[ Tech Support ] [ Main Menu ]
3397
From: horst graben, [DNS_Address]
Subject: mr bopp ... an "impertinent question" for you
URL: http://earthboppin.net/talkshop/international/messages/26699.html
|
i'm wondering how you can ban some and allow the shenagins of others to continue ... see the thread at the link ... what's the "fairness doctrine" to rationalize that? and ... once again ... should my "impertinent question" anger you ... feel free to ban me i could use a several decades break from posting here and having to continually fend off unsubstantiated assertions from JTRIV |
Responses:
[3423] [3429] [3436] [3437] [3438] [3439] [3431] [3428] [3430] [3426] [3425] [3432] [3424] [3401] [3408] [3412] [3427] [3416] [3421] [3433] [3415] [3414] [3413] [3398] [3399] [3400] [3417] [3409]
3423
From: Nasirah, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: mr bopp ... an "impertinent question" for you
|
Here's an example safe pic that won't upset horst grabben's delicate sensibility - all pictures from grimmlord must hence forth use this is as a shining example of what's acceptable in the female form. |
Responses:
[3429] [3436] [3437] [3438] [3439] [3431] [3428] [3430] [3426] [3425] [3432] [3424]
3429
From: Cinnamon in Oregon, [DNS_Address]
Subject: That was the style back in the late 50's, early 60's.
|
I could show you graduation pictures of my 2 cousins 9 years older - and they ALL looked just like that. THAT was considered very chic back then. Teased hair - and then sprayed with Aqua Net hair spray. Times change. I often wonder how people 30 years from now will look on tattoos all over people's arms and backs. Or pants hanging down. Think they'll laugh? I'd bet on it. |
3436
From: Lynn, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: That was the style back in the late 50's, early 60's.
|
Oh yes, Aqua Net. Stiff as a board. Teased to the moon. The winged rim glasses ( which of course are NOW back in style and considered fashion forward stylish) I thought they were ugly way back then, and I still think they are ugly now. Oh well. I saw one of those young men come into a restaurant the other day. This time his pants were nearly down to his knees. How in heck he managed to keep them from fully falling down I have no idea! Maybe they are safety pinned like diapers because he did have a very, very long white undershirt type thing that was still tucked into his jeans which were at his knees. All so stupid. People herd like sheep in fashion world. They start out wanting to be "different", and then eventually everyone looks like everyone. The tattoo thing. Again, in mho, stupid. But, I shall keep my mouth shut, just waiting for the butterfly and giraffe dragging along at their heels, eventually. Humans are the strangest creatures on this planet. Get another tattoo folks. Be unique, make your statement to the world. And, if our police state continues you'll all be so incredibly easy to identify. The Jewish people had numbers tattooed into their arms. And, not for any voluntary choice. They didn't much care for it. People rarely learn from their ancestors horrors. Innocent people tattooed with marker identifications. Step up folks, the tattoo parlor has an opening just for you. sigh... |
3437
From: Karen in IL, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: That was the style back in the late 50's, early 60's.
|
My first pair of glasses were like that, 1968 - just another reason to hate that year! Lord, what an awful year. Lost Grandpa to a stroke. Oldest brother's newly-married-best-friend drowned. Next brother's very good friend died of chicken-pox-infected brain. RFK killed. MLKJr died. ...and I got those damned glasses... geez I was only 11. |
3438
From: Cinnamon in Oregon, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: That was the style back in the late 50's, early 60's.
| Sheesh, girl, I hope you at least got a VACATION that year. That was quite a haul! And a long one at that. |
Responses:
[3439]
3439
From: Karen in IL, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: That was the style back in the late 50's, early 60's.
|
I had to google vacation definition; I have no idea what that is... oh yeah, now I remember sigh |
Responses:
None
3431
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: That was the style back in the late 50's, early 60's.
|
Oh, that reminds me of something someone said to me today...said I knew a man who had a ship tattooed on his chest in his youth. As he got older it sank until it could not be seen anymore. Where ya suppose it went? (the latter was my thought) ~Eve |
Responses:
None
3428
From: Karen in IL, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Nasirah ... for you
| ^^^see link^^^ |
Responses:
[3430]
3430
From: Nasirah, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Nasirah ... for you
|
My ears are now bleeding, as well as well my eyes ;-) Effective acoustic and visual birth control…. |
Responses:
None
3426
From: Polydactyl in N. Bay, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: mr bopp ... an "impertinent question" for you
| Omg, that is got me ROFLMAO, can't stop laughing not at the people (heck NO) but the picture, hahahaha. Thanks for the laff. |
Responses:
None
3425
From: Karen in IL, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: mr bopp ... an "impertinent question" for you
|
I seriously don't think that God meant to have us put all that toxic crap into our hair. Good God |
Responses:
[3432]
3432
From: Eve , [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: mr bopp ... an "impertinent question" for you
|
Right! God is good! I doubt we meant to do most of what is has passed and hopefully not too much more test tubes to come. At least they were hopefully able to wash it out eventually, yet not great for the environment or lungs either. ~Eve |
Responses:
None
3424
From: JeffLake Almanor,CA, [DNS_Address]
Subject: That will put the "goods' in a safe position for sure. LOL.(NT)
| (NT) |
Responses:
None
3401
From: susanna, [DNS_Address]
Subject: here's the fairness aspect,
URL: http://earthboppin.net/talkshop/tech/messages/3302.html
|
explained. |
Responses:
[3408] [3412] [3427] [3416] [3421] [3433] [3415] [3414] [3413]
3408
From: horst graben, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: go look at ALL the posts in the thread at the link
URL: http://earthboppin.net/talkshop/international/messages/26699.html
| and then we might have something to talk about |
Responses:
[3412] [3427] [3416] [3421] [3433] [3415] [3414] [3413]
3412
From: susanna, [DNS_Address]
Subject: we are responsible for ourselves ..
