Envirowatchers
|
[
Envirowatchers ] [ Main Menu ] |
|
|
|
16129 |
|
|
Date: May 30, 2019 at 23:56:29
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Testing Verizon 5G in Chicago: Speedy, But Watch Out for That Tree |
URL: https://www.pcmag.com/news/368433/testing-verizon-5g-in-chicago-speedy-but-watch-out-for-tha?fbclid=IwAR1P0zks0kgLVJWep8GNxCNVJtgK5Poeo67ZNB-VBKr7vm2f5Kosesl685A |
|
just giving short excerpt here- not clear about copy paste, full article as it gives copyright notice - saying need permission. So read it at site-thks.
ps In N Ireland and the rest of parts of UK they are hacking down trees left and right. Been watching it go on for months now. I just posted the 5G first LIVE broadcast on International- it was taking place in London. Its kinda funny when you watch their first run at it-see that short BBC short interview. So for all the trees being destroyed and this article says so... trees are a problem. News & Analysis / Testing Verizon 5G in Chicago: Speedy, But Watch Out for That Tree On the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, we saw speeds up to 1.17Gbps with an unobstructed cell site 500 feet away. But millimeter-wave technology is still finicky and obstacles are an issue.
By Sascha Segan May 17, 2019 12:05PM EST
PC Magazine Best Tech Reviews | PCMag.com Ad By Ziff Davis
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[16130] [16131] [16132] [16133] [16137] [16142] [16141] [16135] [16139] [16140] [16153] [16157] [16158] [16159] |
|
16130 |
|
|
Date: May 31, 2019 at 04:28:56
From: Alan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Testing Verizon 5G in Chicago: Speedy, But Watch Out for That Tree |
URL: https://www.skyandtelescope.com/observing/spacex-launches-starlink-satellites/ |
|
"So for all the trees being destroyed and this article says so... trees are a problem. "
I presume you've been protesting for many decades against trees being cut down oddly enough just so you have a landline phone, power, railways and roads...
Good news about the 60 5G satellites launched - with 12,000 more satellites coming online soon that should save a few trees ;-)
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[16131] [16132] [16133] [16137] [16142] [16141] [16135] [16139] [16140] [16153] [16157] [16158] [16159] |
|
16131 |
|
|
Date: May 31, 2019 at 06:35:31
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Testing Verizon 5G in Chicago: Speedy, But Watch Out for That Tree |
|
|
So what's the rush then and why even bother to cut them down when wonder boy is here to save the day; you know the loon who wants to also save humanity from being over run by AI by offering humans the deal of connecting their brains to a computer...(already posted the video of him talking about this and how one just down loads their brain to an AI/computer) you might ask what "choice" humans will be able to afford that. Or still be alive to do so. bbwwaahhhhaaa, you techies are not green or sane. Will her majesty or the prince Charles environmentalist like the idear of having all of the royal trees cut down - or will Elon Musk-iteer get all of his sats in place just in time to save their trees at least. I can just see it now, the royals walking around with AI computer brains - wireless no less, instead of the bejeweled crowns. Oh happy days. (sarc)
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[16132] [16133] [16137] [16142] [16141] [16135] [16139] [16140] [16153] [16157] [16158] [16159] |
|
16132 |
|
|
Date: May 31, 2019 at 12:31:18
From: Alan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Testing Verizon 5G in Chicago: Speedy, But Watch Out for That Tree |
URL: https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk |
|
"you techies are not green or sane."
Said the conspiracy theorist sitting at a electronic computer after having watched a load of nonsense on wootube
"Will her majesty or the prince Charles environmentalist like the idear of having all of the royal trees cut down"
You really do spout ludicrous notions out the top of your head - how many trees do you think the Royals own through Crown Estates - really do some research if you believe that they will '"all" be cut down
http://www.windsorgreatpark.co.uk/en
and then this which is directly applicable to you:
"Fox News broadcasters like Tucker Carlson push some of the same conspiracy theories — such as fears about 5G networks — that Russian media outlets do, and pro- Trump outlets like One America News Network do the same thing."
You really are being played > http://earthboppin.net/talkshop/national/messages/304254.html
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[16133] [16137] [16142] [16141] [16135] [16139] [16140] [16153] [16157] [16158] [16159] |
|
16133 |
|
|
Date: May 31, 2019 at 20:01:33
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Testing Verizon 5G in Chicago: Speedy, But Watch Out for That Tree |
|
|
Again, "so whats the rush"? if Elon is going to save the day? hmmmm? why cut down all these trees for nothing if the satellites are going to do "the job"?
There are lots of trees around the royal palaces. If they use 5g, won't they too be subject to tree cutting? The councillors in UK are doing it all over UK, why not the palaces? I use the term "all" not as in all inclusive. But to use it as in general.
