Tech Support

[ Tech Support ] [ Main Menu ]


  


8178


Date: December 30, 2021 at 14:28:21
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: definition of trolling...

URL: https://www.thefreedictionary.com/trolling


4. To post inflammatory or irrelevant material on (an electronic forum) to
provoke responses.


Responses:
[8182] [8190] [8192] [8179] [8232] [8234] [8193] [8187] [8195] [8207] [8210] [8213] [8197] [8231] [8235] [8200] [8202] [8199] [8203] [8229] [8263] [8265] [8233] [8206] [8216] [8220] [8221] [8224] [8227] [8228] [8225] [8226] [8198] [8204] [8211] [8194] [8181] [8183] [8184] [8185] [8188] [8191] [8186] [8189]


8182


Date: December 30, 2021 at 18:20:37
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: definition of trolling...


i saw that as just a commentary on the site, not inflammatory or irrelevant...that plus your history of wanting to bust dan's chops leads to a no go...


Responses:
[8190] [8192]


8190


Date: December 31, 2021 at 11:34:58
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: definition of trolling...


a commentary on the site based on nothing. You win, buddy.


Responses:
[8192]


8192


Date: December 31, 2021 at 11:40:06
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: definition of trolling...


true nuf...but i'm not even playing...


Responses:
None


8179


Date: December 30, 2021 at 15:02:31
From: JTRIV, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Bopp seems to define trolling as something completely different


Hi Akira,

Bopp seems to define trolling as responses he doesn't
like and therefore posts he doesn't like. It has nothing
to do with what trolling really is. This mainly applies
to us mere mortals as "the few" are never considered to
be trolling even if their "inflammatory or irrelevant"
posts would have gotten them booted on most forums
around the internet. It is kinda like defining water as
dry or fire as cold but it is his ball so we play by his
rules no matter how fair they are.

Hell the majority of ryan's posts on these forums over
the years meet the definition of trolling as he is a big
fan of one line "inflammatory or irrelevant" posts to
people he doesn't like.

This is a big reason there are rarely long, intelligent
on-topic discussions on these forums. Trolling is
sanctioned here but us mere mortals get our posts
deleted regardless of how polite, detailed and on topic
they are.

Happy New Year

Jim


Responses:
[8232] [8234] [8193] [8187] [8195] [8207] [8210] [8213] [8197] [8231] [8235] [8200] [8202] [8199] [8203] [8229] [8263] [8265] [8233] [8206] [8216] [8220] [8221] [8224] [8227] [8228] [8225] [8226] [8198] [8204] [8211] [8194] [8181] [8183] [8184] [8185] [8188] [8191] [8186] [8189]


8232


Date: January 01, 2022 at 05:11:48
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Jim...


I've been reading your posts for years and just want to express my
appreciation for the contribution you've made here, especially on the
science related boards.

You and I obviously disagree on issues, but I've found you usually to be a
calm, thoughtful, rational and incredibly patient presence (maybe less so
lately, understandably, lol). So thank you for your efforts.

Happy new year to you & your family.


Responses:
[8234]


8234


Date: January 01, 2022 at 12:18:43
From: JTRIV, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Akira...


Hi Akira,

Thank you for the kind words. We tend to look at things
from different perspectives, but I definitely appreciate
your liberal views on things in contrast to my
conservative views. The important thing is we aren't
aligned to any jackass political party as the truth means
more than petty partisan politics.

Happy New Year!

Jim


Responses:
None


8193


Date: December 31, 2021 at 11:40:27
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Bopp seems to define trolling as something completely different


You're right. Dan contributes next to nothing on this site. He can't even
back up his hit-and-run smear with an intelligent thought. And that's okay
with Bopp now. It wouldn't have been a couple of years ago. I guess it's a
sign he's more evolved now.

What a wasteland this place has become.

Happy new year.


Responses:
None


8187


Date: December 31, 2021 at 10:54:57
From: ao, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: So says the troll.


As far as I can tell you troll ry with passion.. endlessly.. as if you have a little boy schoolyard crush on him..

And since Nev has scaled his trolling back I'd say you're the biggest troll hereabouts..

Dude.. that makes you the king of trolls..

And omg look.. I'm a troll too!

What's a troll to do?


