| Charles : Bible : Religion
|
[
Charles : Bible : Religion ] [ Main Menu ] |
|
|
|
22996 |
|
|
Date: January 20, 2021 at 17:15:20
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Jesuit Priest gave invocation at Biden's Inauguration |
URL: https://www.jrsusa.org/news/jrs-usas-director-of-mission-fr-leo-j-odonovan-s-j-gives-the-invocation-at-the-biden-inaguration/?fbclid=IwAR2P2E52HUIncwGT8N78K2j7oThZ7ZoIG607AsAa1Q4O828iICy9iE4Es0c |
|
Father Leo J. O’Donovan S.J., JRS/USA’s Director of
Mission gave the invocation at today’s Inauguration
Ceremonies for President Joseph R. Biden and Vice
President Kamala Harris. His prayers were for peace,
unity, and most of all, love.
We hope his prayers are heard by our new leaders and
that they seek peace and justice, especially for those
most vulnerable in our world, refugees.
"Be with us, Holy Mystery of Love, as we dream
together. Help us under our new President to reconcile
the people of our land, restore our dream, and invest
it with peace and justice and the joy that is the
overflow of love.
FR. LEO J. O'DONOVAN S.J."
Read the full invocation here.
Want more for Fr. Leo? Check out Blessed are the
Refugees, a book of stories and reflections from
children forced to flee from Central America on
authored by Fr. Leo, Scott Rose, and the Staff and
Volunteers of Catholic Charities’ Esperanza Center.
-----
10 FACTS You Must Know About The Jesuits!
November 5, 2019 by Edward Morgan
https://prepareforchange.net/2019/11/05/10-facts-you-
must-know-about-the-jesuits/
The Superior General of the Society of Jesus is the
official title of the leader of the Roman Catholic
religious order, the Jesuits. He is generally
addressed as Father General. The position sometimes
carries the derogatory nickname of the Black Pope. The
current Superior General is the Reverend Father Arturo
Marcelino Sosa Abascal (Wikipedia Arturo Sosa)
“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s
clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves.” –
Yahushua in Matthew 7:15 (NKJV)
“We came in like lambs and will rule like wolves.” –
Francesco Borgia, Third Jesuit Superior General.
The Society of Jesus, more commonly referred to as the
Jesuits, are the armed militia of the Roman Catholic
Church. They were sanctioned in 1540 by Pope Paul III
with one mandate: to defeat Protestantism and regain
worldwide Papal rule. To achieve this monumental task,
they employ ever-adapting methods of pseudo-education,
social programs, infiltration, and all wickedness that
could possibly be conceived. Needless to say, they are
achieving great success in their mission, which is
climaxing with the present pope, Pope Francis, i.e.
the Eighth and last Pope of Revelation 17, who held
some of the highest positions in Argentina, including
Provincial Superior in the Society of Jesus and
Archbishop of Buenos Aires. He was made a cardinal by
Pope John Paul II.
Trending
Astonishing COV Testing Fraud Revealed
Today most of the world is oblivious as to how Jesuits
operate, from their inception to this very day. Now
more than ever, World’s Last Chance believes it is
exceedingly important to bring up the following
historical facts about this evil society, to expose
the wicked nature of this truly malevolent order.
Pope Clement XIV abolished the Jesuits
Fact #1
Pope Clement XIV abolished the Jesuits as a society in
1773:
It did not take long for the 18th Century Catholic
nations to get tired of the meddling of the Jesuits
into their national affairs. They were so infuriated
against the Jesuits that they demanded the Roman
Catholic Church abolish them once and for all.
Sufficient political pressure was brought to bear on
Pope Clement XIII. However, he passed away before he
could do anything about it. The task of abolishing the
Society of Jesus then fell on his successor, Clement
XIV. As Clement XIV signed the decree abolishing the
Jesuit Order he said, “I have signed my death
warrant,…” Within nine months he was dead. [Many
contemporaries considered his death a case of
poisoning, and suspected the Jesuits were
responsible].
Source: http://www.pickle-
publishing.com/papers/triple-crown-clement-xiv.htm
Fact #2
No other entity on Earth was expelled and suppressed
by Catholic and non-Catholic countries as the Jesuits:
Jesuits IHS
Obviously the Jesuits were not expelled from many
nations (even Catholic nations) because of their
educational or charity work. They were expelled for
engaging in and carrying out subversive political
plots against humanity to advance their own cause.
“Between 1555 and 1931 the Society of Jesus [i.e., the
Jesuit Order] was expelled from at least 83 countries,
city states and cities, for engaging in political
intrigue and subversion plots against the welfare of
the State, according to the records of a Jesuit priest
of repute [i.e., Thomas J. Campbell]. Practically
every instance of expulsion was for political
intrigue, political infiltration, political
subversion, and inciting to political insurrection.”
The Jesuits are known for their deception, spying,
infiltration, assassination, and revolution. They
worked deep into the political field and plotted
through politics throughout the world countries.
Source: “The Babington Plot”, by J.E.C. Shepherd, p.12
When the Jesuits are expelled from a country, they
simply change strategies and return to the country
they were expelled from under a new disguise. The
following sums up their operational strategy:
“We came in like lambs and will rule like wolves. We
shall be expelled like dogs and return like eagles.”
Source: Francesco Borgia, Third Jesuit Superior
General.
Hitler and the Jesuit connection
Fact #3
Hitler modeled his dreaded SS army and party after the
organizational structure of the Jesuits and the Roman
Catholic Church:
“…the SS organization had been constituted according
to the principles of the Jesuit Order.”
Source: “The Secret History of the Jesuits,” by Edmond
Paris, p. 164
Walter Schellenberg, former chief of Nazi counter-
espionage made this statement: “The S.S. organization
had been constituted by Himmler [Heinrich Himmler,
leading member of the Nazi party] according to the
principles of the Jesuit Order. Their regulations and
the Spiritual Exercises prescribed by Ignatius of
Loyola were the model Himmler tried to copy exactly.
Himmler’s title as supreme chief of the S.S. was to be
the equivalent of the Jesuits’ ‘General’ and the whole
structure was a close imitation of the Catholic
Church’s hierarchical order.” “The Secret History of
the Jesuits,” by Edmond Paris, p. 164
Above all I have learned from the Jesuits. And so did
Lenin too, “far as I recall. The world has never known
anything quite so splendid as the hierarchical
structure of the Catholic Church. There were quite a
few things I simply appropriated from the Jesuits for
the use of the Party.
Source: Manfred Barthel, “The Jesuits: History and
Legend of the Society of Jesus (New York, 1984), Adolf
Hitler, p.266.
“I learned much from the Order of the Jesuits”, said
Hitler… “Until now, there has never been anything more
grandiose, on the earth, than the hierarchical
organization of the Catholic Church. I transferred
much of this organization into my own party… I am
going to let you in on a secret… I am founding an
Order… In my “Burgs” of the Order, we will raise up a
youth which will make the world tremble… Hitler then
stopped, saying that he couldn’t say any more..
Vatican connection to Nazis
Signing the concordat is Cardinal Pacelli (later to
become Pope Pius XII). By 1933 he was the Vatican
Secretary of State. Second from left is Franz von
Papen, a sinister Nazi and devout Roman Catholic who
was Hitler’s ace diplomat and the Vatican’s agent in
helping to bring Hitler to power. Standing at the far
right can be seen the little-known Vatican prelate,
Montini, later to become Pope Paul VI.
Source: “Hermann Rauschning, former national-socialist
chief of the government of Dantzig: “Hitler m’a dit”,
(Ed. Co-operation, Paris 1939, pp.266, 267, 273 ss).
“The Fuhrer had come to power, thanks to the votes of
the Catholic Zentrum [Center Party overseen by Jesuit
Ludwig Kaas], only five years before 1933, but most of
the objectives cynically revealed in Mein Kampf were
already realized; this book . . . was written by the
Jesuit controlled Father Bernhardt Stempfle and signed
by Hitler. For . . . it was the Society of Jesus which
perfected the famous Pan-German programme as laid out
in this book, and the Fuhrer endorsed it.”
Source: Edmond Paris, The Secret History of the
Jesuits, page 138
Franz von Papen, another powerful Nazi, who was
instrumental in setting up the concordat between
Germany and the Vatican had this to say: “The Third
Reich is the first world power which not only
acknowledges but also puts into practice the high
principles of the papacy.”
Source:
http://www.chick.com/reading/books/153/153_03.asp
Signing the concordat is Cardinal Pacelli (later to
become Pope Pius XII). By 1933 he was the Vatican
Secretary of State. Second from left is Franz von
Papen, a sinister Nazi and devout Roman Catholic who
was Hitler’s ace diplomat and the Vatican’s agent in
helping to bring Hitler to power. Standing at the far
right can be seen the little-known Vatican prelate,
Montini, later to become Pope Paul VI.
Fact #4Jesuit education
Over the last 400 years the Jesuits have succeeded in
establishing the largest worldwide network of schools
and universities.
These prominent schools and universities, have
produced many well known alumni. Thus, the Jesuits
have been able to shape and mould the thinking of many
famous world leaders, and produce generations of
political and religious leaders who were favorable to
the Roman Catholic Church, and her doctrinal agenda.
The renowned British preacher, Charles Haddon
Spurgeon, once warned about the church ministers who
are graduating from these universities that “… they
keep back a portion of the gospel … having studied in
the devil’s new Jesuitical college.”
Source: Charles H. Spurgeon “A Solemn Warning for All
Churches,” Sermon No. 68
Fact #5
Agents of the Jesuits have been responsible for
assassinating many heads of State over the centuries:
Heads of states were assassinated by the Jesuits, when
they attempt to suppress the influence and meddling of
the Jesuits in their national affairs. Of heads of
states that are known to have been assassinated by
Jesuits we mention for example: William of Orange,
Kings Henry III and Henry IV of France, Czars
Alexander I and Alexander II of Russia, President
Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy, and Mexican
President Benito Pablo Juarez.
