| Charles : Bible : Religion
|
[
Charles : Bible : Religion ] [ Main Menu ] |
|
|
|
24364 |
|
|
Date: June 25, 2023 at 09:45:37
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
URL: https://goodmenproject.com/featured-content/republicans-are-pro-patriarchal-white-christian-nationalism-not-pro-life/ |
|
...& Not "Pro-Life"...
Too hard to pick one board, to me belongs both here and
on National...
The willful ignorance (by so many!) of the graphic
parallels between the rise of the Nazis and the perverse
spectre of White Nationalist Christian Fascism appearing
to loom over our horizon needs our most blindingly
brilliant floodlights upon them, like, yesterday and
ongoingly until no vestige of capacity for them to come
to power remains... The flipflop mindspell they have
cast, in their pathetic attempts to deflect their
intentions as being solely defensive in nature, to
somehow correct progressive humanity's tailspin into
satanic darkness and hell for all, is, yes,
disintegrating with each humanitarian heart and voice
countering it...and we must maintin the momentum as it
rises to victory...
***
The chaplains in the U.S. Senate and House of
Representatives open each session with a prayer, they
coordinate religious programs, reside over funerals and
memorial services, and they provide pastoral care for
members of Congress, their staffs, and their families.
They are hired by majority vote of the members in each
chamber.
Though they serve as individuals and are not meant to
represent any specific religious denomination, to date,
all elected chaplains come from Christian traditions,
though on occasion, guest chaplains from other religions
are invited to give invocations.
One of the initial actions taken by the first U.S. Senate
in 1789 was to select the Right Reverend Samuel Provoost,
Episcopal Bishop of New York to serve as the first Senate
Chaplain. The first Chaplain elected in the House of
Representative was William Linn on May 1, 1789. The
tradition of opening each day’s sessions with a
chaplain’s prayer was established by Rev. Jacob Duche who
led the first opening prayer at the Continental Congress
in Philadelphia on September 7, 1774.
Congress justifies as its Constitutional right the hiring
of religious chaplains by invoking Article 1, Section 2,
Clause 5: “The House of Representatives shall choose
their speaker and other officers.”
One of the framers of the United States Constitution,
James Madison, disputed Congress’ interpretation by
arguing against the appointment of chaplains to the two
houses of Congress, which he did in his “Detached
Memoranda,” 1817:
The Constitution of the U.S. forbids everything like an
establishment of a national religion,” he asserted. “The
law appointing Chaplains establishes a religious worship
for the national representatives, to be performed by
Ministers of religion, elected by a majority of them; and
these are to be paid out of the national taxes….The
establishment of the chaplainship to Congress is a
palpable violation of equal rights, as well as of
Constitutional principles….
The Supreme Court settled the matter of the
constitutional right of legislatures to hire chaplains at
public expense in its Marsh v. Chambers (1983) decision.
The case involved whether the Nebraska legislature had
violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment
by opening each session with a prayer directed by a
chaplain paid for with public funds.
The Court, in a 6-3 decision, ruled that the practice
does not violate the Establishment Clause using precedent
as justification. This ruling, however, went against the
Supreme Court’s previous Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)
decision, which set out a three-pronged test for the
constitutionality of statutes by which a statute is
constitutional: (1) if it has a primarily secular
purpose; (2) if its principal effect neither aids nor
inhibits religion; and (3) if government and religion are
not excessively entangled.
Chief Justice Warren Burger writing the majority opinion
in Marsh v. Chambers stated in part:
In light of the unambiguous and unbroken history of more
than 200 years, there can be no doubt that the practice
of opening legislative sessions with prayer has become
part of the fabric of our society. To invoke Divine
guidance on a public body entrusted with making the laws
is not, in these circumstances, an ‘establishment’ of
religion or a step toward establishment; it is simply a
tolerable acknowledgment of beliefs widely held among the
people of this country.
The Supreme Court, however, disregarded the issue of
precedent when, in 2022, it overturned Roe v. Wade (1973)
unraveling the legal right to abortion for nearly the
last 50 years in its Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health
Organization decision. The Court left it to the states to
decide whether they would legalize reproductive rights.
Since Dobbs, many state legislatures have also banned the
safe and effective drugs used in medication abortions,
mifepristone and misoprostol. The national drugstore
chain, Walgreens, was the first to ban the drugs even in
states where abortion remains legal.
