| Tech Support
|
[
Tech Support ] [ Main Menu ] |
|
|
|
1457 |
|
|
Date: March 25, 2011 at 02:11:20
From: freemind, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in your email |
|
|
They are Trojans and viruses.
Just delete them.
I have gotten 4 of these in the last week.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1459] [1469] [1461] [1462] [1463] [1464] [1465] [1466] [1467] [1471] [1468] [1470] [1472] [1473] [1474] [1479] [1482] [1483] [1485] [1486] [1487] [1484] |
|
1459 |
|
|
Date: March 25, 2011 at 11:18:39
From: jeffersonzuma, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in your... |
|
|
Authorities don't consider this criminal? Too busy going after pot smoke and "cheating" the Fed No-Serve instead?
I've been getting those. Also am waiting on my 2nd debit card replacement.
Us niggers' time and property isn't worth shit unless we're working for master than it is really worth shit.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1469] [1461] [1462] [1463] [1464] [1465] [1466] [1467] [1471] [1468] [1470] [1472] [1473] [1474] [1479] [1482] [1483] [1485] [1486] [1487] [1484] |
|
1469 |
|
|
Date: March 26, 2011 at 13:55:54
From: Costnez, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Spammers sought after botnet takedown |
|
|
The Rustock botnet, which sent up to 30 billion spam messages per
day, might have been run by two or three people.
Early analysis, following raids to knock out the spam network, suggest
that it was the work of a small team.
Rustock was made up of about one million hijacked PCs and employed
a series of tricks to hide itself from scrutiny for years.
Since the raids on the network's hardware, global spam levels have
dropped and remain relatively low.
Net gains
"It does not look like there were more than a couple of people running
it to me," said Alex Lanstein, a senior engineer at security firm FireEye,
which helped with the investigation into Rustock.
Mr Lanstein based his appraisal on familiarity with Rustock gained while
working to shut it down over the past few years.
He said that the character of the code inside the Rustock malware and
the way the giant network was run suggested that it was operated by a
small team.
That work by FireEye, Microsoft, Pfizer and others culminated on 16
March with simultaneous raids on data centres in seven US cities that
seized 96 servers which had acted as the command and control (C&C)
system for Rustock.
Mr Lanstein said hard drives from the servers had been handed over to
a forensic firm that will scour them for clues as to the identity of the
network's controllers.
His hunch that a small team was behind Rustock is partly based on how
different it was to other spam networks such as Zeus.
That network, said Mr Lanstein, operates on a franchise basis and
involves many different groups and cyber criminals.
By contrast, Rustock was a tightly controlled, if huge, network that
brought with it many of the administration headaches suffered by any
web-based business.
Rustock specialised in sending out spam offering fake pills
"They ran into a lot of problems with managing their assets and
pushing updates out to a million user network," he said.
Rustock evaded capture for years because of the clever way it was
controlled, he said. Victims were snared when they visited websites
seeded with booby-trapped adverts and links.
Once PCs were compromised, updates were regularly pushed out to
them using custom written encryption. Those downloads contained the
spam engine that despatched billions of ads for fake pharmaceuticals.
Updates to PCs in Rustock were also disguised to look like comments
in discussion boards, making them hard to spot by security software
which typically looks for well-known signs of malware.
The servers controlling Rustock were also located within hosting
centres in the US rather than overseas.
"By locating all the C&C servers in middle-America, not in major
metropolitan areas, they were able to stay off the radar," said Mr
Lanstein.
Hosting costs for the C&C systems ran to about $10,000 (£6,211) per
month, he said.
It was hard to estimate how much money the operators of Rustock had
made, said Mr Lanstein, but it was likely to be a huge figure.
Since the raids, Rustock's controllers do not seem to have tried to re-
assert control of their creation. Technical steps taken by Microsoft
could limit any future attempt, said Mr Lanstein, adding that he was not
sure they would even try.
