Thanks eve and Johnl about that info...in prior dreams I
saw behind the scenes 'bathroom' business dealings
between trudo and china. That trudo sold out canada to
china and the country going completely red in my recent
dreams. Also on rebel news I read of canuckastan
military training with Chinese soldier during the fall
timeframe of last year...but I think I read of other
military training sessions as well going on too. So deep
bedfollows is my adage! Darn it..trudo stole my peoples
country abd I want my country and freedoms/right back!
There has been changes to our laws here too...there is
the precrime law in bc now, there is bill c-10 that just
recently passed that has to do with censorship and
Canadian content on usa media platforms like Facebook
and youtube etc...Now Bill c-36 is being snuck in which
is completely dystopian and demonic...the combination of
thought pre-crimes agenda...guilty till
innocent,censorship of the highest degree. You just
gotta check these article out!!!
Btw...our churches are not just physically locked up so
people can't do church but now they're are being burned
to the grounds as our a nations statues as
well...reminds me of mao's Ccp revolution thingy and the
wiping out of all history,culture and the country's
historical and ancient past!!! This also reminiscent
that of what happened in Europe and France after the
burning of the notre Dame cathedral...christianity is
under attack..a jihad/holy war and calling the for the
tal and complete desolation of christiandom the globe
over...think albert pike's letter and his reference to
needing 3 wold wars..,we are now in the last part of
that letter btw!...the persecution is now here in
canuckastan!!! Btw...with all this hate crime and
precrime bill legislation/laws bs...they are playing the
Illuminati board game 'race card'to divide a conquer!
That albert pike letter btw....
https://godskingdom.org/blog/2020/06/the-pike-plan-for-
the-final-social-cataclysm
The First World War must be brought about in order to
permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the
Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of
atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the
"agentur" (agents) of the Illuminati between the British
and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At
the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in
order to destroy the other governments and in order to
weaken the religions.”
“The Second World War must be fomented by taking
advantage of the differences between the Fascists and
the political Zionists. This war must be brought about
so that Nazism is destroyed and that the
political Zionism be strong enough to institute a
sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the
Second World War, International Communism must become
strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which
would be then restrained and held in check until the
time when we would need it for the final social
cataclysm.”
“The Third World War must be fomented by taking
advantage of the differences caused by the
"agentur/agent" of the "Illuminati" between the
political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The
war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the
Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of
Israel) mutually destroy each other.
Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this
issue will be constrained to fight to the point of
complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical
exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the
atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social
cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to
the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of
savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then
everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves
against the world minority of revolutionaries, will
exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the
multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose
deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass
or direction… will receive the true light through the
universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer,
brought finally out in the public view. This
manifestation will result from the general reactionary
movement which will follow the destruction of
Christianity and atheism, both conquered and
exterminated at the same time.”
Snip....
.....
Hmmm...overcome the saints comes to mind from the book
of revs...revs 13...
The Beast from the Sea
(Daniel 7:1–8)
1Then I saw a beast with ten horns and seven heads
rising out of the sea. There were ten royal crowns on
its horns and blasphemous names on its heads. 2The beast
I saw was like a leopard, with the feet of a bear and
the mouth of a lion. And the dragon gave the beast his
power and his throne and great authority.(it's a
composite beast/empire... re...Daniel 7 and 2 esdras 11
and 2 esdras 12...the 3 heads are the bigger middle head
china, the other heads on the left and right are the un
and russia...usa is the voice of the belly of the
eagle/global beast of the sea of nations.)
***3One of the heads of the beast appeared to be
mortally wounded. But the mortal wound was healed, and
the whole world marveled and followed the beast. 4They
worshiped the dragon who had given authority to the
beast, and they worshiped the beast, saying, “Who is
like the beast, and who can wage war against it?”***
5The beast was given a mouth to speak arrogant and
blasphemous words, and authority to act for 42 months
(3.5 years aka 1260 days ...or 1290 days if there is a
hebrew leap month that year aka adar2..hmmm...time
specific in duration!!!)
6And the beast opened its mouth to speak blasphemies
against God and to slander His name and His tabernacle—
those who dwell in heaven.