Several organizations sued the government for access to
reproductive care including abortion. Some of these
organizations, for example, Jewish and Muslim, sued on
religious grounds since their respective faith
communities allow abortion. For example, from a press
release of Muslim Advocates:
The Supreme Court’s radical decision to overturn Roe v.
Wade represents a dangerous Christian nationalization of
American law and kicks open the door to future reversals
of the right to contraception,” begins the press release,
“the right to marry whomever you want and even the right
to teach your children a language of your choice. By
upholding a law that defines life as beginning at
conception, the U.S. Supreme Court has enshrined the
religious doctrine of one minority religious community
into law — violating the First Amendment principle of
religious freedom….
Historian Amanda Tyler defines Christian nationalism as,
…a political ideology and cultural framework that seeks
to merge American and Christian identities, distorting
both the Christian faith and America’s constitutional
democracy. Christian nationalism relies on the
mythological founding of the United States as a
“Christian nation,” singled out for God’s providence in
order to fulfill God’s purposes on earth. Christian
nationalism demands a privileged place for Christianity
in public life, buttressed by the active support of
government at all levels.
Anthea Butler distinguishes, more specifically, what is
white Christian nationalism:
Simply put, it is the belief that America’s founding is
based on Christian principles, white protestant
Christianity is the operational religion of the land, and
that Christianity should be the foundation of how the
nation develops its laws, principles and policies.
Though I rarely offer comparisons between events
transpiring before and during the ascension to power of
the German Third Reich with resemblances to contemporary
United States – since to do so could result in
trivializing one of the most horrific episodes in human
history – nonetheless, I am haunted by certain parallels
that demand voicing.
I am troubled by multiple similarities between that time
not so very long ago with the discourses expressed and
events transpiring today. I, therefore, highlight, in
particular, the parallels in Nazi portrayals and
understandings of sex, sexuality, gender, and gender
expression and connections with white Christian
nationalism: a divisive and brutal program that was anti-
feminist, anti-women’s equality, anti-women’s
reproductive freedoms (anti-family planning, anti-
contraception, anti-abortion), anti-lesbian, anti-gay,
anti-bisexual, anti-transgender, anti-gender
nonconforming, and anti-sexuality education in schools.
“I believe today that my conduct is in accordance with
the will of the Almighty Creator.” – Adolf Hitler, Mein
Kampf, Vol. 1 Chapter 2
On Homosexuality
The Nazis ruthlessly enforced and eventually extended
Paragraph 175, the section of the German Penal Code
dating back to 1871 with the unification of Germany:
“Unnatural vice committed by two persons of the male sex
or by people with animals is to be punished by
imprisonment; the verdict may also include the loss of
civil rights.”
Nazi ideology rested on the assessment that homosexual
(males) lowered the German birth rate; they endangered,
recruited, enticed, and corrupted youth; that a possible
homosexual epidemic could spread; that homosexuals are
“potential oppositionists” and enemies of respectable
society; and that sexual relations between people of the
same sex impairs their “sense of shame” and undermines
morality, which inevitably will bring about the “decline
of social community.”
Even before taking power, appearing in their daily
newspaper, Völkischer Beobachter 14 May 1928, the Nazi
party argued:
“Anyone who thinks of homosexual love is our enemy. We
reject anything which emasculates our people and makes it
a plaything for our enemies, for we know that life is a
fight, and it is madness to think that men will ever
embrace fraternally. Natural history teaches us the
opposite. Might makes right. The strong will always win
over the weak. Let us see to it that we once again become
the strong. But this we can achieve only in one way — the
German people must once again learn how to exercise
discipline. We, therefore, reject any sexual deviation,
particularly between man and man, because it robs us of
the last possibility of freeing our people from the
slave-chains in which it is now forced to toil.”
While Nazi ideology and practice rejected lesbianism as
well, they did not criminalize same sex sexuality between
women, as they had in Germany’s Paragraph 175 of the
Penal Code, because they believed that so-called “Aryan”
lesbians could at least birth children for the “New
Germany.”
On the other hand, Heinrich Himmler, Gestapo head and
chief architect of the Reich’s anti-homosexual campaign,
justified his actions by arguing that male homosexuals
were “like women” and therefore, could not fight in any
German war effort.
