[ Envirowatchers ] [ Main Menu ]
19120
From: Chuckles, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
To be a weather person in the United States Air Force, one needs to have a high or above average IQ, Professor David Dilley knows what he is talking about. |
Responses:
[19162] [19163] [19164] [19147] [19149] [19127] [19131] [19132] [19128] [19129] [19134] [19136] [19138] [19139] [19142] [19143] [19144] [19145] [19146] [19123] [19125] [19122] [19124] [19126] [19130] [19135] [19141]
19162
From: The Hierophant, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
I am not savvy or knowledgeable with weather science- but I have a question- Given ALL the information out there - not only written but on the web - and the different viewpoints that all offer up 'credible' research (or at least the presenters take on it)...with each side presenting information that is supported - how does the 'general public' know which and what to believe? |
19163
From: Chuckles, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
Good reasonable question! Most don't know, heck most today can't tell you which way is North, South, East, or West(I used to give a prehire test to people on Geography along with other stuff), how are they going to know anything about the climate. I myself learned a lot as a young child watching a true meteorologist Pete Giddings on channel 7 news in the Bay Area, I was a weather fanatic, and to this day I love the weather and how it functions. Unfortunately many of those with college degrees in climatology aren't taught in the way that Professor David Dilley can give you the facts, and so they are indoctrinated into the status quo with scientific charts and graphs, but don't learn what Professor Dilley is teaching. Everything is connected with the climate, soil, damming of major rivers, human cause CO2 is minimal compared to natural CO2(something the climate alarmist fail to tell you as they lump it all together as human generated), the sun, how far our planet is from the sun in it's thousands of years orbit around the sun, solar energy being absorbed by our planet, dust particles from the Sahara and Gobi deserts that get swept high into the atmosphere, volcanoes eruptions, forest fires, cutting down of the forest, farming, cities, livestock, and of course, humans, humans messing around with Mother Earth in different experiments especially with aerosol spraying in the atmosphere(very dangerous as it will only enhance and accelerate the incoming global cooling cycle). The general public needs to basically use common sense , be out there in nature themselves and use their inner senses, observe the growth and health of the forest they're in, and most of all, have an open mind about the climate by looking at different sources of information, not just one mindset. In concluding here, I left you with a link with the NEON project that does scientific studies throughout the United States and elsewhere. They have CO2 towers that monitor the atmosphere, water sampling of creeks and rivers, and much more. There's a job site with many job listing for assistants who go hike in the Sierra and the Cascades and elsewhere to do soil and water samples which I will post below this comment. |
Responses:
[19164]
19164
From: Chuckles, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Job Opportunities With Neonscience(NT)
URL: https://www.neonscience.org/get-involved/work-opportunities/careers
| (NT) |
Responses:
None
19147
From: ao, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
Well, Chuckles, I've given your guy a test drive, drove his ideas around for a while, and while Pam has been trying to figure out how to read a graph I remembered a story that seems apropos.. When you said.. "To be a weather person in the United States Air Force, one needs to have a high or above average IQ, Professor David Dilley knows what he is talking about." You were suggesting that this guy, because he had a title, has to be right, right? Well, here's an interesting one for you.. I worked for years at a volcano observatory. We monitored volcanic activity and associated geological processes happening here in Hawaii. At one point a professor, you know a guy with credentials, with letters after his name, came through with his research proposal, and the folks here, even though he seemed to be missing a few, allowed him to come on through, and do whatever he wanted with our data. Seems the guy had decided he saw some correlation between the Space Shuttle launches and volcanic activity in Hawaii. He had a theory that a shuttle's launch disturbed the time space continuum on such a level as to cause volcanoes to erupt. Does that sound plausible to you, Chuckles? Well, needless to say, he eventually stopped trying to convince others of his hypothesis and faded away. But you know, if that guy was still around today I am sure that instead of fading away he would have gone off and started himself a YouTube channel.. Makes one wonder.. eh? |
Responses:
[19149]
19149
From: Chuckles, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
