Tech Support
|
[
Tech Support ] [ Main Menu ] |
|
|
|
8996 |
|
|
Date: July 16, 2022 at 05:19:08
From: Dan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: To Mr. Bopp: Debates about sourcing |
|
|
One of the most controversial aspects here at boppin is debates about sources. Those debates have led to on going trolling and personal attacks dispite your assertion that calling out poor sources is not trolling and is allowed here.
Currently, several members have begun a campaign to discredit mediabias factcheck. This is being done simply to allow themselves to post discredited sources and claim that they are valid.
In my opinion, a far left source can still be considered to be bias, even if it hasn't failed any media bias fact checks. This occurs from the language that is used and how much pertinant information is ommitted from an article.
From my observation, asserting this opinion, began one poster's months long campaign to get me banned and received continuing harrassment, not only from her, but from others in the community.
Repeated attacks occured upon me and others who called out covid disinformation, which was apparently allowed to be posted here at the time.
So my point of all of this is, that if there is a policy concerning disinformation, it may lesson conflict here. In a side note, if may help to clean up WOWS as well.
In a larger sense, we are heading for stricter media regulations, including the internet, in terms of promoting false and misleading information.
So Mr. Bopp, I've had my say. Do with it what you wish.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[8998] [8999] [9001] [9031] [9036] [9035] [9041] [9003] [9005] [9002] [9004] [9008] [9010] [9011] [9013] [9015] [9016] [9017] [9019] [9018] [9021] [9022] [9027] [9023] [9024] [9025] [9000] [9006] |
|
8998 |
|
|
Date: July 16, 2022 at 10:24:24
From: etc., [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: To Mr. Bopp: Debates about sourcing |
|
|
Mr. Bopp I agree with Dan. I know that this is a very difficult situation, especially with what is happening nationwide. Blatant misinformation and even at this point, innuendo and slight of hand, is extremely dangerous. The fact that “the big lie” took hold large enough to not only allow an insurrection at our Capital but was both shot down and then supported by high ranking Republican members of our government shows there is strong use of misinformation to obtain nefarious goals.
Sadly, if misinformation is a continued source here on Boppin, it will be one more internet site that fuels a dangerous premise. I don’t envy you the authority you have here, because it is almost impossible at this point to raise the level of consciousness of some and to stand against the purposed choice of others. This site is being hit by both the extreme right and extreme left. Extremes of any kind are dangerous and throw off the balance of everything else.
I personally don’t want you to close Boppin down. I don’t know if others realize how close that option has been in recent times. It must feel like babysitting the worst with little gain. I just know that it is a fine line for providing a venue and doing no harm. Boppin is truly like a family to many. I know it has been a place I have used to anchor in bad times, when no one else is reachable. Taking the bad with the good I guess. But not if some manage to flush the whole site down the sewer. In spite of a few who think this site is liberal heavy, it isn’t. If not by number, certainly in the mass of posting. I counted it up the other day. Misinformation was running well above anything else. And those trying to stand against it were few. That is a warning :(
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[8999] [9001] [9031] [9036] [9035] [9041] [9003] [9005] [9002] [9004] [9008] [9010] [9011] [9013] [9015] [9016] [9017] [9019] [9018] [9021] [9022] [9027] [9023] [9024] [9025] [9000] [9006] |
|
8999 |
|
|
Date: July 16, 2022 at 10:39:35
From: Karen, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: To Mr. Bopp: Debates about sourcing |
|
|
There are only two of us from the right. The rest are yours. I call that leaning left.
