| Envirowatchers
|
[
Envirowatchers ] [ Main Menu ] |
|
|
|
16557 |
|
|
Date: October 02, 2019 at 21:46:28
From: Logan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Climate change that ignores history |
URL: The UN is using climate change as a tool not an issue |
|
Climate has ALWAYS changed from decade to decade.
There were major swings (volatility) during the
1930s. You had the dust bowl during the summer and in
1936 you had record cold. The 1936 North American
cold wave, which also hit Japan and China, still rank
among the most intense cold waves in the recorded
history of North America. You cannot blame this on
soccer moms driving the kids around town burning
fossil fuels. Cars were a luxury in the 1930s still.
There is just no evidence of human-induced climate
change. There is nobody willing to call them out on
this nonsense with just showing the dramatic swings
in temperature over the centuries.
Here is a piece that appeared in the Weekend
Australian on the covert issues behind the curtain.
We have been subjected to extravagance from climate
catastrophists for close to 50 years.
In January 1970, Life magazine, based on “solid
scientific evidence”, claimed that by 1985 air
pollution would reduce the sunlight reaching the
Earth by half. In fact, across that period sunlight
fell by between 3 per cent and 5 per cent. In a 1971
speech, Paul Ehrlich said: “If I were a gambler I
would take even money that England will not exist in
the year 2000.”
Fast forward to March 2000 and David Viner, senior
research scientist at the Climatic Research Unit,
University of East Anglia, told The Independent,
“Snowfalls are now a thing of the past.” In December
2010, the Mail Online reported, “Coldest December
since records began as temperatures plummet to minus
10C bringing travel chaos across Britain”.
We’ve had our own busted predictions. Perhaps the
most preposterous was climate alarmist Tim Flannery’s
2005 observation: “If the computer records are right,
these drought conditions will become permanent in
eastern Australia.” Subsequent rainfall and severe
flooding have shown the records or his analysis are
wrong. We’ve swallowed dud prediction after dud
prediction. What’s more, the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, which we were instructed was the
gold standard on global warming, has been exposed
repeatedly for misrepresentation and shoddy methods.
Weather bureaus appear to have “homogenised” data to
suit narratives. NASA’s claim that 2014 was the
warmest year on record was revised, after challenge,
to only 38 per cent probability. Extreme weather
events, once blamed on global warming, no longer are,
as their frequency and intensity decline.
Why then, with such little evidence, does the UN
insist the world spend hundreds of billions of
dollars a year on futile climate change policies?
Perhaps Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of
the UN’s Framework on Climate Change has the answer?
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[16558] [16566] [16569] [16560] [16568] [16559] [16561] [16564] [16562] [16563] |
|
16558 |
|
|
Date: October 02, 2019 at 22:52:38
From: Redhart, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Natural News (most discredited site on the web) |
URL: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/natural-news/ |
|
🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩
"CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may
publish unverifiable information that is not always
supported by evidence. These sources may be
untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information,
therefore fact checking and further investigation is
recommended on a per article basis when obtaining
information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-
Pseudoscience sources.
Overall, we rate Natural News a Questionable source
based on promotion of quackery level pseudoscience and
conspiracy theories, as well as extreme right wing
bias. This is one of the most discredited sources on
the internet.
Detailed Report
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA...(full report at link)
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[16566] [16569] [16560] [16568] [16559] [16561] [16564] [16562] [16563] |
|
16566 |
|
|
Date: October 03, 2019 at 19:43:27
From: Logan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Discredited by brainless, truth hating drones with an agenda(NT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[16569] |
|
16569 |
|
|
Date: October 03, 2019 at 20:26:20
From: Redhart, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Discredited by brainless, truth hating drones with an agenda(NT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
16560 |
|
|
Date: October 03, 2019 at 02:52:45
From: sequoia, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Natural News (is worth reading) |
|
|
Hi Redhart,
this regenerative post is to demonstrate your quasicyclic jump-on-
trigger posting attitude.
It goes like (from my previous post):
"""
you are making a fool out of yourself by denouncing info from
Natural News simply because it is coming from Natural News.
It makes you sound like a catastrophically damaged vinyl record
which blares out the same stuff whenever the needle touches a
defective spot which causes a quasicyclic jump and endless
repetition.
"""
This time I only replaced a few words in the subject line which you
may or may not notice because of your increasingly sticky chronic
repetition syndrome.
While writing my previous message I was too distracted by your
subliminally aggressive undertone to change your incorrect and
misleading content of the subject line.
sequoia
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[16568] |
|
16568 |
|
|
Date: October 03, 2019 at 20:02:32
From: long timer, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Natural News (is worth reading) NOT |
|
|
in fact, even FB has banned them on FB
"Facebook on Sunday (June 2019) removed the
prominent health and conspiracy site Natural News
from its platform and banned its incendiary founder
from posting content".
and
this from Forbes: "If you don’t know who Mike
“Health Ranger” Adams is, he may be a steadfast
presence in your social media newsfeed without your
knowledge. Awarded the top slot on Real Clear
Science’s “Worst Websites for Science in 2016” list"
Just enter 'is Natural News legit' and see what
comes up - but then again, you probably think that
that is all 'fake news'...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
16559 |
|
|
Date: October 03, 2019 at 02:37:52
From: sequoia, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Natural News (most discredited site on the web) |
|
|
Hi Redhart,
you are making a fool out of yourself by denouncing info from
Natural News simply because it is coming from Natural News.
It makes you sound like a catastrophically damaged vinyl record
which blares out the same stuff whenever the needle touches a
defective spot which causes a quasicyclic jump and endless
repetition.
sequoia
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[16561] [16564] [16562] [16563] |
|
16561 |
|
|
Date: October 03, 2019 at 09:37:31
From: Redhart, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Natural News (most discredited site on the web) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[16564] [16562] [16563] |
|
16564 |
|
|
Date: October 03, 2019 at 17:09:47
From: Teresa N Cal, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Natural News (most discredited site on the web) |
|
|
Apparently "Go Fish" has replaced her, "beating a dead
horse" response.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
16562 |
|
|
Date: October 03, 2019 at 15:27:34
From: sequoia, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Natural News (good info source but disliked by Redhart) |
|
|
Hi Redhart,
sooner or later your name will transmutate, by climate change
induced gene splicing, into Redgofishhart or similar permutation.
At the very least you could supply some real rainbow trout or Alaska
salmon whenever you issue a gofish command. I have no time to
look for your fish which may be real fake to start with.
sequoia
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[16563] |
|
16563 |
|
|
Date: October 03, 2019 at 16:16:50
From: Redhart, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Natural News (good info source but disliked by Redhart) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
[
Envirowatchers ] [ Main Menu ] |