Responses:
[8195] [8207] [8210] [8213] [8197] [8231] [8235] [8200] [8202] [8199] [8203] [8229] [8263] [8265] [8233] [8206] [8216] [8220] [8221] [8224] [8227] [8228] [8225] [8226] [8198] [8204] [8211] [8194]


8195


Date: December 31, 2021 at 11:57:57
From: JTRIV, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: So you don't understand what trolling is either?? LOL


Hi ao,

How in the hell is it that you don't understand what
trolling is either?

4. To post inflammatory or irrelevant material on (an
electronic forum) to provoke responses.


While you might not like what I say that doesn't make it
trolling. I object to ryan's trolling me all the time
(with his inflammatory or irrelevant one line responses)
and the lack of fairness on this site. But I'm not one
to jump in threads with inflammatory or irrelevant
material in order to provoke a response and distract
from the discussion. I tend to respond to people with on
topic details, facts and data to further the discussion.
The fact you oppose what I say doesn't make my detailed
responses trolling.

I hope you can get rid of all that anger you have ao. It
isn't healthy.

I wish you a Happy New Year

Jim


Responses:
[8207] [8210] [8213] [8197] [8231] [8235] [8200] [8202] [8199] [8203] [8229] [8263] [8265] [8233] [8206] [8216] [8220] [8221] [8224] [8227] [8228] [8225] [8226] [8198] [8204] [8211]


8207


Date: December 31, 2021 at 14:03:44
From: ao, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: I understand enough to know you're the troll


And you sure love that theme.. as if it rids you of whatever you see in yourself.

Funny stuff that.. how thinking we see something in another works out to be ourself reflected in them..

Whatever it takes.. I'm happy to oblige..

Happy happy..


Responses:
[8210] [8213]


8210


Date: December 31, 2021 at 14:14:52
From: JTRIV, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: even though you don't know the definition you are sure I'm one?


Hi ao,


> I understand enough to know you're the troll

LOL, you mean even though you don't know the definition
you are sure I'm one? I'm a lot of things but not a
troll. That is why the definition is important as you
folks use the word as a general slur against people you
don't like having no clue what the word actually means.
My posts tend to have more on topic information than
most people on these forums. I'm comfortable taking
positions that aren't popular with some people but that
isn't trolling.

But hey, you can call me a troll or a refrigerator if
that makes you feel better. What you can't do is put
forth a logical, on topic response to what I've been
posting.

Happy New Year

Jim


Responses:
[8213]


8213


Date: December 31, 2021 at 14:32:59
From: Nevada, [DNS_Address]
Subject: ...try replacing "trolling" with "cronyism" Jim...


...and then cronyism with "democracy" and the plot really
starts to thicken.


Responses:
None


8197


Date: December 31, 2021 at 12:28:20
From: etc., [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: So you don't understand what trolling is either?? LOL


I’m not sure where you picked up that # 4 but this definition is found
when the word trolling is googled:

“A troll is Internet slang for a person who intentionally tries to
instigate conflict, hostility, or arguments in an online social
community. ... Trolls often use inflammatory messages to provoke
emotional responses out of people, disrupting otherwise civil
discussion.”

Pointing out sources that have been found over and over to post
inaccurate information is not trolling. Especially if done plainly with no
personal comments.


Responses:
[8231] [8235] [8200] [8202] [8199] [8203] [8229] [8263] [8265] [8233] [8206] [8216] [8220] [8221] [8224] [8227] [8228] [8225] [8226] [8198] [8204] [8211]


8231


Date: January 01, 2022 at 04:36:59
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: etc, again, please provide evidence...


"Pointing out sources that have been found over and over to post
inaccurate information is not trolling. Especially if done plainly with no
personal comments. "

I take this as an accusation regarding my posts which Dan disapproved of.
Am I correct?

If so, what "inaccurate information" have I posted from the source
Responsible Statecraft, the source in question?

Or is this just another hit & run post from you?


Responses:
[8235]


8235


Date: January 01, 2022 at 16:18:40
From: etc., [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: etc, again, please provide evidence...


“I take this as an accusation regarding my posts which Dan
disapproved of. Am I correct?”

No, actually it wasn’t. It was a generality.