Jesuit connection to Lincoln assassination
Abraham Lincoln was fully aware of the evil nature of
the Jesuits. He stated, “… it is not against the
Americans of the South, alone, I am fighting. It is
more against the Pope of Rome, his perfidious Jesuits
and their blind and blood-thirsty slaves that we have
to defend ourselves.”
Source: Fifty Years in the Church of Rome, by Charles
Chiniquy. p. 496
“It would seem that the Jesuits had had it in mind,
from the beginning of the war [the American Civil War
of 1861-1865], to find an occasion for the taking off
[i.e., the assassination] of Mr. [Abraham] Lincoln.”
Source: Thomas M. Harris (U.S. Army Brigadier General;
Author of the book Rome’s Responsibility for the
Assassination of Abraham Lincoln)
“The favorite policy of the Jesuits [is] that of
assassination.”
Source: U.S. Army Brigadier General Thomas M. Harris;
“Rome’s Responsibility for the Assassination of
Abraham Lincoln”; 1897; Page 19)
“It is of faith that the Pope has the right of
deposing heretical and rebel kings. Monarchs so
deposed by the Pope are converted into notorious
tyrants, and may be killed by the first who can reach
them.
“If the public cause cannot meet with its defense in
the death of a tyrant, it is lawful for the first who
arrives, to assassinate him.”
[Defensio Didei, Jesuit Suarez, Book VI. C 4, Nos. 13,
14]
[Donald] Freed remembers what apparently passes for
polite conversation when men such as [William] Colby
and [Ray] Cline get together. “It was quite bizarre”
Freed said, “for the subject they chose was, ‘When is
it acceptable to assassinate a head of state?’ Colby
presented what he said was a theological and
philosophically sound approach. “The Catholic Church,”
he said, “had long since wrestled with this question
and had,” to Colby’s mind, emerged with a sound
concept: “It is acceptable,” he said, “to assassinate
a tyrant.” [Donald Freed is a friend of the author,
Mark Lane. He organized a conference at USC for the
U.S. intelligence community and its critics to meet.
In the panel were Lane, Ellsberg and John Gerassi, all
critics. On the other side were William Colby, former
DCI (Director of Central Intelligence from September
1973 to January 1976), David Atlee Phillips, and Ray
Cline, former deputy DCI’s.]
[Plausible Denial, Mark Lane, 1991, p. 85]
Jesuit connection to Kennedy assassinationPresident
John F. Kennedy was another victim of appalling Jesuit
wickedness. Once he outwardly distanced himself from
the Papal agenda and stood for more liberal ideals and
human rights, he was considered, by their standards, a
traitor to the Vatican and a “tyrant” worthy of death.
This is an excerpt from “Vatican Assassins” by Eric
Jon Phelps:
Knowing that President Kennedy was not going to
escalate the Vietnam War, the Intelligence Community
began to prepare for his assassination. . . . Cardinal
Spellman [Francis Spellman, Archbishop of New York
from 1939-1967], through FDR, had arranged the release
of “Lucky” Luciano . . . Now the Cardinal needed a
favor. If refused, Spellman could use the entire
intelligence community which he had helped to
organize, to eliminate any mob boss. If agreed to, new
gambling centers would open up, Atlantic City in
particular. Clearly, if the President [JFK] was
removed, everybody would acquire more power and
wealth, the intelligence community would become more
absolute, and the Cardinal would be even more
respected by his peers in Rome.
Later, in 1964, for the first time in history, the
Pope of Rome set foot in Fourteenth Amendment America.
Cardinal Spellman had performed well and was rewarded
by a visit from his Master, fellow Cold Warrior and
Vatican Ratline handler, Cardinal Montini, who was now
Pope Paul VI. There is yet another reason for the
removal of President Kennedy. He wanted to arm Israel.
Loftus writes:
“In September 1962 Kennedy decided to supply Israel
with defensive ground-to-air missiles capable of
stopping aircraft, but not the Egyptian offensive
missiles. It was the first arms sale by the U.S.
Government to Israel…. Kennedy promised the Israelis
that as soon as the 1964 election was over, he would
break the CIA ‘into a thousand pieces and scatter it
to the winds’…. With Kennedy’s assassination in
November 1963, the Israelis lost the best friend they
had in the White House since Truman departed.” Source:
The Secret War Against The Jews, John Loftus, 1994]
And why did the Vatican’s Jesuits not want any arms
sales to Israel at this time? Why did the Jesuit-
controlled President Johnson turn his back as the
Egyptian army moved up through the Sinai desert to
prepare its assault on Israel in 1967? Because the
attack upon Israel had to be provoked. That attack was
provoked by the Jesuits’ International Intelligence
Community through Egypt falsely perceiving the
weakness of the Israeli army and the supposed
abandonment of Israel by the American Empire. The six-
day war, engineered by Knight of Malta James Angleton,
had one primary purpose: the taking of Jerusalem along
with the Temple Mount. The apparent lack of military
hardware on the part of Israel provoked the planned
attack by Egypt. Therefore, Israel launched a
preemptive strike and, in six days, the holy city was
in the hands of Rome’s Zionist government.
Had Kennedy armed Israel, the Egyptians would never
have been emboldened to maneuver for war. With no
provoked war, there would have been no Israeli attack.
With no Israeli attack, Jerusalem would never have
been taken by the Zionists, controlled by the Jesuits’
Mossad. With Jerusalem in Arab hands, the Zionists
could never rebuild Solomon’s Temple—unbeknown to them
—for the Jesuits’ “infallible” Pope,
“Who opposeth and exalted himself above all that is
called God, or that is worshiped; so he is God sitteth
in the temple of God [Solomon’s rebuilt temple],
showing himself that he is God.”
-[II Thes 2:4]
It is safe to say that the Jesuit General, using the
Pope with his most powerful Cardinal, [assassinated
President Kennedy].
Source:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vatican/esp_vatican0
3.htm#
THE JESUITS — 1945-1990
Assassination of Kennedy “Pietà” hangs in the Vatican
Cathedral of St. Paul.
One might assume that this emotive painting would hang
somewhere in Dallas, Texas or perhaps in the
Smithsonian. And one would be wrong on both counts.
This painting of President John F. Kennedy’s gruesome
assassination, by Mark Balma, hangs in the Vatican
Cathedral of St. Paul. The painting is entitled
“Pietà” after Michelangelo’s famous sculpture of Mary
holding the body of the crucified Christ, which is
also located at the Vatican. Isn’t this a macabre way
to “celebrate” the life of perhaps America’s most
beloved President? or is this rather an homage to the
Jesuit agenda, serving as a stern warning/reminder to
those willing to cross them?
Image:
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2006/11/1
5/jfkpieta
Fact #6
The Jesuits today control all the powerful secret
societies that are shaping the New World Order
Jesuits at the head of secret societies
“The list of secret societies being controlled by the
Jesuits today include: the Freemasonry, the Knights of
Malta, the Bilderberg group, and the higher levels of
the Knights of Columbus, and the highest levels of
Opus Dei – and all the subgroups that fall under these
powerful entities.”
Source:
http://www.toughissues.org/the%20jesuit%20oder.htm
“There are still …[men and women] about the country,
who will tell you, with grim gravity that, if you
trace up Masonry, through all its Orders, till you
come to the grand tip-top, head Mason of the world,
you will discover that the dread individual and the
Chief of the Society of Jesus are one and the same
person!”
Source: James Parton, 1855, American Historian, The
Black Pope, M.F. Cusack, (London: Marshall, Russell &
Co., 1896) p. 76.
If the above is true, than the example below would be
a meeting of two of the most powerful men on Earth!
The Head of the Jesuits and the Pope, who is also a
Jesuit.
Father General Nicolás [Superior General of the
Society of Jesus/Jesuits] meets with Pope Francis and
wrote of his experience.
Father General Nicolás meets with Pope Francis“At the
personal invitation of the Pope Francis I went to the
Santa Marta House. . . He was at the entrance and
received me with the usual Jesuit embrace. We had a
few pictures taken, at his request, and at my
apologies for not keeping protocol he insisted that I
treat him like any other Jesuit at the “Tu” level, so
I did not have to worry about addressing him as “Your
Holiness,” or “Holy Father.” I offered him all our
Jesuit resources because in his new position he is
going to need counsel, thinking, persons, etc. He
showed gratitude for this and at the invitation to
visit us for lunch at the Curia he said he would
oblige. There was full commonality of feeling on
several issues that we discussed and I remained with
the conviction that we will work very well together
for the service of the Church …
There was calm, humor and mutual understanding about
past, present and future. I left the Casa de Santa
Marta convinced that the Pope will gladly count on our
collaboration in the vineyard of the Lord. At the end
he helped me with my coat and accompanied me to the
door. That added a couple of salutes to me from the
Swiss Guards there. A Jesuit embrace, once again, as
the natural way to greet and send off a friend.”
http://news.sjnen.org/2013/03/father-general-meets-
with-pope-francis/
The Secret History of the Jesuits, Edmond Paris
Fact #7
The Jesuits are responsible for fomenting the two
world wars and escalating the Vietnam War after
President Kennedy’s assassination:
Image URL:
http://www.chick.com/catalog/books/images/0191.jpg
“The public is practically unaware of the overwhelming
responsibility carried by the Vatican and its Jesuits
in the starting of the two world wars – a situation
which may be explained in part by the gigantic
finances at the disposition of the Vatican and its
Jesuits, giving them power in so many spheres,
especially since the last conflict.”
