| Tech Support
|
[
Tech Support ] [ Main Menu ] |
|
|
|
1267 |
|
|
Date: January 09, 2011 at 15:39:50
From: jeffersonzuma, [DNS_Address]
Subject: When does the C-Word become succinctly appropriate? |
URL: http://earthboppin.net/talkshop/national/messages/40380.html |
|
{I posted regarding Gabrielle, wife of an astronaut, who would know thing about secret technology, space navies, space goat farts stuff, being the chairwoman of the House Space and Aeronautics Subcommittee. I don't think it's good to just stuff my feelings.. sublimation, poltergeists, cancer, others acting out on them (referred expression). Stuff like this wouldn't bother me so much but it is becoming more mainstream.. soon, only the kelli maries will have 'free speech', and the others of us will be free to act out their cancer pathologies.. deep seated frustrations and conflicts. I take responsibility and express it, or exercise it out, and I am shut up and censored and slurred.. so I can shut up and pay for the cancer lucre. At least make this go to liaho.. -zuma}
***
Date: January 08, 2011 at 21:42:48
From: Kelli Marie
Subject: Thank you for confirmation !!!
URL: http://earthboppin.net/talkshop/national/messages/40308.html
Hot damn! I'm right!
Jeffie, Jones and Jared: three peas in a pod.
Hail the NWO! Heil "mind control!" Hail Ad hominem! Heil "Nearly all the people, who don't know this accurate information of a new currency, aren't aware of mind control and brainwash methods." (Does he mean sheeple by that?) Hail "the treasonous laws of Amerika!"
Screw the political labelists. As usual, the "MSM" is missing the whole point. This ain't left/right political. It's a bold stroke against the NWO, the Amero, chemtrails, nano-particles reprogramming our brains (per Alex), and all the other firmly held beliefs of that brand new religion.
Ain'tchoo got that new religion?
Ain'tchoo got that new religion?
Ain'tchoo got that new religion?
Glory, glory halleloooooooooooooooooooooo
***
Date: January 09, 2011 at 15:17:40
From: jeffersonzuma
Subject: Re: Thank you for confirmation !!!
So you're blaming it on my deep passion regarding health responsibility and fairness regarding paying for health/disease?
I think it interesting that I felt like telling about my suspicons regarding my mother's and my girlfriend's mother's interestingly untimely and improbable "natural" and "accidental" deaths in this time period leading up to this Az event that would be a mainstream 'release' just around the jan 7 release dip of the predicitive linguistics ala Clif High.
You, km, ridiculed my report and cast hatred at me. Now it is as if you are blaming me for the same to others and their families, etc.
YOURS is the sort of thing that psychically fuels the mentally ill to act out the deep pain and angst that you fuel with your utterly hateful disrespect. On a metaphysical basis, the mentally ill, most probably mind-controlled person acted out on the deep pain of all who are affected by such assassination (murder, etc for political purposes), that your type of pathological denial psychology oppress with your disrespectful hatred towards the real events very similar to this more public one. It is like you help cause, then blame other victims of your denial and support for this fascism and stupid psy-op that has got 'the majority' so mesmerized about. Universe expresses repressed emotion, and you, km, are metaphysically guilty of sublimating our deep pain into others' psychotic expressions.
So.. take this out of context as another one of the 'mean things I've written to you' as if such just comes out of the blue.. lol.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1271] [1273] [1276] [1278] [1279] [1280] [1281] [1282] [1283] [1268] [1269] [1277] |
|
1271 |
|
|
Date: January 09, 2011 at 23:27:49
From: Teshuvah, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: When does the C-Word become succinctly appropriate? |
URL: Propaganda Techniques |
|
It is NEVER appropriate to use the C-word. The only people who ever use it are of low or no moral character. It also shows a total lack of any useful argument in a debate. It is inflammatory, derogatory and lewd.