Misinformation is in the eye of the beholder. Unless you point out the actual lie, it means nothing. Just rhetoric.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[9001] [9031] [9036] [9035] [9041] [9003] [9005] [9002] [9004] [9008] [9010] [9011] [9013] [9015] [9016] [9017] [9019] [9018] [9021] [9022] [9027] [9023] [9024] [9025] [9000] [9006] |
|
9001 |
|
|
Date: July 16, 2022 at 11:17:14
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: To Mr. Bopp: Debates about sourcing |
|
|
do you mean yourself and cc? (and blindhog and jeff of course, among others) you must know that you all have posted a lot of disinformation over the years, from dubious sources...of course there has been some from the "other" side too...misinformation is not in the eye of the beholder...there is truth and there is untruth...often hard to discern, especially in these times of expert liars and bullshitters...that is the basic reason i have continued to let you guys post, even if most of it is crap...a little truth wrapped in a lot of crap...even this last post of yours is like that...yes. the site leans left...but there are more than two of you from the right...so that is an actual lie...but the truth is that those who lean left seem to the ones who are most accurate with what they post, and who use reasonable sources for their info...not to say that msm doesn't also have its limitations...but posters that promote division and violence and negativity do wear me out, and that is mostly why they get gone, especially when they flagrantly violate the few basic rules of order i have instituted here...that is why jim is gone...i deleted a number of his posts as a warning they were out of line, and reminded him that if your posts are being deleted it is a warning about your posting behavior...his response was to repost the same things...this happened multiple times and finally poof...he was gone...basically the same thing that happened with trapper and rig and whoever else has been banned...so now you know and can quit speculating...
i do my best to keep it reasonably fair...y'all don't make it easy...
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[9031] [9036] [9035] [9041] [9003] [9005] [9002] [9004] [9008] [9010] [9011] [9013] [9015] [9016] [9017] [9019] [9018] [9021] [9022] [9027] [9023] [9024] [9025] |
|
9031 |
|
|
Date: July 19, 2022 at 14:19:58
From: old timer , [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Media Bias/Fact Check - amateur site with subjective assessments |
URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Bias/Fact_Check |
|
Ironic you booted Jim for source trolling. Did you ever tell him this wasn’t allowed or just deleted his posts and then booted him?
According to Daniel Funke and Alexios Mantzarlis of the Poynter Institute, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[2] In 2018, the Columbia Journalism Review described Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and characterized their assessments as "subjective assessments [that] leave room for human biases, or even simple inconsistencies, to creep in".
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[9036] [9035] [9041] |
|
9036 |
|
|
Date: July 20, 2022 at 08:58:43
From: blindhog 6th sense, [DNS_Address]
Subject: LOL, It's Clear Haters Here Use a Bad Source to Negate Others' Posts(NT) |
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
9035 |
|
|
Date: July 19, 2022 at 19:49:47
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Media Bias/Fact Check - amateur site with subjective assessments |
|
|
i did not ban him for source trolling... i asked him many times to stop his nonsense...i then deleted some of his posts as a warning when he did not respond to my requests...i told him when posts are getting deleted, it is a warning...when he reposted them, multiple times, i realized he should no longer be allowed to post here...get your facts straight...i have posted this several times already...
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[9041] |
|
9041 |
|
|
Date: July 23, 2022 at 17:44:05
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Media Bias/Fact Check - amateur site with subjective assessments |
|
|
Well at least you know why you banned him, even if nobody else can figure out your arbitrary banning decisions.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
9003 |
|
|
Date: July 16, 2022 at 11:49:16
From: Jeff/Lake Almanor,CA, [DNS_Address]
Subject: I'm honored to have made the Conservative list |
|
|
But Karen is correct, because I view literally everything posted by the left wing on this board, is full blown misinformation BS. As I also know it is an agenda driven news sources being believed by the same gullible left.
The sad part is, these news sources know these naive liberals will believe it, hook, line and sinker.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[9005] |
|
9005 |
|
|
Date: July 16, 2022 at 12:20:31
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: I'm honored to have made the Conservative list |
|
|
spoken like a true cracker jeff...lol...your biases and outlook are difficult to behold and process, but you are still here, non?
