[ Envirowatchers ] [ Main Menu ]
16583
From: Logan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Off script, climate hysteria child Greta Thunberg barely answers basic
URL: “You gin up a crisis and you demand the population submits to your will, or else
|
Off script, climate hysteria child Greta Thunberg can barely answer basic questions or explain anything Greta Thunberg and fellow child activists seemed to run short on words after exhausting talking points at a recent press conference in New York City. Thunberg, along with 15 other “child petitioners,” were assembled at the Headquarters of the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) to announce a “landmark complaint to the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child . . . to urge the independent body to order Member States to take action to protect children from the devastating impacts of climate change.” Following statements read and recited by adults and children on the panel, members of the press were granted an opportunity to pose questions. Tomas Kvarnkullen, a reporter with Swedish media outlet Expressen directed two basic question at Thunberg. “What kind of message would you send, by doing this, to world leaders, and also can I ask you, do you think it’s about time President Trump would respond to what you have said today?” Kvarnkullen asked. Thunberg responded, “I think… I’m sorry, what was the first question?” Kvarnkullen repeated his original question. “I think what we would want to send is — the message we want to send is to say that, ‘We have had enough.’ And… does anyone else want to answer that question? I can’t speak on behalf of everyone.” Thunberg then asked Kvarnkullen to pose his follow-up question to other children on the panel. Fox News host Tucker Carlson summed up the driving forces behind the Greta Thunberg ‘phenomenon’ succinctly during his television show earlier this week. “The point now is political power,” Carlson said. “You gin up a crisis and you demand the population submits to your will, or else. If you do that, you don’t need to fight fair or acknowledge democracy or even make a rational case for your position. You do whatever it takes. You’ll even use children if it helps.” “When you use children to demand power, they become a kind of human shield. You can hide safely behind them. No one can criticize you. But who would do something that unscrupulous? Anyone who would do that is someone who would literally do anything to seize control, and that’s exactly what they are doing.” As Infowars recently reported, one of Thunberg’s adult ‘coaches’ is German climate activist Luisa- Marie Neubauer, a “Youth Ambassador” for the “ONE” foundation, an international lobbying organization funded by George Soros, Bill and Melinda Gates, Bono and others. |
Responses:
[16590] [16596] [16594] [16597] [16598] [16601] [16593] [16584] [16599] [16600] [16586] [16588] [16589]
16590
From: sequoia, [DNS_Address]
Subject: arguments against climate hysteria
|
Hi Logan, it just so happens, by synchronicity not by random coincidence I assume, that the following article sums up a number of arguments which will drive many climate hysterians way up to new heights, beyond the Eiffel tower for sure, possibly even higher than the CN tower in Toronto. https://www.sott.net/article/421626-The-Top-10-Arguments-Against- Climate-Hysteria sequoia |
16596
From: Alan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: arguments against climate hysteria
|
sott.net sequoia - Not by any chance the website of Laura Knight Jadczy? in fact are you LKJ by any chance? Laura Knight Jadczyk (hereafter referred to as LKJ) is a batshit insane blogger and crank, who calls herself a "scientific mystic and PaleoChristian Shaman." She is primarily notable for her role in purveying Comet Elenin and Planet X/Nibiru woo, but she is also into free energy, Mossad conspiracies, the 9/11 truth movement, the Denver Airport conspiracy theory, the New World Order, Earth changes, alien abduction, and HAARP. It seems LKJ never met a piece of pseudoscience, she didn't like, and she's a crank and moonbat par excellence in a political wilderness. She's Gene Ray with slightly better writing skills. In late 2011, her aforementioned Sign of the Times website started to have some legal trouble, though exactly what the trouble is isn't clear. It also coincided with them asking for donations, with those pledging a certain amount getting "A Telephone Into the FUTURE." The post also states that the 2012 apocalypse is a fake... but because it is so well known and "smacks of a set up." That's right, the 2012 theories are a false flag operation by psychopaths. |
Responses:
None
16594
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: arguments against climate hysteria
|
Not in hysterics here but it's true that the garden is overcome by weeds by lack of care of the ones who were created to keep it right side up...hence destruction. |
16597
From: sequoia, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: arguments against climate hysteria
|
Hi Eve, I agree with you that the beautiful bountiful garden which earth was a long time ago is being destroyed by those who are supposed to tend to the garden, or in your words "to keep the right side up". Climate hysteria is actually making it much worse because the real problems are not addressed at all, for example the excessive, unnecessary, extremely wasteful use of energy, in particular electricity, everywhere on this planet. The climate hysterians are carrying out a political agenda which has nothing to do with climate at all. It is an agenda of controlling other people. sequoia |
16598
From: Teresa N Cal, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Yep
|
Religion and fear mongering were used to control. Religion doesn't work so another way has been found. Taking our money. Don't look at the sun cycles. The cycles that our planet goes thru. Ignore solar forcing. Don't prepare for growing food and housing for the next cycle. Lets blame it all on the people for their sins and tax them more. All the while continuing trade with polluting, human exploiting countries because we gotta have those cheap products. |
Responses:
[16601]
16601
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: ?