***7Then the beast was permitted to wage war against the
saints and to conquer them, and it was given authority
over every tribe and people and tongue and nation. 8And
all who dwell on the earth will worship the beast—
all whose names have not been written from the
foundation of the world in the Book of Life belonging to
the Lamb who was slain.
9He who has an ear, let him hear:
10“If anyone is destined for captivity,
into captivity he will go;
if anyone is to dieb by the sword,
by the sword he must be killed.”
Here is a call for the perseverance and faith of the
saints. Snip....
.....
Bill c-36 info...
https://spencerfernando.com/2021/06/24/with-bill-c-36-
trudeau-government-launches-dangerous-new-assault-on-
your-freedom-of-expression/
https://goldenageofgaia.com/2021/06/29/canadian-bill-c-
36-may-assault-freedom-of-expression/
https://www.narcity.com/bill-c-36-proposes-50k-fines-
for-hate-speech-in-canada
https://www.rebelnews.com/stop_the_worlds_worst_censorsh
ip_law_petition
.....
With Bill C-36, Trudeau Government Launches Dangerous
New Assault On Your Freedom Of Expression
INSIGHT
SPENCER FERNANDO
JUNE 24, 2021
The trend in all of this legislation is clear: More
government control, less freedom. And C-36 takes that to
a terrible new level.
With Bill C-10 having passed in the House of Commons and
going on to the Senate, the Liberals are wasting little
time in launching yet another assault on your freedom of
expression.
The Liberals have introduced Bill C-36, which they claim
is aimed at countering ‘online hate’:
As you can clearly see in this description of the
legislation, they are leaving the definition of ‘hate’
deliberately vague:
“Bill C-36 would allow a person to appear before a
provincial court, with the Attorney General’s consent,
if the person fears that another will commit an offence
“motivated by bias, prejudice or hate based on race,
national or ethnic origin, language, colour, religion,
sex, age, mental or physical disability, sexual
orientation, gender identity or expression, or any other
similar factor.”
Hate is defined in the bill as “the emotion that
involves detestation or vilification and that is
stronger than dislike or disdain,” but hatred is not
incited solely because it “discredits, humiliates, hurts
or offends.”
In addition, the bill would amend the Canadian Human
Rights Act to make it a “discriminatory practice” to
communicate hate speech through the internet where it is
“likely to foment detestation or vilification of an
individual or group of individuals on the basis of a
prohibited ground of discrimination.””
Vague & Dangerous
When it comes to government power and authority,
vagueness is dangerous.
And consider how vague the idea of “the emotion that
involves detestation or vilification and that is
stronger than dislike or disdain.”
Interestingly, the Merriam-Webster dictionary lists
‘disdain’ as a word ‘related’ to ‘detest,’ making that
distinction nearly irrelevant.
How do you figure out whether someone ‘detests’ or
‘disdains’?
Could someone give a speech in which they say they
‘disdain’ people from a certain country, yet not say
they ‘detest’ them?
Who decides what emotion someone is feeling?
Then, the legislation lists ‘Exclusions,’ noting “For
greater certainty, the communication of a statement does
not incite or promote hatred, for the purposes of this
section, solely because it discredits, humiliates, hurts
or offends.”
But what if someone says something that humiliates
someone in such a way that it invites others to detest
them?
Would that then be a hate crime?
You can see how absurd all of this is.
And it gets even worse.
Under the section “Fear of hate propaganda offence or
hate crime,” C-36 makes it possible for the government
to bring someone before a judge if someone else is
worried they could commit a crime. I’ve included that
section below in its entirety, because it is essential
for all Canadians to familiarize ourselves with how
dangerous this legislation is:
Fear of hate propaganda offence or hate crime
810.012 (1) A person may, with the Attorney General’s
consent, lay an information before a provincial court
judge if the person fears on reasonable grounds that
another person will commit
(a) an offence under section 318 or subsection 319(1) or
(2);
(b) an offence under subsection 430(4.1); or
(c) an offence motivated by bias, prejudice or hate
based on race, national or ethnic origin, language,
colour, religion, sex, age, mental or physical
disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or
expression, or any other similar factor.
