8609
From: trapper/austin, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Fukushima reactor 3 melt down may not be a hoax
|
Fukushima reactor 3 melt down may not be a hoax First of all, an unintentional melt down is impossible this late in the game, (an un intentional melt down is virtually impossible only 4 hours after shut down and completely impossible 10 hours after). At first I blew this off because it sounded like more ENE B.S. It appears it is not. There are two possibilities here, and these are the only possibilities regardless of what anyone else says - 1. The fuel pool has had a problem and is experiencing a chain reaction. Thus far we are only dealing with steam and not fire, so the temperatures cannot be over 135 celsius or so, and though it would be a headache, this particular scenario would be controllable by pumping extra water into the pool. But here is scenario 2, and it is BY FAR the most probable - There is a portion of reactor 3´s core which remains functional after the blast, and this core is completely submerged in water and completely blown out of the reactor pressure vessel. This remaining functional portion of the core has either been activated from Dimona Israel via the totally unauthorized connection to reactor 3's inner containment they admitted to having in the Jerusalem Post, a connection that the Japanese cannot cut because the radiation levels are too severe to approach the systems that are affected, OR, the Stuxnet virus has re activated itself for the new year and has, by itself, put what is left of the reactor core to the fullest output it can manage. The proof that in one form or another the Darpa/CIA/Israeli created Stuxnet virus is at play here is the fact that even though the blown open containment suddenly started steaming, none of the control room readouts are showing that anything strange is going on. Stuxnet keeps the control room readouts normal while it destroys in secret, and the only way reactor 3 could be reading cold while steaming is if Stuxnet is spoofing the control room displays to read normal while it makes a second attempt at giving Japanese the nuclear disaster Israel really wanted for them. This second disaster would involve a fuel pool fire - many people who read this site know that a large amount of material was expelled from reactor 3's core during the big blast, and this material has made all of reactor 3's containment too dangerous to approach. Because of this, all of the fuel in reactor 3's "spent" fuel pool is still sitting there waiting to be used as a weapon. Adding to the mayhem is the apparent storage of fuel in the steam separator pool, which got blown away when reactor 3 was destroyed. It was this fuel that melted into a river of fuel captured on video by a drone, this fuel drained out the North West corner of the steam separator pool and into the alley between reactors 2 and 3 and caused the deaths out at Fukushima, deaths which have now been expunged from the "ziopress" because a little steam from a vented reactor won´t kill people and the official ziopress story is that nothing really bad happened there. Saying what really happened via the MSM would wake up too many nuclear engineers around the world about very real threats their own facilities face, threats Israel wants kept in their war chest and scam sites like ENE news keep well protected by blaming Tepco all the while there is a monster on the loose in the form of a weaponized industrial control virus. What do I think will happen? It is a near certainty that this new problem is the result of Stuxnet putting what is left of reactor 3 back at full output. And what happens will be the result of several factors - if there is enough of that reactor core left to produce a few hundred megawatts (the thermal design ran at 33 percent efficient, which means a 1.2 gigawatt reactor actually produced 3.6 gigawatts) and this means that if even 20 percent of that core is still functional (which equals 720 megawatts) the Israelis might just be able to light the place up good. 720 megawatts would succeed in boiling off all the water faster than they could pump it in from external pumps, after it went dry there would be a radioactive firestorm (watch for ENE Arnie Gundersen to plaige that phrase). If any of the reactor pumps are still functional, don't count on Israeli sympathies, Stuxnet will just shut them off and all the pump control systems are too radioactive to allow people to go in and bypass them. However, My guess is that not even 5 percent of reactor 3´s blown up core is functional, and I think Israel will only manage a little steam show that external pumps can handle. They could drag this out for decades but compared to a nuclear firestorm an extended steam show would be a godsend no matter how long the show went on. Let's hope for the best with this one. The proof that this is Israel and Stuxnet is the fact that the control room is saying EVERYTHING IS NORMAL, SEE THE FOLLOWING: |
Responses:
[8618] [8619] [8621] [8622] [8610] [8614] [8644] [8647] [8611] [8615] [8616] [8617] [8645] [8612] [8613] [8646] [8648]
8618
From: horst graben, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: if MOX was burning before the detonation ("thousands of degrees")
URL: http://www.earthboppin.net/talkshop/disasters/messages/8597.html
| then it's very likely that it will burn from now until kingdom come |
8619
From: kay.so.or, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: if MOX was burning before the detonation ("thousands of...