"When you are a programmer and you realise that you have the full
force of the Microsoft legal department pointed directly at you, then
you might say to yourself its time to try something else," he said.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
1461 |
|
|
Date: March 25, 2011 at 15:20:03
From: Don in Hollister, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in your... |
URL: American Computers |
|
Hi Dex. I will have to agree, but there is one little problem. Those who are sending you the virus, trojans, malware aren't from the US. They are from places such as China, Russia, North Korea, etc. The majority of them are State sponsored. It would pretty hard for law enforcement in the US to arrest someone in China.
American websites host more malware and computers relay more spam than any other country, the latest security report showed. The problem is they want to make money so they will skimp on how much protection they use.
I use an antivirus program, antitrojan, and a malware program. To the best of my knowledge my computer is clean. There are problems though and that is there are some sites I can't look at. My antivirus program will block me. It operates on the premiss that if it looks or acts like a virus, trojan, or malware it will be treated as such. Of course I can over ride it, but I pay for the protection and if I'm going to override it then I might as well not have it.
There are times I wonder how secure Bopp's site is. I know he doesn't have any control over who gets into the host, but maybe he should take a hard look at them. There have been a couple of times when I clicked on a poster my computer locked. The only way I could continue was to close the program, reopen it, see what the topic was about then search for it that way.
I use Firefox and it is always telling me it blocked this or that because the link was trying to direct me somewhere else. Take Care...Don
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/155850/us_computers_generate_most_malware.html
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1462] [1463] [1464] [1465] [1466] [1467] [1471] [1468] [1470] [1472] [1473] [1474] [1479] [1482] [1483] [1485] [1486] [1487] [1484] |
|
1462 |
|
|
Date: March 25, 2011 at 16:15:34
From: jeffersonzuma, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in your... |
|
|
You forgot Britain and Israel. Oh, of course U.S. authorities cannot do anything about this. They don't want to. Their international authority is quite arbitrary. If I were doing "corporate espionage" it would be different.
I do have lots of protection programs. They cost time and money. Again, the time of certain of us is supposed to be wasted.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1463] [1464] [1465] [1466] [1467] [1471] [1468] [1470] [1472] [1473] [1474] [1479] [1482] [1483] [1485] [1486] [1487] [1484] |
|
1463 |
|
|
Date: March 25, 2011 at 16:36:44
From: Don in Hollister, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in your... |
|
|
|
Hi Dex. Why don't you just say the whole world and yourself as well. You are just as responsible as they are or maybe that should be irresponsible. Take Care...Don
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1464] [1465] [1466] [1467] [1471] [1468] [1470] [1472] [1473] [1474] [1479] [1482] [1483] [1485] [1486] [1487] [1484] |
|
1464 |
|
|
Date: March 25, 2011 at 22:31:21
From: jeffersonzuma, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in your... |
|
|
|
If I'm as responsible as they are I should have as much power to change it. Fair point?
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1465] [1466] [1467] [1471] [1468] [1470] [1472] [1473] [1474] [1479] [1482] [1483] [1485] [1486] [1487] [1484] |
|
1465 |
|
|
Date: March 25, 2011 at 22:55:29
From: Don in Hollister, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in your... |
|
|
Hi Dex. Fair point indeed. A couple of years ago when I was using Windows XP I had a problem with it that left me two options. One was reinstall the OS or pay Microsoft to fix it. Needless to say when they told me how much they charge I made a remark along the lines that they probably programed the problem so I would call them to fix it rather then reinstalled the OS. That was the fastest hangup I ever experienced.
