Kk...from Corona Times News [Image
link] [Image link] [Image link]
The Next Plandemic will be a SARS +
HIV + Avian (H5N1) Chimeric Bioweapon
as told by Dr. Paul Cottrell and Mike
Adams.
A quick summary of the audio podcast;
National Wildlife Health Center warns
of "zombie" HPAI H5N1 that alters
neurology and behavior of mammals
Media pushing strong warnings of
zombie bird flu crossing over to
humans and spreading as a pandemic
This is the next plandemic tyranny:
Lockdowns to prevent public protests
against financial collapse
Dr. Cottrell warned of combination
SARS + HIV + Avian (H5N1) chimeric
bioweapon
The DoD built it and likely already
released it, now spreading across
North America
Huge amounts of Peramivir drug being
flown on cargo planes to stockpile for
the plandemic
Peramivir cause ZOMBIE side effects
including confusion, cracked skin, red
eyes, hallucinations and skin lesions
Also causes people to hold FALSE
beliefs (such as beliefs in false
plandemics) (a known side effect of
the drug)
The HPAI H5N1 causes ATAXIA, which
also presents as zombie-like side
effects including loss of motor
control
The plan is to treat the masses with
Peramivir and CAUSE side effects which
are blamed on avian flu
14 vaccine manufacturers are gearing
up for massive vaccine production for
the avian flu plandemic
Vax supplies are being directed by the
WHO to target poor black nations for
depopulation and genocide
The proposed wonder drug called
Peramivir is being bulk shipped to key
locations as the staging grounds for
the next Plandemic is well under way.
Check some of the side effects from
this new wonder Bioweapon below. How
about losing your mind and then
“holding false beliefs that cannot be
changed by fact”. Does that sound like
a Drug or a Bioweapon to you? How can
something with such side effects even
be allowed on the market? Unless that
Drug has an intended purpose. And that
purpose is Death.
[Twitter avatar for @Raptor6Ranch]
Raptor6Ranch
@Raptor6Ranch
Peramivir is being stocked up on in
blue cities for the next planned-
demic. Here are some side-effects:
looks like a zombie drug!
[Image]
8:47 PM ∙ Mar 27, 2023
A warning from Chris Sky who broke
this story early on about the early
staging of the future killer called
Peramivir. If you hear that name in
the future, run in the opposite
direction. Unless you are looking to
become an official mortified zombie
that cannot distinguish between fact
and fiction. These are not cures or
drugs, these are the pure poisons
brought to you by the Big Pharma
Pharmakia Kabal. The origin of the
word Pharmacy is as follows. The Snake
Oil Salesmen selling your literal
Magick Potions.
late 14c., farmacie, "a medicine that
rids the body of an excess of humors
(except blood);" also "treatment with
medicine; theory of treatment with
medicine," from Old French farmacie "a
purgative" (13c.) and directly from
Medieval Latin pharmacia, from Greek
pharmakeia "a healing or harmful
medicine, a healing or poisonous herb;
a drug, poisonous potion; magic
(potion), dye, raw material for
physical or chemical processing."
Snip....
***So a chimera virus of...
cov_hiv_and n5h1
I recall when cov hit globally and
India researcher found hiv graphed
into the cov virus...
https://www.westernjournal.com/doctor-
discovered-hiv-confident-covid-19-
created-lab/
[RETRACTED] Doctor Who Discovered HIV
Confident COVID-19 Was Created in a
Lab
By Jared Harris
April 17, 2020 at 12:04pm
RETRACTION, Apr. 24, 2020: The Western
Journal has retracted this commentary
after a fact check by Health Feedback
determined that the claims by Nobel
laureate Luc Montagnier were
inaccurate. “Genomic analyses indicate
that the virus has a natural origin,
and was not engineered. The so-called
‘unique’ protein sequence insertions
found in the 2019 novel coronavirus
can be found in many other organisms,
not just HIV,” according to the fact
check.
In addition, while the commentary as
published did point out that “the
overwhelming scientific consensus
points to COVID-19 being natural in
origin instead of man-made,” the
headline did not allude to this fact,
potentially leading some readers to
believe the opposite, which was not
our intention.
Professor Luc Montagnier, a central
member of the team that identified HIV
during the early days of the AIDS
epidemic, is now bucking the media
consensus on the novel coronavirus by
claiming the pathogen was at least
partially edited in a laboratory.
Montagnier revealed his reasoning on a
French medical podcast Thursday,
according to the French newspaper Le
Parisien.
According to research performed by
Montagnier, a Nobel Prize winner, and
his mathematician partner Jean-Claude
Perez, SARS-CoV-2 contains sequences
of the human immunodeficiency virus —
HIV.
The medical legend took his claims a
step further and asserted his
confidence that the virus was pieced
together in a Wuhan, China, biolab.
