Tech Support
|
[
Tech Support ] [ Main Menu ] |
|
|
|
4513 |
|
|
Date: November 03, 2016 at 23:40:01
From: C, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Ryan |
URL: http://82.221.129.208/basepaget3.html |
|
Is it okay to post this on WOWOWS? It'd definitely be a WOWOWOS if true. If you don't want any politics I understand.
BUSTED, HERE ARE THE COMPLETE RIGGED ELECTION RESULTS. TRUMP LOSES.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[4522] [4521] [4529] [4530] |
|
4522 |
|
|
Date: November 06, 2016 at 17:47:25
From: Karen in IL, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Of course they want Trump to lose |
|
|
Read what I posted on personal before it gets deleted.
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
4521 |
|
|
Date: November 06, 2016 at 17:41:29
From: Jim W, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Jim Stone aka Mr. Goofy strikes gain LOL(NT) |
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[4529] [4530] |
|
4529 |
|
|
Date: November 07, 2016 at 14:08:04
From: Polydactyl in N. Bay, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Jim Stone aka Mr. Goofy strikes gain LOL(NT) |
|
|
Do you mean he's calling attention to cyber spoofing? Could be! Jim, as far as I know, started out publishing known and unknown factoids about Fukushima, some of which were verified later, others still in limbo despite compelling evidence that Fukushima was a very 'managed' nuclear environment given the MOX fuel development going on for various global interests. I actually feel very sorry for what's happened to him. There is no deterring from the higher party line propaganda on issues of power and money, unless you want to risk your life and or reputation. This dog-eat-dog style of communication, if you can call it that, has been going on for a loooong time. Journalists of all ilk are becoming victims of an unquestioning propaganda and rigid politics. Some are calling Hillary's upcoming reign the New McCarthyism, for good reason. (BTW I'd love to see any articles om the latter if anyone runs into them online).
One thing I notice when posts get more wild or people get more tense is that none of us have solid backup in referring to any published news articles, including Jim, especially when offering counter opinions that are viewed as real threats! I remember Diane Feinstein saying only official journalists (in the club) should be allowed to say anything online as in a 'news' article. Talk about a turncoat among us. The term 'factoid' is not a frivolous terminology. In the mainstream news that is literally mostly propaganda there is not much allowance for discussion or verification of most 'news' or factoids presented, especially in digital form. Comments are often preaching to the choir on any given Internet news page. I call the data points factoids as they are not entirely verifiable and given to faith in whoever the professional mainstream writer is while those who write outside mainstream news are given swift kicks for any differing opinions.
People have very few forums where they can talk out loud about anything. Better to do it live with a person in front of you. I guess. People are taking sides and discussing what they are reading online, much of which will not mean a hill of beans in the long run as we have ENTIRELY lost our connection to state and federal representatives or any actions they take within their affiliated groups. I do believe we are being run by a global corporate conglomerate or syndicate and that's just the way it is right now.
I would hope that people don't blame the folks here who are trying to sort things out from intuition, experience, and printed and online media. After all, all we've got are words to go on. Like they said in the old days, 'the revolution will not be televised' and it won't be online either. If change is thwarted in digital forms of communication, involving the masses, then change will have to be become local and face-to-face, eventually. Everyone took the digital bait and ran with it- :D
Let people keep their normalcy bias online. Does it matter when media is overrun by apologists for the corporate groups that pay their salaries and our news is cherry picked, filtered, and otherwise politicized? Not really, in the long run. I don't see a reason to stop people from flapping online. In a way it is a straw argument that they have an opinion that is going to be listened to or acted upon, so where's the beef? The beef is in people who want to maintain some civility and see people's frustrations in not being heard and not having any power in communications about anything going on around them (except face to face, local). I knew things changed enormously when TV news turned into city by city or regional news casts and cartoons were on all the channels instead of one or two, lol. No longer was it the 'place' of any person to discuss higher level political matters OUT LOUD or have a TV news channel address any real concerns. We are all supposed to shut the heck up and act like that's all there is, verifiable, to report. Or, like Bopp really is suggesting, take some time off, put your feet up, and have some tea with friends! I think in some ways, I had more 'intellectual' fun reading the old magazines when they were less restrained in publishing alternative views.
This too shall pass- :)
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[4530] |
|
4530 |
|
|
Date: November 07, 2016 at 14:22:19
From: JTRIV, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Jim Stone aka Mr. Goofy strikes gain LOL(NT) |
|
|
Hi Polydactyl,
> Jim, as far as I know, started out publishing known and unknown factoids about Fukushima
From what I can tell the first well known post that went around was a claim that the 9/11 airplanes exceeded their software limits. He put that one out under his real name of Jim Heikkila. This was probably before he had to run to Mexico to get out of paying child support.
Of course a lot of Boeing pilots and mechanics quickly spoke up to show that was bullshit. Still it was quoted hundreds of times and probably gave Jim Stone/Heikkila his first take at how gullible people really are.
He has since been an expert on Fukushima, Ebola, hurricanes, floods, earthquakes and anything else that is making the rounds of internet conspiracy sites.
Jim Stone not only doesn't have a clue about what he is talking about, he is also unoriginal just makes the rounds of conspiracy sites and writing articles where he is an expert on the conspiracy topic of the day.
That's why few believe Jim Stone's garbage. He's just recycling bullshit to make money to support himself hiding out in Mexico.
Cheers
Jim
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
[
Tech Support ] [ Main Menu ] |