| Tech Support
|
[
Tech Support ] [ Main Menu ] |
|
|
|
2558 |
|
|
Date: November 13, 2012 at 18:20:38
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: A word of warning for Chrome users |
|
|
A few days ago a program I downloaded installed the Chrome browser without asking. I promptly deleted it but stared having problems while browsing with Firefox.
A window would pop up listing an error from a script that was timing out. This would cause Firefox to lock up and only a reboot would stop it.
These all traced back to Chrome. The removal program does not remove everything. It took multiple searches with regedit to track down and delete all references to Chrome in the registry.
So.. BEWARE!
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[2561] [2562] [2564] [2560] [2568] [2569] [2570] [2559] [2563] |
|
2561 |
|
|
Date: November 15, 2012 at 13:09:20
From: jeffersonzuma, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: A word of warning for Chrome users |
|
|
it requires you to make sure you've unchecked everything they've checked "for you". Of course the fucking google chrome bar is checked.
Instead of you being required to check it if you want it.. it is an infringement on free will and an unfair requirement.. it is dishonest.
It is a waste of time/energy/money.
If you don't want their shit you shouldn't have to deny it; it should be that you have to "ask" for it.
Same with all the damn social network feeds that I have to wait for while the system bogs down.. sht I refuse to use.
Of course "law enforcement" has better things to do.. like checking on emails to make sure you have your shirt on and are not going out on their marriage control..
always a good psy-op in a cover-up.
Remember me complaining about fake emails being loaded onto my email accounts AND being sent out?
This is your FBI, amerika.
FBI of Monsatan/google.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[2562] [2564] |
|
2562 |
|
|
Date: November 15, 2012 at 15:39:08
From: Clarissa Lilywhite, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Yes, the FBI and CIA can read your email. Here's how |
URL: Yes, the FBI and CIA can read your email. Here's how |
|
but more likely you have a hotmail type account with an easily
guessed/cracked password, or you've browsed 'Jews with big tits' porn
and clicked to get a 'codec' to enable you to see the movie, which in turn
has exposed your address book and loaded a trojan;-)
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[2564] |
|
2564 |
|
|
Date: November 15, 2012 at 18:06:29
From: jeffersonzuma, [DNS_Address]
Subject: also violates equal protection of the law -basic principle regardless |
|
|
..of the b.s. corporatism interpretations of the 14th Amendment.
1988 electronic communications act "law", which is unconstitutional, alleges it is legal for any federal prosecutor or other whore bolshevik minion to hack emails OLDER than 180 days (according to time stamp, of course, which is easily faked). NOW THAT' HOT PURSUIT! LOL. And 'reliable evidence' LOL.
Younger than 180 days it alleges a judicial warrant makes it legal. HOW CAN THIS BE A LAW??
Maybe in your cuntry??
However, in my America, THE LAW NEEDS: 'Speech' that confesses a crime; that was actually a PUBLIC confession thereof; and that being that it wasn't just some hot air spew (i.e., not a notarized type witnessed 'confession' of some "crime").
There needs to be better 'probable cause' than something spewed on the internet, EVEN ON A PUBLIC FORUM. (of course YOUR TYPE would like to shut down all media that provides alternative access to YOUR CONTROLLED MONOPOLY (and thus unconstitutional) MEDIA.
Emails are private communications among the consenting, regardless of ridiculously stupid "legal experts" and their sh*thosing monopoly media minions' claims that such as google, yahoo, hotmail, whatever OWN EVERYTHING YOU WRITE AND/OR RECEIVE ON THEIR EMAIL WEBSITES (EXCEPT FOR WHAT THEY DON'T LIKE AND THEN YOU "OWN" IT!) Lol this is what is going down!
THIS MAKES THIS A TREASOUS "LAW" THAT CANNOT BE AND NEVER WAS LAW *because* it is ILLEGAL SEARCH/SEIZURE.
That "you can" does not make it RIGHT. Because you are raped does not mean you consented to have sex and are thus an adulterous whore (the a.w. part being an establishment of religion JUDGEMENT and thus also unconstitutional). comprende??
Yes, I know, that certain questionable "judges" have made ridiculously unconstitutional rulings in this manner does not OVERTURN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Such that it is "legal" to put surveillance devices on people's property because they can?!
I am an American, not whatever piece of shit cuntry you exist in, troll (british israel?).
In fact, your type of "harassing" bullshit is just the excuse to HARASS CONSENTING ADULTS. (P.S.: if poor wifey-poo doesn't like her possession going out on her that's her problem and she can either leave him or learn to share her meat; it's called FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION).
Obviously, your type of legal mind would then 'exhibit' my response to you while leaving out the instigating harassment..
AND WHO 'INTERPRETS' WHAT THE SPEECH ACTUALLY INTENDS IN REAL LIFE ACTION???
Go enjoy your last sadistic hurrahs in raping Palestine oh poor pitiful anonymous c*nt, but leave me the fuck alone (or with whomever consents to be with me whom I consent to be with).
Yes, you know who I am and I don't know (for sure) who you actually are.. but level playing fields are not popular among bullies who are actually pipsqueek cowards (perhaps with a nice arsenal of nuclear scalar weapons?) or their synchophants having mental breakdowns because of poor health.
How pitiful to create cover stories of sexual relationships to cover whatever type of coup is going down regarding these generals getting fired..
perhaps we can bring back the Inquisition and start burning witches at the stake again, instead of just through Psychiatry! Yes! Let's make it a male v. female issue.. the classical stupid psy-op BUT IT WORKS!
P.S.: I need LOVE w/ my sexuality. Believe it or not (and do you think women don't "objectify" men?? Oh fucking lol!)
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
2560 |
|
|
Date: November 15, 2012 at 11:02:44
From: Dona, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: A word of warning for Chrome users |
|
|
roger I was worried about you. I am glad you posted.
Chrome keeps having shockwave plug in probs..I am too
lazy to go in and fix it. I wish someone would do it
for me,lol
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[2568] [2569] [2570] |
|
2568 |
|
|
Date: November 17, 2012 at 01:07:07
From: prinze, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Dona...A word of warning for Chrome users |
|
|
Type in chrome://plugins/ into the URL address bar.
There are two shockwave flash versions. One is the
version in the Chrome web browser and the second one is
Windows flash player.
Only one of these versions needs to be enabled. The
likely cause of videos locking up is a conflict between
the two versions of flash player.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[2569] [2570] |
|
2569 |
|
|
Date: November 17, 2012 at 02:30:05
From: Dona, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Dona...A word of warning for Chrome users |
|
|
yes,that is the problem but the way you explain it is
much easier then what I was reading,thanks. Which one
is better?
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[2570] |
|
2570 |
|
|
Date: November 19, 2012 at 22:47:28
From: prinze, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Dona...A word of warning for Chrome users |
|
|
They're both about the same. If YouTube gives you
problems with one you can just switch to the other
version.
Windows flash player will only install automatic updates
when it is enabled. You have to check manually if you
disable it.
At November 17, 2012 at 02:30:05, Dona wrote:
yes,that is the problem but the way you explain it is
much easier then what I was reading,thanks. Which one
is better?
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
2559 |
|
|
Date: November 14, 2012 at 22:32:35
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: A word of warning for Chrome users |
|
|
|
howzit going roger? hope you are faring well...I miss netscape...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[2563] |
|
2563 |
|
|
Date: November 15, 2012 at 16:57:08
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: A word of warning for Chrome users |
|
|
Thanks all;
Everything is fine now with Chrome eradicated.
I hate messing with the registry but that's what it took, many times.
I should use Linux for browsing.
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
[
Tech Support ] [ Main Menu ] |