I recently tried to install SP 1 for Windows 7. There was no way it was going to install. I contacted Microsoft and even they couldn't get it to install. I decided to go on the net and see if anyone else was having that problem. It seems I'm not the only one. Then I looked for what this service pack was suppose to do. After reading that I decided I didn't need it. Assistance with the service pack was free so I'm not out anything except it was frustrating as hell. Take Care...Don
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1466] [1467] [1471] [1468] [1470] [1472] [1473] [1474] [1479] [1482] [1483] [1485] [1486] [1487] [1484] |
|
1466 |
|
|
Date: March 26, 2011 at 09:32:40
From: jeffersonzuma, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in your... |
|
|
|
That's cool. But I'd say that your psychic energy was abused and there's a debt and a karmic debt in there, presumably that should be to your credit (unless it is a balancing of something like that you did, which I don't know, thus must presume your innocence). For me, when it is made the "'victim''s fault" then it is like excusing a thief or a rapist and thus propagating karmic imbalance. That doesn't work for me, and is asking for it from Universe. There were others wrong by ramifications to the 'victim''s Energy and others involved because of the 'victim''s distress.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1467] [1471] [1468] [1470] [1472] [1473] [1474] [1479] [1482] [1483] [1485] [1486] [1487] [1484] |
|
1467 |
|
|
Date: March 26, 2011 at 12:01:00
From: Anonymous Bastard, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in your... |
|
|
Has anyone ever given thought to the possibility that all the problems you have with computers are your own fault? Sorry for being blunt and I don't mean it as an insult. Likely you are doing things inadvertently without realizing it. Not everyone can be an expert in computers. They ARE complex.
The point is, I don't have these kinds of problems simply because I don't do certain things. So here's some advice based on my many many years of experience with computers and the internet.
I used to have an anti-virus program. I ditched it because it never found anything. I still occasionally run free online virus scans, they never find anything. Nod32 is a nice one.
I do not have anti-malware, anti-spyware, or any other anti-XXXXX software.
The only thing I have is a firewall. And not the crappy one that comes with windows. Turn that shit off. My home network router is one with a built in firewall - SPI (Stateful Packet Inspection). It's not a guarantee, but it helps a lot. I also have a software firewall. Stay away from bloated crap-ware like Zone Alarm that tries to do everything (firewall, anti-virus, anti-everything) but can't do anything right. Find a program that is a firewall and ONLY a firewall. I use the software firewall for controlling programs from 'phoning home'. Windows firewall ONLY controls inbound, hence why it is useless.
Next, don't use internet explorer or outlook express. They are full of security holes and Microsoft thinks it doesn't have to follow accepted industry standards. They want to do things their own way, often with disastrous results. Firefox and Thunderbird are excellent alternatives and I've used them with no problems. They are open source, which means ANYONE can look for and fix bugs.
When some old fart comes through your neighborhood saying, "hey kid, want some candy?" do you go running up to the open car door? DUH!!!
Regarding the original post about fake package tracking emails, why would you even click on the link for a package that you aren't even expecting? It's obvious it's a scam or trick of some kind. I've got candy. Want some?
By the way, you should configure your email software to view the contents in TEXT ONLY. Never HTML. HTML email increases your security risk. But even so, a good email program like Thunderbird will show you in a status line at the bottom of the window where a link REALLY goes. Just hover your mouse over the link. The same goes for Firefox. It's easy to make a link 'look' like it goes one place when it really goes somewhere else. Checking the status line tells you the REAL link. If you get a link for UPS but the REAL link goes somewhere else, then its obviously a trick. Don't take the candy!!!
Oh, don't install tool bars in your browser. These are notorious for being trojans. The same goes for any fancy little gimmick gizmo from some strange website. Just more candy from a stranger. Sure, it might be perfectly harmless.... but how do you know?
Don't always go for the bleeding edge in technology. I only just started using XP about 2 years ago. Why? It's on service pack three, which means all you other suckers found all the bugs and problems for me already. Windows 7 is only just getting it's first service pack, which means it's buggy.
Another VERY IMPORTANT one, if you ever get a pop up window claiming to be some sort of anti-XXXXX program saying you have a virus or something, and to click to fix the problem - DON'T!!!! I can't stress this one enough. If you click on it, you might as well put a gun to your head. All you are doing is clicking 'yes' to "may I install this virus plug-in to your browser?" Gee, would people be so cruel as to actually try to trick you like that? Here, have some more candy.
