[ Roll & Rock ] [ Main Menu ]
23196
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: California Earthquake - Feb. 13, 2024
|
Posted by EQF on February 13, 2024 Hi everyone. The following earthquake is reported to have shaken quite a few people in the California area. 2024/02/09 21:47:27 34.06N 118.91W 15 4.6 "11 km WNW of Malibu, CA" NEIS Data I ran some checks on my data and the earthquake appears to have clearly appeared in my EM Signal log, most recently around February 4, 2024. That means that it likely COULD have been predicted. If it registered with my EM Signals then there were undoubtedly a number of other earthquake precursor type signals that could have been observed in the vicinity of the fault zone during the days and weeks before it occurred. Once again, I was quite surprised to see such a low magnitude earthquake generate such strong EM Signals. The earthquakes below also recently occurred. 2024/02/12 08:42:48 32.80N 115.57W 16 4.6 "2 km NNW of El Centro, CA" 2024/02/12 08:36:25 32.81N 115.57W 18 4.8 "3 km NNW of El Centro, CA" NEIS Data However, with a quick check, my EM Signal log does not show any clear, recent signals pointing to those earthquakes. One possible explanation for that might be that strain associated with the 119W February 9, 2024 earthquake transferred to the fault zone where the two 116W February 12 earthquakes occurred and caused them to be abruptly triggered. Since they would not have occurred on February 12 without that sudden additional strain, they would not have generated any prior EM Signals. That is just a theory. Other scientists could likely determine if that might have actually happened. However, I believe that I have seen that occur with more powerful earthquakes occurring elsewhere. I have been expecting a more powerful earthquake to occur somewhere on the planet. However, I have lost track of it. The expected approaching earthquake doesn't seem to be presently generating any especially strong EM Signals. There are times when strain builds in a fault zone. EM Signals might be generated. But then the strain just disappears on its own or results in a "Slow" earthquake that no one notices. These are personal opinions. Regards to all, EQF |
23197
From: Leonardo, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: California Earthquake - Feb. 13, 2024
|
Since a mag. 4.6+ happens every ~2 hours Worldwide (per last ~51 years worth of data) you would be expected to be able to choose from any of 58 quakes (over 4.9 days) ! to claim as a "hit" for your implied (But actually non-)forecast. For a person who claims to have two science degreez and knows about statistics it is quite amazing to see you continue to cite what amounts to expected seismicity based on historical data as a 'Hit" for your (Non-)forecast. (You never formulated an evaluatble forecast). I think you may be misjudging that people reading this forum are gullible enough to believe you. Congrats on your 'hit" (not). This is a widely held opinion by scientists who know statistics "around the world". Just ask.... So. again, what is your actual purpose here if most if not all readers will likely not believe your claim ? |
23201
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: California Earthquake - Feb. 13, 2024
|
Posted by EQF on February 15,2024 These notes are being posted here so that interested parties, especially world government scientists can see my latest earthquake precursor data. Some Comments are added regarding my own interpretation of those data. The goal is to have earthquake researchers compare these data with their own precursor data etc. and then perhaps spot the approach of a significant earthquake. CALIFORNIA EARTHQUAKE The picture chart below explains why I determined that there were a number of high intensity EM Signals that were likely pointing to the approach of the widely felt February 9, 2024 California area earthquake Within the orange circled area on top right area of the chart the LINE PEAK for the widely felt California earthquake can be seen. Just below it within the orange circle is the LINE PEAKs for the EM Signals were detected on February 2 and 4, 2024. The fact that they are at the same longitude on the chart indicates to me that the earthquake and line signal were related. Ideally, the LINE PEAKS on the chart should be at the same longitude as the earthquake. However, different earthquakes are usually triggered by different forces. So, quite frequently the LINE PEAKS are at different longitudes as can be seen on that chart.
|
Responses:
[23202]
23202
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Fpr Mr. Bopp: Resize Pictures - Feb. 15, 2024
|
Posted by EQF on February 15, 2024 As the picture file shown in the above post and below demonstrates, resizing picture files does allow them to fit onto these forum Web pages without causing the text to run off the right side of the page. The resize width I usually go for is 1000 px. Most picture file editors that can resize pictures probably have a feature that causes the height or width ratio to remain the same even if only one of them is changed. There CAN be some loss of picture clarity when a resize is done if the picture file is compressed and especially if the picture file is expanded. Lines might not look continuous etc. Regards to all, EQF
|
Responses:
None
[ Roll & Rock ] [ Main Menu ]