| Roll & Rock
|
[
Roll & Rock ] [ Main Menu ] |
|
|
|
21664 |
|
|
Date: November 10, 2020 at 16:26:45
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Earthquake Warning - November 10, 2020 |
URL: Comments And News |
|
EARTHQUAKE WARNING
Posted by EQF on November 10, 2020
This Earthquake Warning note would have been posted days ago. But I am still having trouble getting on this site on a reliable basis. My ISP has been contacted about this. Efforts are underway to resolve the problem.
During the past week or so, numerous high intensity EM Signals were detected. They indicate to me that a significant earthquake is likely approaching.
TIME WINDOW – Using my newest theory for determining Time Windows, there is a good chance that this expected earthquake will occur by November 17, 2020.
The sun and moon will be in almost the exact same location in the sky on November 15, 2020. Tidal forces should be at a maximum at that time. My Time Windows allow for a few extra days past the maximum Tidal Forces day.
MAGNITUDE – When an approaching expected earthquake is strong enough to generate the high intensity EM Signals that I work with it then it will likely have a magnitude that is high enough for it to cause damage if the earthquake occurs near a populated area. It will usually also be fairly shallow. If it is instead going to be at a great depth then the magnitude would be higher.
LOCATION – I have one high probability primary location for this expected earthquake. It is in the Europe – Asia area. I do not want to be more specific than that in a public forum as it could cause problems.
International disaster mitigation and government personnel are being sent warnings about this expected earthquake. I also have a secondary location that I am watching.
CONFIRMATION INFORMATION
Several other earthquake forecasting personnel now agree that an earthquake is expected for that primary location.
REFERENCE INFORMATION
The following Web page is being updated on a regular basis regarding earthquake forecasting topics.
Comments.html
A formal Earthquake Warning was posted there several days ago.
I recommend that people check that Web page now and then to see what the latest news is regarding Earthquake Warnings etc.
These are personal opinions.
Regards to all,
EQF
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21715] [21712] [21713] [21701] [21696] [21699] [21691] [21679] [21682] [21683] [21710] [21681] [21684] [21686] [21687] [21689] [21690] [21693] [21702] [21703] [21704] [21705] [21706] [21694] [21695] [21697] [21698] [21700] [21688] [21685] [21671] [21672] [21665] [21666] [21670] [21668] [21667] [21669] |
|
21715 |
|
|
Date: December 22, 2020 at 19:21:22
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Earthquake Warning - November 10, 2020 |
|
|
Posted by EQF on December 22, 2020
My ISP is having so many connection problems that it is now almost unusable.
One more talk with them and then it will probably be time to look for a new ISP.
Regards to all,
EQF
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
21712 |
|
|
Date: December 15, 2020 at 01:50:11
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Update - December 15, 2020 |
|
|
Update Posted by EQF December 15, 2020
This expected earthquake has simply "disappeared."
EM Signals believed to be associated with the approaching earthquake were being detected in batches. They would be detected for several day. Then there would be a stretch of no signals being detected for a week or two. Then signals would be detected again.
The present Time Window for this expected earthquake ends on December 17, 2020. If there is no significant earthquake by that time then the Earthquake Warning will be officially cancelled.
As data on my Web pages show, there have been times when approaching earthquakes generated high intensity EM Signals for six months or more before they finally occurred.
One of the most frightening examples of that was the following catastrophic December 26, 2004 Indonesia earthquake that reportedly claimed a quarter of a million lives.
2004/12/26 00:58:53 3.3N 95.98E 30 9.1 "off the west coast of northern Sumatra"
NEIS Data
My data indicate that it was likely generating strong signals for a good part of a year before it occurred.
Similarly, the devastating March 11, 2011 earthquake in Japan appeared to have been generating signals for a good part of a year.
2011/03/11 05:46:24 38.30N 142.37E 29 9.1 "near the east coast of Honshu, Japan"
However, those Japan warning signals appeared to have been highly deceptive. They seem to have been pointing to the wrong location. I believe that I understand why that was the case. And it is a problem that can probably exist for a variety of earthquake forecasting methods.
These are personal opinions.
Regards to all,
EQF
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21713] |
|
21713 |
|
|
Date: December 16, 2020 at 13:01:33
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update - Programming problem |
|
|
Hi all;
Just a note to let you know I found the problem with the program I was working on.