Learn how to use Task Manager in windows. Learn how to kill a task. But be careful which you kill. The point being, I occasionally I get those pop-ups from my anti-virus program. WAIT!!! Remember, I don't have an anti-virus program!!! So it's obviously some sort of trick. I don't click 'no'. I don't click on the 'X' to close the pop-up (they can be configured to use that as a 'yes' answer). I don't click the 'X' to close the browser. I go to task manager and kill the browser task. This stops the program dead in it's tracks. No nice shutdown. No chance for that pop-up to try something tricky.
I should mention this is where the software firewall comes in handy. Before I kill the task in a situation like this, I go to the firewall and have it block all traffic, which effectively takes you offline. In lieu of that, you can simply pull the plug on your network connection. The idea is that it takes you offline so that pop-up trick cannot communicate back home and download anything. Run from the car!!! Don't take the candy!!
If you use Firefox, don't worry about losing those 35 open tabs to your favorite porn sites. After killing the task, when you restart, Firefox will have remembered those tabs and reload them all automatically.
I recommend doing this BEFORE reconnecting to the internet. Firefox will complain about not finding the server for all those tabs, but the tabs will still be there unloaded but with the URL intact. The idea is now you can go to the tab where the offending website had the bad pop-up, and now you can safely close that tab. NOW you can reconnect to the net and start reloading tabs.
BTW, do you know where those fake pop-ups come from? Notice how they only happen on websites that have shit loads of advertising on the side? Yep, those fake pop-ups come from fake advertisements. Which brings up another tactic. Don't click on the ads!!! If you see something interesting, Google up the business and find it that way. If it's real, you'll find it very easy. If it's fake, a scam, a trick, You won't find it so easily. In fact, what you may find are people warning NOT to click on that ad!!!
Back to emails. Of course, don't open attachments and click on links, unless you want some candy from that scuzzy old man with the open car door. But you know who else you should be afraid of in your emails? YOUR FIRENDS. That's right. You should be more concerned with attachments and links FROM YOUR OWN FRIENDS. Why? Here's what a virus does. It get's into someone's computer and hacks into their email program. It looks at their address list and then sends itself as an attachment to all the people in that address list, INCLUDING YOU!!! Since it's from your friend, someone you trust, you blindly and quite happily click on the link thinking it's safe. HA!!!!! sucker.... you just licked the lollipop.
Oh, something else you can do. Go Google for something like "windows services to turn off". Complex topic. You may not get it right away. But windows by default has little programs running that can be a major security risk. Learn what they are and learn how to disable them. A MAJOR IMPORTANT EXAMPLE is "Windows Messenger Service". This is a major hole in your network security. There are others, too. Find them. Fix them.
Why do I think you are causing your own problems? Because I go to many of the websites your do. Yet I don't have the problems you do. So if I'm going to the same places you are, yet I'm safe and you are not, then it's something you are doing different than me.
Be paranoid. If you are not sure of something - then DON'T!!
Be curious. If you are not sure of something, look it up and learn!!
If there's anything I said that you didn't understand, Google it!!! Don't be stupid!!! You can learn. You can be smarter as you do your stuff online.
Some helpful advice from an Anonymous Bastard.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1471] [1468] [1470] [1472] [1473] [1474] [1479] [1482] [1483] [1485] [1486] [1487] [1484] |
|
1471 |
|
|
Date: March 26, 2011 at 18:15:13
From: Yep, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in your... |
|
|
Hi You Bastard :-),
You may want to toss XP too. MS stopped updating the holes after sp3 so it's 'dead in the water' less you're a programmer and a pro at that. (tho the router may compensate?).
You might also try locking down on your system/application .exe .dlls files by changing the file properties to READ (only) or READ and ARCHIVE only. This hypothetically should make it harder for a virus to write to the file to enhance it (in theory). Course on boot you'll see some whining and complaining that some files could not be updated (my history files?) and that the computer may possibly crash blah blah - but hasn't happened yet -for all the whining.
