| Roll & Rock
|
[
Roll & Rock ] [ Main Menu ] |
|
|
|
22306 |
|
|
Date: December 24, 2021 at 05:39:10
From: Richter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: DOCUMENT for USGS, Download.pdf ( Roger ) |
URL: Earth seismic sinchonous pendulum, Download.Pdf |
|
Roger, here link to Earthwaves.org-old forum
I UpLoad this file in the past.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22319] [22331] [22336] [22337] [22340] [22383] [22398] [22310] [22314] [22315] [22316] [22311] [22307] [22308] [22312] [22309] |
|
22319 |
|
|
Date: December 27, 2021 at 20:52:21
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Question |
|
|
So re-reading your paper, are you saying the Earth's axis
tilts in a periodic fashion?
By how much?
Brian
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22331] [22336] [22337] [22340] [22383] [22398] |
|
22331 |
|
|
Date: December 31, 2021 at 00:20:34
From: Richter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Question |
|
|
How important it is for no one so far. The measurements
I have made show that the average interval between two
earthquakes is equal to the period of oscillation of the
earth's axis. The pendulum is called synchronous because
at one point, when the earth rotates, it synchronizes
with the place where the earthquake will occur. The
longer the synchronization, the more helpful the
earthquake, because the layers have a longer time to
rise. This is the mechanism of strong earthquakes.
By the way, sorry, was Pythagoras' pi number? Wink, wink
...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22336] [22337] [22340] [22383] [22398] |
|
22336 |
|
|
Date: January 01, 2022 at 21:06:28
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Question |
|
|
I think maybe the translation is bad.
If the tilt of Earth's axis oscillates, how big is the
oscillation?
Does it change by degrees? Fraction of a degree? Meters?
Millimeters?
Brian
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22337] [22340] [22383] [22398] |
|
22337 |
|
|
Date: January 02, 2022 at 05:48:26
From: rh5919899, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Question |
|
|
Skywise;
If there was any such movement, astronomers would have a terrible time keeping large telescopes aligned.
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22340] [22383] [22398] |
|
22340 |
|
|
Date: January 02, 2022 at 09:37:39
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Question |
|
|
I know. That's why I'm asking by how much the axis moves.
The Keck telescopes in Hawaii have a blind pointing accuracy
of 1 arc-second. That means they can position the telescope to
within 1/3600 of a degree of their intended target without
even looking.
When closed-loop tracking is turned on, pointing accuracy
increases to 0.05 arc second. That's 1/72,000 of a degree.
The position encoders can mechanically position the telescope
with 10 nanometer precision.
reference:
https://www.techbriefs.com/component/content/article/tb/supplements/md/features/applications/34118
So, if the Earth's axis is oscillating, it MUST be doing so
by less than the accuracy of the Keck telescope's pointing
ability, otherwise as you say it would be noticed.
Which then leads to the next question, how can such a super
tiny oscillation (if it exists) have any effect on the timing
of earthquakes?
The hypothesis that Boyko posits just doesn't make any sense
on first principles.
Brian
p.s. I wonder where this idea ever came from, Earth's axis
tilting in such fashion. There have been many ideas thrown
around on these forums over the years that depend on this
notion. Some have even claimed the axis tilts daily by tens
of degrees. It's just so easily proven wrong. Even a fifth
grader could figure it out it's wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22383] [22398] |
|
22383 |
|
|
Date: January 19, 2022 at 06:53:12
From: Richter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: 1 Example: |
|
|
Do you remember that Russian plane that violated Turkish
airspace?
The planes have appliances. Isn't it possible that the
Zenith deviated just when this plane was flying?
Boyko.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22398] |
|
22398 |
|
|
Date: January 28, 2022 at 07:33:16
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Bad example |
|
|
And affected only ONE plane?
Why didn't ALL planes have fly off course?
Brian
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
22310 |
|
|
Date: December 25, 2021 at 14:38:01
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: DOCUMENT for USGS, Download.pdf ( Roger ) |
|
|
I've taken a look at your document and I have found so many things
wrong with it I just don't know where to begin. I think if I were to
break down every error it would end up being a paper ten times as long
as yours.
But I fear it would be but a waste of my time and energy to embark on
such an endeavor as I do not believe that you would be open to my
constructive criticisms due to, and I mean this with no intent to
denigrate you, a profound lack of critical thinking skills on your
part. You simply would not understand my explanations because of the
very same lack of critical thinking skills which caused you to make the
errors to begin with. I'm speaking of nothing more than a classic case
of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
There was a book I read about 15 years ago, titled "Why People Believe
Weird Things" written by Michael Shermer. It had a very enlightening
impact on my understanding of pseudoscience and the people taken in by
it. In case you are not aware of the term, pseudoscience is any idea or
belief or way of thinking that pretends to be scientific but is in fact
contrary to the scientific method.