As expected, it was a simple thing I had overlooked.
The editor I was working with works with files of different formats. The default is ASCII whereas I needed DOS.
Once I reset to DOS all was well.
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
21701 |
|
|
Date: December 05, 2020 at 12:21:02
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Update - December 5, 2020 |
|
|
Update Posted by EQF on December 5, 2020
One or more earthquakes are still expected. High intensity EM Signals are now being detected on a daily basis.
LOCATION
The longitudes of the Chart C line peaks on my forecast Web page have shifted to around 140 E.
Several areas in the southwest Pacific Ocean are now being watched.
Chart C will be updated with new data as soon as possible.
These are personal opinions.
Regards to all,
EQF
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
21696 |
|
|
Date: December 02, 2020 at 22:32:30
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: New Earthquake Warning December 3, 2020 |
URL: News and Comments |
|
NEW EARTHQUAKE WARNING
Posted by EQF on December 3, 2020
It appears that the earthquake that has been expected is once again generating high intensity EM Signals. Two were detected on December 1, 2020. More will probably be generated before it finally occurs.
The latest information can be found on the Comments Web page.
A high probability location for the expected earthquake has not yet been determined. Several possible locations are still being monitored.
TIME WINDOW
Using the sun and moon positions to determine a Time Window, there is perhaps a 50% chance that it will occur by December 17, 2020. The sun and moon will be closest to one another in the sky on December 15, 2020. That means that tidal forces will be at their maximum value.
However, considering that these types of high intensity EM Signals were also detected on November 7, 2020, it is possible that it could occur sooner than December 17.
This expected earthquake appears to be somewhat unusual. Normally, expected earthquakes generate a mixture of high, medium, and low intensity EM Signals. This one is only generating high intensity signals. If and when it does occur, its location and the fault zone environment might explain why that is the case.
NEVADA EARTHQUAKE
Somewhat surprisingly, my computer programs indicate that the following widely felt earthquake generated quite a few EM Signals before it occurred.
2020/12/01 23:32:56 38.16N 118.08W 5 5.1 "25 km S of Mina, Nevada"
The data have not been studied sufficiently to determine how far back in time those signals were being detected.
The most likely reason that an earthquake with such a low magnitude was generating clearly detectable EM Signals was that it was a shallow earthquake with a reported depth of 5 km.
Generally, the closer the earthquake is to the surface the more likely it will be to generate detectable signals. The farther away it is in distance, the less likely it will generate detectable signals.
EARTHQUAKE FORECASTING COMPUTER PROGRAM
The primary computer programs being used to do this forecasting work and generate the forecasting charts were developed over a decade period of time. They are almost magical in the way they display the charts and allow them to be compared with one another. Seeing them in operation they would probably appear to be something out of a science fiction movie.
They mainly involves a combination of Perl and Gnuplot routines. If a newer version were created, that would probably be done using Python. The amount of effort needed to do that would be extraordinary. I don’t intend to do that myself and don’t have time to try to get the Python people to develop it even though they have been cooperative and helpful in the past.
The Perl language routines were formally copyrighted years ago.
These are personal opinions.
Regards,
EQF
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21699] |
|
21699 |
|
|
Date: December 03, 2020 at 12:10:55
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: New Earthquake Warning December 3, 2020 |
|
|
EQF;
All you're doing is opening a window on a seismic region
and making excuses until a quake happens.
That's not prediction.
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
21691 |
|
|
Date: December 01, 2020 at 03:11:22
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Update - December 1, 2020 |
|
|
Posted by EQF on December 1, 2020
This expected earthquake is no longer generating high intensity EM Signals. That situation can change in just a day.
Two fault zone strain charts are being monitored.
One named "P1" suggests that earlier high intensity signals might have been linked with a volcano eruption in the Indonesia area. It erupted around November 29, 2020.
The other chart named "Ida" suggests that the fault zone responsible for those signals might have temporarily stabilized. No new strain is presently being added to it. That could be because the sun and moon are not presently at locations in the sky that would cause maximum tidal forces to be generated.
Time will tell which of those possibilities (if either) is the correct one.
These are personal opinions.