URL: https://www.quora.com/profile/Professor-David-Dilley-GlobalWeatherCycles
|
Which is more dangerous, global warming, or global cooling? According to a book(Secrets of the Soil)I gave to Ryan many years ago, and haven't read it since, a ice age is much more dangerous than global warming. Icicles in the Greenhouse in the book had some good information. If you were the CIA, and knew that a ice age was eventually coming, and were aware of the dangerous ramifications that would incur such as wars and famine, don't you think the CIA would be pushing the global warming narrative as not to cause panic? Whether you like it or not, the earth is going to get scary cold, and panic will set in as the indoctrinated won't be able to wrap their heads around it. And people like me and others who have tried to point you and others in the non political science direction, it appears you'll have to witness the cooling signs as they become more frequent, to the point where it cannot be denied. Sounds like you had a interesting job there. Is that your photo that Ryan uses for Earthboppin? Left you another link with information that you're not comprehending. |
Responses:
None
19127
From: ao, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
Heynow Chuckles, thanks for sharing your manao. Your guy says that 2022-2023 was the coldest spring-summers in the arctic on record and I find that an interesting stretch.. so I poked around and here's what NOAA has to say about 2022-2023.. (map) Surface temperatures in July-September 2023 compared to the 1991-2020 average. Some areas were 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit or more above average (darkest red). (graph) Summer temperatures (July-September) each year from 1940-2023, showing rapid warming in recent decades. NOAA Climate.gov image, based on ERA5 data from Siiri Bigalke. NOAA’s 2023 Arctic Report Card documents new records showing that human-caused warming of the air, ocean and land is affecting people, ecosystems and communities across the Arctic region, which is heating up faster than any other part of the world. “The overriding message from this year’s report card is that the time for action is now,” said Rick Spinrad, Ph.D., NOAA administrator, in a press release. “NOAA and our federal partners have ramped up our support and collaboration with state, tribal and local communities to help build climate resilience. At the same time, we as a nation and global community must dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions that are driving these changes.” The annual Arctic Report Card, now in its 18th year, is the work of 82 authors from 13 countries. It includes a section titled Vital Signs, that updates eight measures of physical and biological changes, four chapters on emerging issues and a special report on the 2023 summer of extreme wildfires. Below are some image-based highlights from this year's report. With record-hot summer, Arctic experiences its sixth-warmest year on record The past year, October 2022–September 2023, was the sixth-warmest year in the Arctic since records began in 1900. It was the 14th consecutive year in which Arctic temperatures exceeded the 1991–2020 average, according to the Arctic Report Card: Update for 2023. (The Arctic monitoring year runs from October of one year to September of the next to span the region’s cold season.) This map shows average surface temperatures in summer (July-September) 2023 compared to the 1991-2020 average. Places where it was warmer or cooler than average are colored red or blue. Intense warmth was present in western North America, northern Greenland, and western Russia. Only a few locations were cooler than average, and none of them strongly so. The widespread warmth averaged out to a record-warm summer, shown by the graph. Based on ERA5 data from the Copernicus Climate Change group, the graph shows summer temperatures from 1940-2023 compared to the 1991-2020 average. It’s been nearly 20 years since the Arctic experienced a cooler than average summer. Unusual warmth in northern Canada coincided with below-normal precipitation, contributing to the region’s extreme wildfire season and resulting smoke in the United States. Unusual warmth in Greenland contributed to a cumulative melt-day area approaching the all-time record on the Greenland Ice Sheet. “Arctic amplification” is a widely recognized phenomenon in which human-caused global warming is amplified at the poles, causing the Arctic to warm more quickly than the rest of the globe. Multiple factors enhance warming at high latitudes, but the main one is that warming reduces snow and ice, which would otherwise reflect incoming sunlight. As this graph indicates, Arctic temperatures have risen at least twice as fast as global temperatures, possibly even faster, since the year 2000. The Arctic’s eight warmest years on record have all occurred since 2016, according to the Arctic Report Card authors. |
Responses:
[19131] [19132] [19128] [19129] [19134] [19136] [19138] [19139] [19142] [19143] [19144] [19145] [19146]
19131
From: Chuckles, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