Responses:
None


8200


Date: December 31, 2021 at 13:05:17
From: JTRIV, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: So you don't understand what trolling is either?? LOL


Hi etc.,

That is just a more extensive version of the same
definition. A troll doesn't try to discuss things but
derail discussions. Now ryan has said that source
trolling is allowed here... but it most certainly is
still trolling as it is done to derail discussions.

And really we know Dan is just trolling with the source
thing because he only goes after certain people's
sources and he posts things from sources that fail the
same media bias website he trolls people with. His goal
isn't good sources but to distract discussions initiated
by a few specific people here. But don't worry, ryan
will protect this type of trolling no matter how blatant
Dan is.

How many times have we seen news items that were
absolutely true trolled and the discussion distracted
from that true news item? It has happened a lot because
"truth" isn't the goal. Good sources aren't the goal. It
is all about disrupting the discussions on topics that
certain people post.

And etc. I'm not one of those people. I'm actually very
picky about my sources and don't really do the political
thing so I'm not one of the victims of the source
trolling. Dan trolls me with brilliant things like
claiming Oxford University was "anti vax propaganda"
because he didn't like the discussion. He was source
trolling when the source was one of the most prestigious
universities on the planet because he didn't like what
they said! LOL

Have a Happy New Year!

Jim


Responses:
[8202]


8202


Date: December 31, 2021 at 13:12:54
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: So you don't understand what trolling is either?? LOL


i've never heard dan call you a douchebag jim...


Responses:
None


8199


Date: December 31, 2021 at 13:00:05
From: Akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Please provide evidence for your claim

URL: https://responsiblestatecraft.org/about/


"Pointing out sources that have been found over and over to post
inaccurate information is not trolling."

Please provide evidence that the site I posted from, Responsible Statecraft,
contains inaccurate information.

Dan's hit & run reply to my post with the Responsible Statecraft article is the
epitome of "trolling".


Responses:
[8203] [8229] [8263] [8265] [8233] [8206] [8216] [8220] [8221] [8224] [8227] [8228] [8225] [8226]


8203


Date: December 31, 2021 at 13:19:40
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Please provide evidence for your claim

URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quincy_Institute_for_Responsible_Statecraft


seems like a mixed bag...partially funded by soros and the kochs...but if tom cotton is out against them, they must have something going for them...dan is not always right in his criticisms of sites...none of us are always right...so it seems over the top to go bonkers about it...you might say personal...


Responses:
[8229] [8263] [8265] [8233] [8206] [8216] [8220] [8221] [8224] [8227] [8228] [8225] [8226]


8229


Date: January 01, 2022 at 04:28:56
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Please provide evidence for your claim

URL: https://responsiblestatecraft.org/about/


Left - Right and in-between, judging by the journalists who do the actual
writing. Seems at least as legitimate as any other source most seem to
accept here, more so than some, imo*.

Criticizing the State is anathema to Dan. He frequently accuses me of being
unpatriotic, un-American and of hating my country, literally. It doesn't
matter to Dan what site I use. I recently posted something from the
reputable British Medical Journal. Dan latched on, accusing me of
promoting "vaccine hesitancy", and you said nothing.

You are playing the game with every choice you make on this site, whether
you want to admit it or not... imo*.



"About Responsible Statecraft
Mission

Responsible Statecraft is the online magazine of the Quincy Institute for
Responsible Statecraft. It publishes outside contributors and reporters as
well as staff analysis, opinion, and news to promote a positive, non-partisan
vision of U.S. foreign policy — and the ideologies and interests behind them
— that have mired the United States in counterproductive and endless wars
and made the world less secure.

The views expressed by authors on Responsible Statecraft do not
necessarily reflect those of the Quincy Institute or its associates.

Staff

Kelley Beaucar Vlahos is Editorial Director of Responsible Statecraft and
Senior Advisor at the Quincy Institute. Previously, she served for three years
as Executive Editor of the The American Conservative magazine, where she
had been reporting and publishing regular articles on national security, civil
liberties, foreign policy, veterans, and Washington politics since 2007. From
2013 to 2017, Vlahos served as director of social media and online editor at
WTOP News in Washington, D.C.. She also spent 15 years as an online
political reporter for Fox News at the channel’s Washington D.C. bureau, as
well as Washington correspondent for Homeland Security Today magazine.
Follow her on Twitter @VlahosAtQuincy.

