| Skywatchers
|
[
Skywatchers ] [ Main Menu ] |
|
|
|
46989 |
|
|
Date: November 28, 2022 at 17:05:52
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: spaceweather.com is being weird |
URL: https://spaceweather.com/ |
|
Solar wind
speed: 549.9 km/sec
density: 13.28 protons/cm3
more data: ACE, DSCOVR
Updated: Today at 1250 UT
X-ray Solar Flares
6-hr max: C1 2119 UT Nov28
24-hr: C1 2119 UT Nov28
explanation | more data
Updated: Today at: 0055 UT
Daily Sun: 28 Nov 22
Expand: labels | no labels
All of these sunspots have simple magnetic fields that
pose little threat for strong solar flares. Credit:
SDO/HMI
Sunspot number: 56
What is the sunspot number?
Updated 28 Nov 2022
Spotless Days
Current Stretch: 0 days
2022 total: 1 day (<1%)
2021 total: 64 days (18%)
2020 total: 208 days (57%)
2019 total: 281 days (77%)
2018 total: 221 days (61%)
2017 total: 104 days (28%)
2016 total: 32 days (9%)
2015 total: 0 days (0%)
2014 total: 1 day (<1%)
2013 total: 0 days (0%)
2012 total: 0 days (0%)
2011 total: 2 days (<1%)
2010 total: 51 days (14%)
2009 total: 260 days (71%)
2008 total: 268 days (73%)
2007 total: 152 days (42%)
2006 total: 70 days (19%)
Updated 28 Nov 2022
Thermosphere Climate Index
today: 15.58x1010 W Neutral
Max: 49.4x1010 W Hot (10/1957)
Min: 2.05x1010 W Cold (02/2009)
explanation | more data: gfx, txt
Updated 27 Nov 2022
The Radio Sun
10.7 cm flux: 107 sfu
explanation | more data
Updated 28 Nov 2022
Cosmic Rays Solar Cycle 25 is beginning, and this is
reflected in the number of cosmic rays entering Earth's
atmosphere. Neutron counts from the University of
Oulu's Sodankyla Geophysical Observatory show that
cosmic rays reaching Earth are slowly declining--a
result of the yin-yang relationship between the solar
cycle and cosmic rays.
Oulu Neutron Counts
Percentages of the Space Age average:
today: +2.4% Elevated
48-hr change: -0.3%
Max: +11.7% Very High (12/2009)
Min: -32.1% Very Low (06/1991)
explanation | more data
Updated 28 Nov 2022 @ 0700 UT
Planetary K-index
Now: Kp= 4.00 unsettled
24-hr max: Kp= 5.33 EXTREME
Just a short bit ago it stated EXTREME under the Kp and
the 24 hr max now its stating EXTREME -but the Now one
is stated as unsetelled.
I look at the graph and all it shows is this
https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/planetary-k-index
showing nothing higher than 4.33
but in 24 hrs it will be at 5.33
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[46993] [46994] [46995] [47002] [47003] [47013] [47014] [46997] [46996] [46998] [46999] |
|
46993 |
|
|
Date: November 29, 2022 at 00:30:11
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: spaceweather.com is being weird |
|
|
They recently "changed" the kp index graph reading...which I thought was odd and to me not logical...after all these years
I wondered why...also the HUGE filament burst I posted about was not mentioned even in daily reports (at least none I
could find)..or on the usual web sites like solarham.
I look at some graphs like this one and the solar wind was up to almost 700 a few hours ago:
https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/real-time-solar-wind
Here is a animation showing the pressure (scroll to third animation) and it's intense at the time of this post (ie. red)
https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/geospace-magnetosphere-movies
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[46994] [46995] [47002] [47003] [47013] [47014] [46997] [46996] [46998] [46999] |
|
46994 |
|
|
Date: November 29, 2022 at 01:05:50
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: spaceweather.com is being weird |
|
|
Thanks, Spaceweather.com only put it at 500 something,
for the solar wind and yet, the site is telling us its
EXTREME, 2 times for Kp index. I've watched this site for
many years and don't recall it using the words extreme.
Something is definately UP. And I am feeling it very
strongly in all my body symptoms.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[46995] [47002] [47003] [47013] [47014] [46997] [46996] [46998] [46999] |
|
46995 |
|
|
Date: November 29, 2022 at 07:36:56
From: Rodney Boulderfield, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: spaceweather.com is being weird |
|
|
Some chance that parts of the overall space weather
system may have been designed with limited hindsight
type info which biased or limited the range of
processing to what might EVER happen, therefore when
something that COULDN'T EVER happen happens, it
automatically gets suppressed.
Also to keep in mind, solar events of various kinds
will have potentially strong influence on the
functional capabilities of various military technology,
so there would be incentive to keep everyone guessing
and therefore cautious.
Also, any time a solar event might have caused the non-
believer to expect an Earth disaster on the level of
magnetic pole shift/reversal or rotational axis change
to be triggered, and no such trigger gets pulled, there
is strong incentive to cover up the solar event because
the lack of cataclysm can be seen as evidence that the
Covenant with Noah is still in force, which would
constitute Proof of God.