|
and, for our own behavior. If things get your goat, walk away from them. Many of us, have done just that, many times. We have a choice. If anyone is overly attached to "being right", they're in for a fruitless journey here and in life. lighten up a bit ... read the rules mr bopp set up, and respect them and him, yourself and other posters. Is that too much to ask? I read some of the thread ... yawn. Your risking getting banned for a thread? Seriously, now. Mr bopp is taking a break from baby sitting, presently. We have to figure out how to be civil adults on our own ... capiche? |
3427
From: et, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: we are responsible for ourselves ..
|
being attached to "being right", by being right is a wonderful journey here and in life. |
Responses:
None
3416
From: horst graben, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: and if ,,, and when ... you do send that e-mail
| make sure you ask mr bopp why "grimmlord" has "special priviledges" that none of the rest of us have |
3421
From: susanna, [DNS_Address]
Subject: what email, what rat out and what the fudge are you doing?
|
fyi, naked women are still not against the guidelines, as far as I know. A naked body is not porn. GL has posted those for years. Don't click on his posts, if pics of naked women offends you. I'm out of this thread. Good luck to you. |
Responses:
[3433]
3433
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: what email, what rat out and what the fudge are you doing?
|
Still not necessary and it's I doubt thoughts see it as pure according to the comments I wish I never saw those or the grime post. I would recommend NOT for others not to check out that thread. I opened it and never expected to see that. I need my brain washed with pure water...it's almost gone, someday forever...something for to toss into the trash bin of nasty thoughts, through them out and hopefully rise above it all and the world may become a better place. Fortuna to you oh susanna. ~Eve |
Responses:
None
3415
From: horst graben, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: maybe you should be a "good citizen" and rat me out
| send mr bopp and e-mail with your big tattle-tail ... i'd like to see his response to my messages ... and that soon |
Responses:
None
3414
From: horst graben, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: btw ... i don't give a damn if i'm banned or not
| capiche? |
Responses:
None
3413
From: horst graben, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: you "read some of the thread" ... did you notice the naked ladies?
| i once posted pictures of naked ladies on a "grimmlord thread" that had pictures of naked ladies (wearing shoes ... nod, nod, nudge, nudge) and mr bopp came down hard on me ... and did you miss the "made JohnL's penis explode" in the subject line? i'm no prude ... but if mr bopp makes the rules for all ... they should apply to all ... how's that for "adult"? ... or do you think i need more "baby sitting"? ... now ... why don't YOU be a good citizen and just "walk away" from this ... or is that too "being right" for you? |
Responses:
None
3398
From: Jeff/Lake Almanor,CA, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Dang-it horst
|
I don't want to see you, or anyone else band from here. If you don't like a post, just do like something you don't like on radio or TV, just change the channel or turn it off. I've seen Akira's post now a few times, got a few sentences in, and closed it. No problem. We're all walking on thin ice here on earthboppin, in a heating pool. It just started to seem like it might be cooling down. Mr. Bopp said he will lurk, but not moderate. It's not my job either. But he may be watching, to decide the fate of earthboppin's future. 95% of the good people here, had nothing to do with this. And we need to think of them, before ourselves. Jeff |
3399
From: horst graben, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: thanks for the interest Jeff ... but i've complained before this
| and got no satisfaction ... now with the banning of Jim W., RIG, and trapper ... it seems appropriate to bring it up again ... and i'm not the only one that's complained ... there have been plenty who don't like is style ... if you are wondering what all the fuss is about ... look at the posts at the link provided |
3400
From: Jeff/Lake Almanor,CA, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: thanks for the interest Jeff ... but i've complained before this
|
I know horst, I've read all this before, several times. It's all cool what you are saying. Just don't want to loose you too. Tread Lightly, Jeff |
3417
From: horst graben, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: you'll learn that mr bopp has his own biases and prejudices
| and that "treading lightly" is not always the right thing to do ... i call it "knuckling under" and "pulling the forelock" ... and i say "fuck that noise" |
Responses:
None
3409
From: horst graben, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: thanks for the interest Jeff ... but no great loss (NT)
| (NT) |
Responses:
None
[ Tech Support ] [ Main Menu ]