| Roll & Rock
|
[
Roll & Rock ] [ Main Menu ] |
|
|
|
23005 |
|
|
Date: September 11, 2023 at 10:02:56
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Forecast Data For Morocco Earthquake - Sept. 11, 2023 |
|
|
FORECAST DATA FOR MOROCCO EARTJQIALE
Posted by EQF on September 11, 2023
This first post is just a preliminary note. There will be more data in any updates.
The following deadly earthquake has occurred:
2023/09/08 22:11:02 31.06N 8.39W 26 6.8 "52 km WSW of Oukaïmedene, Morocco"
NEIS Data
The latest fatalities figure I have seen is somewhere around 2500. It will likely get higher.
One question would be,
"Did anyone forecast it or even expect that a significant earthquake could be approaching?"
I wonder if Shan saw any suspicious looking data.
FOUR DIFFERENT TYPES OF PRECURSOR DATA
Three of them can now be seen on my Data.html earthquake forecasting Web page that was just updated.
For my Web site address, use any Internet search engine and type in:
earthquake research index.html data.html
My forecast Web site should be at or near the top of the returned list. Then you can go to the Data.html Web page.
Two of the types of data on my Web page are my own. They are for individual EM Signal times and averaged signal times.
The third on my Data.html Web page are date from a group in the Europe - Asia area. They use ground tilt sensors in abandoned coal mines etc.
https://www.dynamicgravity.org/mereni2/
My forecasting computer programs copy the data from their Web site and create PNG picture files that are stored on my Data.html Web page.
The fourth type of data are on Dr. Lowell Whiteside's forecasting Web site: (Thanks again Pamela for the site address)
http://www.earthquakesummary.info/
His data are not discussed on my own Web site. I looked in detail at his data for the first time during just the past few days and developed something of an understanding regarding how to interpret them.
The easiest thing to say is that he had apparently reported that there might be some seismic activity in the Morocco area. If I understood his data, his expected magnitude was much lower than the actual earthquake magnitude.
The ground tilt data available on both the original site and my own site are being evaluated. It takes perhaps a week for me to determine if any of those charts matched my own data and pointed to the earthquake's approach.
So far, it appears that the "Garni" chart and perhaps a few others might have been affected by the approaching earthquake. If so, then I expect that the charts will start to show a significant change now that the earthquake has occurred.
MY OWN DATA
These can be seen at my Web site. One of the charts will probably be displayed HERE in the next posting.
This will take a while to determine for sure. But it appears that the approaching Morocco earthquake VERY CLEARLY appeared on my charts.
How to interpret the data is explained in detail on some of my Web pages. It would probably take someone with a degree in physics a few days to develop an understanding of the various processing steps for those data.
Individual signals pointing to the approach of the earthquake might have been strongly detected back as far as February of 2023.
As data on my Web page show, the two best, most recent individual signals were detected on July 3, 2023.
This is too complex to explain, but I have never before seen signals like those two. I am going to have to check over some past records to see if any other signals like them have appeared since I started keeping records.
There have been only a few strong EM Signals detected since early July, 2023. I was expecting something because of my earlier data. But with no new signals i could not generate a TIME WINDOW. I thought it might occur in Turkey or Haiti.
It could be that the fault zone stabilized for a few months before finally shattering on September 8. As a result, few signals were being generated.
It might have something to do with solar storm activity or the Earth's geomagnetic energy field or both or neither.
The actual signal generation mechanism is not accurately known at this time.
My data can be used by anyone interested in them. But they are mainly intended to be used by government agencies and international research groups that have the necessary time to understand them and check them each week.
No agencies that I am aware of are doing that so far. But I am still in the process of preparing reports on this that are scheduled to be circulated internationally.
FINALLY
It will take another week or so to see if my data were in fact CLEARLY pointing to the approach of that earthquake. The AVERAGED signal line peak locations should change now that the earthquake has occurred.
If that turns out to be the case, then I believe that government agencies would likely have been easily able to tell that the earthquake was approaching.
My data would have provided them with lists of locations to check. Then they could have checked those locations for reports of other earthquake precursors such as static on radio and TV signals, fresh cracks in building foundations, glowing lights on the horizon, reports of unusual behavior by local animals etc.
