| Health
|
[
Health ] [ Main Menu ] |
|
|
|
14996 |
|
|
Date: November 18, 2024 at 20:24:15
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: VACCINATION Proved Useless & Dangerous FROM FORTY-FIVE YEARS OF REGI |
URL: https://archive.org/details/b2136140x/mode/2up?view=theater |
|
VACCINATION
Proved Useless & Dangerous
FROM FORTY-FIVE YEARS OF REGISTRATION STATISTICS.
ALFRED R. WALLACE, LL.D.
complete book on the studies at link
you can read it for yourselves
inside covers reads thus
TO MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT
AND OTHERS.
Forty-five years of Registration Statistics, proving
Vaccination to be both useless and dangerous.
In Two Parts.
BY
ALFRED R. WALLACE, LL.D.
SECOND EDITION. WITH CORRECTIONS, NOTES, AND AN
APPENDIX. By ALEXANDER WHEELER.
Condon i
E. W. ALLEN, 4 Ave Maria Lane.
1889.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[15000] [15001] [15007] [15008] [15009] [15010] [14997] [14998] [14999] |
|
15000 |
|
|
Date: November 20, 2024 at 13:55:17
From: aen, [DNS_Address]
Subject: 1889 and before |
|
|
Vastly different methods.
Not comparable to current times.
Given that I have living family members who can still
tell about the casualties and the brain damage and
bodily damage and institutionalizations from things
like measles, mumps, scarlet fever, etc, and given that
some of the great aunts and uncles died in the iron
lung, and given that we have polio survivors...
Think I'll take my chances with the vaccines.
You want to know what happened to all those in the past
who were left permanently brain damaged by the actual
diseases?:
In light of the fact that brain damage caused by the
diseases themselves is far worse and far more prevalent
than autism is even now, even if vaccines DO cause
autism (they don't), the diseases caused far far far
worse.
Very few family members tell their descendants about
the relatives locked away, institutionalized, starved
to death in attics. Currently due to shame. Back then,
they weren't mentioned because knowing of mental
illness in a family would have resulted in other family
members being unmarriagable. Crazy aunt Tabitha starved
and died unfed screaming in th attic from measles
induced insanity but no one now knows about her because
if they did, you and I likely wouldn't be born as our
grandma or grandpa, crazy aunt Tabitha's sibling,
wouldn't have been able to be married if anyone found
out. They might after all be tainted by the insanity.
And let's not forget becoming a victim of all the
predatory sexual practices if one as a woman was
institutionalized. Institutions were nothing but
glorified prostitution chambers for the so-called
doctors in charge back in those days, which IS well
documented.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[15001] [15007] [15008] [15009] [15010] |
|
15001 |
|
|
Date: November 20, 2024 at 14:03:19
From: Awen, [DNS_Address]
Subject: For what it's worth |
|
|
I do agree that in a beginning phase vaccines are
questionable. Folks here can take this or leave this
because I have nothing to back it up, it's hearsay,
but:
I came from an area where the missionary movements were
big, and I went to uni in anthropology.
I know both a missionary group and a medical group
(connections to the anthro dept) who were in Guatemala
administering the first cervical cancer vaccinations.
It DID have side effects, severe, sometimes deadly, and
I heard it both from the religious and medical side,
both of which at the time were very pro-vaccination but
were left a bit horror stricken at the fallout in
Guatemala.
Eventually they were told to keep quiet about what they
saw. One friend implied it was classified, but that
particular friend is prone to exaggeration so I'm not
sure.
Basically we use third world countries like we did the
Tuskegee Institute these days. It's sick.
Be that as it may, in the early 200os, knowing what I
knew, I wouldn't get the cervical cancer vaccination
despite pressure from doctors. It still hadn't been
completely refined to what it is now, and one still saw
the side effects from it.
Now though it's an everyday thing, everyone gets it,
and I haven't heard about anything above and beyond the
usual rare side effects in about a decade, and every
younger relative I know has had it. Including some of
the guys.
I'd get it now if I were sexually active and it were
offered to my age group. But not as it was then.