Throwing CT names at me not going to change the facts. No matter how much you use the words. FACT; trees are being chopped down in front of businesses - homes, etc. for the purpose of trying to provide a better connection. FACT: One of your recent posts on this was to claim the satellites put up there will do away with the need to cut trees. So why are they still doing it? FACT: There are many studies 5G proves to be harmful. You keep on ignoring them. I already posted the peer reviewed on last time I wrote about this and you completely ignored it. Nothing to do with Fox news or Putin. I think he's going to be using it too, last time I heard, so he's as stupid as the other techies pushing it. Trump pushes 5g too. And he's as stupid.
btw, what is that link from earthboppin'? I went to it and it has been deleted.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[16137] [16142] [16141] [16135] [16139] [16140] [16153] [16157] [16158] [16159] |
|
16137 |
|
|
Date: June 01, 2019 at 10:02:54
From: Johnl, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Testing Verizon 5G in Chicago: Speedy, But Watch Out for That Tree |
|
|
yes, I agree that 5G and above will be detrimental to physical health. The frequencies might be much worse than regular radio waves. In a way, those who argue in favor of 5G helps to show how the general public will be deceived into accepting 5G. It also shows how forum posts can use tunnel vision to say, “nothing to see here.”
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[16142] [16141] |
|
16142 |
|
|
Date: June 01, 2019 at 19:54:42
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Testing Verizon 5G in Chicago: Speedy, But Watch Out for That Tree |
|
|
thanks for comments to both your posts JohnL. It is nice you gave your opinion on 5G, it is best to offer scientific research and peer reviewed papers which I have done and will try to supply more as I have the time. Anyone can find the info if one searches. btw, Alan spelled his handle Nasirah. You can find his posts in archives, that is, the ones Mr Bopp did not delete.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
16141 |
|
|
Date: June 01, 2019 at 17:28:19
From: Johnl, [DNS_Address]
Subject: added note |
|
|
he's using the "you need psychiatric help" comment, that was sometimes used by EB posters about 8 years ago, such as Nashirah. This kind of shows how the asylum could be taken over by the inmates, and then they can put the normal people in, and say, "you need help." Some of EB's posters show what might happen in the near future.
One poster, about 8 years ago, said that because I kept denying I had same-sex interests, kept saying that I did have same-sex interests, and that my continuing to deny it meant that I "needed help." Gamblers who believed him might have lost a lot of money. People who believe in 5G might lose more than a lot of money, i.e. their physical health.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
16135 |
|
|
Date: June 01, 2019 at 02:17:59
From: Alan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Testing Verizon 5G in Chicago: Speedy, But Watch Out for That Tree |
|
|
Spelling it out simply for your CT addled brain
Because 5G is being rolled out now - satellite provision will take longer because building rockets and satellites need a bigger investment in time & money than setting up relay towers in densely concentrated population centres. Even when satellites are more commonplace there'll still be a need for local towers to get into hard to reach areas and to sustain bandwidth.
"There are lots of trees around the royal palaces. If they use 5g, won't they too be subject to tree cutting? The councillors in UK are doing it all over UK, why not the palaces? I use the term "all" not as in all inclusive. But to use it as in general. "
who is the 'they' - the Queen, the royal family, their staff or British public in general. Have a link that shows for instance that Great Windsor Park trees are planned to be all cut down for better 5G.
"The councillors in UK are doing it all over UK" WTF are you on about
There are roughly 20,000 local councillors in England. They are are elected to the local council to represent their local community, so they must either live or work in the area. Are you claiming this body of UK councillors are out chopping down trees for 5G?
I think you'll find internet service providers liasing with town councils (made of councillors) will subcontract tree surgeons to prune out any necessary trees in urban areas. If you have any evidence of any laws being broken please provide it.
Trees as I've shown are cut down for a variety of reasons - to ensure safe and continuous provision of power lines, telephone lines, railway lines, roads, foot paths, cycle ways etc. - don't you have a problem with any of that? - ironic & a tad hypocritical as you claim not to use mobile phone presumably you have a fixed line which would mean trees have more than likely been cut down.
You've posted lots of wootube links to CT of pseudoscientific reasearch made by dubious characters with dubious expertise & qualification. Heck there was the UK drop out quack doctor who turned up in the US, after doing a yoga course in Tx, as a self-appointed expert on the conspiracy lecture circuit - remember? You went very quiet after that...
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[16139] [16140] [16153] [16157] [16158] [16159] |
|
16139 |
|
|
Date: June 01, 2019 at 14:14:21
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Testing Verizon 5G in Chicago: Speedy, But Watch Out for That Tree |
|
|
you wrote: Because 5G is being rolled out now - satellite provision will take longer because building rockets and satellites need a bigger investment in time & money than setting up relay towers in densely concentrated population centres. Even when satellites are more commonplace there'll still be a need for local towers to get into hard to reach areas and to sustain bandwidth. -- and for YOUR CT addled brain that believes this technology is safe for the planet... why are you believing the Tech's/government pushing this, is the question I have for you. THe former FCC chairman told us, he doesn't care about seeing if it's safe. He cares about the big money. What a con man. So YOU it seems are being taken in by this. Not giving a whit about the safety-- and yes I shut up about replying to your posts about the safety since you did not bother to read the peer reviewed papers I provided links for, not once but twice.
Just like you believe Monsanto/Bayer is safe to use on our food supply, Nasirah/ aka Alan.