Regards to all,
EQF
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
21679 |
|
|
Date: November 18, 2020 at 12:15:44
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
URL: Comments and News |
|
Posted by EQF on November 18, 2020
This expected earthquake did not occur during the primary Time Window that ended on November 17, 2020.
That is not unusual. Perhaps only 50% of the expected earthquakes actually follow that pattern. The other 50% might not occur for months.
This one appears to still be generating EM Signals though not as strong and numerous as the signals that were detected on November 7, 2020. Other forecast personnel are also watching a Europe - Asia area location.
EARTHQUAKE FORECASTING ADVANCE
After trying to learn how to do this for a very long time, yesterday I was finally able to determine how to download and save the ground strain forecasting charts available on the following Web site.
http://www.dynamicgravity.org/mereni/
By comparing my own data with those charts I can see which ones match my data and then watch the buildup of strain in the fault zone responsible for the EM Signals.
Unfortunately, the strain charts can't presently identify the fault zone location by themselves. However, they do provide some clues and make it possible to see what is likely happening in the active fault zone, wherever it is.
These are personal opinions.
Regards to all,
EQF
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21682] [21683] [21710] [21681] [21684] [21686] [21687] [21689] [21690] [21693] [21702] [21703] [21704] [21705] [21706] [21694] [21695] [21697] [21698] [21700] [21688] [21685] |
|
21682 |
|
|
Date: November 20, 2020 at 06:56:58
From: sher, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
Could the window end on Nov. 27, 2020? I have been
watching the area between the Caucasus/Capsian Sea as
well as Germany/France border and Austria, for this
date. Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21683] [21710] |
|
21683 |
|
|
Date: November 25, 2020 at 20:42:05
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
Posted by EQF on November 25, 2020
The following is the best information I can provide at this time regarding Time Windows.
Once again, even being able to get this forum to appear on my computer is an on and off process. At least I now know that if I keep trying for a long enough time at any given point in time, the connection will likely eventually be made.
These are personal opinions.
TIME WINDOWS AND OTHER TOPICS
The “experimental” Time Windows that are presently being tested rely on the locations of the sun and the moon in the sky.
When certain types of fault zone activity related electromagnetic signals (EM Signals) are detected, perhaps 50% of the time they are good indicators that a significant, likely powerful earthquake will occur in a relatively short period of time. I used to propose that this would be within a week of the time that the signals were detected.
This new “experimental” Time Window calculation for me proposes that the Time Window will end when the sun and moon are next to one another in the sky, as far as longitude is concerned. Sun and moon latitudes are not considered.
If I understand the physics of all of this correctly, that is the time when tidal stresses will be at their maximum because the combined gravity related forces of the sun and moon are at a maximum.
So, with the signals that were detected on November 7, 2020, the next time for that would have been November 15, 2020. I then add a day or two to the Time Window in case the earthquake is delayed.
The next Time Window end would then be around December 15, 2020 when the sun and moon are once again near one another in the sky.
I would need to check my past data to see how accurate those proposed Time Windows actually are. A quick check indicated that they might be fairly accurate.
If the expected earthquake does not occur by the end of the first Time Window then it might not occur for weeks or months. There are many factors that determine the exact occurrence time. Sun and moon locations in the sky are not the only ones.
WATCHING AS STRAIN BUILDS IN THE FAULT ZONE
A new procedure that just got started in the past week or so involves watching the strain detectors at the following Web site.
http://www.dynamicgravity.org/mereni/
In the past I did not have data processing routines for easily doing that. Now I do. And in a few weeks or so, I might be making those graphs available through my own Web site.
There are 13 different detector charts that can be seen at the site. Each detector favors a preferred direction of strain. For example, one might be sensitive to strain building in fault zones that are directly to the southeast of where the sensor is located. Another might be sensitive to fault zone strain building to the northeast of the sensor’s location.
By comparing my EM Signals data with abrupt transitions in the strain measurements on those charts I believe that it is possible to tell which sensor system is focused on the fault zone responsible for the signals that I myself am monitoring. It should be remembered that those sensors and my own forecasting method can be detecting signals for multiple approaching earthquakes.
Right now, the strain sensors that appear to be in the best agreement with my own signals are the ones in the “Pribram P1” 30 day graph window (not the “Temp” graph).