Ben Armbruster is the Managing Editor of Responsible Statecraft. He has
more than a decade of experience working at the intersection of politics,
foreign policy, and media. Ben previously held senior editorial and
management positions at Media Matters, ThinkProgress, ReThink Media,
and Win Without War. His work has been published in the Guardian, Salon,
The Globe Post, LobeLog and other outlets. He holds a bachelor of arts in
history from Ohio University and a master of arts in international relations
from King’s College London. Follow him on Twitter @benjamina.

Jim Lobe is a Senior Advisor and contributing editor at Responsible
Statecraft. He served as chief of the Washington bureau of Inter Press
Service (the other IPS) from 1980 to 1985 and again from 1989 to 2015.
Best known for his coverage of the neoconservative movement’s influence
on U.S. foreign policy, he has directed LobeLog.com, which has focused
primarily on U.S. Middle East policy, since 2007. In 2015, LobeLog became
the first weblog to win American Academy of Diplomacy’s Arthur Ross Media
Award for Distinguished Reporting and Analysis on Foreign Affairs. Proud
native of Seattle, Jim graduated with Highest Honors in History from
Williams College and received a law degree from the University of California
at Berkeley (Boalt Hall). Follow him on Twitter @LobeLog.

Eli Clifton is a Senior Advisor at the Quincy Institute and Investigative
Journalist at Large for Responsible Statecraft. Eli focuses on money in
politics and U.S. foreign policy. He previously reported for the American
Independent New Network, ThinkProgress, and Inter Press Service. Clifton
is co-author of the Center for American Progress’s report Fear Inc.: The
Roots Of the Islamophobia Network In America. Eli has been a fellow at The
Nation Institute and the Type Media Center. His work has appeared on
PBS/Frontline’s Tehran bureau, The Intercept, the South China Morning
Post, Right Web, LobeLog, Salon, Huffington Post, the Daily Beast, Slate,
Gawker, and ForeignPolicy.com. Eli holds a bachelor’s degree from Bates
College and a master’s degree in international political economy from the
London School of Economics. You can follow him on Twitter @EliClifton.

Sam Fraser is an assistant editor at Responsible Statecraft and
communications associate at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft.
He holds a B.A. in International Relations from Claremont McKenna College.
His studies there focused on U.S. foreign policy and Latin America, and he
has conducted field research on human rights and transitional justice in
Argentina. He has also studied the issue of impunity for U.S. foreign policy
officials for his undergraduate thesis entitled “The Catastrophe Artists:
Understanding America’s Unaccountable Foreign Policy Elite.” You can
follow him on Twitter @SxmFrxser.

David Saveliev is a reporting intern at the Responsible Statecraft. He has
reported on conflicts, protests and natural disasters on the ground in places
such as Donbass, Paris and Yakutia. You can find his work in Nikkei Asia and
the National Interest among others.David holds a BA in Political Science and
International Relations from the Johns Hopkins University. David is currently
pursuing an MPhil at the University of Oxford where he researches protest
movements and ideology in the former USSR. He tweets his works and
obscure memes at @saveliev_david.

Submission Guidelines

Submissions should generally reflect Responsible Statecraft’s mission and
be presented most often within the context of the immediate news cycle.
They should also offer a unique viewpoint; present a novel, unconventional,
or contrarian argument; and/or introduce previously unreported or
underreported and compelling information. Articles on Responsible
Statecraft range from 400- to 500-word rapid-response pieces to
commentary and analyses of the 800- to 1,200-word range, although, in
some circumstances, essays may exceed that limit.

Potential authors should send their pitch to PitchRS@quincyinst.org with a
one- to three-sentence explanation of the thesis they want to put forward,
and/or a preview of the news they want to report. Completed articles are
accepted but short pitches are preferred.

Submissions should be written in American English and adhere to AP style.
Links to reputable sources should be embedded in the text."


Responses:
[8263] [8265] [8233]


8263


Date: January 03, 2022 at 17:26:57
From: Dan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Please provide evidence for your claim


"He frequently accuses me of being unpatriotic, un-
American and of hating my country"

Your rhetoric plays right into the narrative of those
who oppose this country, those who wish to do us harm.
You criticize and find fault with just about everything
concerning this country ignoring pertinent information
along the way, tearing us down. You are quick to judge
without investigating to find out what may be actually
happening behind the scenes.
Plus you are selective in your outrage. You are more
than willing to sacrifice civilians while promoting what
you think foreign policy should be.
You are no better than those you criticize, in my
opinion.