|
What religious group is fear mongering about the climate and using their religion as controlling what in that sense? I am not sure what religious group you are referring to. Solar forcing is one component of a bunch of data taken by others you don't even know and circle an argument around that only makes no sense given it's a known that human destruction and rearranging of the elements does change the weather. Some things one cannot prepare for via their flesh and that is the end of this world and time is up in that regard. Won't be time enough for anyone to take anyones money and they won't be needing it anyways plus man made taxes will be the least of anyones concerns. |
Responses:
None
16593
From: chatillion, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Thank you, Sequoia!(NT)
| (NT) |
Responses:
None
16584
From: Redhart, [DNS_Address]
Subject: News wars: fake news/conspiracy/unreliable - warning
|
🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩 "QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources. Overall, we rate NewsWars Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of pseudoscience and conspiracies as well as the publication of fake news from poor sources. Detailed Report Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Some Fake News..." |
16599
From: Teresa N Cal, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Snarky(NT)
| (NT) |
Responses:
[16600]
16600
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Barky!(NT)
| (NT) |
Responses:
None
16586
From: sequoia, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Redhart: extremely biased, yelling at whoever disagrees
|
Hi Redhart, it seem have fired up your Tibetan plateau powered denouncer mill again so you can throw your ample bias at everyone who does not agree with you. Except on very few occasions where you narrate your own experiences such as around Loma Prieta, your comments on earthbopping are extremely biased. You don't follow links to original articles presented by fellow posters (or embedded in the articles presented) but yell at them in a propaganda like fashion. Therefore, according to the definition you present here, you yourself have become a questionable source. You are losing your credibility. Greta darling is a grossly misused child, severely disturbed and has insufficient knowledge of global CO2 and temperature cycles. She has been misused by her parents for at least for years, for financial and power gain, by her many handlers. She has become sort of a climate prostitute as a result of brainwashing by many people with a not so good agenda. You are not just making a fool of yourself but you are actively participating in exploiting a child, wielding the words of a 16-year old know-nothing like a pitchfork in order to gain acceptance of your opinion because you have run out of factual arguments. sequoia |
16588
From: Redhart, [DNS_Address]
Subject: sequoia: extremely tedious full of jibber-jabber psuedoscience
| go fish :) |
Responses:
[16589]
16589
From: sequoia, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Redhart: without facts again but with an aggressive mouth
|
Hi Redgofishhart, first: it's pseudoscience not psuedoscience which by itself may be an innovation on your part, could be short for psu edo science perhaps, as in probable shaking units edo science. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edo_period Plus it is not a good time for fishing as hot dry is supposed to take over in parts of Northern California prompting PG&E to announce possible power shutoffs to avoid wildfires. Without power and without wildfires no gofish could be fried to taste. Now, if a gofish would jump out of the Lake Tahoe exit to the Truckee river into a big enough pan prepared for said Redharty gofish then a fishless week might be avoided, unless the pan itself decides to reject gofish of the Redhart type due to extreme bias of said gofish. I also wonder if gofish are anticyclic to earthquakes or procyclic, or even precyclic, as in precursor. sequoia |
Responses:
None
[ Envirowatchers ] [ Main Menu ]