Subsequently, he conducted surveillance operations on an
estimated 90,000 suspected homosexuals, arrested
approximately 50,000, and transported somewhere between
10,000 and 15,000 to a number of concentration camps
throughout the Nazi dominion. Very few survived.
Upon coming to power in 1933, under their Youth Leader,
Baldur von Schirach, the Nazis took over all youth groups
converting them into Hitler Youth groups. One action
taken following consolidation was to eliminate all signs
of “homosexual corrosion,” because it allegedly posed a
threat to state control by “fostering political
conspiracies.”
Nazi leaders purged all boys suspected of “homosexual
tendencies.” They tried and convicted an estimated 6,000
youth under Paragraph 175 between 1933 and 1943.
Hitler also proposed eliminating all sexuality education
from the German school system and encouraged parents to
take on the primary responsibilities for sexuality
instruction within the home.
While the Catholic Church spoke out then and today
against same-sex sexuality, their own policies actually
boomeranged and hit them in their own faces. Used
primarily to silence any potential resistance from the
Church, the Nazis conducted their so-called “Cloister
Trials” in which they dissolved Catholic youth
fraternities, arrested and incarcerated large numbers of
priests, religious brothers, and Catholic laity in
prisons and concentration camps accusing them of being
“threats to the state” on fabricated charges of
homosexuality. For example, prison guards at Dachau
concentration camp murdered a Catholic priest, Fr. Alois
Abdritzki, one of a number of fatalities from the
“Cloister Trials.”
On Women
Alfred Rosenberg, one of the Nazi’s chief ideologues,
directed his misogynist outrage against women: “The
emancipation of women from the women’s emancipation
movement is the first demand of a female generation
trying to rescue nation and race, the eternally
unconscious, the foundation of all civilization, from
decline…. A woman should have every opportunity to
realize her potential, but one thing must be made clear:
Only a man must be and remain judge, soldier, and
politician.”
Englebert Huber, a Nazi propagandist, dictated the
“proper” place of women in the Third Reich, figuratively
(and literally as well) beneath men: “In the ideology of
National Socialism, there is no room for the political
woman….[Our] movement places woman in her natural sphere
of the family and stresses her duties as wife and mother.
The political, that post-war creature, who rarely ‘cut a
good figure’ in parliamentary debates, represents the
denigration of women. The German uprising is a male
phenomenon.”
The Nazis added Paragraph 218 of the German Penal Code to
outlaw abortions and establish a national file on women
who had undergone and doctors who had performed
abortions.
On “Indecency”
In their increasing obsession with “purifying” the social
sphere, Nazi leadership enacted the “Decree for Combating
Public Indecency,” which included such provisions as
working to eliminate prostitution; closing all bars and
clubs that “are misused for the furtherance of public
indecency” including “public houses solely or mainly
frequented by persons engaging in unnatural sex acts”
(a.k.a. homosexuals); closing kiosks and magazine stands
in libraries and bookshops “whether because they include
nude illustrations or because of their title or contents,
are liable to produce erotic effects in the beholder.”
Though Pope Pius XII maintained a position of neutrality
and rarely spoke out against the atrocities perpetrated
by the Nazi regime, of which he was roundly criticized in
some circles, The Vatican, on April 3, 1933, praised the
Reich on this policy:
“The Vatican welcomes the struggle of National Germany
against obscene material. The strong measures that
Prussia’s Minister of the Interior Göring has ordered for
the combating of obscene writings and pictures…have
received serious attention in Vatican circles. It will be
recalled that Pius XII, in his recent encyclicals, has
repeatedly and vigorously stressed that defensive actions
against obscene material are of fundamental importance
for the bodily and spiritual health of family and nation,
and he most warmly welcomes the type and manner…with
which this struggle has been undertaken in the new
Germany.”
The Patriarchal White Christian Nationalist Connecting
Strand
The Nazi regime connected multiple forms of oppression
when Heinrich Himmler reorganized the Reich Criminal
Police Bureau to centralize operations by creating a
national file on male homosexuals, transgender people,
what they referred to as “wage abortionists” (women and
their doctors), and to monitor the production and ban the
use of contraceptives to “Aryan” women.
Within this Bureau, they established The Reich Office for
Combating Homosexuality and Abortion, which in the single
year of 1938 alone, conducted 28,366 arrests for
abortion, and 28, 882 arrests of male homosexuals.