At the times when you see abrupt increases or decreases in those graph lines, those times are also matching the times when I am detecting high intensity EM Signals.
As a result, you can actually watch the strain build in the fault zone. The exact location of the fault zone is unfortunately not yet known.
I have been attempting to get some additional information from the group maintaining those sensors regarding the direction in which each of the sensors is responding to. But so far I have not been able to contact them by E-mail. They do a lot of traveling.
When this expected earthquake does occur, the displacement of those graph lines should fairly quickly return to normal meaning that strain has been finally been released in the fault zone. The approaching earthquake has occurred.
Regards to all,
EQF
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21710] |
|
21710 |
|
|
Date: December 13, 2020 at 06:34:28
From: sher, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
Thank you so very much for your response! The area
that has been on my radar since 2017 is this area
currently experiencing quakes in the past few days.
2020-12-13 13:05:03.8
1hr 23min ago
43.33 N 45.56 E 15 4.2
CAUCASUS REGION, RUSSIA
2020-12-13 12:08:27.8
2hr 19min ago
43.04 N 45.50 E 10 3.8
CAUCASUS REGION, RUSSIA
2020-12-13 11:34:18.9
2hr 53min ago
43.18 N 45.60 E 10 4.6
CAUCASUS REGION, RUSSIA
2020-12-13 09:15:46.2
5hr 12min ago
42.94 N 45.48 E 10 3.7
CAUCASUS REGION, RUSSIA
2020-12-12 23:50:21.6 43.28 N 45.75 E
10 4.1 CAUCASUS REGION, RUSSIA
2020-12-12 21:35:31.0 43.04 N 45.40 E
3.3 CAUCASUS REGION, RUSSIA
2020-12-12 21:29:51.0 43.23 N 45.67 E
4.7 CAUCASUS REGION, RUSSIA
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
21681 |
|
|
Date: November 18, 2020 at 15:19:58
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
EQF;
This enormous website of yours is to instruct others
in how to predict quakes using your data and methods.
But nowhere do you demonstrate that YOU can do it!
Now why would anyone go to the trouble to read and
understand what you've said when there's no evidence
that you can do what you claim?
Now I can settle that point decisively, given a list
of your predictions but I don't find such a list in
the website and I don't feel like reading the whole
thing to compile such a list.
So it's up to you. You undoubtedly know where to find
the information so it's not a time consuming project
for you. Post it in here so all can see it and we'll
settle this once and for all.
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21684] [21686] [21687] [21689] [21690] [21693] [21702] [21703] [21704] [21705] [21706] [21694] [21695] [21697] [21698] [21700] [21688] [21685] |
|
21684 |
|
|
Date: November 26, 2020 at 04:01:55
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
Posted by EQF on November 26, 2020
These are personal opinions.
Hi Roger,
You appear to be living in a type of “Time Warp” that existed at some point in the distant past.
At the moment I am attempting to merge two powerful earthquake forecasting technologies.
One of them, my own, can provide valuable information regarding WHEN a fault zone is starting to become unstable.
The other can provide some information regarding the buildup of strain in that fault zone, wherever that fault zone might be.
What YOU are attempting to do is a never ending mystery.
Once again, my own forecasting program is not a true Earthquake PREDICTION Program. Instead it is an Earthquake WARNING Program.
I don’t maintain organized lists of Earthquake Predictions that have been made in the past. I do recall quite a few formal Earthquake WARNINGS that I have circulated over the years.
The first formal one was sent to U.S. Government officials on December 30, 1994. Several weeks later, Kobe, Japan was heavily damaged by a deadly earthquake.
Numerous other Earthquake Warnings have been circulated over the years. They are generally quite accurate as the data on my Web site going back to 2001 show.
A MORE POWERFUL TRUE BASIC
As I stated in other notes, there is a way to use Windows BAT files and shortcut files to make it possible for True Basic to interact with the Windows operating system and do things such as direct Internet Explorer to visit some Web page.
Basically, TB would store a command in a batch file and then exit. At that time the batch file would execute and TB would start running again in this type of loop until it was told to stop running.
I tried this using Perl. And it will work for virtually any program including TB.
However, Perl doesn’t have to exit before a batch file can be executed. It can send DOS commands from a running program using the “System” command. TB apparently has no command like that. Some other versions of Basic do.