The book so impressed me that I sought and obtained permission from the
author to quote an entire chapter of the book on my personal website.
I really think it would help you to read it.
Why People Believe Weird Things
But for an example of how error prone I found your paper to be, the
number pi is not "Pythagoras number". It is such a fundamental factual
error and is indicative of the critical flaws found elsewhere in your
treatise.
For further reading:
Pseudoscience
Dunning-Kruger Effect
List of Logical Fallacies
I know what I just wrote is likely to be found offensive. I'm sorry if
you take it that way. But I just think it would be a disservice to try
to dress up what I'm saying with a bunch of niceties.
Brian
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22314] [22315] [22316] [22311] |
|
22314 |
|
|
Date: December 26, 2021 at 01:45:59
From: Richter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Skywise... |
|
|
But Brian, I am open to constructive criticism of what is
written in the document. You did not mention a single
statement in the document. It is claimed that the period
of oscillation of the Earth's axis-radius of the Earth,
its period coincides with the average interval between
two earthquakes. This is supported by measurements - this
is the science of making measurements and their
conclusions. Instead, I read about a book and countless
unnecessary words that are not on the topic. General
speech. In my opinion, this is a discovery in the
document. If in doubt, please pass it on to USGS
scientists to verify and evaluate it. Then criticize me
as much as you want ...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22315] [22316] |
|
22315 |
|
|
Date: December 26, 2021 at 07:20:37
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Skywise... |
|
|
Actually, I did point out one of your errors.
The number pi is not "pythagoras number" as you stated.
The information I referenced to you is important for you
to understand first to understand any list of criticisms,
because the errors you made are rooted in the critical
thinking errors I am talking about.
So although what I wrote doesn't directly address the
errors in your paper, it is still very much relevant in
order to understand those errors.
If you don't understand logical fallacies, you will not
understand my criticisms.
But if you have read the book quoted on my website, then
your mistake about the number pi could fall under error
number 5 "Scientific Language Does Not Make a Science".
To someone who does not know much about math, saying "pi
is Pythagoras number" sounds all fancy and smart. But to
someone who knows math they will think you either have no
clue what you are talking about or are just making things
up to sound smart. Or most likely, both.
Brian
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22316] |
|
22316 |
|
|
Date: December 26, 2021 at 07:57:14
From: Richter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Skywise... |
|
|
Skywise, when I wrote the document I could see well. I do
not remember whether I wrote that the number "pi" is
Pythagoras. If I wrote it, it could be a mistake and I
admit it, I was careless. And at this point I don't know
if the number "pi" belongs to Pythagoras. This is subtle
knowledge for me. I don't go into them ..
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
22311 |
|
|
Date: December 25, 2021 at 19:24:58
From: rh5919899, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: DOCUMENT for USGS, Download.pdf ( Roger ) |
|
|
Brian;
Odds are he won't read any of it and if he does read some he won't understand it.
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
22307 |
|
|
Date: December 24, 2021 at 05:51:14
From: Richter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: 2nd DOCUMENT for USGS, Download.pdf ( Roger ) |
URL: Exhibition: Predicted earthquakes in Bulgarian newspapers.pdf |
|
Roger this link worked.
Download "Exhibition: Predicted earthquakes in Bulgarian
newspapers". You must click in 1st row on right icon, who
in English.
But left icon is for Bulgarian language.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22308] [22312] [22309] |
|
22308 |
|
|
Date: December 24, 2021 at 09:44:21
From: rh5919899, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: 2nd DOCUMENT for USGS, Download.pdf ( Roger ) |
|
|
Richter;
I don't understand your "Click on right icon..." instruction.
The newspaper images are in Bulgarian and the remarks below are in english but do not give enough information to be useful.
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[22312] [22309] |
|
22312 |
|
|
Date: December 26, 2021 at 00:16:32
From: Richter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: 2nd DOCUMENT for USGS, Download.pdf ( Roger ) |
|
|
Sorry Roger, but this is my mistake.
The Document open all, only 1st click.
But Roger I think you send document
by e-mail. ...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
22309 |
|
|
Date: December 24, 2021 at 11:20:29
From: Richter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: 2nd DOCUMENT for USGS, Download.pdf ( Roger ) |
|
|
Roger, give this links in UCGS science and END.
Only this.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
[
Roll & Rock ] [ Main Menu ] |