URL: https://www.globalweatheroscillations.com/2022-greenland-ice-snow
|
I would suggest you go to his website and study the climate change education videos. |
Responses:
[19132]
19132
From: ao, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
Yeah, Chuckles, I'll leave that for those so inclined. Good luck. You know, when I started monitoring volcanic activity we had limited tools so we worked our asses off for little data, and as such spent a lot of time filling in the details with assumptions.. and yeah a guy/gal can surely shape the data to fit a supposition. For instance, I spent a few years reoccupying a level line every few weeks. It was just a simple line made with a level and a rod. that had maybe 15 - 18 data points on it, that radiated out from a local magma body we were measuring to observe changes in magma volume over time. And that line took 4 of us all day to measure. Fifteen points along a two mile line that we used to model a 3D magma body. A simple line who's data we used to imagine what was going on under our feet. Whereas today, we have inSar, or Interferometric synthetic-aperture radar, which with a couple of passes a satellite can provide a map of deformation that covers miles, tens of miles, a hundred miles of the changes of the land's shape without a guy getting out of bed. It's phenomenal, and I get chicken skin every time I look at one image, let alone a whole series. And that's just one data point among dozens we can use to determine the 'shape' of things and what's going on to make then. All's to say, NASA, NOAA, you know, the big boys, have a phenomenal amount of toys, and when they are employed together they create highly detailed images of what's going on here. And, as you suggest I visit your guy's, I'd highly recommend you follow along, you might learn something.. Regardless, thanks for sharing.. |
Responses:
None
19128
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
Seems you are citing Summer 2023 only. Not 2022 2023 spring summer . Also I asked the meteorologist on his channel please site where he's getting his info from-- for the Arctic and Antarctic since he doesn't cite the info and only shows graphics. |
Responses:
[19129] [19134] [19136] [19138] [19139] [19142] [19143] [19144] [19145] [19146]
19129
From: ao, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
Try looking at the graph in my post.. There's the map on the left that covers only 2023, but the graph on the right covers all the way back to 1940, and shows not only the highs but a trace of the entire year cycle of summer to winter throughout the years. |
Responses:
[19134] [19136] [19138] [19139] [19142] [19143] [19144] [19145] [19146]
19134
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
URL: https://youtu.be/NeFePI1nW1Y?si=JGJDapFyytJSGBbZ&t=1487
|
Again you are showing only part of the info- this report card from NOAA did not include the 2022-2023 spring summer and on the graph to the right- same thing. So its not a complete report. On the link provided, I watched his video again and it gives references for his report at that time and showing also more graphs with references , starting at 24:47 onwards. |
Responses:
[19136] [19138] [19139] [19142] [19143] [19144] [19145] [19146]
19136
From: ao, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
The report I posted says.. "October 2022–September 2023, was the sixth-warmest year in the Arctic since records began in 1900" There is no way to imagine the few months proceeding that time frame was the coldest on record. Methinks anyone saying as much is playing on their viewer's gullibility. And, besides, the graph shows continuous data from 1940. If you don't see that I can't help. Sorry. |
Responses:
[19138] [19139] [19142] [19143] [19144] [19145] [19146]
19138
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
At May 15, 2024 at 14:42:19, ao wrote: The report I posted says.. "October 2022–September 2023, was the sixth-warmest year in the Arctic since records began in 1900" thats the problem, the report is only showing Oct 2022- Sept 23. Why cannot you understand this? Obvious you are not following along with his graphs/references and data and don't care to-- thats not my problem and I can't help you. Later, babe. |
19139
From: ao, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
Please explain to me the right side of the graphics below.. The caption that goes with it says.. Graph on the right: Summer temperatures (July-September) each year from 1940-2023, showing rapid warming in recent decades. NOAA Climate.gov image, based on ERA5 data from Siiri Bigalke. That's 1940-2023.. ie 1940 thru 2023. And it's a continuous plot showing all the temps throughout the years.. summer, winter, spring and fall. Can you read that? Is it clear enough for you? Or do you need all your information to come from wannabes on Youtube who's only concern is that you like them? Should I make a channel would that make it easier for your to understand? Or is NASA, and NOAA just so much bullshit to you? |
19142
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