With TB, the sequence of commands has to be exactly correct or this procedure won’t work.
It is not a slow process. Each loop goes just as fast as TB can load and run or exit a program.
Regards to all,
EQF
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21686] [21687] [21689] [21690] [21693] [21702] [21703] [21704] [21705] [21706] [21694] [21695] [21697] [21698] [21700] [21688] [21685] |
|
21686 |
|
|
Date: November 26, 2020 at 18:08:17
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
Hi EQF;
We seem to be talking to someone other than each
other.
I'm trying to show you that your method(s) are bogus
but you steadfastly refuse to supply the information I
need to prove my case.
I know you use sun and moon positions in your
analysis.
I also know that sun and moon have absolutely nothing
to do with major earthquakes.
I'm not interested in learning another language at my
age. So if you have any projects where TB can help,
let me know. Otherwise, not.
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21687] [21689] [21690] [21693] [21702] [21703] [21704] [21705] [21706] [21694] [21695] [21697] [21698] [21700] [21688] |
|
21687 |
|
|
Date: November 28, 2020 at 05:02:46
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
Posted by EQF on November 28, 2020
Hi Roger,
With humor intended, you need to start taking those memory pills again.
You specifically asked me to explain to you how TB could be made more powerful. I just did that.
TB runs doing something. Then when it is time to open a text file using Windows Notepad, TB stores a special command in a Windows .bat file.
TB then exits and the batch file starts running and opens the appropriate file using Notepad. It is a very easy process and does not involve learning a new language.
If desired, TB can then automatically start running again to begin another task.
This should work with any computer program that can write to files.
If and when time permits I will send you copies of some exact, very simple example files that will explain how to do this.
Regards to all,
EQF
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21689] [21690] [21693] [21702] [21703] [21704] [21705] [21706] [21694] [21695] [21697] [21698] [21700] [21688] |
|
21689 |
|
|
Date: November 28, 2020 at 10:40:40
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
EQF;
Sound like you are thinking of the CHAIN command, where
a running program calls another program to execute and
resumes when the called program finishes.
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21690] [21693] [21702] [21703] [21704] [21705] [21706] [21694] [21695] [21697] [21698] [21700] |
|
21690 |
|
|
Date: December 01, 2020 at 01:32:48
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
Posted by EQF on December 1, 2020
To a certain degree that is correct.
As far as I am aware, the main problem is that TB has no way of communicating with the computer operating system and with the real world. It can only read files and store information in them. It cannot do things such as direct other types of programs such as Notepad to start running.
The routine that I described would enable TB to easily and fairly effectively interact with the computer operating system and with computer programs that are not TB programs.
Regards to all,
EQF
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21693] [21702] [21703] [21704] [21705] [21706] [21694] [21695] [21697] [21698] [21700] |
|
21693 |
|
|
Date: December 01, 2020 at 16:42:35
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
EQF;
No, that's wrong. The CHAIN command causes an external
program to execute and return to the maim program when
finished.
I've never had occasion to use it.
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21702] [21703] [21704] [21705] [21706] [21694] [21695] [21697] [21698] [21700] |
|
21702 |
|
|
Date: December 05, 2020 at 22:54:41
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
Posted by EQF December 6, 2020
Hi Roger,
It is my understanding that the TB version of "CHAIN" will only let you call other TB programs. The procedure that I have been discussing will let TB instruct DOS to do anything that it is capable of doing.
The reason for going through this effort is because you wont' work with anything but TB. As a result, if you want it to be able to direct Internet Explorer for example to visit some Web site on command then this batch file approach is the only thing that will work unless you want to use another programming language.
If I were going to use another program it would be Python. That language does everything that is needed including fast calculations and easy interactions with the Operating System.
But, like anything, it has to be learned. I don't have time to learn it and convert my Perl and Gnuplot programs to Python. And you don't appear to be interested in learning it.
ROGER PROJECTS
There are three project that should be of interest to you. The first easy one involves developing that more powerful version TB. That might take 2 hours of effort.
Another involves searching for patterns in my data file that contains records for more than 100,000 past earthquakes. The resultant charts would be displayed on my Web site. That is another really easy project.