Those type of precursor data would likely be detected in only the area where the earthquake was going to occur. Other locations could then be ignored.
Something like 50,000 people died during the Turkey earthquakes earlier this year. Several thousand more have now died in Morocco.
If only ONE scientist were working full-time in various countries evaluating all of the available precursor data then many of these deadly earthquakes might be predicted and people warned in time to get out of the way.
I expect that any one of those more than 50,000 people who lost their lives to earthquakes just this year alone would be willing to do that in order to save their own lives. But, people and governments unfortunately don't think like that.
As I have said quite often, I personally don't have enough free time to evaluate my own data much less the many other data that are available. It takes a considerable amount of my time just to collect and make available the data that I am generating. And I have quite a few other humanitarian projects on which I am working. One especially important one involves international energy resources.
These are personal opinions.
Regards to all,
EQF
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23006] [23008] [23018] [23013] |
|
23006 |
|
|
Date: September 13, 2023 at 11:56:50
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Brief Update - Sept. 13, 2023 |
|
|
Posted by EQF on September 13, 2023
Quite a few tests are still being run on the data associated with that recent deadly Morocco earthquake. This is a brief update.
There are researchers in the Europe - Asia area that use ground tilt data to help spot approaching significant earthquakes. They also use gravity strength sensors. But those gravity data are not available on the Internet as far as I can tell
They unfortunately do not have any information on their Web site that explains how their data should be interpreted. I plan to contact them and ask for more information regarding the subject matter. These people are earthquake technology and science experts.
One problem is that they don't seem to have a consistent E-mail address for that. I have been in contact with them for quite a few years. But I have to to try to track them down each time I want to reach them.
This most recent earthquake is the first time that I have been able to use their data to study approaching or past earthquakes. My newest computer programs now make that possible.
Regarding their charts, some are blank or badly out of date. I learned long ago that this is usually because the sensors for that particular chart are located in areas where there are hostilities in progress. The Internet link could be lost for those sensors. Or it is simply not safe to visit the area in order for them to check on the sensors.
Their chart data appear to me to clearly indicate that their sensors did respond to the earthquake. Their data also clearly agree with many of my own data.
However, I have been monitoring their sensor charts. I was expecting to see some of their chart lines go down after the earthquake occurred. But so far, that does not appear to be happening.
Some of the possible reasons for that are the following:
1. Their various charts were not being STRONGLY affected by that Morocco earthquake. Instead, they were and possibly are indicating the approach of an earthquake that will occur somewhere else.
2. It could be that I simply don't understand what their charts are indicating.
3. It could be that my expectation that their chart lines should start going down in intensity after an earthquake is not valid. Perhaps the property they are measuring still remains after an earthquake responsible for the chart lines occurs.
Regards to all,
EQF
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23008] [23018] [23013] |
|
23008 |
|
|
Date: September 14, 2023 at 14:15:37
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Morocco Earthquake Lights - As Expected - Sept. 14, 2023 |
|
|
Posted by EQF on September 14, 2023
In the first post in this thread I stated that in my opinion, if government agencies etc. had used my freely available forecast data to look for areas where an earthquake might be about to occur, then the area where the deadly Morocco earthquake occurred would have been one of those areas.
What I stated is that those areas could then be watched for earthquake precursors such as fresh cracks in building foundations, glowing lights on the horizon, and on and on.
If you do an internet search for "Morocco Earthquake" and "Earthquake Lights" you should now be able to find reports of those particular precursors in the area of the earthquake, plus actual photographs of some of the lights that were taken automatically I believe by security cameras etc.
The Earthquake Lights are easily observed phenomena that can probably even be seen by orbiting satellites.
It is likely that there were other earthquake precursors that could have been spotted in the area where the earthquake eventually occurred. My own data indicate to me that they might have been observable as far back as February of 2023.
It would be my guess that most Earthquake Lights and perhaps "Earthquake Clouds" are most easily observed during the days or weeks before the earthquake occurs.
But other precursors such as fresh cracks in building foundations, gravity fluctuations, well water level fluctuations, various electromagnetic energy signals including perhaps what are known as "Total Electron Content" signals (TOC) can be observed for days, weeks, months, and perhaps even years before some significant earthquakes occur.