| and us with it... |
8621
From: horst graben, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: yes ... that's the story isn't it (NT)
| (NT) |
Responses:
[8622]
8622
From: kay.so.or, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: yes ... that's the story isn't it (NT)
| breaks my heart with the new babies coming into our very family this coming year....praying they will be alright but I know this affects them the most...so far... |
Responses:
None
8610
From: trapper/austin, [DNS_Address]
Subject: got iodine?
| lolololol |
Responses:
[8614] [8644] [8647] [8611] [8615] [8616] [8617] [8645] [8612] [8613] [8646] [8648]
8614
From: horst graben, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: iodine won't save you if you ingest a "hot particle"
| in fact ... nothing will save you if you ingest a "hot particle" ... short of the removal of the surrounding tissue ... but then ... the have to find it first |
8644
From: trapper/austin, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: iodine won't save you if you ingest a "hot particle"
|
since i dont write books then it takes a person with a brain like you to read between the lines. #1 - iodine is essential no matter what. #2 - iodine is a de-obstructor, removing or loosening up detox pathways. #3 - iodine is a known mobilizer(not chelator) of heavy metals, like most radioactive elements are. #4 - the famous effect of protecting the thyroid from radioactive iodine is useless because I-131 has a half life of 8 days. strontium 90, however, almost 30 years half life. #5 - iodine is also mucolytic. it breaks down mucus so it flows easier, removing particles in it quicker and easier for less absorption by the body. so you have to get educated if you want to have a chance at surviving this mess. the thing to do is WHAT YOU CAN, ie what you already know to do and is possible/practical. detox, avoid exposure and provide the right hydration and nutrition. if boron is in a cell it will absorb the radiation and prevent damage. take triboron, 9mgs orally, and use borax ubiquitously about the house and other living environments, like in your clothes and your car(its also anti-fungal). take at least 200mcg of selenomethionine a day for cancer prevention. and since you know strontium is present, feed your bones well with strontium and K2 and magnesium and plenty of sunshine vitamin. and so on. |
Responses:
[8647]
8647
From: horst graben, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: that's all fine ... but a "fuel flea" in your lungs
| cannot be detected ... and cannot be removed short of surgery ... and will ... in all likelihood ... cause a tumor to grow that will kill you ... so what ... did you want to live forever? |
Responses:
None
8611
From: grzbear/AZ, [DNS_Address]
Subject: got...
URL: http://www.drsinatra.com/protect-yourself-from-radiation-exposure/
|
baking soda, salt, etc. too? man-made ionizing radiation, EMFs, etc. etc. cause 100s fold increases in fungal activities... all three of these things help to mitigate the fungus threats as well. grz- |
Responses:
[8615] [8616] [8617] [8645] [8612] [8613] [8646] [8648]
8615
From: horst graben, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: fungus will be the least of worries if you ingest "fuel flea" (NT)
| (NT) |
8616
From: grzbear/AZ, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: fungus will be the least of worries if you ingest "fuel...
|
fungus after you are dead is a good thing... it recycles you back into the dirt from whence you came. grz- |
8617
From: horst graben, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: ok (NT)
| (NT) |
Responses:
[8645]
8645
From: trapper/austin, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: ok (NT)
| there are theories that many cancers are fungal in nature. Boron. |
Responses:
None
8612
From: trapper/austin, [DNS_Address]
Subject: new video
|
and borax. dont forget boron/borax. |
8613
From: horst graben, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: you won't be able to measure ingested "hot particles" (NT)
| (NT) |
8646
From: trapper/austin, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: you won't be able to measure ingested "hot particles"...
| cant measure it in food, either. |
Responses:
[8648]
8648
From: horst graben, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: yes ... which is why i stopped eating seafood in March 2011 (NT)
| (NT) |
Responses:
None