The common thread running through Nazi ideology regarding
gender, gender expression, and sexuality was an intensive
campaign to control individuals’ bodies and the bodies of
members of entire communities in the attempt to control
their minds.
Women and LGBTQ people have been constructed as second-
class and even third-class citizens not merely in Nazi
Germany, but today as the current political discourse
indicates. But women and LGBTQ are certainly not victims
because through it all, women and LGBTQ people as
individuals and as groups have resisted and challenged
the inequities and have pushed back against patriarchal
white Christian nationalist constraints.
I hope, though, that we as a society can learn from the
tyranny of the past.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[24376] [24378] [24383] [24384] [24385] [24386] [24371] [24380] [24381] [24389] [24373] [24375] [24372] [24374] [24377] [24366] [24367] [24369] [24368] [24370] [24379] [24382] [24388] |
|
24376 |
|
|
Date: June 26, 2023 at 12:35:02
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
and I might add here: we really should not be
legislating morality. And yet we do by the very fact we
consider it wrong to kill, steal, swindle, bribe, bear
false witness, lie, covet to the point of harming
another, etc. This is not a perfect world. I suppose
we might be better off eating grass or at east smoking
it. Lol.
Not all people, nations, towns, countrysides, practice
morality the same. Does forcing another to act in a
certain way delay the breakdown of society? Does it
eventually build it up?
I have an older half sis, same mom, different dad.
She's very far left. I'm in the middle of left.
We can discuss all the pros and cons of any subject,
but we do not go to the point of condemning either to
hell. Why? Its not conducive to love. Or building
each other up. I'm spiritual, she claims to be atheist.
Am I going to change her views? Is she going to change
mine by hating one another? No. And this is what I am
seeing going on. I see it in how the govment conducts
itself regards the bombing of other nations just
because they do not hold the same values as they are
claiming to have, or making sanctions or anything else
each want to do to the other in trying to change their
behaviors.
Giving each other labels to justify ones own stance or
beliefs aint gonna do it either.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[24378] [24383] [24384] [24385] [24386] |
|
24378 |
|
|
Date: June 26, 2023 at 12:46:45
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
Pamela, with regard to differences in idealogy and belief
of this nature as they're expressed in the context of
personal relationships, I'm just the same as you... ;)
What we're speaking of is the greater context operative
here...at least that's all I've been referring to.
Thanks be to all that's holy for those more intimate,
heart-connected bonds that can and DO, so often, manage
to elevate their Love above all else... Would that this
could roll out at the highest levels of controlling
division...the energies that inspire ALL dis-
inclusion...! And who's to say that's not how it will,
ultimately, take place... ;)
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[24383] [24384] [24385] [24386] |
|
24383 |
|
|
Date: June 26, 2023 at 13:42:21
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
Ah-men, Amen, So be it. Let it be so. In the words of
another King; 'can't we all just get along?!!!' being
the scoundrel he was/is, he said a truth we should not
ignore.
I want the same right to make my medical choices as
those who want the right to choose if they should or
should not get an abortion or use contraceptives
without persecution or retaliation or negative marks
against my social standing.
I may or may not continue with this discussion later.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[24384] [24385] [24386] |
|
24384 |
|
|
Date: June 26, 2023 at 14:12:30
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
I may or may not continue beyond this comment as well.
I support your right to make your own medical choices
just as emphatically as I support all other personal
medical rights of choice, including birth control and
contraception and all others... Would you have thought
otherwise of me? If so, why?
And as beautiful as "Why can't we all get along?" is, and
as likely or unlikely as it may be, for a heart
connection between beings to serve as some quantum,
impossible-seeming miracle catalyst that somehow explodes
Upward within the chain of global control and destroys
its capacity for realizing its evil designs...again,
keeping big light upon how the GOP's Celebrated Agenda
for enacting actual Fascism here is literally the
farthest mindset from entertaining anything remotely
humanitarian, or all-inclusive, or toward *gee, how can
we get along?" oriented, is not putting ANYONE into any
"box" other than the one they gleefully erected around
themselves, and would not appreciate being removed from
.............
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[24385] [24386] |
|
24385 |
|
|
Date: June 26, 2023 at 15:31:31
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
you:
I support your right to make your own medical choices
just as emphatically as I support all other personal
medical rights of choice, including birth control and
contraception and all others... Would you have thought
otherwise of me? If so, why?
My reply:
when I post anything here on the Earthboppin forums, I
consider anyone can read them so its not you
specifically I m replying or making a statement to.
