22736
From: et, [DNS_Address]
Subject: some interpret reality so it favors a position in actuality
|
Today I read something I consider appropriate to highlight and share here.. it has to do with how some interpret reality so it favors a position in actuality whilst some interpret it so it favors their reality... personally I prefer to mold what I think to be to what actually happens to be and what ought to be... whilst seeking to make what actually happens to be in line with what ought to be... In any event we should be mindful of what we do and what others do and the situation about... for we may run into doors and shatter them with a simple action whilst others will never ever dare move past the entrances nor will ever ever manage to do it on their own... some doors are only meant to be opened in one direction and whilst some may walk through them in the other direction there can be an explosive shattering and a rain of glass which can be dangerous and not so nice experience to experience... so now off to get some glass off my head... |
Responses:
[22737] [22738] [22744] [22746] [22741] [22747] [22753]
22737
From: RIG, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: some interpret reality so it favors a position in actuality
|
But on a more serious note... Isn't this part... "personally I prefer to mold what I think to be to what actually happens to be and what ought to be... whilst seeking to make what actually happens to be in line with what ought to be" Actually representative of this part... "it has to do with how some interpret reality so it favors a position in actuality whilst some interpret it so it favors their reality" I sounds like you were trying to describe two separate ideas, but they sure look like the same idea... |
22738
From: et, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: some interpret reality so it favors a position in actuality
|
When the position one opts for reality in actuality corresponds to the actuality that ought to be the three separate notions sort of become identical and one and the same (whilst being distinctly separate)... Now the notion that --"it has to do with how some interpret reality so it favors a position in actuality whilst some interpret it so it favors their reality"-- was meant to include both the ways of charlatans and visionaries... and indeed I was seeking to describe two separate ideas, with the same text and for some the distinctions involves will sure look like the same thing when being completely different notions... ... |
22744
From: Candace/Denver, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: some interpret reality so it favors a position in actuality
|
what most people think is reality is anything but. reality is always the truth... and never the imagined games |
Responses:
[22746]
22746
From: et, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: some interpret reality so it favors a position in actuality
|
Candace/Denver I like to distinguish - what individuals think to be - what actually happens to be - what ought to be The way I do it involves associating the first with reality the second with actuality and the third I still have to find a term to associate it with. Non the less one can distinguish these notions and a wee bit more. if you notice I included these three notion when I stated: When the position one opts for reality in actuality corresponds to the actuality that ought to be the three separate notions sort of become identical and one and the same (whilst being distinctly separate)... I agree with you in that what most people think is... is anything but what actually is... and in most cases individuals never imagine nor appropriately perceive the reality that appropriately corresponds to the actuality of what actually is... and then there is the issue of if what is appropriately corresponds to what ought to be... Still some do get it right and whilst experiencing a reality in actuality via what they think to be real it happens to be that there exists an appropriately corresponds with the actuality and what they think to be... so they do get to actually experience the actuality through the reality that they think/feel/hold and experience... I imagine you do manage to get at how this happens... Yes what is is always what is and in line with the truth of the matter one just has to see sense and perceive it accordingly... |
Responses:
None
22741
From: RIG, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: some interpret reality so it favors a position in actuality
|
So what you're saying is that you decry in others the same mode of operation you yourself function under... |
22747
From: et, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: RIG I highlight something ...
|
... for some it's a decry of the operation under which they function under ... for some it's a description of the functional operations which the employ |
Responses:
[22753]
22753
From: RIG, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: LOL... same ol' ET... round and round...
| Good to see you're back... ;) |
Responses:
None