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
9002 |
|
|
Date: July 16, 2022 at 11:47:30
From: Karen, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: To Mr. Bopp: Debates about sourcing |
|
|
Which is why I posted it on wows. Which I guess is where I will do all my posting. Since nothing is tolerated on national. I’m sure u know that there are only a couple of right sites approved from media bias. And u call that fair.
They seldom post so they don’t count. Jeff and a couple others
It will come out eventually that joe is taking cognitive drugs. Guess I’ll have to wait for cnn to report it. After all. Hunter did and ya all said I was lying back then.
I must have missed the posts that actually pointed out the actual lies in Jim’s posts.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[9004] [9008] [9010] [9011] [9013] [9015] [9016] [9017] [9019] [9018] [9021] [9022] [9027] [9023] [9024] [9025] |
|
9004 |
|
|
Date: July 16, 2022 at 12:18:31
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: To Mr. Bopp: Debates about sourcing |
|
|
and the pity party continues...lol...and who cares if joe is taking cognitive drugs? the guy is almost 80 for gawd's sake...i should probably be taking them too...lol...and as i related, jim's dismissal didn't have anything to do with lies in his posts...
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[9008] [9010] [9011] [9013] [9015] [9016] [9017] [9019] [9018] [9021] [9022] [9027] [9023] [9024] [9025] |
|
9008 |
|
|
Date: July 17, 2022 at 06:28:28
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: To Mr. Bopp: Debates about sourcing |
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[9010] [9011] [9013] [9015] [9016] [9017] [9019] [9018] [9021] [9022] [9027] [9023] [9024] [9025] |
|
9010 |
|
|
Date: July 17, 2022 at 09:56:54
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: To Mr. Bopp: Debates about sourcing |
URL: http://earthboppin.net/talkshop/tech/messages/9001.html |
|
i explained that already...
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[9011] [9013] [9015] [9016] [9017] [9019] [9018] [9021] [9022] [9027] [9023] [9024] [9025] |
|
9011 |
|
|
Date: July 17, 2022 at 14:49:41
From: Nevada, [DNS_Address]
Subject: and finally poof...he was gone... |
|
|
......gone because Jim felt your sourcing policy was inherently misguided and tried repeatedly to explain that to you?
Talk about "rewarding" genius.
Regardless as to how "you" may feel about "sourcing", your current misguided policy on it will not have a long term beneficial effect on Earth Boppin and will only deepen the divide among posters.
You really ought to find a more positive solution and a restoration and and apology to Jim is very much in order.
You were "wrong" on this one.
We all need to move on as a team of diverse energies, not as the negative energy we are increasingly becoming.
Please don't take this personal Ryan, it comes as a gift from a friend that appreciates what you have accomplished here over the many years.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[9013] [9015] [9016] [9017] [9019] [9018] [9021] [9022] [9027] [9023] [9024] [9025] |
|
9013 |
|
|
Date: July 17, 2022 at 17:16:40
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: and finally poof...he was gone... |
|
|
i did find a more positive solution...
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[9015] [9016] [9017] [9019] [9018] [9021] [9022] [9027] [9023] [9024] [9025] |
|
9015 |
|
|
Date: July 17, 2022 at 18:30:56
From: Nevada, [DNS_Address]
Subject: banning one of your better posters is a "solution"? |
|
|
...seems like a step backwards to me.
rewarding intellectual mediocrity while punishing intelligence and wisdom sounds like something our country might do...
...to their regret.
The "go fish" mentality can be so narrow...
...especially when rewarded.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[9016] [9017] [9019] [9018] [9021] [9022] [9027] [9023] [9024] [9025] |
|
9016 |
|
|
Date: July 17, 2022 at 18:42:10
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: banning one of your posters is a "solution"? |
|
|
i know...letting you continue to post here defies logic...and yet...you know when you look through water your view is distorted...