A periodic reinstall of the oper. system may overwrite any sneaky worms or virus that got in - easier said than done though. HP has a hidden partition though so buying a new drive from time to time to start fresh may also be a good idea. When the hidden partition got revealed they may now come out in the open and call it a 'system volume' or something like that and tell you not to mess with it. Gee the stuff on it was encrypted too - wonder why?
Using a thumbdrive for interent access file saves and writing all files to that (and then wiping it by dumping to another non-surfing (older) puter might be a good idea too). Or start with new thumb drives everytime if you have the budget. They were giving them away somewhere for a gas fill-up.
Using bootable floppy drive using DOS commands from an earlier windows system may allow better deletion of hidden files stored by windows. Windows has inserted sneaky conditional execution command files so that it conceals files it does not want you to see (however, the search function must have that capability - thus creative use of "*" in the search file name will reveal the hidden files - which are impossible to delete (except maybe using the method above). The new OP sYS liek XP 'delete' and 'erase' commands will not delete certain files thus showing conditional execution. Those files are things like internet history files (index.___) in IE directory etc.
XP interferes with all software firewalls it seems. I tried to install "process explorer" and in the user's agreement MS demanded that you not reverse engineer it and that if you do that you not report your findings to others ont he net. This could only be because they have concealed processes running and they crippled process explorer to conceal these hidden processes (which hackers could prolly exploit for their own nefarious purposes.).
The guy who wrote 'process explorer' was an ace who could debug windows problems and so forth and his 'process explorer' was doing great showing what the OS was doing. Then MS hired him as an employee - now they have that BS user agreement which basically says - we are doing stuff on your cpu and it's none of you damn business - move along - there is nothing fory ou to see here!
So I use that XP sys cpu offline and am scheming to switch it over to linux ASAP.
You couldn't pay me to use anything with windows systems higher than XP since I'm convicned it is riddled with holes like swiss cheese.
There maybe unwritten processor instruction sets too for all I know (like 'report processor serial number' - thus leaving no doubt as to which cpu is online.).
OTOH, your ISP is prolly doing a fine job of tracking your internet habits too - so it may be a zero sum game where you may get some satisfaction at the cpu level but it's a pyrrhic vic.
Anyway, download the 'process explorer' sh*ftware and try and install it. You will be forced to read the user's agreement and agree with it to continue.
Since I've complained about this before elsewhere, they may have since modified the agreement to be a little more diplomatic and less in your face- maybe - who knows.
Anyway, wihtout a router, I've had viruses penetrate and then put a kill on my software firewall being unrecoverable and forcing me to reinstall the firewall.
Their are some damn smart (virus) coders out there. They blocked me from editing the firewall IP'S and also from killing that process altogether.
Before I ditched the AVG software completey (surfing naked you know), it reported to me that my firewall software was silently 'phoning home' on me. Bottom line is that a router firewall is prolly essential for minimal protection to stop even a 'free firewall' from also ET'ing back to base and sending god only knows what info back to them.
Some additional helpful advice from an Yep.
(Yes - agree that surfing naked is probably not a good idea. But I also noticed that the AVG download files were getting bigger and bigger and it never really found anything either. I think that the SYS MODS are doing better in keeping their servers clean -it's just the odd site or two that may have worms and trojans on them.)
