Earth seismic synchronous pendulum Boyko Georgiev Iliev,emaul: eqpboyko@abv.bg Abstract.In science, there are some cases, where we cannot intervene making any analysis in order to monitor certain causeand-effect relationship. Then we have to apply the approach of accumulation of already ascertained coincidences or observed phenomena, which could be somehow related to the problem, subject to our study. For instance, if the statement is that the earth axis makes 24-hour periodic vibrations (Figure 1) and that these vibrations are the cause of earthquakes, then we shall have to search for coincidences, relationships between earthquakes and the vibrations of the earth axis. We cannot stop the vibrations of the earth axis and see if earthquakes shall stop. Other visible phenomena due to the shake of the earth axis could be as follows: spiral movement of submarine streams in oceans, spiral movement of tectonic plates, the so called “Corkscrew theory”, friction between tectonic plates. Two new relations between the tidal force of the Moon and earthquakes have been found in the researches bellow. A conclusion about a new theory of earthquake mechanism is derived from these relations. Key words Earth,pendulum,axis,earthquakes. Fig. 1 Earth seismic synchronous pendulum The theory Earth can be considered as a giant mathematical pendulum with length, equal to the mean earth radius, R = 6372 795.5 m. The period of any mathematical pendulum is determined by the following formula: T = 2.п (1) Methods and data The basic method of operating with the data is to find the average value of the time interval between two earthquakes. The average value is interesting because it is constant. This value shall be compared to the data obtained from the theory described above. In the first case, the mean value of the interval of time between two earthquakes has been calculated, without any preset conditions. It turns out that it is equal to 12.01 hours, or 12 h 06 min, Table 3 and Diagram 3. This case shall be commented in the conclusions. In the second case the mean interval of time between two earthquakes has been found, but under the condition that the earthquakes have happened in an interval from 0 to 4 hours. It is shown in Tables 1 and 2. The respective diagram is attached to each of the tables. In the interval from 0 to 4 hours, there is coincidence between the data from the theory and measuring. This coincidence shall be commented in the conclusions part. The data regarding the earthquakes on Earth have been taken from a catalogue of earthquakes published in internet. In this case, the data were taken from USGS American Catalogue of Earthquakes at http://earthquake.gov/earthquakes. In this case, the data concerning the earthquakes were selected from 1 January 1973 through 20 November 2011. In Table 1 and Table 2 bellow, at the respective randomly selected geographic coordinates, the total number of earthquakes found are shown, and how many of them have happened in an interval from 0 to 4 hours. With respect to those ones which happened within this interval, the average value between two earthquakes was calculated. In this case it is not important if two earthquakes happened in the same geographic place, or not. The interval from 0 to 4 hours between two earthquakes is relevant. The average interval is for them, which shall be compared with theoretical period of vibration of the earth axis calculated above. Where п = 3.1415, is Pythagoras number, R is the mean earth radius, R = 6372 795.5 m, g is the earth acceleration; g = 9.81 m/s2 . Substituting by these magnitudes in formula (1), for the period, we see it is Т = 5063 seconds, Т = 1.4066 hours, Т = 1 hour 24 minutes and 23 seconds. This value of the period is to be understood as a theoretical period of vibration of the earth axis. If earth axis vibrated, it would vibrate by this period. The sense of this theoretical period consists of the fact that it is calculated before the body has begun to really vibrate. 2 Results Table 1 Dependence of the period on the geographic place № / AX IS X / GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES / axis X / NUMBER OF EARTHQUAKES MEAN INTERVAL IN SECONDS / AXIS Y / MAGNITUDE WIDTH LENGTH TOTAL FROM 0 TO 4 H. 1 from - 50 to 0 from 0 to 360 65530 40115 5069 from М3 to М10 2 from - 50 to 30 from 0 to 360 29143 13520 5121 from М3 to М10 3 from – 30 to 0 from 0 to 360 41987 18712 5441 from М3 to М10 4 from 0 to 42 from 0 to 29 38452 20773 4573 from М3 to М10 5 from 0 to 42 from 30 to 59 11462 3188 4290 from М3 to М10 6 from 0 to 42 from 60 to 89 15340 4346 4767 from М3 to М10 7 from 0 to 42 from 90 to 119 16802 8059 3211 from М3 to М10 8 from 0 to 42 from 120 to 180 61688 35580 4435 from М3 to М10 9 from 10 to 30 from 0 to 360 36664 18118 4975 from М3 to М10 10 from 30 to 50 from 10 to 50 51633 29777 4619 from М3 to М10 11 from 20 to 50 from 10 to 50 52025 30086 4621 from М3 to М10 12 from 30 to 60 from 0 to 360 54651 29950 4332 from М3 to М10 13 from -50 to 50 from 0 to 360 17816 4498 5312 from М5 to М10 Т Theoretical period from Formula (1). For reference. 