Tech Support

[ Tech Support ] [ Main Menu ]


  


966


Date: July 15, 2010 at 16:19:49
From: moderator, [DNS_Address]
Subject: .


?


Responses:
[967] [969] [970] [990] [988] [985] [972] [973] [975] [977] [979] [980] [981] [982] [974] [976] [984] [978]


967


Date: July 17, 2010 at 15:50:00
From: Puget Sounder, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: .


Looks as if a troll is trolling whith an awful small hook he may not catch much.


Responses:
[969] [970] [990] [988] [985] [972] [973] [975] [977] [979] [980] [981] [982] [974] [976] [984] [978]


969


Date: July 18, 2010 at 09:08:02
From: Dan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: .


says he is Bopp authorized......
...no anouncement from Bopp however


Responses:
[970] [990] [988] [985] [972] [973] [975] [977] [979] [980] [981] [982] [974] [976] [984] [978]


970


Date: July 18, 2010 at 17:13:15
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: .


I did authorize Chatillion and LA Man to moderate while I was out of town...didn't want to alert the trolls to such...
thanks


Responses:
[990] [988] [985] [972] [973] [975] [977] [979] [980] [981] [982] [974] [976] [984] [978]


990


Date: July 23, 2010 at 08:49:00
From: mountaingirl/NM, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: .


Excellent decision Ryan.

best-mg


Responses:
None


988


Date: July 20, 2010 at 15:16:05
From: Dan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: .


"didn't want to alert the trolls to such..."

I thought of that possibility.....


Responses:
None


985


Date: July 19, 2010 at 13:18:01
From: Pam,Az, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: .to Mr Bopp


That is a good reason Ryan. You did good, thanks.


Responses:
None


972


Date: July 18, 2010 at 19:55:32
From: Christine/SoCal, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: .


As if we weren't neck deep in rightwing bias already....LOL!


Responses:
[973] [975] [977] [979] [980] [981] [982] [974] [976] [984] [978]


973


Date: July 18, 2010 at 20:33:20
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: .


fair and balanced chris...imho


Responses:
[975] [977] [979] [980] [981] [982] [974] [976] [984] [978]


975


Date: July 18, 2010 at 21:31:26
From: Kelli Marie, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Poor management


Please confirm by private email.

Frankly, without the courtesy of advance notice to all of us that you were sanctioning "alternative moderators," I for one consider this a betrayal, both of your chosen "moderators" and of all the rest of us.

If you had advised and confirmed to everyone that you had selected stand-in "moderators" for an absence of yours that you had not advised us either -- and something you had never done before -- I believe that all of u would have accepted your management decision.

You did nothing to either advise the posters and lurkers on this site that you were deputizing stand-in moderators or give your chosen moderators credibility and legitimacy -- and, eventually, the anonymity they deserve to maintain credibility.

Exceedingly poor management, lousy judgement.

If this scenario is true, you owe everyone, especially Chatillion and LA Man, a huge apology.


Responses:
[977] [979] [980] [981] [982]


977


Date: July 18, 2010 at 22:00:48
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Poor management


consider yourself betrayed then Kelli...
I care not one whit...and of course, I had my reasons for how I proceeded which frankly my dear, are none of your damn business...just because you contributed a few years ago doesn't make you a stockholder...lol...and of course I apologize to everyone...but all y'all know what a fool I am already...


Responses:
[979] [980] [981] [982]


979


Date: July 18, 2010 at 22:07:42
From: Kelli Marie, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Poor management


This site ain't in the Big Board, bopp -- or any board. None of us are stockholders. Shrinking my comments to dollar value reveals your poor position.

No, with your "lol" shit you are not apologizing to anyone, nor accepting responsibility for a job poorly done -- nor contributing to the credibility of your own words nor of the boards.

I doubt anyone else will have the brass to challenge you on this debalce -- but what else is new?


Responses:
[980] [981] [982]


980


Date: July 18, 2010 at 22:28:48
From: Karen in IL, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Poor management


Oh, for GOD'S SAKE, Woman, are you EVER going to grow up?


Responses:
[981] [982]


981


Date: July 18, 2010 at 22:37:03
From: Kelli Marie, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Poor management


Been there, done that, still doing that.

Now I speak my mind.

Do you have something to contribute?


Responses:
[982]


982


Date: July 18, 2010 at 22:51:00
From: Karen in IL, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Poor management


Only anger and pain as of late...sorry.


Responses:
None


974


Date: July 18, 2010 at 20:52:25
From: Christine/SoCal, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: .Fair and balanced


Nice pair of rose-tinted goggles you're wearing these days, Mr. Bopp. ;-)

For the record, they both did a great job. Not so sure that would hold up over the long term, however....but, who really cares anyway?


Responses:
[976] [984] [978]


976


Date: July 18, 2010 at 21:57:15
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: .Fair and balanced


"...but, who really cares anyway? "

exactly!


Responses:
[984] [978]


984


Date: July 19, 2010 at 09:44:33
From: Christine/SoCal, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: .Fair and balanced


Hey, Bopper,

How's about trading me your kool pink goggles for a vintage, pristine condition, 60s Shaheen Aloha shirt with coconut buttons? They would look sensational with my hot pink snorkel, wet suit and flippers. With those pink glasses, I could continue swimming through some of the crap when it gets deep and try to convince myself that it is just pea soup afterall. ;-)


Responses:
None


978


Date: July 18, 2010 at 22:01:24
From: Kelli Marie, [DNS_Address]
Subject: "...but, who really cares anyway? "


Those who care about the tattered integrity of the boards.


Responses:
None


[ Tech Support ] [ Main Menu ]

Generated by: TalkRec 1.17
    Last Updated: 30-Aug-2013 14:32:46, 80837 Bytes
    Author: Brian Steele