As far as COVID was concerned, well, other than the
magnetic spoons, nothing yet. But I am kind of
suffocating under the weight of the spoons and it's
awful hard to type this out.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[15007] [15008] [15009] [15010] |
|
15007 |
|
|
Date: December 01, 2024 at 16:46:43
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: "until now, it hasn't been tested in large scale human trials..." |
URL: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2770485 |
|
excerpt from JAMA Network
September 3, 2020
COVID-19 and mRNA Vaccines—First Large Test for a New Approach
Jennifer Abbasi
Article Information
JAMA. 2020;324(12):1125-1127. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.16866
COVID-19 Resource Center
related articles icon Related
Articles
author interview icon Interviews multimedia icon Multimedia
"On January 10, Chinese researchers posted the novel coronavirus’ RNA
sequence on a preprint server. Immediately, scientists who study genetic
vaccines turned their efforts to the emerging pathogen that causes coronavirus
disease 2019 (COVID-19). They knew that rapid response genetic platforms
could shave precious weeks to months off development, crucial during a
pandemic.
They were right. When the first US clinical trial for a vaccine against severe
acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) began just 66 days
later, volunteers received mRNA-1273, a messenger RNA (mRNA) candidate
codeveloped by biotechnology company Moderna, Inc and the National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).
On July 27, based on encouraging early results, mRNA-1273 and another
mRNA vaccine candidate, BNT162b2 from BioNTech and Pfizer, both entered
phase 3 trials, which together will enroll an estimated 60 000 volunteers. The
milestone came “at a remarkably rapid pace compared to the usual pace for
vaccine preparation,” National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Francis
Collins, MD, PhD, said at a press briefing that day. Results could be available as
early as this fall, NIH officials said.
Despite the unprecedented speed, mRNA vaccines are clinically unproven.
No commercially available vaccines use the platform and, until now, it
hasn’t been tested in large-scale human trials. With COVID-19, that’s all set to
change. Experts said in interviews that if the technology pans out, the
pandemic could help to usher in a new plug-and-play approach to
vaccinology."
CONTINUES
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[15008] [15009] [15010] |
|
15008 |
|
|
Date: December 01, 2024 at 18:40:48
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: "until now, it hasn't been tested in large scale human... |
|
|
|
well, they have been tested now, and seem to work pretty well...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[15009] [15010] |
|
15009 |
|
|
Date: December 01, 2024 at 21:06:56
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: "until now, it hasn't been tested in large scale human... |
|
|
I remember when the covid vaccines began rolling out, the gov publicly claimed
the Mrna vaccines had already been thoroughly tested with human trials and
was proven safe. It was a lie. the roll out of the covid vaccine WAS the human
trial. I'm guessing by your reacting that's not a problem for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[15010] |
|
15010 |
|
|
Date: December 01, 2024 at 21:45:48
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: "until now, it hasn't been tested in large scale human... |
|
|
|
it was a gamble for sure...but one i am glad i took...maybe the alternative would have been better in the long run...dunno...maybe fema shouldn't have come in after helene...i ain't gonna waste my time bitchin' about it...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
14997 |
|
|
Date: November 19, 2024 at 07:56:57
From: shadow , [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: VACCINATION Proved Useless & Dangerous FROM FORTY-FIVE YEARS OF... |
|
|
So...a question, pamela, as I'm sure you've read this in
its entirety and my eyes just won't do it this morning,
the bright background on that online reader is blurring
out the script on me: Does this conclude that
*vaccination, overall,* is a failed endeavor, and that
these diseases should be left to run their courses within
the population?
I'm also noting how ancient this study is...and I'm
wondering whether any observations made that have
anything at all to do with the average person's general
health, i.e., capacity to withstand infection during the
researched years, as compared with now...as well as other
contexts of everyday life that've changed markedly since
then, that could factor in?
Thanks in advance if you can clarify for me, I know
you're often not feeling great yourself, I'll find a way
to get through it at some point if so... ;)
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[14998] [14999] |
|
14998 |
|
|
Date: November 19, 2024 at 15:05:39
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: VACCINATION Proved Useless & Dangerous FROM FORTY-FIVE YEARS... |
|
|
You're up early. Turn down and or adjust your computer
brightness. Its all there to see very clearly maybe
after some coffee. I'm not going to tell you what it
says, but to me having this study done so early on seems
to be spot on. And the testing of such vaccines seems
as confusing as todays, ie, allot of and too much
fibbing going on forcing everyone to take the vaccines
irregardless of the findings.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[14999] |
|
14999 |
|
|
Date: November 19, 2024 at 18:34:15
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: VACCINATION Proved Useless & Dangerous FROM FORTY-FIVE YEARS... |
|
|
|
Okay then…thanks anyway….
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
[
Health ] [ Main Menu ] |