Source: Edmond Paris, The Secret History of the
Jesuits, page 9
Here is a link to the entire e-book-
http://www.spirituallysmart.com/Paris-
The_Secret_History_of_Jesuits_1975.pdf
Pavelić facing Cardinal StepinacCatholic Bishops
giving the Nazi saluteThe documented atrocities
committed by the Jesuits, particularly those under the
Ustachi (or Ustaše) are particularly disturbing and
shocking, especially since there are actual
photographs of such evil. This didn’t happen hundreds
or thousands of years ago. It happened in the 1940’s!
Here are a few links to some of the nothing short of
satanic genocide the Ustachi carried out under the
rule of Ante Pavelić, a Catholic Croatian fascist
leader, who occupied part of Yugoslavia for Fascist
Italy and Nazi Germany, and ultimately for the Papacy.
For many in Yugoslavia it was either convert to
Catholicism or be brutally tortured and killed.
(Left image – Pavelić facing Cardinal Stepinac who was
arrested for War crimes and went to jail and died
under house arrest but was beautified by the Pope JPII
in 1998.)
(Right image – Catholic Bishops giving the Nazi salute
in honor of Hitler; Note far right: Joseph Goebbels
and second from right: Wilhelm Frick)
(Below image – Ustachi symbol)
Ustachi symbol
http://www.chick.com/reading/books/153/153_03b.asp
http://www.reformation.org/holoc3.html
http://www.spirituallysmart.com/genocide_in_croatia.pd
f
Pope Pius VII reinstated the Jesuits
Fact #8
After Pope Pius VII was freed from exile in 1814, his
first order of business upon returning to Rome was to
restore the Jesuit order
The papacy suffered great humiliation at the hand of
Napoleon. Thus, right after the defeat of Napoleon in
1814, Pope Pius VII was freed from imprisonment and
was returned to Rome. The need to restore the Jesuit
militia became an urgent matter. Rome did not want to
be deprived again of the services of the Jesuits, no
matter how burdensome this service was to the Church
of Rome, and its allies.
“In the agreement to rescue Rome [i.e., the Roman
Catholic Church’s hierarchy] from the predicament of
losing its world control to Protestantism, and to
preserve the spiritual and temporal supremacy which
the popes [had] ‘usurped’ during the Middle Ages, Rome
now ‘sold’ the [Roman Catholic] Church to the Society
of Jesus [i.e., the Jesuits]; in essence the popes
surrendered themselves into their hands.”
Source: John Daniel (“The Grand Design Exposed”; 1999;
Page 64)
Fact #9
The Jesuit Order took over the Office of Inquisition
shortly after it was sanctioned and this led to the
martyrdom of millions of saints
Jesuit Order took over the Office of Inquisition
In 1254 Pope Alexander IV established the Office of
the Inquisition. The first inquisitor was Dominic, who
was the founder of the Dominican order of monks.
However, shortly after Pope Paul III sanctioned the
Society of Jesus, the Office of Inquisition was
revived and the Pope gave free reign to the Jesuits to
run this office, and the inquisitor Generals were
granted exceptional powers in carrying out their
mandate to root out of all “heretics.” This caused the
martyrdom of millions of saints.
The quotes below show the effect of Jesuits taking
over the Office of the Inquisition:
“Need I speak to you of the thirty years’ war in
Germany, which was mainly instigated by the Jesuits,
in order to deprive the Protestants of the right of
free religious worship, secured to them by the treaty
of Augsburg? Or of the Irish rebellion, of the inhuman
butchery of about fifteen millions of Indians in South
America, Mexico and Cuba, by the Spanish papists? In
short, it is calculated by authentic historians, that
papal Rome has shed the blood of sixty-eight millions
of the human race in order to establish her unfounded
claims to religious dominion.” Source: Dr. Brownlee’s
“Popery an enemy to civil liberty”, p. 105
“This was the century of the last religious wars in
“Christendom,” the Thirty Years’ War in Germany,
fomented by the Jesuits, reducing the people to
cannibalism, and the population of Bohemia from
4,000,000 to 780,000, and of Germany from 20,000,000
to 7,000,000, and making Southern Germany almost a
desert, …”
Source: Cushing B. Hassell, History of the Church of
God, Chapter XVII.
Writing about the Jesuits, [John] Lord states
“They are accused of securing the revocation of the
Edict of Nantes,– one of the greatest crimes in the
history of modern times, which led to the expulsion of
four hundred thousand Protestants from France, and the
execution of four hundred thousand more.”
Source: John Lord, Beacon Lights of History, volume
VI, p. 325.
“In Bohemia, by 1600, in a population of 4,000,000, 80
per cent were Protestant. When the Hapsburgs and
Jesuits had done their work, 800,000 were left, all
Catholics.”
Source: Henry H., Pocket Bible Handbook, Chicago, 13th
edition, 1939, p. 790.
Fact #10
The Jesuits succeeded in their destructive agenda
through dominating the confessor field wherever they
went
The Jesuits’ confessor
“The Jesuits became the predominant group supplying
confessors to (meaning, hearers of the confessions of)
kings and princes and those in authority. As the New
Catholic Encyclopedia says, “they acted as royal
confessor to all French kings for 2 centuries, from
Henry III to Louis XV; to all German emperors after
the early 17th century; to all Dukes of Bavaria after
1579; to most rulers of Poland and Portugal; to
princely families throughout Europe.
“As advisors to kings, they influenced political
policy. A royal confessor was not slow to tell a king
that he had a duty to make the kind of political
alliances that would promote the temporal interests of
the Church. It was Le Tellier, Jesuit confessor to
Louis XIV, who in the 1680’s persuaded that monarch to
revoke the Edict of Nantes, which granted religious
liberty to Protestants.”
Source:
http://justus.anglican.org/resources/bio/44.html
The Jesuits are even confessors of popes. “The Pope’s
confessor, an ordinary priest, must be a Jesuit: he
must visit the Vatican once a week at a fixed time,
and he alone may absolve the Pope of his sins.”
Source: http://amazingdiscoveries.org/S-deception-The-
New-Superior-General-A-Wolf-in-Sheeps-Clothing
———————–
Conclusion:
Ignatius Loyola – Jesuit Founder – by Francisco
Zurbaran
Given the above historic facts about the Jesuits, it
is incredulous and most shocking to see the media and
the world’s religious and political leaders stampeding
to endorse and praise Pope Francis. We have no words
to describe this unprecedented worldwide epidemic of
memory loss towards Rome and her Jesuits.
The prescient warning of General Sherman is most
appropriate to quote today:
“I would remind you of Webster’s definition of a
Jesuit: a designer, an intriguer. If the Church of
Rome prevailed, the Pope would be the Universal King .
. . The Jesuits are here to plot and scheme and, if
possible, take from us the noble heritage of our civil
and religious freedom. The rules of the Jesuit Order
justify theft, licentiousness, lying, false-witness
bearing, suicide and the murder of parents and other
relatives. The greatest crimes in history committed
against individuals and nations have been committed by
the Jesuits . . . Wherever Jesuits are they have the
torch to burn, the sword to slay, the inquisition to
torture. They are the enemies of [Bible-believing]
Christianity. They live for conquest, fortune and
glory.”
Source: General Sherman’s Son: The Life of Thomas
Ewing Sherman, S.J., Joseph T. Durkin, S. J., (New
York: Farrar, Straus and Cudahy, 1959) p. 186.
It is our duty to as followers of Yahuwah to expose
Rome and her Jesuits, and to pray for the utter
destruction of their evil deceit. Prayer is the only
weapon we have against this veiled enemy we face
today. Rome and her Jesuits are the greatest enemy of
the Gospel and of humanity. However, we are assured in
His prophetic Word that they will not prevail. The
Harlot will be utterly destroyed prior to the Second
Coming of Yahushua:
“And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast,
these shall hate the whore, and shall make her
desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn
her with fire.” Revelation 17:16.
Praise His name for ever and ever!!
Source: https://www.worldslastchance.com
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund
our Volunteer Website and Orphanage
Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you
information that is not offered by the mainstream
news, and therefore may seem controversial. The
opinions, views, statements, and/or information we
present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed,
espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its
leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC,
or those who read its content. However, they are
hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use
logical thinking, your own intuition and your own
connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to
help you determine what is true and what is not. By
sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our
goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher
truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in
this material realm.
Elaine
December 22, 2020 at 5:56 PM
Well I was raised by one of them and this sounds
right. He was a cruel man and bore false witness
against me twice in very serious circumstances. He was
violent and tortured me for not obeying exactly as he
demanded. Today he would do years in prison for what
he did regularly to small children yet he ended up on
the board for a religious college where supposedly he
wasn’t fanatic enough for their taste but who knows
because of the constant lying.
Reply
David
June 14, 2020 at 8:11 AM
Thank you Edmond for your article helping this world
to see the true evil of the jesuits. Jesus Christ –
King of Kings and Lord of Lords!
Reply
Carl
December 23, 2020 at 12:33 PM
Forever and ever, hallelujah, hallelujah.
And then, “scripture alone” is a heresy by itself and
cannot break off mainstream Christianity’s pagan
origins.
This conspiracy all began with Adam Weishaupt, not by
St. Inigo Loyola.
Reply
Dhara
November 6, 2019 at 9:34 PM
It is not the second coming of Jesus, but the return –
resurrection – of the awareness of who we are; our own
Christ (crystal clear awareness) of the God/dess
within each of us. A restoration. resurrection.
The Catholic church, servants of the dark forces who
hate Mother God and all women, cannot survive without
our permission to forget who we are – God/dess
individualized. They burned millions of women at the
stake to stop Mary Magnalena and Jesus’ sacred
bloodline from entering the DNA of Humanity.