>>Or do you need all your information to come from wannabes on Youtube who's only concern is that you like them? Should I make a channel would that make it easier for your to understand? Or is NASA, and NOAA just so much bullshit to you? Professor Dilley worked for NOAA for many years.... Hes semi retired now. So since NASA and NOAA both are on youtube. . . .your hate list, they both make tons of money from tax payers/grants, etc- they must think they really need our money and look to them favorably to exist... Dilley has his own non youtube channel, ie a regular website just like NASA and NOAA and still works well into his 80's. A wanna be? Hardly. Now to your persistent question: Please explain to me the right side of the graphics below.. The caption that goes with it says.. Graph on the right: Summer temperatures (July- September) each year from 1940-2023, showing rapid warming in recent decades. NOAA Climate.gov image, based on ERA5 data from Siiri Bigalke. --- Dilley is showing Spring and Summer anomalies and is also showing the warming and cooling temps for thousands of years. I don't want to go on and on about this- you either want to learn more or you do not. Best of luck to you. ps, my late husband worked for a division of NASA, got a Snoopy award for his work. Died in 2012. |
19143
From: ao, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
The red line in the plot is the temperature, measured in Celsius on the left and Fahrenheit on the right, and plotted using the average temperature for the years between 1991 and 2020 as the mean (vertical center). And, as you can see, the temps are so high over the last fifteen years that the winter temps (the troughs in the annual cycles on the plot) have been higher than the summer temps (the ridges on the plot) in the preceding years. |
19144
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
Yes, the Artic and Antarctic are getting warmer-- he explains why that is. |
19145
From: ao, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
Methinks you need to find a better source of information. Youtube isn’t it. But hey, maybe the real question is why are you attracted to charlatans? Why are you afraid of the truth? Good luck in your inquiries. |
Responses:
[19146]
19146
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
I watched the youtube NASA site on line last night-- live- feed- showing two astronauts showing they could do summersaults on the ISS- our hard earned tax dollars at work- say what you will- |
Responses:
None
19123
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
| i guess it's a wee probability, but highly unlikely imo... |
Responses:
[19125]
19125
From: Chuckles, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
Wee may highly likely see soon enough! |
Responses:
None
19122
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
Excellent presentation- only 47 mins long - I'm halfway thru it- thanks.. Have seen/watched several of his documentaries - |
19124
From: Chuckles, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
You just watch Pamela, and I'm saying it here first, Central American countries when they catch on to what's really going on with this oncoming cooling trend, will make new immigration laws for their countries, and you'll see many immigrants returning back to their home countries. My personal feelings is that it will be much worse than what Professor David Dilley is saying due to massive volcanic eruptions happening due to the earth bulging, which will quickened and deepen the cooling trend into a full blown mini ice age. |
19126
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
You can say it here first but many of us dreamers all had these dream visions of what the climate (including increased volcanic eruptions)was headed to-- Marja, Me, Kay, many others dreamed it - saw it and posted about it for years. |
19130
From: Chuckles, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
I know about the dreams, I'm talking about Central America countries tightening their borders. |
19135
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
At May 15, 2024 at 06:03:32, Chuckles wrote: I know about the dreams, I'm talking about Central America countries tightening their borders. ------ thanks, I understand-- already those immigrants coming into NY areas in winter time and not being able to find housing- are telling themselves and others it was a mistake when they were spending cold/snow on the streets -some with tents and some without. |
Responses:
[19141]
19141
From: Chuckles, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Global Warming Will Be Dead By 2030
|
I've actually spoken to a couple of people from Central America who went back to their home country because not so much due to the weather in California, but thought our society is just a little too fast for them, in other words, our society is crazy, they wanted nothing to do with it. But I can imagine many of them didn't know what they were getting themselves into by being in New York, Chicago, or anywhere where it's cold with high crime. |
Responses:
None
[ Envirowatchers ] [ Main Menu ]