The third one involves identifying "Earthquake Pairs." These are two or more powerful earthquakes that were triggered by the same sun and moon gravity forces as one another. Powerful earthquakes and some of their aftershocks often form Earthquake Pairs.
Those Pairs can then be used to study earthquake triggering phenomena.
FORECASTING UPDATE
This expected earthquake or earthquake does not yet appear to have occurred. Two specific southwest Pacific Ocean locations are being watched.
The present plan is to try to contact the governments of those countries some time this coming week and advise them to keep watch for some unexpected possible strong seismic activity.
BOPPIN SITE ACCESS
It appears that my ISP might have finally determined how to fix the problem with my being able to access this forum without having to make numerous attempts. It remains to be seen how long that "fix" will last.
These are personal opinions
Regards to all,
EDG
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21703] [21704] [21705] [21706] |
|
21703 |
|
|
Date: December 06, 2020 at 11:23:16
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
EQF;
You may be right that TB will only CHAIN to other TB
programs. I'll check with the user support on their
website.
No, I'm not interested in learning Python. I'm 86
years old and have problems remembering what I had for
lunch yesterday.
Your quake file must have a high lower value for mb if
it only has 100,000 entries. I have 878,000 entries in
mine and it only goes to August 2020. I need to update
it.
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21704] [21705] [21706] |
|
21704 |
|
|
Date: December 06, 2020 at 14:22:44
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
EQF;
What evidence do you have to show that the sun and moon
positions have anything to do with quakes?
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21705] [21706] |
|
21705 |
|
|
Date: December 06, 2020 at 15:07:02
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
EQF;
Whereas I can show, using a program written for you,
that the sun-moon angle is randomly distributed over the
range of possible values.
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21706] |
|
21706 |
|
|
Date: December 06, 2020 at 16:48:11
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
EQF;
Clarification needed.
I was referring to the sun-moon angle at the time of mag
7+ quakes.
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
21694 |
|
|
Date: December 01, 2020 at 22:07:36
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
TB was never designed to do what Ed is trying to do.
I'm not putting TB down. It's just that every programming
language has purpose for which it is designed. It's a
tool. And tools are designed to do certain things.
Trying to force TB to do something it was not designed to
do is like trying to force a square peg into a round hole
by pounding on it with a hammer made of downy pillows.
Yeah, eventually you might get a result.
I just have to shake my head at the amount of effort,
time, and mental energy that has been wasted trying to
accomplish what sounds like a relatively simple task
but with the wrong tools. Had that effort been put into
acquiring the right tool, the task would probably be
done by now.
Seriously, how many years has Ed been at it now?
Brian
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21695] [21697] [21698] [21700] |
|
21695 |
|
|
Date: December 02, 2020 at 08:42:14
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
Skywise;
TB will do what he wants, I just didn't know it.
But yes, it won't help what he's trying to do because
what he's trying to do is not possible.
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21697] [21698] [21700] |
|
21697 |
|
|
Date: December 02, 2020 at 22:45:24
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
I'm not even judging the purpose of his quest.
I'm just looking at this as a programming problem to
solve. Based on what little info he's given about what he
wants to do he's simply making it hard on himself. He's
kludged together so many pieces of code from various
sources written in contrasting languages it's a wonder
he's able to get anything to work.
There's many times I've written a program and gotten so
far only to realize that I'm just holding it all together
with twine and chewing gum.
At some point, you just have to scrap it and start over.
And doing so is in no way a failure. It's taking
advantage of the learning experience of the previous
efforts. Even major software companies do this.
Brian
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21698] [21700] |
|
21698 |
|
|
Date: December 03, 2020 at 12:03:22
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
Brian;
Yes but when it's all done and running it's a thing of
beauty!
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21700] |
|
21700 |
|
|
Date: December 03, 2020 at 22:02:37
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
That it is.
There are times when I get some particular piece of code
finished and I just sit back and just admire the sheer
art of it.
Probably only programmers understand this, but sometimes
code has a beauty all it's own.
Brian
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
21688 |
|
|
Date: November 28, 2020 at 10:21:33
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
EQF;
You could very well be correct. 86 years is just too
many. There's too much I'm no longer able to do, both
physically and mentally.
