| Spiritual
|
[
Spiritual ] [ Main Menu ] |
|
|
|
22480 |
|
|
Date: February 10, 2016 at 20:32:36
From: Lynn, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Collaborative vs. Competitive Nature |
|
|
Collaborative verses competitive nature.
Can this be?
Competitive assumes a lackful-ness. Not-enough-ness. Shortness. Not enough to go around. King of the hill.
Take or be taken.
Is this of God thinking?
Is there enough?
Is it an illusion that we have swallowed hook, and all that their is a shortage of everything?
Is the ego the false god, leading us down the garden path, from early training by well-meaning adults, that a short supply is the big truth.
And, have we completely missed the real truth.
There's enough.
And, if there is enough, then it takes the stress off, and competition is surely a stressful thing.
Winner, loser, have-have not.
What if there is enough, but by our own creative misuse of power, we invent an illusion that seems so real, and we set out to prove the illusion, and therefore cannot begin to perceive the truth of enough-ness.
The frantic nature of media, a perfect reflection of competitiveness, by listening to them talk, hearing the edginess of their words, voices, cadence, pitch, lack of peacefulness, all manifestations of competition manifesting into sound/form.
Deepak Chopra comes and sits on the set of Fox News for an interview, and within a few short minutes the entire ensemble of news anchors are now speaking slower, pitch has lowered in all of them, they react slower and all appear to be captured into the entrainment of Deepak's intentional peacefulness. And, the competitiveness appears to have melted briefly amongst them. All simply by one person who has clarity within himself and intention and does not believe in competitiveness,.. opens up a space that the unaware news anchors are drawn into, and the atmosphere changes around and in them.
Competitiveness cannot stand for long with ones who are clear in mind, body and spirit. They melt, and a collaborative simply appears as if coming out from behind a curtain.
Is there a conspiracy to distance human from their true knowing. The rushing, the loudness of things, the insane levels of music and discordant notes, all designed to confuse and distance human beings from their own god-guidance system, where collaborative is the true nature, and not competiveness.
When Michael J. Fox went to Tibet and spent 2 months with the peoples in their mountain homes, his symptoms of his palsy completely disappeared. He said in an interview that the mystery of his vanishing symptoms may have had something to do with the peacefulness of the peoples, and the non-competiveness of their lifestyle. Healing is natural with the frenzy is not activating. A conscious being, and many conscious beings affect all things, atmosphere, and a natural entrainment towards peacefulness, which manifests as healing beings who are in the presence of a collaborative, trusting environment. Tibetans may have much to teach the world... but will the world hear it.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22481] [22483] [22490] [22491] [22496] [22510] [22484] [22482] |
|
22481 |
|
|
Date: February 11, 2016 at 06:03:55
From: RIG, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Collaborative vs. Competitive Nature |
|
|
Deepak's intentional peacefulness... is it that, or... "The
force can have a strong influence on the weal minded."...
this was on FOX news, yes?... need I say more... ;)
So, competitive vs. collaborative... and what of the
obviously superior to both, the Independent, the
Individual?...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22483] [22490] [22491] [22496] [22510] [22484] [22482] |
|
22483 |
|
|
Date: February 12, 2016 at 06:31:58
From: Candace/Denver, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Collaborative vs. Competitive Nature |
|
|
what is superior to both is the Balanced behavior.. for
both must exist. Competitiveness is normal and needed in
seeking growth and development.. the competitiveness can
be good or bad in other words... Right now what the US of
A and western countries are doing in syria is beyond bad
and evil.
The ideal balance is comfort and collaboration in deity
behavior with the necessary competition that causes
growth.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22490] [22491] [22496] [22510] [22484] |
|
22490 |
|
|
Date: February 14, 2016 at 19:06:33
From: Lynn, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Collaborative vs. Competitive Nature |
|
|
"No tree is so stupid as to have it's branches fighting amongst themselves."
Oh, the simple wisdom of nature.
Competitiveness is a learned behavior.
Survival mode mentality accounts for the best excuse of competitiveness. The irony is, few understand that collaboration does not diminish the individual, but works with. Only the weak believe the lies that competitiveness accounts for.
Not to say you cannot better your own time running on a 440 track, or you can better your own personal best on any thing, but to believe that it's wisdom, naw...
Watching nature tells humans much, but few notice.
Collaboration in form and action; watch a flock of Canada Geese. GoPro and shows on PBS filming the massive flock flying south. Each takes a turn at the "helm", the point position. It's the hard position because the goose in the lead has to cut the airstream. And, perfectly aligned off each others wings in a V-formation pattern is not random idiocy. It's collaboration at work. Each changes position to accord the leader rest, and were it not the wisdom of the collaborative flock awareness, they'd tire all to quickly. It's NOT competitive. Humans are so dumb sometimes.
Think tree, think geese. It works, but only if the wisdom abounds, and trees don't have brains, and geese have smaller brains than humans but to look around it would seem that empty heads abound in human cavities, call craniums.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22491] [22496] [22510] |
|
22491 |
|
|
Date: February 14, 2016 at 20:45:05
From: mr bopp, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Collaborative vs. Competitive Nature |
|
|
|
as a frequent tree puner, I find that branches often fight among themselves...lol
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22496] [22510] |
|
22496 |
|
|
Date: February 15, 2016 at 20:52:00
From: Lynn, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Collaborative vs. Competitive Nature |
|
|
|
Pruned a few myself. They actually do not fight amongst themselves. They adapt. It's only we humans who think pruning is a must because we want maximum fruit from a tree. The tree has no care of such things, it simply grows and the branches grow and adapt around each other.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22510] |
|
22510 |
|
|
Date: February 16, 2016 at 14:02:07
From: Nen, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Collaborative vs. Competitive Nature |
|
|
Well, if by adapt you mean they rub bark off of each other, thus killing at least one if not both branches, which then break off, allow the wood inside the break to start rotting and infecting the tree, which then eventually dies...
Granted in the meantime it makes plenty of homes for the wildlife, though the local squirrel family wasn't too pleased when the last ice storm took down the tree, killing a couple of them who had their homes in it.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
22484 |
|
|
Date: February 12, 2016 at 11:23:34
From: RIG, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Collaborative vs. Competitive Nature |
|
|
Balance is good... but it's not a matter of "both must
exist"... competitive simply does exist, while collaboration
is a learned behavior... my comment was more geared to out
of focused, missing the mark nature of the original posts
subject matter...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
22482 |
|
|
Date: February 11, 2016 at 06:06:21
From: RIG, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: dag nabbit... |
|
|
|
That should read, "weak minded"... ;)
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
[
Spiritual ] [ Main Menu ] |