Appearances
(2) The provincial court judge who receives an
information under subsection (1) may cause the parties
to appear before a provincial court judge.
Adjudication
(3) If the provincial court judge before whom the
parties appear is satisfied by the evidence adduced that
the informant has reasonable grounds for the fear, the
judge may order that the defendant enter into a
recognizance to keep the peace and be of good behaviour
for a period of not more than 12 months.
Duration extended
(4) However, if the provincial court judge is also
satisfied that the defendant was convicted previously of
any offence referred to in subsection (1), the judge may
order that the defendant enter into the recognizance for
a period of not more than two years.
Refusal to enter into recognizance
(5) The provincial court judge may commit the defendant
to prison for a term of not more than 12 months if the
defendant fails or refuses to enter into the
recognizance.
Conditions in recognizance
(6) The provincial court judge may add any reasonable
conditions to the recognizance that the judge considers
desirable to secure the good conduct of the defendant,
including conditions that
(a) require the defendant to wear an electronic
monitoring device, if the Attorney General makes that
request;
(b) require the defendant to return to and remain at
their place of residence at specified times;
(c) require the defendant to abstain from the
consumption of drugs, except in accordance with a
medical prescription, of alcohol or of any other
intoxicating substance;
(d) require the defendant to provide, for the purpose of
analysis, a sample of a bodily substance prescribed by
regulation on the demand of a peace officer, a probation
officer or someone designated under
paragraph 810.3(2)(a) to make a demand, at the place and
time and on the day specified by the person making the
demand, if that person has reasonable grounds to believe
that the defendant has breached a condition of the
recognizance that requires them to abstain from the
consumption of drugs, alcohol or any other intoxicating
substance;
(e) require the defendant to provide, for the purpose of
analysis, a sample of a bodily substance prescribed by
regulation at regular intervals that are specified, in a
notice in Form 51 served on the defendant, by a
probation officer or a person designated under
paragraph 810.3(2)(b) to specify them, if a condition of
the recognizance requires the defendant to abstain from
the consumption of drugs, alcohol or any other
intoxicating substance; or
(f) prohibit the defendant from communicating, directly
or indirectly, with any person identified in the
recognizance, or refrain from going to any place
specified in the recognizance, except in accordance with
the conditions specified in the recognizance that the
judge considers necessary.
Conditions — firearms
(7) The provincial court judge shall consider whether it
is desirable, in the interests of the defendant’s safety
or that of any other person, to prohibit the defendant
from possessing any firearm, cross-bow, prohibited
weapon, restricted weapon, prohibited device,
ammunition, prohibited ammunition or explosive
substance, or all of those things. If the judge decides
that it is desirable to do so, the judge shall add that
condition to the recognizance and specify the period
during which it applies.
Surrender, etc.
(8) If the provincial court judge adds a condition
described in subsection (7) to a recognizance, the judge
shall specify in the recognizance how the things
referred to in that subsection that are in the
defendant’s possession shall be surrendered, disposed
of, detained, stored or dealt with and how the
authorizations, licences and registration certificates
that are held by the defendant shall be surrendered.
Reasons
(9) If the provincial court judge does not add a
condition described in subsection (7) to a recognizance,
the judge shall include in the record a statement of the
reasons for not adding it.
Variance of conditions
(10) A provincial court judge may, on application of the
informant, the Attorney General or the defendant, vary
the conditions fixed in the recognizance.
That is all incredibly disturbing, because it means that
someone ‘fearing’ that another person will commit a
‘hate propaganda offence’ or ‘hate crime’ can initiate a
process that would result in someone facing a severe
loss of freedom and/or financial damage, all without
that person having actually committed any crime, not to
mention that ‘hate propaganda’ and ‘hate crime’ are
incredibly vague in the legislation.
This is the kind of legislation you would expect to see
in an anti-democratic, Communist state that is seeking
to create wide pretexts to arrest or punish whomever the
government feels has ‘stepped out of line’ with the
official government message.
That’s why the vagueness of this is – in the eyes of the
Trudeau government – a feature, not a bug.
