Great post and reference to the sad state of the Fuku news environment, not seen in 'ANY' MSM rag, tv, or radio, barring quick one-line headlines stating that 'something was done here, made it better there, look ma, no problem now!'
The Disclaimer about the archived forum on the Berkeley Nuclear Engineering department site cracked me up:
'Forum Disclaimer
This forum was hosted by the UC Berkeley Nuclear Engineering Department from March 2011 until September 2013. It was an open, anonymous forum where all views were allowed to be expressed. The University in no way endorses the accuracy of the contents nor the views expressed therein. Please read at your own risk.'
PLEASE READ AT YOUR OWN RISK!!!!? You mean, if:
*You have the temperament of an oatmeal, meat-and-potatoes person who might go into a panic attack seeing salmon and tuna on a restaurant menu, after reading enenews radiation measurements of same?
*You LOVE the Pacific Ocean and as a depressive, you find the death of ALL the marine life in it, a possible cause for early suicide?
*You read only editorials and articles that give a psychological boost of 'positive thinking' or 'things you can really DO something about,' not including any manmade disasters that are 'out of your hands'? (translated, you've washed your hands of the issues).
*You really believe Japan's 'Dr. Death' (Yamashita) warning not to believe any information coming out about the Fuku disaster and health effects of radiation because stress kills FASTER than radiation?
*You don't want to cry like a baby in front of everyone when you find out what happened to the tuna, sea lions, whales, dolphins, sea stars, otters, hake, King Salmon, polar bears, musk ox, eagles, sea birds, etc., after the Fuku outopouring of radiation into the ocean. And you don't want to fall down in public and pound the pavement with your fists when you find out what's going to happen to everything and everyone alive, due to a collective lack of rad information and ongoing Fuku corium vaporizing into air, continuing it's spew in the ocean(s)...
I'm sure people can come up with even better reasons why NOT to RISK reading the archives of the radiation monitoring forums, lol. Nevermind the fact that the School of Nuclear Engineering stopped all soil, water, grass, and milk readings around April 2012, AS IF, the event was OVER. Who told them to do that, I wonder?
One last reason likely you will NOT RISK reading the radiation monitoring archives:
*You are a bonafide scaredy-cat OSTRICH with your head stuck so far in the sand that if Fuku+earthquake musters up a monster hydrovolcanic explosion that causes the entire plant to subside (Dear God, NO), you will probably not notice when the radiation cloud burns the feathers off yer' butt!
The commentors did a good job of showing up the writer of the disclaimer to be a bit of an ostrich him/her self, considering the disaster is ONGOING and no follow-up monitoring by the Berkeley Nuc Eng department. They are frightened by the PTB, frightened of the public discounting nuclear energy that is not the 'end all be all' it was promised to be, and frightened of what the defense departments might do about their funding if they didn't stop the information flow. They are following behind the media and DoD in their pathetic handling of information to the public, info that might've saved the thyroids of a lot of kids born and unborne and the 'nuts' of unprotected swimmers off of SoCal, to mention a few organ targets of specific isotope plumes. The DoD are not exactly known for transparency, so go figure! They treat us like a dumb herd of cattle, rather than doing their best to save the future. I wonder who are their handlers?
|
|