They won't allow that. As when the sequenced unedited
human DNA revealed the Name of the Lord encoded on the
active strands, and the entire valid Old Testament
encoded in the "Junk DNA".
Maybe this event did wake up Mauna Loa, at least.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[47002] [47003] [47013] [47014] [46997] [46996] [46998] [46999] |
|
47002 |
|
|
Date: November 30, 2022 at 06:42:45
From: Rodney Boulderfield, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: ON TOPIC: 100% |
|
|
paragraph 1: The Space Weather reporting systems are
Skywatching systems, inquiry as to potential inherent
data scope limitations is ON TOPIC.
Paragraph 2: Speculating on the tactical Military
significance of the Skywatching systems and the
capability of the system to obfuscate various event
types accidentally or on purpose or accidentally on
purpose is ON TOPIC. Of course a worthy rival has
their own Skywatcher infrastructure as a second
opinion, although they may want us to believe our
systems are the highest authority.
Paragraph 4: The Biblically reported Magi were
historical Skywatchers who Watched the Sky for notable
Signs in the Heavens, or Skies, if you will.
Speculating on the motives of individuals in the
scientific community who may be followers of Atheist or
non-Biblical belief systems and may also be in a
position to obfuscate or otherwise cover up Signs in
the Skies that would be in conflict with the worldview
they seek to impose on all is ON TOPIC.
Paragraph 5: Citing a parallel phenomenon in a
separate scientific field which is a prime example of
the type of behavior alluded to in Paragraph 4 is ON
TOPIC. Since the encoding referenced is in Hebrew,
which is Greek to me and my knowledge of either is
limited at best, and I am not a molecular biologist, I
cannot claim scientific witness to the evidence.
However it makes perfect sense as illustration of
behavior of the type speculated in Paragraph 4, as
evidenced by the immense mRNA and other genomic
campaigns to obliterates the Divine Image in our DNA.
Paragraph 5: Not quite a paragraph, really, but on the
extensive evidence all over these boards, it was a
probably ill-fated attempt to stimulate
multidisciplinary discussion between Earthwatchers and
Skywatchers concerning a possibly Space Weather
influenced Earth event, the Mauna Loa eruption, which
is ON TOPIC.
WRONG BOARD ???? Your bias is showing.
Disclaimer:. At no point am I infringing intellectual
property of the Lucas Skywalker organization.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[47003] [47013] [47014] |
|
47003 |
|
|
Date: November 30, 2022 at 10:16:26
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: ON TOPIC: 100% = WRONG BOARD AGAIN ! PARAGRAPH THIS!!! |
|
|
For one, you don't seem to know the constellations real time as were watched long ago plus the solar wind and all the measurements
were not available online on a www fowler's snare... plus they (magi whatever) were not following the sun in such a way as man's ways
as you infer that you "paragraph" (snores) with all it's nonsensical verbiage...they followed the stars at night...real time
constellations I post it nigh on every day here but it probably eludes your understanding.
And the bible as we know it was not available back when to cart and carry about...scripts were in huge scrolls in a temple....AND if
you say blah blah encrypted on your DNA then I guess you got all the books in on your junk DNA that spoken of in the OT saying such
as you can read about it in so and so book but that is not even available today as it's gone missing...basically you make zero sense
most of the time and are a OT confused state of mind of mixing good and evil unable to differentiate.
My Lord did not say follow a book that was not even available at the time he walked on earth in the flesh. IMO you are a book/bible
worshipper unable to sift for truth as your head is stuck in a magicians book mentality that is unable to pull from it what is real
and what is not in terms of spirit.
Are you even sober? I doubt it.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[47013] [47014] |
|
47013 |
|
|
Date: December 09, 2022 at 11:31:21
From: Arthur, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: ON TOPIC: 100% = WRONG BOARD AGAIN ! PARAGRAPH THIS!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[47014] |
|
47014 |
|
|
Date: December 09, 2022 at 13:55:02
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: ON TOPIC: 100% = WRONG BOARD AGAIN ! PARAGRAPH THIS!!! |
|
|
You may use a fake name but the spirit of Lilith gives you away.
Tell us Lilith what's the name, chapter and verse number of the book you are referencing?
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
46997 |
|
|
Date: November 29, 2022 at 12:32:48
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: WRONG BOARD(NT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
46996 |
|
|
Date: November 29, 2022 at 09:52:02
From: chaskuchar@stcharlesmo, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: spaceweather.com is being weird |
|
|
that explanation was totally over my head, especially
the ols testament coded in our dna? i thought the
covenant with noah means the world will not flood again.
i do agree with man neglecting God will result in
increased volcanos, increased earthquakes and increased
solar activity, which we are experiencing now.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[46998] [46999] |
|
46998 |
|
|
Date: November 29, 2022 at 12:34:13
From: Eve, [DNS_Address]
Subject: WRONG BOARD |
|
|
Be faithful in the least... please..?!?!
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[46999] |
|
46999 |
|
|
Date: November 29, 2022 at 17:39:54
From: chaskuchar@stcharlesmo, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: WRONG BOARD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
[
Skywatchers ] [ Main Menu ] |