The more vague the definition of hate in Bill C-36 is,
the more the government can abuse their power and apply
that power in a politically biased way to chill and
silence their opponents, while giving themselves and
their ideological allies a free pass.
Free expression under attack
With Bill C-10, and now Bill C-36, there can be zero
doubt that the Trudeau Liberal government is engaged in
an attack on your freedom of expression.
They abhor your rights and your ability to think for
yourself, and they want to control you and impose a
chilling effect on speech across our nation.
Rather than protecting our rights as a government is
supposed to do, the Liberals are trying to restrict and
attack our rights.
Bill C-36 is incredibly dangerous, goes against Canada’s
values, and must be stopped.
Spencer Fernando
TRENDING NOW....
As Statues Are Torn Down & Churches Burn, We're Seeing
What A 'Post-National State' Looks Like
The RCMP Must Be Deployed To Protect Catholic Churches
Canada Day Message From Spencer Fernando
With Bill C-36, Trudeau Government Launches Dangerous
New Assault On Your Freedom Of Expression
Catherine McKenna’s Legacy: Foreign Oil Dictatorships
Enriched At Our Expense
Is It Time To Remove Pierre Trudeau's Name From All
Government Buildings?
Standing Up For Canada Day
Response To Bill C-36 Could Make Or Break The
Conservative Party
WATCH: Arrogant Trudeau Brags About Bribing The Media
With Your Money
How To Influence Your Member of Parliament
|
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada%E2%80%93China_rela
tions
(these excerpts show conflicts between Canada and
China)
[article tells about Canada dismissing 2 chinese
scientists related to the Wuhan labs in China]
In July 2019, the University of Winnipeg was forced to
sever ties with Xiangguo Qiu and her husband, Keding
Cheng, who had been employed in its department of
medical microbiology after the RCMP began to
investigate the Chinese scientists, who had been
employed at the highest-security Biosafety Level 4
Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health.
The facility "is equipped to work with the most serious
and deadly human and animal diseases." The security
access for the pair and for its Chinese students was
terminated. Qiu had worked in a team of scientists on
the ZMapp treatment for Ebola. Someone at the PHAC had
alerted the authorities on 24 May, and the pair was
removed from the laboratory on 5 July. Qiu has been
able to train students from China at the facility for
over 20 years.[42]
Qiu made at least five trips over the 2017–2018
school year to the Wuhan National Biosafety
Laboratory of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,[43]
which was certified for BSL4 in January 2017. In August
2017, the National Health Commission of China approved
research activities involving Ebola, Nipah, and
Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever viruses at the Wuhan
facility.[44]
[from a related wiki article about Canada’s detaining
chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou of China’s Huawei
5G company in Canada.]
According to Crown counsel in Canadian court, Meng was
"charged with conspiracy to defraud multiple
international institutions."[30] The warrant was based
on allegations that Wanzhou had cleared money that was
claimed to be for Huawei, but was actually for Skycom,
[31] an entity claimed to be entirely controlled by
Huawei, which was said to be dealing with Iran,
contrary to sanctions.
(other excerpts about Canada-China conflicts)
[Hong Kong conflict]
On 6 October 2020, a group of 39 countries, including
Canada, the U.S., most of the EU member states, Bosnia
and Herzegovina, Albania, Australia, New Zealand,
Haiti, Honduras, and Japan, made a statement at the
United Nations to denounce China for its treatment of
ethnic minorities and for curtailing freedoms in
Hong Kong. [95]
Calls for Canada to be more hostile
(statement by IPAC about China’s communism)
China under the rule of the Chinese Communist Party
represents a global challenge. Democratic norms that
keep us free and safe are under ever greater pressure.
The rules-based order is suffering. And this cannot
continue unchecked. When countries have stood up for
values and human rights, they have done so alone -
sometimes, at great cost.
…...
A survey published in September 2019 by the Pew
Research Center found that 85% of Canadians had an
unfavourable view of China.
----------------
So the relationship between Canada and China is not
completely harmonious as in Mystic’s dream. More like
the conflicts between her and Simon. However, Canada
depends a lot on international trade with China.
China imports a lot of wood products, canola oils and
meat from Canada. Canada imports a lot of machinery,
furniture, etc. from China.
|
|