Earth Goddess Sophia instructed women to master the
elementals to protect themselves against the church
and men in general. Jealous of abilities the men did
not have and could not understand, the church labeled
them ‘witches’ which is short for bewitching
(charming, causing men to lose their confidence and
sense of superiority) and according to documented
research, the church raped and burned millions at the
stake, including a few men and children. Today, the
men of the church rape children, men and women.
Without our support, they cannot exist- let them
starve to death of the money and energy Humanity has
been giving them for centuries. It is time to free
ourselves of these servants of the dark forces and
seek Mother/Father God Within.
Reply
Nada
October 28, 2020 at 1:18 PM
more at link
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23003] [23006] [23008] [23004] [23010] [23033] [23011] [23013] [23015] [23017] [23020] [23021] [23018] [23022] [23024] [23014] [23016] [23012] [23019] [23023] [23025] [23026] [23027] [23029] [23030] [23031] [23032] [23034] [23035] [23036] [23037] [23028] [23007] [22997] [22998] [22999] [23000] [23001] [23002] [23005] [23009] |
|
23003 |
|
|
Date: January 23, 2021 at 13:09:52
From: Akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: maybe this board should be retitled Charles:Bible:Hitler for short? |
|
|
“I learned much from the Order of the Jesuits”, said
Hitler… “Until now, there has never been anything more
grandiose, on the earth, than the hierarchical
organization of the Catholic Church. I transferred
much of this organization into my own party… I am
going to let you in on a secret… I am founding an
Order… In my “Burgs” of the Order, we will raise up a
youth which will make the world tremble… Hitler then
stopped, saying that he couldn’t say any more..
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23006] [23008] [23004] [23010] [23033] [23011] [23013] [23015] [23017] [23020] [23021] [23018] [23022] [23024] [23014] [23016] [23012] [23019] [23023] [23025] [23026] [23027] [23029] [23030] [23031] [23032] [23034] [23035] [23036] [23037] [23028] [23007] |
|
23006 |
|
|
Date: January 23, 2021 at 21:27:15
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: maybe this board should be retitled Charles:Bible:Hitler for... |
URL: Jesuits have seized the White house |
|
Maybe the National board should be retitled "The Jesuit Board".
Are you willing to examine what you have invested in as in Jesuit Joe and the
others as well?
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23008] |
|
23008 |
|
|
Date: January 23, 2021 at 22:57:00
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: maybe this board should be retitled Charles:Bible:Hitler for... |
URL: Pope Francis proclaims 2021 the Year of St. Joseph |
|
Now maybe there is some understanding why the lean towards the Jesuits like Biden and Fauci...the latter
of whom Trump really liked because he is in on it. Fauci their chosen "healer" who will carry on in the
same role this was a plan hidden in plain sight...Trump is a player, one of them many voters think they
chose but it was already decided of belief in ballot box magic (tricky huh?). And also their daddy
Francis did choose St. Joseph as the patron saint for 2021 I guess that is eluding to your chosen
leaders namesake...so you have your choice via Francis their "pope"(not mine). More grieving is
coming....Thanks a lot not for more Hitler.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
23004 |
|
|
Date: January 23, 2021 at 19:20:28
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: maybe this board should be retitled Charles:Bible:Hitler for... |
|
|
This board is about all religions. ( so it would seem by
the title)So it should not be called Hitler. btw,
Christianity was in Briton prior to Rome getting a hold
on it or ever the RCC came into existence. Was wondering
if you read the whole thread? Just curious. And
according to the Jesuits oath, all peoples are heretics
if they are not Catholic and are considered deserving of
death.(man, woman and child) The Jesuits are the
military arm of the RCC sworn to the oath, there is no
rulership on earth except the Pope, being the so called
vicar of Christ in the flesh. (according to them)
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23010] [23033] [23011] [23013] [23015] [23017] [23020] [23021] [23018] [23022] [23024] [23014] [23016] [23012] [23019] [23023] [23025] [23026] [23027] [23029] [23030] [23031] [23032] [23034] [23035] [23036] [23037] [23028] [23007] |
|
23010 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 04:32:05
From: Akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: maybe this board should be retitled Charles:Bible:Hitler for... |
URL: http://www.religioustolerance.org/wic_burn2.htm |
|
"And according to the Jesuits oath, all peoples are heretics
if they are not Catholic and are considered deserving of
death."
Give me a break. I suggest you review your history of Catholic extreme
intolerance, torture and demise of non-catholics, Pamela. It certainly wasn't
limited to Jesuits.
link:
"The Inquisition was a powerful office set up within the Catholic Church to
root out and punish heresy throughout Europe and the Americas. Beginning
in the 12th century and continuing for hundreds of years, the Inquisition is
infamous for the severity of its tortures and its persecution of Jews and
Muslims. Its worst manifestation was in Spain, where the Spanish Inquisition
was a dominant force for more than 200 years, resulting in some 32,000
executions.
Catharists
The Inquisition has its origins in the early organized persecution of non-
Catholic Christian religions in Europe. In 1184 Pope Lucius III sent bishops to
southern France to track down heretics called Catharists. These efforts
continued into the 14th Century.
During the same period, the church also pursued the Waldensians in
Germany and Northern Italy. In 1231, Pope Gregory charged the Dominican
and Franciscan Orders to take over the job of tracking down heretics.
The Job of Inquisitors
Inquisitors would arrive in a town and announce their presence, giving
citizens a chance to admit to heresy. Those who confessed received a
punishment ranging from a pilgrimage to a whipping.
Those accused of heresy were forced to testify. If the heretic did not
confess, torture and execution were inescapable. Heretics weren’t allowed
to face accusers, received no counsel, and were often victims of false
accusations.
Bernard Gui wrote the influential guidebook for Inquisitors called “Conduct
of the Inquisition into Heretical Depravity” in the early 14th Century. Gui
himself pronounced over 600 people guilty of heresy and was featured as a
character in Umberto Eco’s novel The Name of the Rose.
There were countless abuses of power. Count Raymond VII of Toulouse was
known for burning heretics at the stake even though they had confessed.
His successor, Count Alphonese, confiscated the lands of the accused to
increase his riches.
In 1307, Inquisitors were involved in the mass arrest and tortures of 15,000
Knights Templar in France, resulting in dozens of executions. Joan of Arc,
burned at the stake in 1431, is the most famous victim of this wing of the
Inquisition.
Conversos
In the late 15th Century, King Ferdinand II and Queen Isabella of Spain
believed corruption in the Spanish Catholic Church was caused by Jews
who, to survive centuries of anti-Semitism, converted to Christianity.
Known as Conversos, they were viewed with suspicion by old powerful
Christian families. Conversos were blamed for a plague and accused of
poisoning peoples’ water and abducting Christian boys.
Ferdinand and Isabella feared that even trusted Conversos were secretly
practicing their old religion; the royal couple was also afraid of angering
Christian subjects who demanded a harder line against Conversos—
Christian support was crucial in an upcoming crusade against Muslims
planned in Granada.
Ferdinand felt an Inquisition was the best way to fund that crusade, by
seizing the wealth of heretic Conversos.
Torquemada
In 1478, under the influence of clergyman Tomas de Torquemada, the
monarchs created the Tribunal of Castile to investigate heresy among
Conversos. The effort focused on stronger Catholic education for
Conversos, but by 1480, the Inquisition was formed.
That same year, Jews in Castile were forced into ghettos separated from
Christians, and the Inquisition expanded to Seville. A mass exodus of
Conversos followed.
In 1481, 20,000 Conversos confessed to heresy, hoping to avoid execution.
Inquisitors decreed that their penitence required them to name other
heretics. By the year’s end, hundreds of Conversos were burned at the
stake.
Spanish Inquisition
Hearing the complaints of Conversos who had fled to Rome, Pope Sextus
proclaimed the Spanish Inquisition was too harsh and was wrongly accusing
Conversos. In 1482 Sextus appointed a council to take command of the
Inquisition.
Torquemada was named Inquisitor General and established courts across
Spain. Torture became systemized and routinely used to elicit confessions.
Sentencing of confessed heretics was done in a public event called the
Auto-da-Fe. All heretics wore a sackcloth with a single eyehole over their
heads. Heretics who refused to confess were burned at the stake.
Sometimes people fought back against the Inquisition. In 1485, an Inquisitor
died after being poisoned, and another Inquisitor was stabbed to death in a
church. Torquemada managed to round up the assassins, burning at the
stake 42 people in retaliation.
Torquemada’s downfall came when he investigated members of the clergy
for heresy. Complaints to Pope Alexander VI convinced him that
Torquemada needed tempering. Torquemada was forced to share leadership
with four other clergymen until he died in 1498.
Inquisitor Generals
Diego de Deza took over as Inquisitor General, escalating the hunt for
heresy within cities and rounding up scores of accused heretics, including
members of the nobility and local governments. Some were able to bribe
their way out of imprisonment and death, reflecting the level of corruption
under de Deza.
After Isabella’s death in 1504, Ferdinand promoted Cardinal Gonzalo
Ximenes de Cisneros, the head of the Spanish Catholic Church, to Inquisitor
General. Ximenes had previously made a mark in Granada persecuting the
Islamic Moors.
As Inquisitor General, Ximenes pursued Muslims into North Africa,
encouraging Ferdinand to take military action. Upon seizing African towns,
the Inquisition became established there. Ximenes was dismissed in 1517
after pleas from prominent Conversos, but the Inquisition was allowed to
continue.
Roman Inquisition
Rome renewed its own Inquisition in 1542 when Pope Paul III created the
Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Roman and Universal Inquisition to
combat Protestant heresy. This Inquisition is best known for putting Galileo
on trial in 1633.
In 1545, the Spanish Index was created, a list of European books considered
heretical and forbidden in Spain, based on the Roman Inquisition’s own
Index Librorum Prohibitorum. In other nods to Rome’s concerns, the Spanish
Inquisition focused on the rising population of Spanish Protestants in the
1550s.