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
1468 |
|
|
Date: March 26, 2011 at 12:04:06
From: jeffersonzuma, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in your... |
|
|
|
I already got that covered fuck-ass. Every time you act like we are just stupid and it is just my own fault you should be charged for it. Then I can tell you how it is your own fault.. that would then be true! Thanks for wasting my time reading your condescending shit. You're fucking criminals.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1470] [1472] [1473] [1474] [1479] [1482] [1483] [1485] [1486] [1487] [1484] |
|
1470 |
|
|
Date: March 26, 2011 at 13:59:28
From: Costnez, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: @jeffie -Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in |
|
|
If this is how you talked to your teachers then no bloody wonder you are
such a gullible woo saturated dimwit
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1472] [1473] [1474] [1479] [1482] [1483] [1485] [1486] [1487] [1484] |
|
1472 |
|
|
Date: March 26, 2011 at 18:19:03
From: Yep, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: @jeffie -Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in |
|
|
>such a gullible woo saturated dimwit
LOL - BONUS POINTS for wordsmithing.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1473] [1474] [1479] [1482] [1483] [1485] [1486] [1487] [1484] |
|
1473 |
|
|
Date: March 26, 2011 at 18:21:44
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: @jeffie -Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in |
|
|
|
liaho...last warning...all of you...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1474] [1479] [1482] [1483] [1485] [1486] [1487] [1484] |
|
1474 |
|
|
Date: March 26, 2011 at 22:19:52
From: jeffersonzuma, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: @jeffie -Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in |
|
|
|
sorry.. appreciate the geek info too. = property and liberty.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1479] [1482] [1483] [1485] [1486] [1487] [1484] |
|
1479 |
|
|
Date: March 28, 2011 at 09:51:15
From: Costnez, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: @jeffie -Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in |
|
|
Spam emails are usually so crude that it might seem impossible that
spammers make money from them, but the sheer volume of messages
sent every day makes spamming a profitable industry - most emails
sent worldwide are spam.
This constant stream of cheap drug offers and other scams is pumped
out by botnets, networks of computers that have been hijacked without
their owners' knowledge, which are rented out to spammers as a mass
email delivery service. In August last year, researchers at the
International Secure Systems Lab were able to take over of one of these
botnets, known as Cutwail, and have now published a paper on its inner
workings.
Cutwail botmasters market their services as "0bulk Psyche Evolution",
offering customers a web interface in Russian and English that lets
them create spam campaigns with a few clicks. There's even an
instruction manual and an online support team for spammers who need
assistance.
The researchers took control of 16 servers used to operate the Cutwail
botnet, which in May 2009 was estimated to be responsible for nearly
half of all email spam. They analysed the software used to infect
computers and add them to the botnet, and identified which servers the
bots contacted for instructions. Working with internet service providers,
they shut down the botnet servers and gained unprecedented access to
the botmasters' data.
Their findings demonstrate the huge scale of a botnet operation. On an
average day the botnet contained more than 120,000 individual
computers, 38 per cent of which were in India. The researchers believe
that botmasters specifically target Indian machines because they are
cheaper to recruit - there is an entire sub-industry of online groups
who install botnet malware on thousands of computers, for a fee.
Records found on the Cutwail servers show they sent more than 1.7
trillion emails between June 2009 and August 2010. Such high numbers
are necessary for the spammers to get their messages through. The
researchers found that factors such as invalid or blacklisted email
addresses mean that only 30 per cent of spam emails reach their
destination server, and the number seen by users is likely to be much
lower once client-side spam filters are taken in to account.
Even with so few messages getting through, this email bombardment
eventually pays off. The researchers say that botmasters typically rent
out their services for between $100 and $500 per million emails sent,
or offer bulk discounts of 100 million emails per day for $10,000 per
month. Depending on the discounts sold, the researchers estimate
Curtwail controllers made a profit of between $1.7 million and $4.2
million since June 2009 - in other words, around one ten-thousandth
of a cent per email sent.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1482] [1483] [1485] [1486] [1487] [1484] |
|
1482 |
|
|
Date: March 28, 2011 at 20:29:52
From: jeffersonzuma, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: @jeffie -Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in |
|
|
|
I understand the tech; my beef is the lack of law enforcement whilst they are surveilling us. Should be easy busts with a little work. But the law enforcement agencies don't seem to want to. It violates equality of law. These guys can be easily caught with some effort and manpower. Why not? If I dumped manure on both your front and back doors I would be arrested. Please explain.. but if you want to play 'law of the jungle' then so be that. It is conspiracy at least by negligence of equal protection. And 'who benefits'? Well, the internet is a big pain in the arse to the elite criminals, so why bust that which slows it and us down? We, the pests to the City of London..