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[9017] [9019] [9018] [9021] [9022] [9027] [9023] [9024] [9025] |
|
9017 |
|
|
Date: July 17, 2022 at 18:54:03
From: Nevada, [DNS_Address]
Subject: letting you continue to post here defies logic... |
|
|
...seems like most of the smart money is convinced I'll be the next to go.
I'm thinking WW3 and global collapse will save you the trouble.
I'm betting the world will wake up before then but then I've never been a very good gambler.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[9019] [9018] [9021] [9022] [9027] [9023] [9024] [9025] |
|
9019 |
|
|
Date: July 17, 2022 at 20:12:50
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: letting you continue to post here defies logic... |
URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6VrKro8djw |
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
9018 |
|
|
Date: July 17, 2022 at 20:04:20
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: letting you continue to post here defies logic... |
|
|
jim wasn't a very good gambler either...lol...you'll go if you want to...that seems to be how it works...
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[9021] [9022] [9027] [9023] [9024] [9025] |
|
9021 |
|
|
Date: July 18, 2022 at 10:29:41
From: Nevada, [DNS_Address]
Subject: you'll go if you want to... especially if pushed hard enough... |
|
|
The trick is to know when to back off before you push a good poster too far.
Otherwise you lose the talents of a good poster that helped keep balance on the boards.
Why would you let yourself do that?
Seems like you should be "encouraging" good talent on EB, not "corralling" it Ryan.
Time to let Jim back before this becomes a habit.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[9022] [9027] [9023] [9024] [9025] |
|
9022 |
|
|
Date: July 18, 2022 at 10:40:54
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: you'll go if you want to... especially if pushed hard enough... |
|
|
seems like you are still trying to tell me how to run my boards...
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[9027] [9023] [9024] [9025] |
|
9027 |
|
|
Date: July 19, 2022 at 07:28:33
From: shadow , [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: you'll go if you want to... especially if pushed hard enough... |
|
|
Yep...forever and always...lol...
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
9023 |
|
|
Date: July 18, 2022 at 11:00:02
From: Nevada, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: you'll go if you want to... especially if pushed hard enough... |
|
|
...just offering some good advice from one that has been where you are and was glad I worked to bring out the best in others, not the worst.
Didn't necessarily make "me" a better person, but it made "great" broadcasters that went on to become even greater broadcasters because I was clever enough to see their "true potential" and not so much their obvious "defects.
Worked for "them" if not for "me", but then, it was never for "me" anyway...
...win win so to speak.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[9024] [9025] |
|
9024 |
|
|
Date: July 18, 2022 at 11:53:04
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: you'll go if you want to... especially if pushed hard enough... |
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[9025] |
|
9025 |
|
|
Date: July 18, 2022 at 12:49:56
From: Nevada, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: you'll go if you want to... especially if pushed hard enough... |
|
|
Obviously "good for them" as well Ryan...
It's been my experience that sometimes passing some on the "negatives" and really helping to amplify the good characteristics of others solves both issues eventually while doing the "same" for myself.
Jim is essentially a fine person, picking on a "weakness" to prove a point doesn't help him, or more importantly, all of us.
All of us are on a "team", and that should include all sides eventually.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
9000 |
|
|
Date: July 16, 2022 at 11:09:56
From: etc. , [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: To Mr. Bopp: Debates about sourcing |
|
|
Two? That is a lie.
And you think a lie is not a lie unless it’s proven? Wow, that is convenient. But not true as well. No wonder we are in such a mess :(
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[9006] |
|
9006 |
|
|
Date: July 16, 2022 at 13:36:05
From: Nevada, [DNS_Address]
Subject: would you agree that Karen and C are the only 2 "regular" conservative |
|
|
...posters etc? A few others post rarely, but not "regularly.
Sometimes a "lie" is so close to the "truth" that most people can figure out for themselves what was really meant by something.
Bertrand Russell would probably give Karen a pass on this and forge on to find common ground...
...which is usually more "considerable" than we sometimes give ourselves credit for.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
[
Tech Support ] [ Main Menu ] |