In 1556, Philip II ascended the Spanish throne. He had previously brought
the Roman Inquisition to the Netherlands, where Lutherans were hunted
down and burned at the stake.
Inquisition in the New World
As Spain expanded into the Americas, so did the Inquisition, established in
Mexico in 1570. In 1574, Lutherans were burned at the stake there, and the
Inquisition came to Peru, where Protestants were likewise tortured and
burned alive.
In 1580 Spain conquered Portugal and began rounding up and slaughtering
Jews that had fled Spain. Philip II also renewed hostilities against the Moors,
who revolted and found themselves either killed or sold into slavery.
Philip II died in 1598 and his son, Philip III, dealt with the Muslim uprising by
banishing them. From 1609 to 1615, 150,000 Muslims who had converted to
Catholicism were forced out of Spain.
By the mid-1600s the Inquisition and Catholic dominance had become such
an oppressive fact of daily life in Spanish territories that Protestants avoided
those places altogether.
End of the Spanish Inquisition
In 1808, Napoleon conquered Spain and ordered the Inquisition there to be
abolished.
After Napoleon’s defeat in 1814, Ferdinand VII worked to reinstate the
Inquisition but was ultimately prevented by the French government, which
helped Ferdinand overcome a fierce rebellion. Part of the agreement with
France was to dismantle the Inquisition, which was defunct by 1834.
The last person to be executed by the Inquisition was Cayetano Ripoll, a
Spanish schoolmaster hanged for heresy in 1826.
The Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Roman and Universal Inquisition
still exists, though changed its name a couple of times. It is currently called
the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.”"
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23033] [23011] [23013] [23015] [23017] [23020] [23021] [23018] [23022] [23024] [23014] [23016] [23012] [23019] [23023] [23025] [23026] [23027] [23029] [23030] [23031] [23032] [23034] [23035] [23036] [23037] [23028] |
|
23033 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 09:58:48
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: maybe this board should be retitled Charles:Bible:Hitler for... |
|
|
What???? did you read my post wrong? I am not saying
the RCC did not persecute non Catholics. The Jesuits
came along later but yes of course, they've been doing
this a long time.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
23011 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 04:52:44
From: Akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Promising Salvation to Non-Catholics: A Sin against Charity |
URL: https://catholicism.org/ad-rem-no-145.html |
|
Promising Salvation to Non-Catholics: A Sin against Charity
NOV 2, 2010 BROTHER ANDRÉ MARIE
"We all hate it when someone makes a promise and doesn’t keep it. “But
you promised!” we will say, and, depending on the level of blame and
sensitivity of conscience on the part of the offending party, the reaction can
be one of great shame. If this is true of promises one is simply unable to
keep because circumstances forbade it, it is more so in the case of false
promises: that is, those made with no intention of keeping them, or those
one had absolutely no authority to make. To promise salvation to a non-
Catholic, either directly or indirectly, falls in the latter category as being
particularly shameful. It is shameful because it is sinful. It is sinful because it
offends not only against faith, but against the greatest Christian virtue:
charity.
That the Church has defined there is no salvation outside her means that
this proposition is true, and we know it is so with a divinely guaranteed
certitude. Genuine charity is rooted in truth. A lie is an affront to truth and
therefore an offense against charity. The ontological and psychological
connection between truth and charity is a basic Christian concept, whose
origin is in the Trinity Itself. Pope Benedict XVI recently highlighted this
truth-charity nexus:
To defend the truth, to articulate it with humility and conviction, and to bear
witness to it in life are therefore exacting and indispensable forms of charity.
Charity, in fact, “rejoices in the truth” (1 Cor 13:6). … Only in truth does
charity shine forth, only in truth can charity be authentically lived. (Caritas in
Veritate, No. 1, 3, emphasis in original.)
There are various theories regarding how non-Catholics get to heaven as
non-Catholics. Many of these have been advanced by churchmen of high
rank. Rather than attempt to disprove these opinions in polemical fashion, I
would prefer to show the truth of their contrary, and the consequent duty
we have in charity not to waver from it. Out of love for God and for our non-
Catholic neighbor, we must not give false or even uncertain assurances
concerning how salvation is to be attained, and, consequently, how
damnation is to be avoided. That would not be “doing the truth in charity”
(Eph. 4:15), as St. Paul enjoins upon Christians.
Let’s consider an oft-cited infallible definition:
“The most Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that
none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but
also Jews and heretics and schismatics, can have a share in life eternal; but
that they will go into the eternal fire which was prepared for the devil and his
angels, unless before death they are joined with Her; and that so important
is the unity of this ecclesiastical body that only those remaining within this
unity can profit by the sacraments of the Church unto salvation, and they
alone can receive an eternal recompense for their fasts, their almsgivings,
their other works of Christian piety and the duties of a Christian soldier. No
one, let his almsgiving be as great as it may, no one, even if he pour out his
blood for the Name of Christ, can be saved, unless he remain within the
bosom and the unity of the Catholic Church.” (Pope Eugene IV, the Bull
Cantate Domino, 1441.)
We often hear the objection that someone does not need to be a “formal”
member of the Church in order to be saved. The implication is that the
spiritual trumps the juridical, and that God is not a stickler for names on
baptismal registers and the like. But the implication often reaches further
than such trivialities, to include what the Church has defined is necessary
for salvation. The objection frames the issue of being Catholic in a far-too-
juridical way. What makes us inside the Church? Three things: Divine and
Catholic Faith (explicit in the principal mysteries — the Trinity and the
Incarnation — and at least implicit in all other articles), sacramental baptism,
and subjection to the Holy Father. These defining elements of Church
membership expounded by St. Robert Bellarmine were authoritatively
postulated by Pope Pius XII in Mystici Corporis:
Actually only those are to be included as members of the Church who have
been baptized and profess the true faith, and who have not been so
unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or been
excluded by legitimate authority for grave faults committed. “For in one
spirit” says the Apostle, “were we all baptized into one Body, whether Jews
or Gentiles, whether bond or free.” [I Cor., XII, 13] As therefore in the true
Christian community there is only one Body, one Spirit, one Lord, and one
Baptism, so there can be only one faith. [Cf. Eph., IV, 5] And therefore, if a
man refuse to hear the Church, let him be considered – so the Lord
commands – as a heathen and a publican. [Cf. Matth., XVIII, 17] It follows
that those who are divided in faith or government cannot be living in the
unity of such a Body, nor can they be living the life of its one Divine Spirit.
(No. 22)
There are many people who would not be considered “formal” members of
the Church who are, in fact, Catholics in the dogmatic sense. Consider a
case I’m personally familiar with: a teenager baptized in a (schismatic)
Orthodox church in Russia. Adopted by a Catholic couple when she was
about eleven years old, she continued to communicate and confess in the
Catholic Church as she had in the Orthodox parish in Russia. The Catholic
priest in this country said that as long as she believed in the pope — which
she did — she was free to receive the sacraments. Yet I have been assured
that, juridically, she is still considered Orthodox. I am fairly certain that her
name appears on no Catholic parish register. For all that, she meets the
three of the requisites above. This young lady could not be more Catholic.
What is important are not the “juridical” issues, but the ecclesiological,
sacramental, and “creedal” elements that truly make one a Catholic.
Perhaps we can put it in terms that might make a canonist cringe: de facto
Catholicism is what matters, not de jure Catholicism.
Saint Francis Xavier would not allow his hearers to think they could be saved
outside the Church.
The overly legalistic analysis strikes me as somewhat disingenuous, too,
inasmuch as those who advance it generally accuse us (“Feeneyites”) of
being hung up on some sort of formalism. Assuredly we are not; but we are
hung up on Catholicism.
Note in the definition of the Council of Florence that “pagans, … Jews and
heretics and schismatics” are all categorically described as “existing outside
the Catholic Church” and, consequently, they cannot “have a share in life
eternal.” With only two exceptions, those “outside” the Church according to
Florence correspond exactly to those not included as “members” by Pius
XII. Those exceptions are 1) unbaptized believers (e.g., catechumens),
whom Florence does not mention in Cantate Domino, but whom Pius XII
clearly states are not members; and 2) excommunicates, whom Florence
does not mention.
The unbaptized catechumen and analogous individuals bear a certain close
relationship to the Church, as they have her faith, assent to her government,
and seek her sacraments. I don’t see the need to be preoccupied with this
question, as some are. God will provide for His own, and these people are
His by those ties I’ve just mentioned. God will not cast off anyone who
perseveres in His grace.1 Regarding excommunicates, we know from the
grave nature of excommunication that those who die in that terrible state —
if they really are excommunicated in foro interno — are lost. What concerns
me most are the “pagans, … Jews and heretics and schismatics” that do not
have the Church’s faith, do not assent to her government, and may or may
not have a sacrament or two, or even seven. The Church infallibly assures us
that those who fit these descriptions are not in the way of salvation and that
“that they will go into the eternal fire which was prepared for the devil and
his angels, unless before death they are joined with Her.” Jesus commands
us in the Holy Gospels to preach the unvarnished Catholic Gospel to these.
If we let human respect get in the way of the great mandate, we damn
ourselves.
These categories are not beyond comprehension. “Pagans” (or the
synonymous “infidels”) would include not only unbelievers like atheists and
agnostics, idolators like Hindus, or pantheists like Buddhists, but also
Muslims, whom the Catholic world lumped into the category “pagan” in the
fifteenth century when the Florentine Fathers met. “Jews” are hardly in need
of explanation. They identify themselves as such. The words “heretic” and
“schismatic” are rarely used in common parlance today, even in
ecclesiastical circles, for they are considered “divisive” and even rude. Yet,
the Church not only officially uses the words, but also clearly defines them
in the current (1983) Code of Canon Law:
Can. 751 Heresy is the obstinate denial or doubt, after baptism, of a truth
which must be believed by divine and catholic faith. Apostasy is the total
repudiation of the christian faith. Schism is the withdrawal of submission to
the Supreme Pontiff or from communion with the members of the Church
subject to him.