Ad hominem attacks are actually a propaganda tool of the globalists to derail logical debate in a futile attempt to demonize their enemies. On many forums the use of such a word would get the Name Caller instantly and correctly banned....Name Calling: Propagandists use this technique to create fear and arouse prejudice by using negative words (bad names) to create an unfavorable opinion or hatred against a group, beliefs, ideas or institutions they would have us denounce. This method calls for a conclusion without examining the evidence. Name Calling is used as a substitute for arguing the merits of an idea, belief, or proposal. It is often employed using sarcasm and ridicule in political cartoons and writing. When confronted with this technique the Institute for Propaganda Analysis suggests we ask ourselves the following questions: What does the name mean? Is there a real connection between the idea and the name being used? What are the merits of the idea if I leave the name out of consideration? When examining this technique try to separate your feelings about the name and the actual idea or proposal (Propaganda Critic: Common Techniques 1). ...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1273] [1276] [1278] [1279] [1280] [1281] [1282] [1283] |
|
1273 |
|
|
Date: January 10, 2011 at 10:34:05
From: jeffersonzuma, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: When does the C-Word become succinctly appropriate? |
|
|
My original point was that some things are just as irritating as the c-word and are thusly equivalent. KM's b.s. and Loughner-like attitude and constant personal attacks, but if ya use the wrong word back then it as if proves all her personal b.s. is true.. and T, you use the JHater slur like cheap port.. I know about ad hominim, such as anything mentioned by sorcha faal is illegitimate, even if there are links.. now it is being 'outcast', or having 'wild ideas', or 'fringe'.. but there's a continuum here, and that's nouns are used to describe that which does certain actions (verbs). A 'c' is like a 'd', isn't that logical? Dominating, controlling, abusive. I do not like it as being portrayed in association with genitalia but that's the way it is (because sex is so often used as a tool of power rather than love, so the behavior is profane against sex which should be an expression of love.. if there isn't love then it is the form of "lust" that is degrading to the souls involved). The kicker is that I am weird and that it is gender-irrelevant to me, except that the c may be abusively controlling over other women or men, just as the d may be abusively controlling over other men or women. But it is alright to reference such behavior, otherwise it is socially-coerced censorship and denial, which leads to the programming of acceptance.. and do we deny that we ever have bosses who are dicks? Does that mean you hate all men, no matter without qualification?
The whole problem with delineating certain disparaging terms as acceptable while others are not is that it is unfair, arbitrary in the legal sense, and gives some privilege to abuse others while the others may not bite back. And to make every utterance, as a hate crime or hates speech is absurd, as people tend to spew when they're upset.
Also, to me, being called Jew Hater WAS a slur that used to really upset me because I know my own heart and intent. Now I am de-sensitized because it has been so inappropriately used for censorship. So, T, what goes around comes around. What you do unto others..
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1276] [1278] [1279] [1280] [1281] [1282] [1283] |
|
1276 |
|
|
Date: January 10, 2011 at 15:25:27
From: Teshuvah, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: When does the C-Word become succinctly appropriate? |
|
|
There is no parallel between using the word cunt and the words Jew Hater.
The c-word is low, base, vulgar and evil and only used by wicked people who do not know how to communicate.
The term Jew Hater is just a description of what someone hates. If you drive a Chevy and hate Fords, you are a Ford Hater. If you like carrots but hate broccoli, you are a Broccoli Hater.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1278] [1279] [1280] [1281] [1282] [1283] |
|
1278 |
|
|
Date: January 10, 2011 at 22:00:10
From: Pam,Az, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: When does the C-Word become succinctly appropriate? |
|
|
lol, nope that's not quite right--especially if you call another a hater of the jewish religion, or hating semites, or someone who specifically hates jews when it is not at all true; making a false claim to suit your labeling and agenda, it is debased and low to assume someone hates jews because they do not agree with your bible interpretations. Jeff already made it clear to anyone who can read that he has jewish friends and family and does not hate jews and yet you continue to sling the words to satisfy your hateful ignorance and slander. Now if I like broccoli and you kept on saying I hated broccoli and you kept telling me I hate it and kept telling everyone else I hate it, what does that say about you?