Montagnier said researchers from India
published their findings after
stumbling over the HIV link, but were
forced to retract after “enormous
pressure,” according to a translated
version of the Le Parisien story.
....
https://www.opindia.com/2021/06/indian
-scientists-had-found-unique-
insertions-in-covid-19-virus-genome/
Editor's picksNews
ReportsSpecialsOpIndia ExplainsTech
Covid-19 lab leak theory: Indian
scientists had flagged ‘unnatural
insertions’ in its genome, were forced
to withdraw study
4 June, 2021
Raju Das
After vehemently rejecting the
possibility of the SARS-CoV-2 virus
being leaked from a lab in China for
more than a year, suddenly the
American left-liberal has started to
consider the possibility. When former
president Donald Trump had suggested
the possibility, it was dismissed as
his wild imagination, but now that
president Biden has ordered a probe
into the possibility, the media is
forced to wake up and question the
national origin theory of the virus.
The lab-leak theory got another boost
after thousands of mails of Dr Anthony
Fauci were obtained under Freedom of
Information Act revealed that Wuhan
Institute of Virology was researching
on increasing the infectious nature of
the Coronavirus obtained from bats.
The mails, and other studies that have
surfaced recently, suggest that
several people, including researchers,
people in US administration and
intelligence, wanted to probe the role
of the Chinese lab, but they were
overruled by Dr. Fauci and other, who
had vested interests in the issue as
they themselves were instrumental in
US govt funding the study on the virus
in the Wuhan lab.
One of such studies that was brought
to the notice of Fauci was a research
paper by some scientists from India.
In January last year, researchers from
Kusuma School of Biological Sciences
in IIT Delhi and Acharya Narendra Dev
College under Delhi University had
published a paper, where they had
found that the spike glycoprotein (S)
of SARS-CoV-2 had four insertions
which are not found in any other
Coronavirus, and the insertions are
similar to those found in HIV virus.
The study had raised that possibility
that SARS-CoV-2 may have been bio-
engineered using the existing
Coronavirus and HIV virus.
The research paper, Prashant Pradhan,
Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, Akhilesh
Mishra, Parul Gupta, Praveen Kumar
Tripathi, Manoj Balakrishnan Menon,
James Gomes, Perumal Vivekanandan and
Bishwajit Kundu, had studied the all
the available coronavirus sequences
which are available at NCBI viral
genome database.
The spike (S) glycoproteins enable the
Coronavirus to enter the cells of
human bodies. Studies have shown that
the glycoprotein has a specific shape
that helps them to attach to host
cells, and this ability is unique to
the SARS-CoV-2, not found in other
types of Coronaviruses like SARS-CoV.
More specifically, the spike
glycoprotein (S) of Coronavirus is
cleaved into two subunits, S1 and S2.
The S1 helps in binding with the
receptor on the target cell, and the
S2 subunit facilitates fusion with the
cell membrane.
As this splitting of the glycoprotein
in SARS-CoV-2 is unique to it, the
Indian researchers wanted to study how
this evolution happened. To do this
study, they compared the spike
glycoprotein sequences of the SARS-
CoV-2 with SARS-CoV, and analysed the
difference in them. On careful
examination of the sequence alignment,
they found that the SARS-CoV-2 spike
glycoprotein contained 4 insertions,
or 4 segments that are not found in
the earlier less infectious forms of
Coronavirus.
The four insertions found in the study
are, GTNGTKR, HKNNKS, GDSSSG and
QTNSPRRA.
4 insertions at SARS-CoV-2 spike
glycoprotein
After finding this, they then studied
all available full-length sequences of
the virus found in human bodies, and
they found that the insertions were
present in all of them. But most
importantly, the found that these
segments were not there in the spike
glycoprotein sequence of the same
virus found in bats.
When they further analysed these 4
segments to know its possible origin,
they found that all four them match
with segments in Human
immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1)
proteins. The first 3 segments match
with segments of amino acid residues
in HIV-1 gp120, while the fourth
segment matches with HIV-1 Gag. Among
the four, the first two are 100%
matches, while the rest two have some
gaps. These proteins are critical for
the viruses to identify and latch on
to their host cells and for assembly
of new viruses.
According to the researchers, such
matches of proteins in both SARS-CoV-2
and HIV-1 viruses can’t be random.
They also say that as the segments
were not there in the same virus found
in bats or all other forms of
Coronavirus, it is very startling, as
it is quite unlikely for a virus to
have acquired such unique changes
naturally in a short duration of time.
It may be noted that it is claimed
that the virus jumped to humans from
bats, either directly or through an
intermediary animal.