I sure did experience allot of hateful fascism and
physical and psycological/mental harm during the C
control, not just here but in life. And its still not
over.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[24386] |
|
24386 |
|
|
Date: June 26, 2023 at 15:40:06
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
Okay, thanks -- I wondered if maybe you meant that
generally, but since assumptions often go wildly astray I
thought I should state that for the record...
Sorry, I'm sleep-deprived in the extreme & am sure this is
fairly obvious, but: C control?
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
24371 |
|
|
Date: June 26, 2023 at 01:34:37
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
Allota Black folk might disagree with this assessment.
King Jr being against abortion. There are so many
people of color in the Christian category that do not
fit in with this - does being a vegan as was Hitler
make all vegans a Nazi? King Jr was a Baptist minister,
and an activist. Would that make him a Nazi? Many
people of color are for prayer; Muslims, Hindu's,
Christian's, Jews.
Repubs and Dems are for prayer. Does it belong in
Congress? I recall in Jr High school during history,
it was announced on the PA system, no more school
prayer silence for a minute.. there was a big uproar
over it.
I didn't care one way or the other. For me, it didn't
matter. I could pray anywhere, anytime and not be
noticed or create a big drama about it.
Allot of different people are against abortion. Or pro
life, does that make them a Nazi?
There are patriarch's in all colors, does that make
them a Nazi?
It seems this article is wanting/needing to label all
Repubs Nazi's.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[24380] [24381] [24389] [24373] [24375] [24372] [24374] [24377] |
|
24380 |
|
|
Date: June 26, 2023 at 13:00:40
From: georg, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
yes, totally, human beings come in all shapes and sizes
and ideas about right and wrong and none of us deserve
to be put in little boxes that have labels but right and
wrong do exist and I think everyone knows the difference
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[24381] [24389] |
|
24381 |
|
|
Date: June 26, 2023 at 13:03:50
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
You think everyone knows the difference between right and wrong, do
you georg? ;-O
Okay then… ;->
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[24389] |
|
24389 |
|
|
Date: June 27, 2023 at 10:08:39
From: georg, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
24373 |
|
|
Date: June 26, 2023 at 10:16:37
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
fwiw vegan believe in non violence towards any sentient being let alone eat them!..I mean I know there are rumors folks can believe what they want but Hitler was okay
with violence obviously and had a strong overtone of warrior against his own kind....
There are vegans in military who believe it's okay to kill other humans for certain reasons but many vegans will disagree with that I am one of them...I would rather be
killed than to kill.
Many people do not see themselves as animals but this is a misconception and thus I feel not recognizing this having dominion it inflects harm and death on other
sentient beings including humans and the environment....Thus such boomerangs as we were created with dominion as keepers of the garden...so it trickled down and caused
violence in other creatures as humans.
Namely the adversary the FIRST murderer, the Father of Lies, the Father of disease began it as he did what he wanted and cared not and he rules the darkness...a viper, a
snake. That is why this world is now filled with violence as the majority are overcome with the darkness of the adversary and cannot see or understand why so much death
exists or why killing is wrong and is not a spirit of peace nor does is it part of a peaceable kingdom. Human are animals...mammals.
I am just saying this not to argue with you but just to share a different perspective and say I do not think Hitler was a vegan not really in the sense of what it means
truly but in a sense the adversarial spirit may want to portray it which is a falsehood, an untruth many will accept to justify their own actions. Not only that he
killed and harmed his other animals and waged war against them (ie. his own species the human species).
Vegans do not eat eggs, cheese, dairy of partake of animal by products. If they do they are not vegans.
Take it as you will...believe what you want as many will... it is what it is. ~Eve
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Query excerpts online:
But his primary diet included meat. In "The Life and Death of Adolf Hitler," Robert Payne mentions Hitler's fondness for Bavarian sausages. Other biographers, including
Albert Speer, point out that he also ate ham, liver and game.Sep 21, 1991
Don't Put Hitler Among the Vegetarians - The New York Times
The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com › 1991/09/21 › opinion › l-do...
About featured snippets
•
Feedback
People also ask
What was Adolf Hitler's diet?
Thomas Fuchs concurred, observing that a "typical day's consumption included eggs prepared in any number of ways, spaghetti, baked potatoes with cottage cheese, oatmeal,
stewed fruits and vegetable puddings. Meat was not completely excluded. Hitler continued to eat a favourite dish, Leberklösse (liver dumplings)."