Responses:
[8265]


8265


Date: January 03, 2022 at 18:32:05
From: Nevada, [DNS_Address]
Subject: ....I love my country right or wrong!


"Your rhetoric plays right into the narrative of those
who oppose this country, those who wish to do us harm."

This attitude is why we fight and lose 20 year wars
Dan...

...maybe we should consider the needs and desires of the
other 7.3 billion folks before we destroy the planet with
our senile immaturity towards life and the universe.


Responses:
None


8233


Date: January 01, 2022 at 09:53:38
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Please provide evidence for your claim


i knew you would understand...


Responses:
None


8206


Date: December 31, 2021 at 13:42:51
From: JTRIV, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Please provide evidence for your claim


Hi ryan,

While you have supported source trolling for whatever
reason this is an example where the media bias guy
doesn't rate that site, no specific criticisms are given
and as you say it is a mixed bag, funded by the big, bad
right wing boogeyman Koch and the big, bad left win
boogeyman Soros. Is Dan really source trolling in this
case or just trolling trolling?

This is the problem you have created by sanctioning all
this source trolling. With nothing specific on the
source Dan responds by posting a variation of the source
name.... which can't really be source trolling can it?
That was just to distract from an article Dan didn't
like. Maybe you should consider advising Dan to use a
bit of restraint?

Happy New Year

Jim


Responses:
[8216] [8220] [8221] [8224] [8227] [8228] [8225] [8226]


8216


Date: December 31, 2021 at 14:55:44
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Please provide evidence for your claim


hey dan...use some restraint...

hey jim...lighten up...


Responses:
[8220] [8221] [8224] [8227] [8228] [8225] [8226]


8220


Date: December 31, 2021 at 15:28:12
From: Nevada, [DNS_Address]
Subject: hey jim...lighten up...


...better yet ryan, why don't address Jim's very real
observations? How can we take you seriously if you don't
take us seriously? Are we going by sandbox rules or
debate protocol?


Responses:
[8221] [8224] [8227] [8228] [8225] [8226]


8221


Date: December 31, 2021 at 16:58:59
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: hey jim...lighten up...


i gotta admit lee...it's pretty hard to take you (or jim) seriously...lol...sure once in a while you both post something of note, but more and more all you do is bitch...and if we were going by debate protocol, you would have been escorted out of the building a long time ago...


Responses:
[8224] [8227] [8228] [8225] [8226]


8224


Date: December 31, 2021 at 18:14:24
From: Nevada, [DNS_Address]
Subject: ...maybe we all take ourselves too serious ryan...


...what I may say isn't going to change anything around
here unless someone for some reason is ready to make
changes. It's all our personal perception and belief
systems exercising and practicing various drills on the
earth plane.

The problem arises when someone thinks their answers
are better than someone elses and tries to play the
morality card without equally applying the same
standards to themselves.

Rarely in life, if ever, have I met someone that was
considered "weak" in the morals department that didn't
have a few somewhat hidden "winning" hands that I would
have missed had I adhered to "groupthink" and not
explored that "poor" soul more closely.

A lot of great wisdom on these boards goes unnoticed
because of the erroneous and incorrect judgment of
others that think they have it all figured out.


Responses:
[8227] [8228] [8225] [8226]


8227


Date: December 31, 2021 at 20:19:50
From: ao, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: maybe we don't take ourselves seriously enough..


I mean, all things considered, I suspect all that ails the world would be better..
and better.. and better yet.. if people only bothered to take things seriously..

In a world where just the ante is self awareness.. there ain't many among us
actually at the table bro..


Responses:
[8228]


8228


Date: December 31, 2021 at 20:47:06
From: Nevada, [DNS_Address]
Subject: there ain't many among us actually at the table bro..


...by definition ao, once we emerge on the "earth plane",
we're pretty much "at the table".

Actual "awareness" of the table may be more fleeting than
one might hope.

In any event, our presence here was probably more of an
opportunity than a mistake.