One would think you coming from a family of Romani, born in Lebanon and targeted by the Nazi regime, would not be sucked into the ploys of poisoners of the planet by big Ag/chemicals.
The UK councilors have hired the dirty workers, Amey for the tree chopping. Who is paying the councilors to side with BIG TECH 5g rollouts? Or do they believe they will be monetarily benefitting ( or to keep their jobs)by all this conspiracy of "pie in the sky wonderful for everyone on Earth" crap. Yeah, you are the CT'er here.
It follows logically that if Amey/5G pushers are requiring residents and businesses to having their trees removed for this, it would require the Royals to have it done around their palaces at least. So far I don't see that happening.
I asked what is the rush? Why are they being rolled out NOW? Its not saving the planet. Its not being really green. It has nothing to do with cutting down green house gases. pfff, you are just spouting nonsense and non-science. You are not willing to read the peer reviewed papers on this technology and what they have found so far.
And don't even go into the cost of sending rockets up in the sky, or even the fuel used to deluge us with all the pollution emitted …. while they are claiming to save the planet... what a laugh that is.
Done. So done with your antics.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[16140] [16153] [16157] [16158] [16159] |
|
16140 |
|
|
Date: June 01, 2019 at 14:40:32
From: Alan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Testing Verizon 5G in Chicago: Speedy, But Watch Out for That Tree |
URL: https://wasteservices.amey.co.uk/where-we-work/peterborough/our-commercial-services/trees/ |
|
I suggest you email treespeterborough@amey.co.uk, the town councils and the local papers of about your conspiracy with evidence that the councillors, Trump and the monarchy are in the pay of Elon et al.
It should help you at least feel better, otherwise, seek professional help for your paranoid delusions.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[16153] [16157] [16158] [16159] |
|
16153 |
|
|
Date: June 03, 2019 at 15:24:45
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Testing Verizon 5G in Chicago: Speedy, But Watch Out for That Tree |
|
|
you wrote I suggest you email treespeterborough@amey.co.uk, the town councils and the local papers of about your conspiracy with evidence that the councillors, Trump and the monarchy are in the pay of Elon et al.
I did not post such a thing.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[16157] [16158] [16159] |
|
16157 |
|
|
Date: June 03, 2019 at 23:23:59
From: Alan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Testing Verizon 5G in Chicago: Speedy, But Watch Out for That Tree |
|
|
I did not post such a thing.
"Or do they believe they will be monetarily benefitting"
Getting forgetfull in your old age dear - so why did you write the above and previously write about Trump's and FCC involvement ... again if you have evidence of corruption associated with 5G present it to relevent folk > newspapers and town councils involved
There are two kinds of people.
1) Those who cannot extrapolate from incomplete data.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[16158] [16159] |
|
16158 |
|
|
Date: June 04, 2019 at 01:41:16
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Testing Verizon 5G in Chicago: Speedy, But Watch Out for That Tree |
|
|
Not the same thing as what you conjectured. I have really good memory thks. its true Trump is for pushing 5g.Its all over the news- he likes it. former fcc Wheeler said exactly, its all about money and doesn't care for safety- I have posted already about his statements. Makes one wonder about why they are being so compliant with rolling out 5g when its been shown its not safe- and people are making many protests about it. That's not a CT, its fact. You keep referring to my elder age. Do you have respect for elders in your family or are you just dissing elders cuz you are disrespectful all by yourself?
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[16159] |
|
16159 |
|
|
Date: June 04, 2019 at 05:04:51
From: Alan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Testing Verizon 5G in Chicago: Speedy, But Watch Out for That Tree |
URL: Herbert Hoover / Dr. Albert Soiland / Marie Curie 1929 Conspiracy |
|
So you remember now - great. Best write it down before you forget again who the players are involved in your nefarious 5G conspiracy - so far you have; Musk, Queenie, Trump, Councillors, tree surgeons - presumably Governments must be in on it as well.
So if you have all evidence of corruption and inherent dangers of wireless radio waves why are you posting on earthboppin, a backwater conspiracy theory website, when surely if you're so convinced - tell your neighbours, friends, family, work colleagues - but importantly don't telephone them as when you do your effectively killing them or a tree along the way.
Pretty much wasted on the CTers here as they believe & repeat any ol' nonsense - surely contact FCC, repuatable media (or are they in on the big conspiracy you've single handedly found out about) Have you told your internet service provider what you know?
"and people are making many protests about it."
Only CT folk like you over the internet ironically! and such fear mongering its been happening since turn of 20th century about when Marconi sent a powerful signal across the Altlantic.
Early use > Radiophobia
The term was used in a paper entitled "Radio-phobia and radio-mania" presented by Dr Albert Soiland of Los Angeles in 1903. In the 1920s, the term was used to describe people who were afraid of radio broadcasting and receiving technology. In 1931, radiophobia was referred to in The Salt Lake Tribune as a "fear of loudspeakers", an affliction that Joan Crawford was reported as suffering. The term "radiophobia" was also printed in Australian newspapers in the 1930s and 1940s, assuming a similar meaning.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
[
Envirowatchers ] [ Main Menu ] |