Adolf Hitler and vegetarianism - Wikipedia
Adolf Hitler and vegetarianism
Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Adolf_Hitler_and_ve...
In 1938 Hitler's doctors put him on a meat-free diet and his public image as a vegetarian was fostered, and from 1942, he self-identified as a vegetarian.
Animal welfare in Nazi Germany · Animal rights · Margot Wölk
Myth Check: Was Hitler a Vegetarian?
Skeptical Inquirer
https://skepticalinquirer.org › exclusive › myth-check-...
Nov 2, 2016 — He certainly advocated a vegetarian diet and lifestyle at certain points, but he by no means maintained the diet consistently. And when trusting ...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[24375] |
|
24375 |
|
|
Date: June 26, 2023 at 11:50:09
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
|
I understand... just using an analogy of sorts.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
24372 |
|
|
Date: June 26, 2023 at 05:28:52
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
Well yes, pamela, and not all Germans were Nazis,
either...there are always those who'll take exception to
the party line. But that didn't deter the Nazis from
enacting genocide, and the trajectory of this article had
nothing to do with ensuring that any objectors to
religious/racial Fascism within the GOP got noted for
whatever their tiny influence might be against it...
There's no point in deflecting from what, exactly, the
GOP's current intentions are by voicing that there are
some in their party who object... The "right" is shouting
them from highest rooftops in sick self-righteous zeal,
so eager to imagine they can come to legally dominate all
Americans as per their own social/religious
structures/values and ideals...rob them of the very
freedom God gave them when this nation was founded...
You can call these terrified control-obsessed folk the
GOP, you can call them grownup bullies, you can call them
Bob's Your Uncle, doesn't matter...but what defines them
as the Fascists they are is that their driven compulsion
and intention is to disallow those who disagree with
their values/beliefs from living their own lives as they
see fit, *because their values and beliefs do not
agree*... That is fear-based hatred that fully supports
and rationalizes doing *whatever it takes* to ensure that
GOP/"conservative"/Biblican values prevail within this
country... I mean...many of them literally believe that
if they don't "win this nation over for Jesus," even they
themselves will burn in hell, though the "evil left is
responsible"...lol... For sooo many, that translates to
carte-blanche justification for violence...because "God
calls for it"..........................
But hey, yes please! Let any who identify as GOP and
disagree with this agenda speak up, and loudly... As for
this forum, I predict crickets, but would so love a
surprise...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[24374] [24377] |
|
24374 |
|
|
Date: June 26, 2023 at 11:35:48
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
I see the Dems doing the same things to the Repubs. Its
a no win for both/all. If neither can rise above this
mind boggle trap its a sad day for this country.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[24377] |
|
24377 |
|
|
Date: June 26, 2023 at 12:35:31
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
That's what you see, do you? Democrats mounting fascist
campaigns to elect those who will outlaw the personal
freedoms, rights, integrity and dignity of all citizens
who do not agree with...what? lol
Republicans utilize either the notion that they're God-
ordained-and-approved, or plain brute right-to-survival-
of-the-fittest, "strongest", most gullible, most willing
to sell their souls for positions of domination over
all...as their gauge for who, amongst themselves, "should
win the right to rule over ALL, have the right to decide
the moral code for ALL"... That's their mind-boggle trap.
SO many little factions of that GOP toxicity, who'll now
enact a bloodbath amongst themselves to win that "right"
to represent and spearhead the GOP's anti-
inclusivity/anti-humanitarian war... That's their reality
in a nutshell, that they're attempting to put forward
onto this country.
So where's this Democratic parallel of this exact Fascist
Plan I see being touted, trying to convince everyone that
taking this eyes-wide-open stance brings Democrats down
to the level of Republicans in their intentions? How does
humanitarian inclusivity -- the commitment to honoring
ALL -- intend to rob Republicans of their freedoms,
rights, integrity and dignity? lol Only in the sense that
they're being "robbed" of their imagined "right" to pass
legislation that frees them from the onerous burden of
having to see/hear of those enacting lifestyle choices
they don't agree with, by making them illegal! The nerve
of them, being themselves anywhere I can see or hear
them!!! How are Democrats "doing these same things" to
the Republicans? Do tell, please!