Elsewhere in the Code (1364 §1), we are informed that members of all three
categories here mentioned automatically excommunicate themselves from
the Church: “An apostate from the faith, a heretic or a schismatic incurs a
latae sententiae excommunication…”.
I am very well aware that theologians distinguish between formal and
material heresy as well as between formal and material schism. These are
perfectly legitimate distinctions. Someone baptized and brought up in an
alien sect will inevitably be, for a time anyway, merely in material heresy or
schism. Before the age of reason, it’s not even a question: the child is a
Catholic plain and simple. There are no infant Lutherans, Syrian Jacobites,
or Serbian Orthodox — only pagan ones and Catholic ones. At what point
one brought up in such a sect formally adheres to heresy or schism is God’s
business and I’ll not lose the least amount of sleep over the question. What
is the duty of the Church, however, and what ought to make us lose a few
winks, is the duty we have to witness to the truth of where salvation is to be
found. To keep people somnolent in their errors is just plain damnable. Let
us suppose for a moment that one of the infants we’ve just considered lives
to his teens in a blissful merely material heresy. Supposing he commits a
mortal sin? Where does he seek forgiveness? Let’s say that his particular
denomination believes that sin cannot separate us from God’s love — as so
many believe? What then? Will the same priest who puts the fear of God into
a Catholic boy struggling against vice do a volte-face and assure the non-
Catholic suffering the same moral afflictions a place in Paradise should he
die — even though he will not seek the sacrament of God’s mercy because
his parents taught him it’s a popish abomination?
Indifferentism breeds strange contradictions.
While these distinctions are real, and have a valuable place in Catholic
theology, they are not intended to contradict the plain meaning of dogma.
Theology is meant to serve the revealed word, not to annul it.
The explanation that I recently read on the blog of a particularly intelligent
priest, to the effect that God can save someone outside the Church very
much misses the point. To argue from God’s sheer power while prescinding
from His revelation is a dangerous thing. God could, by His naked
omnipotence, use me — who am not a priest — to confect the Eucharist,
couldn’t He? By His omnipotence, God could arrange for a child of our own
times to be immaculately conceived. Neither of these things entails an
inherent contradiction like squaring a circle, but both contradict defined
dogma. It would be wiser to believe that God’s grace and providence will
make things happen in conformity to His revelation — despite the apparent
“unlikeliness” of it.
If we trust God’s grace, justice, and mercy to conform perfectly to the
dogmatic teaching of His Church, we will never regret it. And that, I can
promise.
And who would have the temerity to suggest that God cannot or will not
provide sacramental baptism for him, even miraculously? ↩"
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23013] [23015] [23017] [23020] [23021] [23018] [23022] [23024] [23014] [23016] [23012] [23019] [23023] [23025] [23026] [23027] [23029] [23030] [23031] [23032] [23034] [23035] [23036] [23037] [23028] |
|
23013 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 06:18:08
From: Akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Without the Church there is no salvation |
URL: https://www.catholiceducation.org/en/religion-and-philosophy/apologetics/without-the-church-there-is-no-salvation.html |
|
Do you disagree that this is a basic tenant of catholicism?
"What does the Catholic Church mean by the phrase, Outside the Church
there is no salvation?
Issue:
What does the Catholic Church mean by the phrase, "Outside the Church
there is no salvation" (extra ecclesiam nulla salus)?
Response:
All salvation comes through Jesus Christ, the one Savior of the world (cf.
Acts 4:12). His Holy Spirit dispenses those graces through His body, the
Church. "He who hears you hears me, and he who rejects you rejects me,
and he who rejects me rejects him who sent me" (Lk. 10:16).
Quoting from various documents of Vatican II and Pope Paul VI, the
Catechism of the Catholic Church (no. 776) explains:
As sacrament, the Church is Christs instrument. She is taken up by Him also
as the instrument for the salvation of all, the universal sacrament of
salvation, by which Christ is at once manifesting and actualizing the mystery
of Gods love for men. The Church is the visible plan of Gods love for
humanity, because God desires that the whole human race may become one
People of God, form one Body of Christ, and be built up into one Temple of
the Holy Spirit. Discussion: There are two principal errors when it comes to
the Churchs teaching on extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Some reject this
teaching as both incorrect and arrogant. Others interpret this statement to
condemn all those who are not visibly united to the Roman Catholic Church.
To properly understand this teaching, we must examine it within the context
of divine Revelation and Church history. This examination will reveal that the
phrase was not formulated to express who would go to heaven and who
would go to hell, for only God will judge that. Rather, the phrase expresses
an understanding of the Church in relation to her role in the salvation of the
world.
Translation or Interpretation?
Many people translate the Latin phrase extra ecclesiam nulla salus as
"Outside the Church there is no salvation." This translation does not seem
entirely faithful to the Latin meaning, and contributes to the
misunderstanding of the phrase.
The Latin word "extra" is both an adverb and preposition. Depending on its
use in a sentence, the word has different meanings. When used to describe
spatial relations between objects, the word is translated as "beyond" or
"outside of" (e.g., Beyond the creek is a tree; or, James is outside of the
room). When used to describe abstract relations between concepts or
intangible things, the word is commonly translated "without" (e.g., Without a
method, it is difficult to teach). Within the phrase in question, extra is a
preposition describing the abstract relationship of the Church to salvation.
Considering the Latin nuances of the word, a proper translation would be,
"Without the Church there is no salvation." This translation more accurately
reflects the doctrinal meaning of the phrase.
Scriptural Foundations
In the Gospel of Mark, after the Resurrection, Jesus appeared to the Eleven
and gave them the commission, "Go into all the world and preach the
Gospel to the whole creation. He who believes and is baptized will be saved;
but he who does not believe will be condemned" (Mk. 16:15-16).
In order to accept or reject the Gospel, each person must have it preached
to him. If acceptance or rejection of the truth were based on private
revelations given to each man, woman, and child, there would be no need
for Christ to commission the Apostles to preach the Gospel. Jesus desired
to reveal Himself through His body, the Church. While this passage
condemns those who reject the truth, it does not condemn those who have
not had the truth offered to them as Christ intends.
The New Testament clearly teaches that salvation is a gift offered by God in
various ways to all men. Adam, Abel, and Enoch lived between the first sin
and the covenant of Noah. They were bound by original sin. All are
considered to be in heaven. Enoch did not even die, but was taken to God
before death (Heb. 11:4-5). These men were neither baptized nor
circumcised, but nonetheless saved.
When the gentile centurion came to Jesus in Capernaum and asked for the
healing of his servant, Our Lord agreed to go to his home, but the centurion
said, "Lord, I am not worthy to have you come under my roof; but only say
the word, and my servant will be healed" (Mt. 8:8). Jesus replied:
"Truly, I say to you, not even in Israel have I found such faith. I tell you, many
will come from East and West and sit at table with Abraham, Isaac, and
Jacob in the kingdom of heaven, while the sons of the kingdom will be
thrown into the outer darkness; there men will weep and gnash their teeth"
(Mt. 8:10-13).
Jesus makes a clear distinction between those who are sons of the kingdom
(that is, those who have knowledge of and accepted the faith) and those
who are not. He includes in the kingdom of heaven many of those who are
not. Jesus graces us with His incarnation, and His presence is known
through His body, the Church. The Church carries on the work of Christ here
on earth. Those to whom the Church has not preached the Good News will
be judged by God in a manner known to God and tempered with His mercy.
As St. Paul explains:
"When Gentiles who have not the law do by nature what the law requires,
they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. They
show that what the law requires is written on their hearts, while their
conscience also bears witness and their conflicting thoughts accuse or
perhaps excuse them on the day when, according to my Gospel, God judges
the secrets of men by Christ Jesus" (Rom. 2:14-16).
Sacred Tradition
Many people who claim that God restricts salvation to baptized Catholics
cite the Fathers of the Church to prove their assertions. While space does
not allow an exhaustive analysis of the Fathers, there are several necessary
points to keep in mind. First, the Fathers must be understood in the context
of their writings, not in the context of the one quoting them. The majority of
the Fathers who wrote on this topic were concerned about those who had
once believed or had heard the truth, but now rejected it. Many of them
believed the entire world had heard the Gospel. Their words were not
directed at those who, by no fault of their own, did not know the Gospel of
Christ.
The Fathers do affirm the inherent danger in deliberately rejecting the
Church. For example, St. Ignatius of Antioch wrote at the turn of the second
century, "Be not deceived, my brethren; if anyone follows a maker of schism,
he does not inherit the kingdom of God" (Letter to the Philadelphians 3:3).
In the third century, St. Cyprian of Carthage wrote, "whoever is separated
from the Church and is joined to an adulteress [a schismatic church] is
separated from the promises of the Church, nor will he that forsakes the
Church of Christ attain to the rewards of Christ. He is an alien, a worldling,
and an enemy" (The Unity of the Catholic Church 6, 1). In the fourth century,
St. Jerome wrote, "Heretics bring sentence upon themselves since they by
their own choice withdraw from the Church, a withdrawal which, since they
are aware of it, constitutes damnation" (Commentary on Titus 3:10-11).
On the other hand, many of the Fathers did write about those who were
invincibly ignorant of the Gospel. Of these, the Fathers accepted that
salvation was open to them, even if in a mysterious way. The Fathers
recognized that the natural law of justice and virtue is written on the hearts
of all men. Those who respect this law respect the Lawgiver, though they do
not know Him. As St. Justin Martyr wrote in the second century:
"We have been taught that Christ is the first-begotten of God, and we have
declared Him to be the Logos of which all mankind partakes (Jn. 1:9).