Once again, there are plenty of observable earthquake precursors and perhaps as many as 2 dozen earthquake forecasting technologies that have been developed over the years. I have invented a few myself that have never been discussed in a publication plus knowledge of forecasting technologies that other people have proposed.
But, governments etc. first need to WANT to be able to forecast earthquakes. None seem to me to be interested in that.
They WOULD be interested in developing technologies that provided 100% accuracy regarding LOCATIONS, TIME WINDOWS, and MAGNITUDES.
But for now, those goals are likely unachievable just as the weather cannot be predicted too far in advance with 100% accuracy.
Governments etc. need to settle for probability numbers as they do with weather forecasts and learn how to circulate earthquake forecasts without sending the general public into a panic.
These days, U.S. government officials seem to be far more interested in discussing UFO sightings rather than earthquake forecasting.
Discussing UFO sightings can be interesting and fun.
In contrast, discussing phenomena such as earthquakes that could devastate entire U.S. cities appears to me to be a forbidden subject among U.S. government officials and scientists.
In my opinion, that is largely because they have never made serious and successful efforts to learn how to discuss earthquake forecasting without getting the general public overly upset.
These are personal opinions.
Regards to all,
EQF
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[23018] [23013] |
|
23018 |
|
|
Date: September 21, 2023 at 20:42:32
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Update – Wow - Sept. 21, 2023 |
|
|
UPDATE – WOW
Posted By EQF On September 21, 2023
These are personal opinions.
A number of high intensity EM Signals were detected on September 21, 2023. These were the first ones that have been detected in months.
The charts related to those EM Signals should be available on my own Web site by tomorrow, Friday, if all goes well. Additionally, I am in the process of adding some computer code to my Earthquake Forecasting computer program that should make it possible to very easily add PNG picture files to these Earthboppin posts. Then those picture files can be easily discussed here in detail.
Those PNG files will not be stored on the Earthboppin Internet server. Instead, the PC user’s own Internet Browser will display the PNG files that will actually be on my own Web site. That is how HTML code works.
Right now, the process of adding PNG files with these posts is moderately complex. They first have to be stored on my own Web site and then referenced. That takes me some time and effort. The approach being developed should be somewhat automatic.
GROUND TILT MEASUREMENTS
My recent computer program updates have made it easy for me to automatically create PNG files that display some of the charts that are available from the following Web site:
https://www.dynamicgravity.org/mereni2/
If I have this right, the charts on that Web site are actually created by the personal computer of the person visiting the site. I don’t know what computer language that involves, perhaps it is JAVA.
The computer user’s PC downloads the code and then runs it. That running program and what is being displayed then disappear from the PC when the Web site window is closed.
There is an advantage to the use of JAVA or whatever like that. Site visitors can use their computer mouse to cause the display to show dates etc. associated with the location of the mouse arrow. However, unfortunately, as mentioned, those displays cannot be automatically downloaded and stored on the computer user’s PC.
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THOSE GROUND TILT CHARTS AND MY OWN EM SIGNALS
The following REALLY amazed me when I saw the data a short time ago.
Some of those ground tilt charts appear to me to be in EXTREMELY good agreement with the EM Signals that I detected earlier today. If that is so then it means that those ground tilt chart data can be used to help determine where an approaching earthquake might be about to occur.
My first informal evaluation of those EM Signals suggests that they could be pointing to a possible aftershock for the following destructive earthquake.
2023/03/18 17:12:52 2.84S 79.84W 66 6.8 "8 km NNW of Baláo, Ecuador"
NEIS Data
Additional analyses are being run to determine if that connection is valid or if the data might be pointing to some other location.
The TIME WINDOW theory that is in present use suggests to me that that the TIME WINDOW for this expected earthquake might be between today, September 21, 2023 and October 2, 2023.
September 29, 2023 is about the time when the sun and the moon will be on opposite sides of the Earth with regard to their longitudes in the sky. I allow a few extra days for the end of the TIME WINDOW.
Regards to all,
EQF
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
23013 |
|
|
Date: September 18, 2023 at 13:50:36
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Morocco Earthquake Lights - As Expected - Sept. 14, 2023 |
|
|
You often see evidence of approaching earthquakes in your
data after they actually occur.
What do you feel is the hurdle that prevents you from
recognizing it before the quake occurs?
Brian
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
[
Roll & Rock ] [ Main Menu ] |