9679
From: atom, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Elimination of 90% of the human population.
URL: The globalists’ war against humanity just shifted into high gear
|
Globalist bloodline researcher David Icke is fond of saying that even people who consider themselves to be “truth seekers” nevertheless have limits of what they are willing to embrace as truth. I’ve also found this to be quite true, and it is with that realization firmly in mind that I’m going to share with you the final end game of all this: It is the elimination of 90% of the human population. |
Responses:
[9689] [9691] [9692] [9706] [9708] [9707] [9697] [9682] [9698] [9680]
9689
From: Polydactyl in N. Bay, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Elimination of 90% of the human population.
|
.. yeah, thanks to Dalton and Malthus, the latter an incestuous little egomaniac who made a case for depop that has influenced many people since his time. Give an egomaniac a reason to kill off all those wretched miserable poor people who he figured are all degenerate bloodlines and then clone your own clan over and over and you have one crazy mo'fo and a bloodline of self-appointed kings and their oligarchs that continue until they mutate themselves into extinction, LOL. The creation of infrastructure and man made extinction events to take out people faster may be possible with spewing of technological waste and space weapons. The depop goals might not take so long now to achieve. Unbeknownst to the depop egomaniacs who spread contamination and death, they will enfold their own selves into the death spiral. Depopulation is a very controversial subject even today. Glad you brought it up! Also look up Aussie David Galalae's vids about 'Killing Us Softly' depop plans and how we can counter the eugenicists and survive them. I think the idea here is that any asteroid that is large usually is deflected from earth's gravity unless it is purposely tweaked in space (astronomer's testimony) to go sideways or rendezvouz with earth, to fulfill the depop plans (the author's theory). Never mind the title and other topics in this video. He goes over Malthus' and Dalton's ideas, at 5:16 seconds into the vid. It's worth a refresher. Malthus' ideas are spoken over and over by certain people as though killing people or shutting down their fertility will instantly create non-aggressive humans and solve all the resource and social problems on the planet. When you talk about depop there is always an idealistic goal behind it, about what good it will do, for certain people. It's totally an 'us and them' philosphy. To my mind the depop ideal is yet another excuse to be a typical hierarchical (reptilian) aggressive human who plots how to kill off the competition for resources, money, and power, that is all it is, considering that humans have higher cortex brains that can think and decide for themselves whether population is an issue and what theyk personally want to do about it. Unless you have a deficit of humans from plague or catastrophe, not allowing very early abortion is absurd. If you don't allow abortion, women will go back to backroom docs with dirty needles. Or, by going all natural, every 'life' a forced birth where women have up to 7 or 8 children (humans are very fertile still) each, then you can wait until the environment and food supply degrades so much that people die young in the streets, without help from those more well off. Do we have to be so cruel? Does depop have to be such an all or none issue? Ask an East Indian about population overgrowth to get real answers about what to do once a population has outgrown it's space and resources. They have a lot of experience with this problem. Overpopulation can create long term, cross-generational misery on the planet but the methods that old and new eugenicists consider to be 'game' for solving overpopulation are downright simple minded and cruel, as cruel as forcing every woman on the planet to have as many children as she can bear, no matter the genes, no matter her resources available, no matter her mental status or if she was raped, no matter what. Eegads, there has to be a middle ground and vaccines, dropping asteroids on people, and seeding populations with dubious anti-fertility drugs or infections is not IT. What say you? |
9691
From: abra, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Elimination of 90% of the human population.
| What say I? How about universal, free birth control and no onerous burdens on folks who choose to terminate a problem pregnancy. No coercion, no laws, just education and widely available free birth control. Be the best investment any country could make. Only problem is the entire world will be speaking arabic in about ten years. People are just doomed. abra |
9692
From: atom, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Elimination of 90% of the human population.
|
Professor Erik Pianka reportedly told his audience that the best way to kill off 90 percent of the human population would be to spread an airborne version of the Ebola virus, to which he received an enthusiastic standing ovation. While the world is watching the mainstream media report lies, the global elite are secretly implementing their plans of mass human slaughter. According to the Georgia Guidestones they want millions of people dead and will stop at nothing to get it done. So they aggressively pursue their plan of depopulation… Today many methods of depopulation are being implemented. The three major depopulation agents include: worldwide hunger ( 7-8 million deaths yearly), war (killing an average of half a million people per year), and diseases (2-3 million deaths per year). Other methods include: Chemtrails and the use of nuclear and biological agents; poisoning and contamination of the food and water supply; pharmaceutical drugs; weather modification via HAARP which triggers earthquakes, volcanoes and tsunamis through electromagnetic psychotropic weapons; the promotion of homosexuality and the spreading of AIDS; forced sterilization in countries such as China; vaccinations; abortion; euthanasia; Obamacare death panels; and the list goes on. http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/90-of-the-population-dead-as-governments-prepare-for-collapse-and-your-bank-deposits-are-at-risk/ |
9706
From: Shirley/PA, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Elimination of 90% of the human population.
URL: https://sputniknews.com/asia/201701091049385316-china-jiangxi-bird-flu/
|
If anyone was looking for a good agent to quickly accomplish the die off of a large part of humanity, then just look to Red China's current H7N9 outbreak. Headline: "New Case of Bird Flu Infection Registered in China's Jiangxi Province" Read more: https://sputniknews.com/asia/201701091049385316-china-jiangxi-bird-flu/ |
9708
From: atom, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Elimination of 90% of the human population.
URL: Their Plan To Exterminate 80% Of The World’s Population
|
Cheer up! We gained 10% back! |
Responses:
None
9707
From: atom, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Elimination of 90% of the human population.
URL: USDA to Allow Importation of US-Raised Chickens Processed in China for Human Consumption
| Will they swap the infected ones for the trip back to US supermarkets? hmmm |
Responses:
None
9697
From: Polydactyl in N. Bay, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Elimination of 90% of the human population.
| The more I think about this 'issue' the more I think the people worried about population will soon see a natural dying off due to lack of (real) food, toxins, and genetic abnormalities. What might happen first is increased infertility and shortened longevity. I'd say 'we'll see' but I won't be around. If there is a natural progression to early death and disease 'en masse' across the world, I'd expect it to happen in the next 20-30 years. I'm feeling that a 'reset' seems to be in progress by some means, possibly externally triggered, maybe by extraterrestrial means..? |
Responses:
None
9682
From: shatterbrain, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Why not 100% of the human population.
| "Our most powerful 21st-century technologies – robotics, genetic engineering, and nanotech – are threatening to make humans an endangered species." |
Responses:
[9698]
9698
From: Polydactyl in N. Bay, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Why not 100% of the human population.
| How convenient for humans or ET's who get bored and cranky when dealing with our primitive problems! Maybe we are caught in a genetic loop where we can only project our own evolution and advanced mental capacity, not in the flesh, but through our technology. To me, our aptitude for survival needs to be part of our biology, not just an extension or our biology through technology or by becoming cyborgs of one type or another. Beware anyone who wants us to become less human mammalian and more like souped up human machines. |
Responses:
None
9680
From: Petra, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Elimination of 90% of the human population.
|
Hi Atom, It's taken ages but today we know the Nazi's were responsible for the deaths of 25 million persons through many countries, yet getting folks into action to stop the madness including the US is an interesting matter. Though also of interest, is the issue of Aleppo, Syria. In 1202 there was a major earthquake in the area and from the quake, post-quake illnesses and famine one million died. But as to how many have died since the war began in 2012 they've stopped providing numbers. However, 1202 and 2012 have the same digits but in a different order and it seems to reflect they are not favorable for the area. Petra |
Responses:
None