[ Envirowatchers ] [ Main Menu ]
16647
From: shatterbrain, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Study shows link between earthquakes and global warming
|
"Earthquakes are hugely important globally, effecting millions of people every day. The research of Dr Brandes and his colleagues is key to develop clear pictures of how these phenomena change the nature of the sediments under our feet. Perhaps more critically, their work reveals how earthquakes are quite likely to be influenced by climate change, as the effects increase over the coming decades. " |
16648
From: sequoia, [DNS_Address]
Subject: NO
|
Hi shatterbrain, it is unclear to me who wrote the condensation of words of which you present the first paragraph. If the author is Brandes himself he is not doing himself a favor. While earthquakes can certainly be considered globally important they do NOT affect millions of people every day. Anyone who makes such a claim has demonstrated a complete loss of reality. Furthermore there is nothing in the entire Brandes article which proves "that earthquakes are likely to be influenced by climate change, as the effects increase over the coming decades". In the link you refer to https://www.scientia.global/dr-christian-brandes-can-climate- change-cause-earthquakes/ it is said that "In particular, they explore how the melting and movement of glaciers, such as that caused by human-induced climate change, can trigger earthquakes." To this day there is still no unquestionable proof for climate change outside of natural bounds which are predominantly influenced by the sun and even less, ZERO exactly, for human- induced climate variations. Obviously humans alter their environments in crazy ways as anyone can see who looks at the endless chemtrails being dumped into the high atmosphere. The poisoneous compounds are subsequently washed out and rained down with our drinking water onto every rock, tree, human, plant, animal. But where is Greta darling denouncing the chemtrailers? Does she have no eyes to look up to the skies during her travels? The chemtrail soup blocks incoming light from the sun and has therefore an immediate cooling effect diminishing plant growth. Considering the fact that, as someone posted yesterday, an unusually early blizzard in the upper midwest may cause devastating crop losses it is beyond stupid to block sunlight required for photosynthesis. The blocking of sunlight by dumping poison into the atmosphere would only make sense if someone has an agenda of human habitat destruction. sequoia |
16649
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: you can contact the author here is his e-mail address...
|
It's in the article near the bottom (the part that was copied and pasted). You would probably have a better chance for a answer/response if you contacted the one who wrote the article: brandes@geowi.uni-hannover.de |
16650
From: sequoia, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: you can contact the author here is his e-mail address...
|
Hi Eve, thanks for supplying the email address. I kind of doubt that Brandes wrote that disqualifying comment. But people do everything nowadays to catch some of the money and attention that comes with climate change. It's a money maker and grant giver. Perhaps you want to get into studying the changes in Floridian climate yourself and apply for an initial grant. For starters you could focus on how the bi-annual migration of gators in highly susceptible wetlands is affected by increased air and water temperatures and humidity bordering on San Francisco fog. You could set up a 24h/365days gator watching station on your patio accompanied by an automatic frog counter and even hire an assistant or two who can produce some climate statistics. Hope all is well in your backyard. sequoia |
16651
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: you can contact the author here is his e-mail address...
|
16654
From: sheila, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: you can contact the author here is his e-mail address...
|
well done Eve! Over the years I've been reporting the effects of climate change and how we humans add to the mix. For anybody to deny that fact is just so wrong on so many levels it begs description so I'll take that kitty with the buggy eyes, says it better than I ever could. Sequoia is living in La La land! LOL |
Responses:
[16655]
16655
From: sequoia, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: you can contact the author here is his e-mail address...
|
Hi sheila, you like Redhart have a very narrow set of beliefs which you twiddle here and sell there usually without providing sufficient evidence. Never and nowhere did I say that humans are not influencing their environment, quite to the contrary. They have completely corrupted their electromagnetic environment with high voltage lines, medium and low voltage lines, with radio, radar, tv, smart phones, electric appliances, automobiles, trucks, airplanes, stinking two wheelers, lawn mowers, chain saws. Now Elon Musk wants to send 30000 microwave beamers into space so that you can communicate more easily with your neighbor which you could best do by just walking over their knocking on the door. The good Elon will microwave everything and everyone on this planet. So you better have your bacon and eggs ready for cooking when his satellites beam down their intelligence. But where are you or Redhart in defending an electromagnetically natural environment? You are nowhere to be found. Rather you choose to call me a lalalander. Now, I can tell you lalaland is a really nice place. It is where good ideas prosper without chains around and concrete in the brain. Earth's climate is dominated by the sun, a continuous stream of light, particles, electromagnetic waves, plus countless internal processes of the earth including volcanic eruptions, external cosmic influences from cosmic rays which influence the production of cloud cover. So you better start studying what controls earth's climate before you blast your clouds of tentative ridicule out into your neighborhood. sequoia |
Responses:
None
[ Envirowatchers ] [ Main Menu ]