Those, therefore, who lived according to reason [logos] were really
Christians, even though they were thought to be atheists, such as, among
the Greeks, Socrates, Heraclitus, and others like them . . . those who lived
before Christ but did not live according to reason were wicked men, and
enemies of Christ, and murderers of those who did live according to reason,
whereas those who lived then or who live now according to reason are
Christians. Such as these can be confident and unafraid" (First Apology 46).
In the third century, St. Clement of Alexandria wrote: "Before the coming of
the Lord, philosophy was necessary for justification to the Greeks; now it is
useful for piety . . . for it brought the Greeks to Christ as the Law did the
Hebrews" (Miscellanies 1:5). Origen wrote, "[T]here was never a time when
God did not want men to be just; He was always concerned about that.
Indeed, He always provided beings endowed with reason with occasions for
practicing virtue and doing what is right. In every generation the Wisdom of
God descended into those souls which He found holy and made them to be
prophets and friends of God" (Against Celsus 4:7). In the fifth century, St.
Augustine wrote: "When we speak of within and without in relation to the
Church, it is the position of the heart that we must consider, not that of the
body . . . All who are within the heart are saved in the unity of the ark"
(Baptism 5:28:39).
Magisterial Pronouncements
Throughout the history of the Church, the Magisterium has accepted and
synthesized these teachings. Recognizing that God will judge our hearts
according to the gifts we have received, invincible ignorance — that is,
ignorance which cannot be overcome by ordinary means — tempers divine
justice. Those who have knowledge of the truth are expected to accept it.
Those who have not been given this gift will be judged according to the law
written on their hearts. Two noteworthy examples of this position are found
in Pope Boniface VIIIs bull Unam Sanctam and Pope Pius IXs encyclical
Quanto Conficiamur Moerore.
Boniface VIII wrote concerning the nature of the Church and the supremacy
of the Pope. He did not write concerning the damnation of those who have
never heard the Gospel. After expressing the truth that there is only one
Lord, one faith, one Baptism and one Church, he explained that supreme
authority of the Pope is both temporal and spiritual. He then ended by
declaring: "We declare, say, define, and pronounce, that it is absolutely
necessary for the salvation of every human creature to be subject to the
Roman Pontiff." This is not a statement demanding that everyone know the
Popes supremacy to be saved, but rather is a truthful claim that the Pope
has authority from God as the legitimate successor of St. Peter, to whom
Our Lord entrusted the keys of the kingdom.
Pius IX clearly expressed the full teaching a century ago. His writing
distinguishes between those who are invincibly ignorant and those who
have willfully separated themselves from the Catholic Church:
"There are, of course, those who are struggling with invincible ignorance
about our most holy religion. Sincerely observing the natural law and its
precepts inscribed by God on all hearts and ready to obey God, they live
honest lives and are able to attain eternal life by the efficacious virtue of
divine light and grace. Because God knows, searches, and clearly
understands the minds, hearts, thoughts, and nature of all, His supreme
kindness and clemency do not permit anyone at all who is not guilty of
deliberate sin to suffer eternal punishments. Also well-known is the Catholic
teaching that no one can be saved [without] the Catholic Church. Eternal
salvation cannot be obtained by those who oppose the authority and
statements of the same Church and are stubbornly separated from the unity
of the Church and also from the successor of Peter, the Roman Pontiff, to
whom the custody of the vineyard has been committed by the Savior."
Sacrament of Salvation
In an expression of the authentic Magisterium, the college of bishops further
explained this doctrine in the context of Christocentric sacramental theology
at Vatican II. Echoing the words of St. Paul, the Council described the
Church as the Spouse and Body of Christ (Lumen Gentium, nos. 6-7). Jesus
is one with His Spouse, the Church (cf. Eph. 5:32). The two form the one
Body of Christ visible on earth. Christ is the Head, and He ministers through
His body, which is the sacrament of salvation (Lumen Gentium, no. 9). To
whom does He minister? Both His body and those apart from the body, that
he might draw all men to Himself (ibid., no. 13). In this way, the Church
dispenses to all men the graces of salvation won by Christ. Those who
knowingly reject these graces are lost. Those who accept them are saved.
Those who do not have the opportunity to accept the grace can be saved
because of the presence of the Church in the world (cf. 1 Cor. 7:12-16). If
they are saved, they are saved through the Church without their knowledge
of that grace.
Vatican II declares:
[Many] of the most significant elements and endowments which together go
to build up and give life to the Church itself can exist outside the visible
boundaries of the Catholic Church: the written Word of God; the life of
grace; faith, hope, and charity, with the other interior gifts of the Holy Spirit,
as well as visible elements. All of these, which come from Christ and lead
back to Him, belong by right to the one Church of Christ. . . . It follows that
these separated Churches and communities as such, though we believe
they suffer from the defects already mentioned, have been by no means
deprived of significance and importance in the mystery of salvation. For the
Spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as means of salvation
which derive their efficacy from the very fullness of grace and truth
entrusted to the Catholic Church" (Decree on Ecumenism, no. 3).
Come Aboard!
This teaching of Christ and His Church is not meant to allow indifferentism
or exclusivism. Baptism and unity with the Catholic Church provide the only
assurance of salvation, but not the only means. "God has bound salvation to
the Sacrament of Baptism, but He Himself is not bound by His sacraments"
(Catechism, no. 1257, original emphasis).
The will of God is for "all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of
the truth" (1 Tim. 2:4). To fulfill His will, Jesus commissioned the Apostles to
preach the Gospel and baptize those who would embrace it (Mk. 16:16). He
gave us the Sacrament of Baptism and unity with the Church as the ordinary
means of salvation. By Baptism we are made sharers in the life of Christ.
When we participate in the fullness of life within the Church, we remain
obedient children of God with the Church as our Mother. To provide
assurance for the salvation of all men, we must fulfill the command of Christ
to evangelize the world and bring all into His body, the Church.
Because God is not bound by the sacraments, He makes the grace of
salvation available to all in ways unknown to us. This is the basis for the
Churchs teaching on "Baptism of desire" (cf. Catechism, nos. 1258-60,
1281). This occurs, for example, when one seeks Baptism but dies first, or
when one dies without explicit knowledge of Christ, but would have
embraced the truth had it been presented. Only God can judge their souls.
The Church is the ark through which men are saved. Noah and his family
were the only men saved on the ark, but even animals who had no
understanding of the matter were saved with them. As the ark saved all on
it, even those who had no knowledge, so does the Church, as the universal
sacrament of salvation, dispense the graces won by Christ and applies them
to all men of every place and condition. In a way mysterious to us, this
salvation is offered to all, and God, who judges the hearts of all, will
determine their destiny."
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23015] [23017] [23020] [23021] [23018] [23022] [23024] [23014] [23016] |
|
23015 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 06:34:30
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Without the Church there is no salvation |
|
|
Are you catholic-jesuit-orthodox now? Jesuit Joe
conversion via ballot box...talk about mixed messages, now
getting lost in lengthy Catholicism expostulations...toot
toot beep beep.
Posting copy and pasted line upon line of Catholic dogma
is just another deep endless route to the bottomless pit.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23017] [23020] [23021] [23018] [23022] [23024] |
|
23017 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 06:51:15
From: Akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Without the Church there is no salvation |
|
|
"Are you catholic-jesuit-orthodox now?"
Are you?
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23020] [23021] [23018] [23022] [23024] |
|
23020 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 06:57:03
From: Akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: "catholic dogma" |
|
|
Some here do believe in it. Argue with them. All religions contain dogma,
imo.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23021] |
|
23021 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 07:04:27
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: "catholic dogma" |
|
|
IMO no one has to do man made religious organizational
dogma one can have a personal relationship without all
that can't they?
You began the discourse in an argumentative manner and imo
you voted for gestapo either side is the same side in
terms of politics and is playing the citizens for fools. I
watch but I don't choose them to lead me as I know how the
snakes are first hand experience with the original.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
23018 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 06:56:22
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Without the Church there is no salvation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23022] [23024] |
|
23022 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 07:05:20
From: Akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: huh? |
|
|
Whatever, eve.
I have a mountain to climb, so toodles.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23024] |
|
23024 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 07:09:29
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: now it's toodles time, have a nice climb |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
23014 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 06:30:43
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Without the Church there is no salvation |
|
|
Without God there is no salvation!
Salvation is of God.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23016] |
|
23016 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 06:48:10
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Who then can be saved? With man this is impossible, but with God.. |
|
|
+ Matthew 19: 25-26 "When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished and asked, "Who then can be
saved?" Jesus looked at them and said, "With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible."
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
23012 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 04:56:08
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Promising Salvation to Non-Catholics: A Sin against Charity |
|
|
They don't care and they are not in the position in
reality to grant salvation at all. Salvation is of God.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23019] [23023] [23025] [23026] [23027] [23029] [23030] [23031] [23032] [23034] [23035] [23036] [23037] [23028] |
|
23019 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 06:56:41
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Well... ;) |
|
|
...given that *Reality* on a human level can never be other than
entirely subjective, even in its clearest, highest moments of spiritual
experience, and in interpreting it...until I really came to understand
how powerful the fear of hell can be, I’d never been able to
comprehend how anyone believed, accepted as Truth *any other
human being’s pronouncement/interpretation, *over their Own,* of
what God or the Divine even actually *IS,* let alone terms of
“salvation or damnation” of their souls..........!!! Incomprehensible to
me from earliest childhood...