Although the research by the Indian
scientists had not claimed that the
virus was engineered in a lab, it had
concluded that it underwent an
“unconventional evolution”. Due to
this, the research paper had suggested
further investigation on the origin of
the virus.
While the preprint of the research
paper was published January 31, 2020
on bioRxiv, an open-source portal
hosting resources on biological
research, it was withdrawn by the
researchers on February 2, 2020. The
note of withdrawal says they had
intended to revise it in response to
comments received from the research
community on their technical approach
and their interpretation of the
results.
While the lab leak theory was strong
during the early day of the pandemic,
it was not taken seriously by a large
section of the scientific community
and US administration. Despite
President Trump raising the issue time
to time, the theory was already by
February 19, 2020, when The Lancet
published a statement completely
rejecting the possibility that the
virus may have leaked from the Wuhan
Institute of Virology. Published by
such an influential medical journal,
the statement signed by 27 scientists
had effectively killed any meaningful
study into the origin of the virus, as
they had shut down one angle
completely.
Now the Fauci emails show that when he
was asked about this research paper by
the Indian scientists, he had
dismissed it saying it is “really
outlandish”. Several other emails have
also shown that Dr Fauci was warned
that COVID-19 may have been
‘engineered’, but he had dismissed all
of them.
Indian researcher still backs their
study, says forced by vested interests
to withdraw
OpIndia talked to Ashutosh Kumar
Pandey, one of the researchers of the
study. Earlier he had commented on
Twitter that they stand by their
conclusion that the SARS-CoV-2 is not
natural. “We said this in Jan 2020, we
are saying it again”, he had tweeted.
Editor's picksNews
ReportsSpecialsOpIndia ExplainsTech
Covid-19 lab leak theory: Indian
scientists had flagged ‘unnatural
insertions’ in its genome, were forced
to withdraw study
4 June, 2021
Raju Das
After vehemently rejecting the
possibility of the SARS-CoV-2 virus
being leaked from a lab in China for
more than a year, suddenly the
American left-liberal has started to
consider the possibility. When former
president Donald Trump had suggested
the possibility, it was dismissed as
his wild imagination, but now that
president Biden has ordered a probe
into the possibility, the media is
forced to wake up and question the
national origin theory of the virus.
The lab-leak theory got another boost
after thousands of mails of Dr Anthony
Fauci were obtained under Freedom of
Information Act revealed that Wuhan
Institute of Virology was researching
on increasing the infectious nature of
the Coronavirus obtained from bats.
The mails, and other studies that have
surfaced recently, suggest that
several people, including researchers,
people in US administration and
intelligence, wanted to probe the role
of the Chinese lab, but they were
overruled by Dr. Fauci and other, who
had vested interests in the issue as
they themselves were instrumental in
US govt funding the study on the virus
in the Wuhan lab.
One of such studies that was brought
to the notice of Fauci was a research
paper by some scientists from India.
In January last year, researchers from
Kusuma School of Biological Sciences
in IIT Delhi and Acharya Narendra Dev
College under Delhi University had
published a paper, where they had
found that the spike glycoprotein (S)
of SARS-CoV-2 had four insertions
which are not found in any other
Coronavirus, and the insertions are
similar to those found in HIV virus.
The study had raised that possibility
that SARS-CoV-2 may have been bio-
engineered using the existing
Coronavirus and HIV virus.
The research paper, Prashant Pradhan,
Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, Akhilesh
Mishra, Parul Gupta, Praveen Kumar
Tripathi, Manoj Balakrishnan Menon,
James Gomes, Perumal Vivekanandan and
Bishwajit Kundu, had studied the all
the available coronavirus sequences
which are available at NCBI viral
genome database.
The spike (S) glycoproteins enable the
Coronavirus to enter the cells of
human bodies. Studies have shown that
the glycoprotein has a specific shape
that helps them to attach to host
cells, and this ability is unique to
the SARS-CoV-2, not found in other
types of Coronaviruses like SARS-CoV.
More specifically, the spike
glycoprotein (S) of Coronavirus is
cleaved into two subunits, S1 and S2.
The S1 helps in binding with the
receptor on the target cell, and the
S2 subunit facilitates fusion with the
cell membrane.
As this splitting of the glycoprotein
in SARS-CoV-2 is unique to it, the
Indian researchers wanted to study how
this evolution happened. To do this
study, they compared the spike
glycoprotein sequences of the SARS-
CoV-2 with SARS-CoV, and analysed the
difference in them. On careful
examination of the sequence alignment,
they found that the SARS-CoV-2 spike
glycoprotein contained 4 insertions,
or 4 segments that are not found in
the earlier less infectious forms of
Coronavirus.
The four insertions found in the study
are, GTNGTKR, HKNNKS, GDSSSG and
QTNSPRRA.
