 at 14:38:12
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Anthem says nevermind... |
|
|
|
maybe someone should try that with amazon, facebook and tesla too? (dark humor for the overlords out there...)
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[15022] |
|
15022 |
|
|
Date: December 06, 2024 at 15:25:30
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Works for me!(NT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
15018 |
|
|
Date: December 05, 2024 at 22:58:12
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Anthem Blue Cross Won’t Pay for the Complete Duration of... |
URL: https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5025236-anthem-reverses-anesthesia-payment/ |
|
blowback can be effective...
Anthem reverses controversial anesthesia coverage decision amid blowback
by Nathaniel Weixel - 12/05/24 5:34 PM ET
One of the country’s largest insurers said Thursday it was pulling back a change in how it would pay for anesthesia care in certain states, after doctors and politicians loudly protested.
Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield told providers in New York, Connecticut, Missouri and Colorado that beginning in February, it would use Medicare metrics to determine payment rates for anesthesia, which is based on how long and complex a procedure is.
An anesthesiology trade group said the move amounted to having the insurance company put an “arbitrary time limit” on procedures. After a certain point, they said insurance wouldn’t pay.
After major backlash this week, which coincided with the killing of another insurer’s CEO in New York City, Anthem backed off.
“There has been significant widespread misinformation about an update to our anesthesia policy. As a result, we have decided to not proceed with this policy change,” the company said in a statement to The Hill.
The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) initially sent a letter to Anthem protesting the policy in November, calling it a “cynical money grab” and urging Anthem to reverse it immediately.
“In effect, if a patient has a surgery which lasts longer than the standards accepted by Anthem, Anthem has absolved themselves of responsibility to pay for the anesthesia that is needed for the rest of the encounter,” the group said.
They argued that patients would then be on the hook to pay out-of-pocket for the difference if a procedure ran longer than Anthem would pay, which could range from hundreds to thousands of dollars.
But the backlash gained momentum this week after the fatal shooting of an executive at UnitedHealthcare cast a new spotlight on the health insurance industry.
As news spread across social media, politicians in affected states began voicing their outrage.
“This is appalling. Saddling patients with thousands of dollars in surprise additional medical debt. And for what? Just to boost corporate profits?” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) wrote in a post on social platform X. “Reverse this decision immediately.”
“What are they supposed to do? Wake you up and ask if they should keep going” Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) wrote on X.
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) also protested, saying Wednesday on X she was “going to make sure New Yorkers are protected.”
Hochul celebrated the reversal Thursday.
“We pushed Anthem to reverse course on their decision to strip anesthesia coverage away from New Yorkers and today they will be announcing a full reversal of this misguided policy,” she said in a statement. “Don’t mess with the health and well-being of New Yorkers — not on my watch.”
Anthem in its statement said it never intended to deny payments for “medically necessary services.”
“To be clear, it never was and never will be the policy of Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield to not pay for medically necessary anesthesia services. The proposed update to the policy was only designed to clarify the appropriateness of anesthesia consistent with well-established clinical guidelines,” the company said.
If an anesthesiologist submitted a claim for a procedure that took longer than Medicare said it should, Anthem said it would only pay the “established” Medicare rates, which are often significantly lower than private plans pay.
Anthem previously said it would exempt maternity-related care and patients under the age of 22, and that providers can follow a process to dispute claims if they disagree with a reimbursement decision.
Marianne Udow-Phillips, a lecturer at the University of Michigan School of Public Health, who formerly made coverage decisions at Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, said the policy appeared to be an attempt to squeeze anesthesia providers, who are paid differently than other doctors, like surgeons.
Udow-Phillips said the health plan likely felt it was overpaying anesthesiologists, so it was looking for a way to lower costs.
But that kind of decision is usually made in a contract between the payer and provider. If the plan allowed anesthesiologists to bill patients for the difference in rates, that would amount to “surprise billing on steroids,” she said.
Patients “don’t get to choose the anesthesiologist, they don’t control how long the procedure takes, so it unusual to put that responsibility on a patient,” she said.
But she drew a direct line from the outrage over the policy to the death of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, who was shot in Manhattan on Wednesday in what police said appeared to be a targeted attack.
“The anger is not unprecedented,” Udow-Phillips said, but the speed of social media amplifies it.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
15014 |
|
|
Date: December 04, 2024 at 15:27:56
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Anthem Blue Cross Won’t Pay for the Complete Duration of... |
|
|
|
only way to change all that bs is nationalized health care...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
[
Health ] [ Main Menu ] |