And you and Jeff should really take it to LIAHO.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1279] [1280] [1281] [1282] [1283] |
|
1279 |
|
|
Date: January 11, 2011 at 14:16:15
From: jeffersonzuma, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: When does the C-Word become succinctly appropriate? |
|
|
|
Thanks for speaking up, Pam! It makes a big difference and warms my heart. Thank you. This thread should go elsewhere than Tech board at this point. I will say that T's attitude is not good for anyone.. I do pray that people will learn to observe people as individuals, rather than letting some definition of 'group' get in the way of seeing us as individual lights of The One Creator. Thanks again!
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1280] [1281] [1282] [1283] |
|
1280 |
|
|
Date: January 11, 2011 at 15:03:31
From: Chris, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: When does the C-Word become succinctly appropriate? |
|
|
You thanking Pam from Arizona is like Hitler thanking Mussolini for all his support lol
"When you look at unbalanced people, how they respond to the vitriol that comes out of certain mouths about tearing down the government. The anger,
the hatred, the bigotry that goes on in this country is getting to be outrageous," said the sheriff. "And unfortunately, Arizona I think has become sort of
the capital. We have become the mecca for prejudice and bigotry." Pima County Sheriff Clarence W. Dupnik
*** I do pray that people will learn to observe people as individuals, rather than letting some definition of 'group' get in the way of seeing us as individual
lights of The One Creator
Pity you don't do that to all the groups including Jews you want hung from lamp posts in your ultranationalist utopia...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1281] [1282] [1283] |
|
1281 |
|
|
Date: January 11, 2011 at 17:19:51
From: boppella, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: jeltz+susan+chris=same jerk troll |
|
|
|
go get a padded room for yeselves
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1282] [1283] |
|
1282 |
|
|
Date: January 11, 2011 at 18:26:58
From: the wild things, [DNS_Address]
Subject: you boppella |
|
|
should basically just fuck off , also how lame your
name is , try to find an ORIGINAL name you
he/she ...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1283] |
|
1283 |
|
|
Date: January 11, 2011 at 19:03:17
From: boppella, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: you boppella |
|
|
|
Sorry to have offended you L. but it is very original, after all, anyone of the boppers could have chosen it, and I have been here quite a long time. If you had at all noted the subject matter to which I was replying, you would not have made such an errant post. Mr Bopp chose the name Halebopp and then it evolved into the bopper and then when he got this site, Earthboppin'. So really you should cool it and not be bothered at all. I have already contacted him and made notice of the name. Cheers, happy new year!
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
1268 |
|
|
Date: January 09, 2011 at 16:41:41
From: Dona, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: When does the C-Word become succinctly appropriate? |
|
|
For me it is a horrid word and the only time in the first of my 12 yr marraige I ever slapped my husband for saying,...yes the old fashion cheek slap...but then he about strangled me to death,lol...
So,that is my feeling on it.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1269] [1277] |
|
1269 |
|
|
Date: January 09, 2011 at 20:59:44
From: jeffersonzuma, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: When does the C-Word become succinctly appropriate? |
|
|
I am honestly telling you that my first associations with hearing the word was that it meant 'controlling woman; a woman who uses her womanhood to control and demand dominance because of her female gender; a woman who uses tactics that would get a man hit.. controlling by manipulation of double-standards..'
and I think it's cute that it is like a contraction of 'unconstitutionalist' or 'unconstitutional'.
Is that frank enough?
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[1277] |
|
1277 |
|
|
Date: January 10, 2011 at 15:39:46
From: Dona, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: When does the C-Word become succinctly appropriate? |
|
|
I had confronted my husband in bed for double dealing,lies etc. He obviously is dominate for no woman can be but a few so a woman may slap a husband for being disrespective but he in turn can with one punch,kill her.
Go figure.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
[
Tech Support ] [ Main Menu ] |