Tech Support

[ Tech Support ] [ Main Menu ]


  


2470


Date: October 08, 2012 at 22:03:26
From: Dona, [DNS_Address]
Subject: mr bopp

URL: link


Real bad abusive troll on Charles board.


Responses:
[2471] [2473] [2472] [2489] [2490] [2491] [2492] [2493] [2494] [2495] [2496] [2497] [2498]


2471


Date: October 10, 2012 at 19:23:59
From: F.D., [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: mr bopp


Is charles, who was smart enuf to trick B. into giving him his own propaganda board, not capable of fielding relevant questions and comments? If not then, like B (who cowardly deleted most of the post), you don't think much of charles either. the issue is should the posts go unchallenged or not here. obviously no rebuttals are allowed on the source url - thus creating the same conditions here makes this place a propaganda dump as well where opposing opinions and discussions are not allowed. censorship is unwelcomed unless it is you doing it right?! Your true stripes are showiing.


Responses:
[2473] [2472] [2489] [2490] [2491] [2492] [2493] [2494] [2495] [2496] [2497] [2498]


2473


Date: October 11, 2012 at 05:54:59
From: Bop thinks he can, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: mr bopp


and knows he can...


Responses:
None


2472


Date: October 10, 2012 at 19:31:02
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: mr bopp


hey asswipe...or mcon, whichever you prefer....these boards are not for personal confrontation...as always, you can debate or discuss the issues, just don't make it personal...labor...


Responses:
[2489] [2490] [2491] [2492] [2493] [2494] [2495] [2496] [2497] [2498]


2489


Date: October 13, 2012 at 19:16:09
From: F.D., [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: mr bopp


I want attention!


Responses:
[2490] [2491] [2492] [2493] [2494] [2495] [2496] [2497] [2498]


2490


Date: October 15, 2012 at 12:31:50
From: F.D., [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: mr bopp


revisionist history. I was trying to point a few things out to charlie (which tesh. took over) on another board when 'Dona-I-want-attn' came a running to you on this board. Since you falsely believe you are loved by the core dwellers herein you caved into the demand unevenly handedly earning you contempt as a pest Mod. rather than a fair minded and benevelont ruler (of the board). In fact you want attn and the cheap thrills that come w/arbitrarily censoring and banning a poster and treating charlie like a child along the way (you both). Of corse you are alos aiding and abetting the propaganda mixed with truth which charlie hasn't enuf sense to realize that he is propagating. OTOh, if you call 'kid gloves' ccs of his other problems then I may acquiese a bit althought your correct answer to Dona should have been:" If Charlie is man enuf to post the propaganda then he should be man enuf to filed any replies to it. "
Capiche?


Responses:
[2491] [2492] [2493] [2494] [2495] [2496] [2497] [2498]


2491


Date: October 15, 2012 at 15:28:48
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: mr bopp


you posted a personal attack...not allowed...dona had nothing to do with it other than point out your transgression...if you have problems with charlie's posts, address the content, not the poster...that's the rule dude, and you have been warned...


Responses:
[2492] [2493] [2494] [2495] [2496] [2497] [2498]


2492


Date: October 15, 2012 at 19:49:03
From: F.D., [DNS_Address]
Subject: b. Re: mr bopp


Both you and Dona missed the fact that I there were two conversations going on: one with the propaganda spouter (who was apparently resPonding directly to my other replies (via charlie) and charlie who was noted 'to be a minion' if he continued so without giving thought to what he waz doing. The attributes spoken were entered into evidecne in the conversation and were direct conclusions based on what was posted and what actions were taken or not taken. Nothing fabricated and external to the conversation was typed - thus no personal attack happened. charlie was being provoked to think about what he was doing. You circumvented that by deleting most of the post. (I will give you some cred. for not deleting it all.) erronious sanctimonius lectures general do end in readers 'calling a spade a spade'. Since your are an atheist - why would you benfit one side unequally over another side - since it's all the same to you?


Responses:
[2493] [2494] [2495] [2496] [2497] [2498]


2493


Date: October 15, 2012 at 20:14:48
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: b. Re: mr bopp


why would you think I'm an atheist? just because I think the omnipotent, omniscient creator is a self-indulgent twit? as for the rest, you are pissing into the wind...I don't recall the meat of the delete, just that a quick read inspired my action...if I acted precipitously, it wouldn't be the first time nor most likely the last...I just don't have much patience for shenanigans anymore, real or perceived to be such...


Responses:
[2494] [2495] [2496] [2497] [2498]


2494


Date: October 16, 2012 at 20:55:54
From: F.D., [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: b. Re: mr bopp


>why would you think I'm an atheist? just because I think the omnipotent, omniscient creator is a self-indulgent twit?

lol - how long have you hated yourself so much?

Or 'why do you think that?'

Or 'only fools go where angles fear to tread'

Or 'does a wise man piss up a rope?'

>as for the rest, you are pissing into the wind

Of course w/you but 3-4 other posters have carried the thought train forward w/charlie

charlie appears to not have too much introspection going on and may find some temp. (but false) relief by reading some web profits. instead of the Bible directly. (same for D.)

>if I acted precipitously, it wouldn't be the first time nor most likely the last.

so true - & as evidenced above in your Creator pique.

>I just don't have much patience for shenanigans anymore, real or perceived to be such...

On the contrary you do but it's a matter of whose shananigans you refer to. OTOH I saw the faint light of behavior modification in you recently so maybe there is still hope for you yet.

Aye, while you yet breath, some may say that even your Creator may forgive your impatience(s).

I don't think you, being so charmingly chummy, would do well if you end up in the 'eternal void' should the Creator decide to 'cash in your chips' for you based on your opening comment above. Maybe you should reconsider your position since 'eternity is a long time'.

lol

Yes - w/o a doubt you are a braver person than me. Good Luck

(search: pastor boat lightning)

*
Trapper: "who's gonna mcon your ass next!?" lol


Responses:
[2495] [2496] [2497] [2498]


2495


Date: October 17, 2012 at 13:20:50
From: jeffersonzuma, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: b. Re: mr bopp


the higher the entity the better it is able to respect dissent. If it would penalize you for being dissatisfied with it then you know it is not the Creator.

take it to the Religion board..


Responses:
[2496] [2497] [2498]


2496


Date: October 17, 2012 at 17:45:20
From: F.D., [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: b. Re: mr bopp


I hope your double lightning bolt insurance is all paid up! lol

YOU -take it there you preaching hypocrite.


Responses:
[2497] [2498]


2497


Date: October 17, 2012 at 18:56:58
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: b. Re: mr bopp


last warning...


Responses:
[2498]


2498


Date: October 20, 2012 at 16:26:02
From: F.D., [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: b. Re: mr bopp


A chickeny dodge of my questions....


Responses:
None


[ Tech Support ] [ Main Menu ]

Generated by: TalkRec 1.17
    Last Updated: 30-Aug-2013 14:32:46, 80837 Bytes
    Author: Brian Steele