Equally incomprehensible is that anyone imagines their own
personal, unique experiences/interpretations of Divinity to *apply to
anyone but themselves*... ;) And yes, I certainly do have my own
very solid ones, and as is always the case, the spiritual realities of
others can *appear* one way or another through that lens... ;) ...yet I
never lose sight of the *fact* that for them, mine is literally *not their
Truth”... So in respect I acknowledge theirs as being equally True in
the context of their own perfect path, *for themselves*... ;)
...and...lol...even as I type this, I’m aware I still have some ways to go
when it comes to applying that to those whose contexts of Divinity
include rationalizing abuse of others... ;( My human passion for the
organic sanctity of Equality runs deep...
Yet to be any other way would translate to me as doubting the power
of the Divine’s Infinite Love, wisdom & compassion in guiding each
one who seeks deeper communion w/It in ways perfect for their
unique psyches...from as many angles as necessary... ;)
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23023] [23025] [23026] [23027] [23029] [23030] [23031] [23032] [23034] [23035] [23036] [23037] [23028] |
|
23023 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 07:06:42
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: well, well, well, as you think you propose by your god is not mine(NT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23025] [23026] [23027] [23029] [23030] [23031] [23032] [23034] [23035] [23036] [23037] [23028] |
|
23025 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 07:22:18
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: "...as you think you propose by your god is not mine..." |
|
|
Um...okay, wording there gives me a moment, but if
you're saying what I think you are... ;) ...that's a
little synch-y and brings me a smile...
...as that's what I yelled at my Preschool Sunday
School teacher when she tried to tell us that little
Black children in Africa would go to hell if they died
without being "saved" (there's that "salvation"
again), if the missionaries didn't get to them in
time. Completely undid me. Screamed "If that's what
you think, then your Jesus isn't MY Jesus!" In
inconsolable tears and hysteria, had to run to the
bathroom and throw up, be carried home by horrified,
ashamed family. Felt like I was in the midst of the
second most hostile, life/sanity-threatening
environment of my short life -- the first most being
at home, where this "need to toe lines put down by an
Angry God" ran the minds and behaviors of my mom's
family... I'm not sure whose behalf I was so enraged
on more -- my own, or this outrageous, if ignorantly
unintended, betrayal of everything that lived in my
heart as Yeshua the Christ, about Whom none of this
crap had anything to do... ;(
*shudder* lol I'd have suicided sooo early if I hadn't
gotten out of there as young as I did... ;)
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23026] [23027] [23029] [23030] [23031] [23032] [23034] [23035] [23036] [23037] [23028] |
|
23026 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 07:32:39
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: neon gods people make, etc.(NT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23027] [23029] [23030] [23031] [23032] [23034] [23035] [23036] [23037] [23028] |
|
23027 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 08:39:51
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Yes! Beginning in Nicaea with Constantine! lol n/t |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23029] [23030] [23031] [23032] [23034] [23035] [23036] [23037] [23028] |
|
23029 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 09:13:18
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: ...& having said that, let me bring back my clarification... ;) |
|
|
From *my* experiential context of spiritual truth, I
see what was done in those councils (from their
intention of removing as much *power of living Spirit
in words* as possible from what they'd gathered of
them, & replace them with designs of fear-based
religious dogma that would effectively control the
population through their most core values and beliefs)
as having *removed SO MUCH* of what'd been the *living
Essence* of Yeshua's teachings that'd come down
through his original Aramaic as to be pretty much
hollow & devoid of what I, myself, personally sought
so intensely as crucial spiritual sustenance,
nurturance & support...
And for many years I was so pickled in my own outrage
& disappointing experience of it, it took me awhile to
grow enough maturity to acknowledge that many, many
people find PRECISELY what THEY need in all those same
ways and just as deeply, in that same book...and that
their context's dignity was to be respected equally
with my own... ;) Until I managed that, I was nowhere
near even beginning to comprehend, let alone approach
the endeavor of living, the context of love,
compassion, forgiveness and allowance he came to
teach... ;)
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23030] [23031] [23032] [23034] [23035] [23036] [23037] |
|
23030 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 09:22:55
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: everyone has their own experiences (NT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23031] [23032] [23034] [23035] [23036] [23037] |
|
23031 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 09:23:48
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: even the little sentient beings who others love to chow on(NT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23032] [23034] [23035] [23036] [23037] |
|
23032 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 09:27:55
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: or big ones like cows, deer, they have experiences, not just people |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23034] [23035] [23036] [23037] |
|
23034 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 10:11:12
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Are you projecting/assuming I meant to disinclude them... |
|
|
...in anything I said, Eve? Or just taking the
opportunity to bring awareness to how we seem to
habitually not mention them, even when our intentions
and caring includes them?
Either way, yes indeed... ;)
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23035] [23036] [23037] |
|
23035 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 10:51:49
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: far as I know things are still the same... |
|
|
... maybe someone else will read your message and relate.
I could write you volumes of my own experiences but I doubt it
would interest you either and I am not feeling led to in spirit.
No one knows who I am in the flesh or has experienced it like I
have and it's okay they don't have to and no one wants to know or
would believe it anyway so I don't give it much time or expect
anyone to understand.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23036] [23037] |
|
23036 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 11:20:04
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Was just agreeing w/you on the rights of sentient nonhumans... ;) n/t |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23037] |
|
23037 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 11:23:28
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: I didn't know you had made the change in diet, that's great! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
23028 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 08:42:14
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: still happening today and was happening before his time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
23007 |
|
|
Date: January 23, 2021 at 21:41:56
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: maybe this board should be retitled Charles:Bible:Hitler for... |
|
|
Forgive me for interrupting your response pamela...and thanks for
posting on the topic...global Jesuit the NWO they don't hide it's hidden
in plain sight for anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear. So many are
in denial. Alas, IMO most of the world has been indoctrinated into the
order in various ways like the the boob tube, mainstream media, social
media, the ballot box agenda and so on.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
22997 |
|
|
Date: January 20, 2021 at 18:45:35
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Jesuit Priest gave invocation at Biden's Inauguration |
|
|
Joe ranks high in the order, no surprise he is where he is
at this time in history.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22998] [22999] [23000] [23001] [23002] [23005] [23009] |
|
22998 |
|
|
Date: January 20, 2021 at 20:11:41
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Jesuit Priest gave invocation at Biden's Inauguration |
URL: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Al+Smith+dinner+for+Trump+and+Hillary&iax=videos&ia=videos&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DxQpmSBpXvN8 |
|
No surprise at all, I think at one point, Jesuits were
hoping Trump would do their bidding. He was put in
place by them too. All puppets. Remember the Al Smith
dinner? 2016. Jesuits one and all. I posted this several
times, I think you were the only one paying attention.
She had to call Cardinal Dolan, "his im•ma•nence" but
funny, Trump makes it a point in his speech, at that
same dinner, she hates all Catholics.....
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22999] [23000] [23001] [23002] [23005] [23009] |
|
22999 |
|
|
Date: January 20, 2021 at 21:19:18
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Jesuit Priest gave invocation at Biden's Inauguration |
URL: https://youtu.be/8U_pAXjB9cA?t=3498 |
|
at invocation prayer, Cardinal Dolan bumps Trumps elbow,
when the prayer gets to the part of respecting life from
its natural beginning to end(ie, no abortion) and Trump
nods.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23000] [23001] [23002] [23005] [23009] |
|
23000 |
|
|
Date: January 20, 2021 at 22:56:14
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Jesuit Priest gave invocation at Biden's Inauguration |
URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPZ24b-G72c |
|
I remember. I was just reviewing similar info on a youtube channel. Also am remembering a youtube
channel some years ago a who spoke of the order I recall he mentioned Biden a lot and it seemed he felt
that he would eventually be where he is now...lost the channel (bummer)...Anyways, trying to find it I
found this clip I had viewed most of it already so I made myself view the rest, I was like yeah, umhum,
computes....This is not a promo for this channel or the person teaching mind you...but it has some
interesting info to sift and it's not a long view. Some of it you will be familiar with already. The
division is intentional it is purposeful attempt to manipulate prophecy...well I am not good at
explaining it though I understand what it is and how that happens...it is in the first part of the clip
what he says about the pendulum is spot on IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23001] [23002] [23005] [23009] |
|
23001 |
|
|
Date: January 21, 2021 at 13:01:07
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Jesuit Priest gave invocation at Biden's Inauguration |
|
|
Thanks, yes, I have watched his video's also. Yep,
hegelian dialectic. And Jesuits everywhere. They do
not seem to be concerned about making this info public
anymore either. (about the puppet prez's and their
connections to the Jesuit schooling) Like maybe they
know hardly anyone is gonna take it serious... about the
past and current history, cuz they already have the game
in the bag and the means to do it. ps, at the Al Smith
dinner the speaker joked, "now everyone is Catholic" and
everyone laughed as the camera panned in to close up of
Kissinger. Ha ha, so funny.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23002] [23005] [23009] |
|
23002 |
|
|
Date: January 22, 2021 at 06:05:22
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Jesuit Priest gave invocation at Biden's Inauguration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23005] [23009] |
|
23005 |
|
|
Date: January 23, 2021 at 21:23:43
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Jesuit Priest gave invocation at Biden's Inauguration |
URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPZ24b-G72c |
|
fwiw, someone in comments at the clip I shared "Jesuits have seize the Whitehouse" asked about Obama and Charlemagne ancestry and that info is at
this link:
https://familypedia.wikia.org/wiki/Descendants_of_Charlemagne/Descent_of_President_Obama
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23009] |
|
23009 |
|
|
Date: January 24, 2021 at 03:52:20
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Jesuit Priest gave invocation at Biden's Inauguration |
URL: https://www.post-gazette.com/news/world/2021/01/23/Jesuits-admit-to-decades-of-sex-abuse-in-Spain/stories/202101230032 |
|
https://www.post-gazette.com/news/world/2021/01/23/Jesuits-admit-to-decades-of-sex-abuse-in-Spain/stories/202101230032
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
[
Charles : Bible : Religion ] [ Main Menu ] |