Roll & Rock
|
[
Roll & Rock ] [ Main Menu ] |
|
|
|
22628 |
|
|
Date: September 13, 2022 at 21:41:37
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Recent Deadly Earthquakes - Sept. 13, 2022 |
|
|
RECENT DEADLY EARTHQUAKES
Posted by EQF on September 13, 2022
Roger who has posted notes here for years is still active. However, age appears to me to be slowing him down a little. So he is not doing a lot of active work. I am going to guess that he still visits this forum and reads the notes. If so, then I expect that I will be getting a note about this from him before too long in response to this present posting.
There have been a number of deadly earthquakes in the past few months.
They have occurred in Afghanistan, Iran I believe, Mainland China, and most recently in Papua New Guinea.
Warning signs for most or all of them have been appearing in my earthquake precursor data. The recent one in PNG appeared quite clearly.
Unfortunately, it can take me as much as a half day to try to evaluate the data, determine where the earthquake might occur, and then circulate a warning. At the present time I tell government officials etc. that they need to evaluate my data themselves to see if an earthquake could be approaching for their countries.
This is actually not that difficult. If my precursor data appear to be pointing to a fault zone in some country then when the precursor signals are detected there will most likely be other strong precursor signals being detected near that fault zone. If none are being observed then the expected earthquake will most likely occur somewhere else.
One of the projects that I am working on is preparing a report to send to government officials after a significant earthquake has occurred in their country. The report will advise them to keep checking my precursor data in order to spot possible aftershocks.
My precursor signals for aftershocks are much easier to interpret. We already know where the aftershock is likely to occur. So it becomes for the most part a matter of telling WHEN there is going to be a powerful aftershock. My precursor signals can be invaluable for that.
There are two picture charts on my forecasting Web site that indicate on what days strong EM Signals were detected. Very strong signals pointing to PNG were detected about a month before the earthquake occurred. That happens quite often.
Those are the EMS.png and EQ-EMS.png charts. The only government that I am aware of at the moment that might be able to effectively use those data is Mainland China. They are reportedly already using multiple forecasting technologies but don't appear to be making any significant progress. I am not sure why they can't get that approach to work. Those two picture chars were created largely to be of help to their earthquake researchers.
The main government I am attempting to get moving with developing earthquake forecasting capabilities is the U.S. However, one of the first things they need to do is to develop procedures for warning the general public about a possible approaching earthquake without getting everyone highly upset.
It is my expectation that my next attempt to get the U.S. moving with this should be successful. It is taking quite a while to get all of the necessary paperwork prepared.
Two major things related to the times when earthquakes are going to occur are the locations of the sun and the moon in the sky and the existence of intense solar proton storm densities around the Earth.
Both of those factors have I believe been clearly proven to be important with various past publications.
For years I was telling other earthquake researchers that solar storms and earthquake occurrence times appeared to be linked. But no one knew what type of solar storm was involved.
Papers showing that solar storm proton densities are the type of storm most strongly affecting earthquakes have been out there for years. Two separate groups in Italy published them.
However, no one presently knows WHY the proton storms affect earthquake occurrence times. A number of theories have been proposed. I have several of my own.
Of course, those two factors are important ONLY if a fault zone somewhere is getting ready to fracture anyway.
If no fault zone is getting ready to fracture then sun and moon gravity forces and solar proton storm densities are not going to help trigger an earthquake. If strong enough, the storms might just cause some radio blackouts or wreck havoc on electric power grids.
People who do not know where my forecasting Web site is located can enter the following on almost any major Internet search engine.
earthquake research index.html data.html
My forecasting Web site should be at the top of the response list.
Something that I also tell people is that probably the best forecasting method to be developed to date is the one that a group in the Europe - Asia area developed years ago. Their sensors detect slight variations in ground tilt before an earthquake.
Something else that I tell people is that if you want to check on the usefulness of some forecasting method then you should go where there are both numerous earthquakes and advanced technologies available.
The best location for that is likely Japan. They have plenty of earthquakes to watch for. They also have a variety of earthquakes rather than just one type such as ones associated with tectonic plates attempting to slip sideways past one another.
If you are going to try to test your earthquake forecasting method in California, you are likely going to have to wait for quite a while for a powerful one to occur.
These are personal opinions.
Regards to all,
EQF
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22629] [22630] [22635] |
|
22629 |
|
|
Date: September 19, 2022 at 11:52:48
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Clinton Global Initiative – Sept. 19, 2022 |
|
|
CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE
Posted by EQF on September 19, 2022
HUMANITARIAN PROJECTS
Throughout the year I work on a variety of humanitarian projects.
At various times I send advice to world governments including the U.S., nongovernmental organizations such as the United Nations, elected officials, research groups, and individuals regarding how they might solve global problems such as ones associated with climate change and detecting the approach of unexpected and dangerous earthquakes.
Some of my past efforts aimed at solving global problems have been quite successful. For example, I believe that several important Bidden – Harris administration cabinet member etc. appointments were made after Bidden – Harris election team members considered recommendations that I had sent them.
CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE (CGI)
If I understand all of this correctly, the Clinton Foundation (former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hilary Clinton) holds a meeting once a year where various humanitarian approaches to solving world problems are discussed and debated.
Those meetings were NOT held for several recent years while Covid-19 was raging etc.
One is being held today, Monday, September 19, 2022 and tomorrow, Tuesday, September 20, 2022.
If I can find a usable E-mail address or FAX phone number to contact them then I plan to send them some world problem solving recommendations by early tomorrow, Tuesday.
Those recommendations will involve climate change, energy systems that rely on fossil fuel, renewable, and nuclear energy, and earthquake forecasting.
If anyone else has any (reasonable) recommendations of their own that they would like me to include with my own recommendations then they can try posting the recommendations here in response to this post, or visit my Web site and use the webmaster E-mail address that can be found at the bottom of each Web page.
That information needs to be sent to me by early Tuesday morning, September 20, 2022.
To visit my Earthquake Forecasting Web site enter the following into any major search engine and my Web site should be near the top of the list that is returned.
earthquake research index.html data.html
Recommendations could be for how to solve or simply recognize some serious global problem. They do not need to be only about earthquake forecasting.
OTHER PAST EFFORTS
DISASTER RECOGNITION AND MANAGEMENT
Back around the year 2000 I and other disaster managers around the world were asked by personnel associated with the United Nations to send them global disaster management proposals that they could display at a U.N. disaster management Web site. I did that. My proposal was then reviewed by disaster managers and the general public around the world.
I am not certain about this, but this was such a long time ago that it is possible that my proposal might have helped get the Wikipedia organization created. The creation of such an organization was discussed in detail in my proposal.
I believe that U.N. officials themselves attempted to create a “Crowd Sourcing” organization based on some of the recommendations in my proposal.
Crowd Sourcing organizations attempt to enroll and get help from people around the world who are interested in solving a variety of world problems.
After my proposal was submitted to them I spent probably several months talking with U.N. personnel about that proposed Crowd Sourcing organization.
Back then, the Internet was not as highly organized as it is now. There were relatively few forums such as his present one. Possibly as a result of that, the first U.N. effort to create a Crowd Sourcing organization was not highly successful if I remember correctly.
A more recent attempt by U.N. personnel has been highly successful. The organization has a large number of people working for it in many countries and has reportedly had some major successes such as with organizing people to watch for, report on, and help deal with a variety of water pollution problems.
These are all personal opinions.
Regards to all,
EQF
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22630] [22635] |
|
22630 |
|
|
Date: September 19, 2022 at 16:04:10
From: mimici/socal, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Clinton Global Initiative – Sept. 19, 2022 |
|
|
Barf emoji. What in the world are you thinking schilling
for the Clinton foundation? Get your head straight.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22635] |
|
22635 |
|
|
Date: September 25, 2022 at 22:04:58
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Clinton Global Initiative – Sept. 19, 2022 |
|
|
Posted by EQF on September 26, 2022
I check this forum perhaps once a week. So I did not see your note when it was posted.
Basically, I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about with your note.
The Clinton Global Initiate is supposed to be a yearly meeting lasting several days where invited speakers discuss world problems.
The Clinton Foundation is a nonprofit that focuses on helping solve various world problems.
Earthquakes are a world problem.
Forecasting earthquakes is a complex science. When you believe that you have made some progress with solving a world problem such as that one then you need to let people know that you are making some progress along with exactly what you have accomplished.
The two basic rules for disaster management are the following:
Rule 1 - If you believe that some disaster might be approaching, don't assume that any other person on the planet will arrive at that same conclusion.
Rule 2 - Don't assume that even if someone else recognizes that the disaster is approaching then he or she will be interested in doing something to deal with the approaching disaster or that he or she will have the skills needed to deal with the approaching disaster.
It constantly astonishes me that so few people around the world can tell when certain types of disasters are approaching and that so many people around the world just assume that someone else will solve a given problem.
Regarding the Clinton Foundation:
I have a letter that I am quite certain that Bill Clinton personally wrote and sent to me many years ago in response to one disaster management problem that I had contacted him about.
When you have several degrees in the physical sciences they act as a key to opening the door to getting people who are running for office to respond to your letter.
No degrees in science - they are likely to ignore your letter unless you are offering them some campaign money.
I also have a letter that was written by Al Gore many years ago and sent to me.
The Clinton letter was a real, original letter.
After reading it about a half dozen times I determined that the one from Al Gore was most likely a "form" letter.
Al Gore is among other things, a talented professional writer.
I believe that he likely created a fairly large number of "form" letters for use when people contact him and he does not want to take the time to personally respond to their letter. His staff then determine which of his form letters is the most appropriate to send the person and convince them that he is actually personally responding to their letter.
His letter was quite impressive. I had to read it repeatedly and look for small clues that would indicate that it was actually a very cleverly and carefully written form letter.
These are personal opinions.
Regards to all,
EQF
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
[
Roll & Rock ] [ Main Menu ] |