Yes! ALL "governments" are still controlled in many ways,
some barely imaginable, by the global corporacratic plan
that's been in place forever -- and, yes, there are
Democrats whose personal values and beliefs allow them to
participate, in hugely varying levels of context, with
its tentacles in D.C.
But when you try to hold up the GOPs clearly-stated
intentions, against whatever level of complicity
Democrats are responsible for, within the toxic nightmare
posing for an American Government that's meant to be
enacting its Founders true ideals of freedom and equal
rights for all its citizens...and say you see the two as
being anywhere near actual comparative territory...ah,
no.
And, no -- throwing light upon the fact that the fascist
idealogies and values of the GOP simply have no capacity,
(*by virtue of their very definitions!*) to come to any
kind of genuine, authentic table of Equals toward
generating greater understanding between, or "rise above"
how they see human beings different from themselves, is
NOT choosing to stand against Unity Consciousness and its
destiny here... It is arising and will continue to in
ways that will, miraculously and unbelievably, elevate
everything...against all odds...and in spite of what many
rightwingers imagine is this country's destiny...
And if presenting the evidential proof that the U.S. has
also engaged in heinous atrocities within the global
circus...that's being manipulated by those with the
capacity to destroy the planet at any given
moment...doesn't organically inspire and expand one's
awareness outward, toward how that could possibly
happen...toward who or what could enact a global design
that holds all "parties and leaders" by their very
shortest hairs, by unimaginable consequences...then all's
I can say is, by all means, remain within your own
perspective...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
24366 |
|
|
Date: June 25, 2023 at 16:11:57
From: georg, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
and this is the malignant indifference board so welcome
aboard ... we thrive on hate and haters ... no time like
the present for you to accept Jesus as your personal
Lord and Savior
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[24367] [24369] [24368] [24370] [24379] [24382] [24388] |
|
24367 |
|
|
Date: June 25, 2023 at 16:47:54
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
Thank you, georg, for providing the most perfect example
of the flipflop spell ya'll relentlessly project,
imagining it'll stick, somewhere, somehow, someway...
Yes, you do all thrive on hate and haters! You are them!
;) Choosing to "hate" everything humanitarianly
progressive -- (in other words, telling those who differ
from you in orientation that they can't live as they want
to because *your beliefs don't support doing so,* THAT
blind violent hatred) -- is the core essence of GOP White
Christian Nationalist idealogy itself, hon...
Yeshua would never support what this party is promoting
as it runs directly contrary to His true
teachings...which is becoming more and more evident as
the new foundations of Unity Consciousness arise...
...and the kneejerk hatred & violence against *anyone
Other* will fade like the nightmare it was...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[24369] [24368] [24370] [24379] [24382] [24388] |
|
24369 |
|
|
Date: June 25, 2023 at 19:06:21
From: georg, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
conflicted about your identity you choose the Christian
board to vilify us as your tormentors ... but we don't
hate you ... we hate the sin that we do and that you do
and the sin that everyone does ... but we are repentant
and that's what you lack ... stiff necked and willful
you refuse to repent of your sins and therefore you will
die in them and your soul will be destroyed
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
24368 |
|
|
Date: June 25, 2023 at 19:02:47
From: georg, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
projection is your specialty ... everything you hate
about yourself you project on others ... hate kills the
hateful soul
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[24370] [24379] [24382] [24388] |
|
24370 |
|
|
Date: June 25, 2023 at 20:21:34
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
No need for the exertion of toxic zeal there, pal, your
first great example of exactly what I'm referring to was
more than enough...but thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[24379] [24382] [24388] |
|
24379 |
|
|
Date: June 26, 2023 at 12:57:12
From: georg, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
it's your choice and I thank the LORD I don't have your
misery
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[24382] [24388] |
|
24382 |
|
|
Date: June 26, 2023 at 13:08:13
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
Oh but I’m not miserable, hon…much to your great dismay, I realize…but
cheer up! You have an endless reservoir, it seems, of testosteresque
righteous rage to hurl at me, you have new opportunities every moment!
;) And you can tell yourself every single one is landing in pay dirt, I won’t
tell you differently anymore, ‘k? ;)
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[24388] |
|
24388 |
|
|
Date: June 27, 2023 at 10:08:10
From: georg, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Republicans are Pro-Patriarchal White Christian Nationalism... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
[
Charles : Bible : Religion ] [ Main Menu ] |