5063 Diagram 1 3 Table 2 Dependence of the period on the magnitude № GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES NUMBER OF EARTHQUAKES MEAN INTERVAL IN SECONDS / axis Y / MAGNITUDE / axis X / LENGTH WIDTH TOTAL FROM 0 TO 4 H. 1 from - 50 до 50 from 0 to 360 8110 1343 5468 М3 2 from - 50 до 50 from 0 to 360 6425 917 5951 М3.5 3 from - 50 до 50 from 0 to 360 7114 1018 6421 М4 4 from - 50 до 50 from 0 to 360 7543 910 6002 М4.5 5 from - 50 до 50 from 0 to 360 3572 259 5714 М5 6 from - 50 до 50 from 0 to 360 1153 35 6170 М5.5 7 from - 50 до 50 from 0 to 360 351 5 5060 М6 T Theoretical period from Formula (1). For reference. 5063 Diagram 2 4 Mean interval between two earthquakes: 12 h 06 min 12,01 11,2 11,4 11,6 11,8 12 12,2 12,4 12,6 1973197519771979198119831985198719891991199319951997199 9200120032005200720092011 Avg Table 3 Mean interval between two earthquakes under no conditions Year 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 Hours 11,72 11,82 12,16 11,94 12,07 11,82 11,93 12,06 12,18 Seconds 42178 42540 43764 42994 43463 42553 42959 43409 43834 Year 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 Hours 11,82 11,87 12,02 11,90 12,06 11,80 11,92 12,04 12,15 Seconds 42539 42725 43287 42834 43425 42463 42919 43346 43746 Year 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Hours 12,18 11,99 11,89 12,12 12,06 11,88 12,23 11,87 12,05 Seconds 43862 43162 42791 43631 43427 42786 44022 42725 43371 Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Hours 12,08 12,05 12,00 12,07 12,09 11,99 12,20 12,10 12,35 Seconds 43474 43383 43195 43453 43508 43161 43923 43575 44456 Year 2009 2010 2011 Average (Avg) Hours 11,67 11,93 12,20 12,01 Seconds 42020 42931 43923 43225 Diagram 3 5 Conclusions In the part of Methods and Data it was mentioned about a calculation made, of the mean value between two earthquakes under no conditions, Table 3. The mean interval between two earthquakes was 12.01 hours, ± 6 minutes of error. This measurement coincides with the fact that at one and the same physical moment, both tidal forces exerted on Earth and caused by the gravitation of the Moon are at a distance of 12 hours from each other. These 12 hours express the relationship between earthquakes and Moon tidal forces exerted on Earth. We can read about Moon tidal forces in „Курс общей астрономии” (‘General Astronomy Course’), 1983, by Bakulin, Kononovich and Moroz, page 99. On page 101 of the same textbook, it is stated that the elevation of the earth crust caused by the Moon tidal force can achieve several decimeters. The mean interval between between two earthquakes happened within the interval from 0 to 4 hours from all the 20 measurements in Tables 1 and 2 is exactly 5078 seconds, or 1 hour, 24 minutes and 38 seconds. In the theory above, the period of vibration of the earth axis was calculated. It is equal to 1 hour, 24 minutes and 23 seconds. The difference of 15 seconds is insignificant. Such a coincidence can happen only and exclusively if the earth axis makes 24-hour periodical vibrations with the theoretical period mentioned above, falling into synchronization with earthquake epicenters. The shake of the Earth has been rhythmically conveyed to earthquakes too. But it means that not only tectonic plates are the trigger of earthquakes. Provided that synchronization is absolute, then a stronger earthquake shall happen, as the points over the epicenter shall be longer under the impact of the Moon. The friction between the layers decreases and if a seismic stress is accumulated, earthquake occurs. Layers begin to move. This can be seen in line number 7 in Table 2. In this case the theoretical period and the interval between two earthquakes almost coincide, i.e. the synchronization is absolute. This is revealed on Diagram 2. As an example we can refer to the earthquake of the town of Pernik on May 22nd, 2012. The main shock occurred at 03:00 a.m., and 1 hour and 30 minutes later, the second shock came, i.e. at 04:30 a.m., and its magnitude was 4.5. The difference in synchronization was 6 minutes only. Where is the effect of the Moon in this case? That very day, the Moon was at its superior culmination with respect to the latitude of Sofia. At that very moment, the tidal force of the Moon would make only one movement on earth crust, which should be synchronized with the shake of earth axis. Reference: ‘Astronomical Calendar’, 2012, published by the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Therefore, for full synchronization, the Moon has to be at its superior culmination and then we shall observe two intensive shocks at an interval of 1 hour, 24 minutes and 23 seconds averagely. A new picture of earthquake mechanism theory appears: Tectonic plates only prepare earthquakes, accumulating seismic stress, but the earthquake does not happen yet. The Moon elevates the layers on both sides the Earth by the tidal forces between the tectonic plates and, at the right moment, falls into synchronization with the shake of the earth axis. Swaying, the earth axis retains for a longer time the points submitted to Moon gravitation and then all the earthquakes happen. The more intensive earthquakes occur in the presence of full synchronization and superior culmination of the Moon with respect to the corresponding geographical coordinates. Any other earthquakes occur in the presence of partial synchronization. Reference: Diagram 2. References Astronomical Calendar, 2012 г., Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Bakulin, Kononovich, Moroz „Курс общей астрономии” (‘General Astronomy Course’), 1983, Earthquakes in USA Database, Internet, USG
|
|