4 insertions at SARS-CoV-2 spike
glycoprotein
After finding this, they then studied
all available full-length sequences of
the virus found in human bodies, and
they found that the insertions were
present in all of them. But most
importantly, the found that these
segments were not there in the spike
glycoprotein sequence of the same
virus found in bats.
When they further analysed these 4
segments to know its possible origin,
they found that all four them match
with segments in Human
immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1)
proteins. The first 3 segments match
with segments of amino acid residues
in HIV-1 gp120, while the fourth
segment matches with HIV-1 Gag. Among
the four, the first two are 100%
matches, while the rest two have some
gaps. These proteins are critical for
the viruses to identify and latch on
to their host cells and for assembly
of new viruses.
According to the researchers, such
matches of proteins in both SARS-CoV-2
and HIV-1 viruses can’t be random.
They also say that as the segments
were not there in the same virus found
in bats or all other forms of
Coronavirus, it is very startling, as
it is quite unlikely for a virus to
have acquired such unique changes
naturally in a short duration of time.
It may be noted that it is claimed
that the virus jumped to humans from
bats, either directly or through an
intermediary animal.
Although the research by the Indian
scientists had not claimed that the
virus was engineered in a lab, it had
concluded that it underwent an
“unconventional evolution”. Due to
this, the research paper had suggested
further investigation on the origin of
the virus.
While the preprint of the research
paper was published January 31, 2020
on bioRxiv, an open-source portal
hosting resources on biological
research, it was withdrawn by the
researchers on February 2, 2020. The
note of withdrawal says they had
intended to revise it in response to
comments received from the research
community on their technical approach
and their interpretation of the
results.
While the lab leak theory was strong
during the early day of the pandemic,
it was not taken seriously by a large
section of the scientific community
and US administration. Despite
President Trump raising the issue time
to time, the theory was already by
February 19, 2020, when The Lancet
published a statement completely
rejecting the possibility that the
virus may have leaked from the Wuhan
Institute of Virology. Published by
such an influential medical journal,
the statement signed by 27 scientists
had effectively killed any meaningful
study into the origin of the virus, as
they had shut down one angle
completely.
Now the Fauci emails show that when he
was asked about this research paper by
the Indian scientists, he had
dismissed it saying it is “really
outlandish”. Several other emails have
also shown that Dr Fauci was warned
that COVID-19 may have been
‘engineered’, but he had dismissed all
of them.
Indian researcher still backs their
study, says forced by vested interests
to withdraw
OpIndia talked to Ashutosh Kumar
Pandey, one of the researchers of the
study. Earlier he had commented on
Twitter that they stand by their
conclusion that the SARS-CoV-2 is not
natural. “We said this in Jan 2020, we
are saying it again”, he had tweeted.
He reiterated the same while talking
to OpIndia, and said that the paper
was outlandish for those who wanted to
prove the ‘natural origin’ theory for
the virus. He said that their study
had correctly identified sections of
the genome that are giving this virus
its speciality. When asked why they
had withdrawn the paper, he said that
was withdrawn due to the pressure from
the people with vested interests.
Pandey also said that this paper was
just a section of the different
studies that they had conducted and
they wanted to include the entire
findings in the updated version. But
the revised manuscripts were hard-
blocked by the publishers. He said
that in the revised manuscript, they
have provided information on why the
virus infection remains asymptomatic
and why it infects human beings so
easily. But it never was allowed to
come out, he said.
Commenting on how a scientific paper
is being blocked to favour a
particular agenda, he said, “Science
is the new medieval church, those who
are popes of it censor at their will”.
Virus gene segments cut-paste is not
unusual
While the Indian researchers didn’t
claim that SARS-CoV-2 virus was
created by using segments from HIV
virus, and only wanted further study
on it, the fact is that such studies
are regularly done. In fact, the Wuhan
Institute of Virology has done several
such experiments in the past on
Coronavirus itself.
Between 2007 and 2017, the lab had
created 8 new chimeric coronaviruses
with various receptor binding motifs
in spike protein. Such research was
still going on in 2019, which was also
funded by the US govt. For example,
this 2008 paper talks about
Manipulation of the coronavirus genome
using targeted RNA recombination.
A 2019 paper by scientists from Wuhan
Institute of Virology and University
of Minnesota in the USA had said this
while describing the objectives of
their study on Coronavirus: “In vitro
and in vivo characterization of SARSr-
CoV spillover risk, coupled with
spatial and phylogenetic analyses to
identify the regions and viruses of
public health concern. We will use S
protein sequence data, infectious
clone technology, in vitro and in vivo
infection experiments and analysis of
receptor binding”.
It may be noted that “Infectious clone
technology” means creating live
synthetic viral clones. In vitro means
study on micro-organisms done in test
tubes, and in vivo means the same
study done in lab animals.
.....
|
|