Our presence on EB no doubt raises the stakes and the
commitment.


Responses:
None


8225


Date: December 31, 2021 at 19:32:11
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: ...maybe we all take ourselves too serious ryan...


speak for yourself...


Responses:
[8226]


8226


Date: December 31, 2021 at 20:07:00
From: Nevada, [DNS_Address]
Subject: speak for yourself...


...I just did ryan...

...and if the shoe fits...


Responses:
None


8198


Date: December 31, 2021 at 12:55:21
From: Nevada, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: So you don't understand what trolling is either?? LOL


"Pointing out sources that have been found over and
over to post inaccurate information is not trolling.
specially if done plainly with no personal comments."

Unfortunately etc, a very large percentage of articles
these days, from literally all sides of the political
spectrum have become tainted and biased to one degree
or another. Just a fact of the times we are currently
going through.

Better to show restraint, respect, compassion and love
for our fellow human beings than to keep opening up old
wounds with snark, derision and judgment if it's
"higher ground" we are seeking.

Teamwork is probably a better goal than trying to judge
those of us who aren't quite perfect yet.

Insults to others are rarely productive in the long
run.

Lee


Responses:
[8204] [8211]


8204


Date: December 31, 2021 at 13:20:45
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: So you don't understand what trolling is either?? LOL


hopefully that means you will be stopping that behavior then...cool!


Responses:
[8211]


8211


Date: December 31, 2021 at 14:23:38
From: Nevada, [DNS_Address]
Subject: ...as ao so thoughtfully observed ryan, look in the mirror yourself...


...raising the dialogue here to the level of "douchebags"
seems to indicate that quality discussion of issues is
pretty much a thing of the past on these pages.

You criticize the one line zingers of others but you
thrive on them personally...

...kind of like trolling yourself from where I stand.


Responses:
None


8194


Date: December 31, 2021 at 11:43:52
From: Nevada, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: So says the troll.


...plenty of "trolling" to go around on everyone's part I
suspect...

...it's the "cronyism" that does the real damage.


Responses:
None


8181


Date: December 30, 2021 at 18:19:51
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Bopp seems to define trolling as something completely different


seems like you have a persecution complex jim...lol...
happy new year indeed...


Responses:
[8183] [8184] [8185] [8188] [8191] [8186] [8189]


8183


Date: December 30, 2021 at 18:52:32
From: Nevada, [DNS_Address]
Subject: seems like you have a persecution complex jim...lol...


...seems like you have a few things to work out yourself
ryan.... lol...whatever that means.

Welcome to the club.

...and happy new years as well.

Always interesting how some of us can do no wrong and
others can do no right in your rather arbitrary ranking
of friend or foe reality complex.


Responses:
[8184] [8185] [8188] [8191] [8186] [8189]


8184


Date: December 30, 2021 at 19:53:40
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: seems like you have a persecution complex jim...lol...


ya think? i realize you don't see it, but there is a method to my madness...in general though, i try to give people what they want...


Responses:
[8185] [8188] [8191] [8186] [8189]


8185


Date: December 30, 2021 at 20:07:08
From: Nevada, [DNS_Address]
Subject: .in general though, i try to give people what they want...


How about what they "need" once in a while? Or better
yet, what "you" need?


Responses:
[8188] [8191] [8186] [8189]


8188


Date: December 31, 2021 at 10:58:20
From: ao, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: .in general though, i try to give people what they want...


Dude.. if you were given what you need... oy!


Responses:
[8191]


8191


Date: December 31, 2021 at 11:38:12
From: Nevada, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: .in general though, i try to give people what they want...


...actually I've usually been given more than I need
ao...

...you should try it sometime.


Responses:
None


8186


Date: December 31, 2021 at 00:36:10
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: .in general though, i try to give people what they want...


that is above my pay grade...


Responses:
[8189]


8189


Date: December 31, 2021 at 11:33:34
From: Nevada, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: .in general though, i try to give people what they want...


...pretty sure "pay grade" has nothing to do with giving
people what they need ryan as opposed to what they think
they want.

Pretty sure you already know that.


Responses:
None


[ Tech Support ] [ Main Menu ]

Generated by: TalkRec 1.17
    Last Updated: 30-Aug-2013 14:32:46, 80837 Bytes
    Author: Brian Steele