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1483] [1485] [1486] [1487] [1484] |
|
1483 |
|
|
Date: March 29, 2011 at 16:10:27
From: Costnez, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: @jeffie -Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in |
|
|
If you are tech savvy - then please tell why it is so easy to prosecute
spammers - those whose computers are infected and part of a network co-
opted through proxy servers and domains by controllers living in Russia, Brazil
or Ukraine etc. who are in turn sub-contracted to send spam by
individuals/groups unknown.
Ideally people as dumb as you would be prosecuted to the full extent of the
law/disconnected from internet by their ISPs for having lax security on their
crap PCs and acting as part of spam bot network.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1485] [1486] [1487] [1484] |
|
1485 |
|
|
Date: March 30, 2011 at 00:43:01
From: jeffersonzuma, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: @jeffie -Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in |
|
|
who are in turn sub-contracted to send spam by
individuals/groups unknown.
lol unknown no one tracks it lololo
University computers, library, are spam bots but used and easily tracked by nsa types however overlapped and/or at odds. Duh no fuck lol. If you're challenging my personal equipment.. then shit to yours. Karma's a bitch and be jealous. Rolling stones gather no moss..
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1486] [1487] |
|
1486 |
|
|
Date: March 30, 2011 at 07:30:48
From: Costnez, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: @jeffie -Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in |
|
|
Let me guess jeffie - you run windows and IE - no envy here over your sad choices that perpetuate the problem that you are ignorantly ranting about
If your so tech savvy then look at the hidden headers in your problem UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications email and see if you can track it back to source... then google the IP to see what country it originated
from - probably originated from your own virus riddled rig. lol
oh.. what you want the government you habitually deride for being reptoidilluminatizionist to sort your computer problems out - oh the irony!
Just so you might learn something useful instead of the opinionated woo that you feed off and regurgitate as factoids.
U.S. and China in the Lead
By Bruce Einhorn
The battle against spam keeps spreading. According to recent figures from Sophos, the British provider of anti-spamming software, the U.S. remains the largest source of spam, accounting for almost 20% of the
global total; China, including Hong Kong, is second, with 10%. That's not that surprising, since the U.S. is the world's largest economy and China has the world's largest online population. "You would expect those
countries to dominate," says Paul Ducklin, head of Asia-Pacific technology for Sophos. The fact that the two giants combined account for less than a third of the world's spam, though, concerns Ducklin. "It indicates
the bad guys are finding places all over the world, with ever-increasing number," he says.
Countries that seem to fare well on the Sophos rankings, generating just 0.1% or 0.2% of the world's spam, in many cases have very limited Internet connectivity; the fact that they show up at all on the charts
indicates the extent of the problem. "These are places where it's not easy or cheap to get on the Internet," says Ducklin. "But the bad guys don't care."
Just because a country's computers send out spam doesn't mean that country is a haven for spammers. Many, if not most, of the world's junk e-mail experts take advantage of security weaknesses to hijack
computers from a distance.
Project Honey Pot Statistics - Top Spam Server Countries
http://www.projecthoneypot.org/spam_server_top_countries.php
#1 China (10.1%)
#2 Brazil (8.9%)
#3 United States (7.3%)
#4 Germany (6.5%)
#5 Russia (6.0%)
#6 Turkey (5.5%)
#7 India (4.6%)
#8 Italy (4.2%)
Microsoft exec: Infected PCs should be quarantined (Q&A) (Oh again the irony as they flog the problem to ignoramuses like little jeffie)
Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-10462649-245.html#ixzz1I5o2e71I
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1487] |
|
1487 |
|
|
Date: March 30, 2011 at 15:45:35
From: jeffersonzuma, [DNS_Address]
Subject: British Israhell(NT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
1484 |
|
|
Date: March 29, 2011 at 20:50:09
From: freemind, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: @jeffie -Do not open UPS, FedEx or, DHL delivery notifications in |
|
|
One thing you two have not brought up is,
Our very own N-ess-A is responsible for much of this stuff as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
[
Tech Support ] [ Main Menu ] |