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
21685 |
|
|
Date: November 26, 2020 at 09:59:39
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update plus Forecasting Advance - November 18, 2020 |
|
|
Ed, it's likely you don't even read my comments but
here goes anyway.... I offer these thoughts free of any
opinions about your goals.
A word comes to mind for the way you accomplish your
programming tasks: kludge.
Seriously. It seems like you are spending a lot of
valuable time and effort trying to force a square peg
into a round hole. Forcing disparate programs written
in different languages doing tasks they weren't designed
for.
I highly recommend you explore the idea of learning a
new language that can accomplish all your goals in one
program.
I am biased, and would recommend C/C++. I am already
writing programs that can do millions and billions of
computations per second on databases containing
millions of records. And generating real time 3D graphics
to represent the results.
But, there are other programming languages out there
that I'm sure would work just as well for you. Perhaps
start with this wikipedia article?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming_languages
I think if you put as much effort into learning a more
appropriate tool for the task, you'll find you end up
being able to accomplish future tasks much faster and
easier. It will open up new possibilities.
Brian
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
21671 |
|
|
Date: November 14, 2020 at 00:04:56
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Update - November 14, 2020 |
|
|
Posted by EQF on November 14, 2020
EARTHQUAKE WARNING UPDATE
There is quite a bit of activity taking place.
A formal Earthquake Warning was sent to researchers around the world several days ago. People who responded were sent information regarding the two high probability locations for this expected earthquake.
Most of the high intensity EM Signal activity has stopped. The largest number of important signals were detected on November 7, 2020. Since then it has been relatively quiet.
Forecast data from other sources appear to me to be in agreement here that a significant event occurred on November 7 in the fault zone where this expected earthquake will likely occur.
The most likely Time Window will remain open until November 17, 2020. If the expected earthquake does not occur before then, it will likely generate more EM Signals before it does occur.
These are personal opinions.
Regards to all,
EQF
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21672] |
|
21672 |
|
|
Date: November 16, 2020 at 16:26:57
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Update - November 14, 2020 |
|
|
EQF;
You have over the years created the largest website
I've ever seen for the express purpose of explaining
how people can predict earthquakes using information
that you are recording.
But one thing is lacking; proof that your method
works.
You are making predictions but you have no record of
them and no record of the degree of success you have
achieved. This is very strange. How can anyone take
you seriously when it is impossible to judge your
accuracy?
I call upon you to rectify this situation for the
good of all involved.
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
21665 |
|
|
Date: November 10, 2020 at 18:00:55
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Message from EQF |
|
|
Attention all;
Due to the difficulty he has experienced in trying to
post on this website, EQF has asked me to tell you to
communicate with him on his website at:
http://www.earthquake-research.com/eqf/Comments.html
Which is the Comments page.
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21666] [21670] [21668] [21667] [21669] |
|
21666 |
|
|
Date: November 10, 2020 at 20:50:57
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Message from EQF |
|
|
|
how could anyone have difficulty posting on this website? it is probably one of the most basic sites on the internet...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21670] [21668] [21667] [21669] |
|
21670 |
|
|
Date: November 12, 2020 at 04:09:47
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Message from EQF |
URL: Comments and News |
|
Posted by EQF on November 12, 2020
Hi Ryan and all,
Roger, thanks for the help.
There is some type of ISP technical problem on my end that makes it so I can access the site one minute and not the next. Then in a few minutes I might be able to access the site again. On occasion I have prepared one of these notes and then could not submit it.
It is not just a problem with posting notes. The site itself won't even appear. The computer returns a 403 Error.
That inability to access the site problem can last for days. Then all of a sudden I can access it again.
It appears to mainly have something to do with the link between my computers and my ISP connection. I never have any trouble getting on the site when I am traveling and use the same computers but a different ISP. The problem appeared during just the past few months. It was not a problem with my former ISP.
Also, it is only a problem with this site for some reason. I can get on other sites with no trouble.
My ISP personnel are attempting to determine why this is happening.
As Roger and I have stated, if people are interested in these Earthquake Warnings etc. and don't see any posts here they can always check my Comments Web page.
RE: EARTHQUAKE WARNING
The high intensity signals have stopped. An earthquake is still expected. The highest probability Time Window ends on November 17, 2020. Two locations are being watched. One is in the Europe-Asia area. The other is in the northeast Pacific Ocean area.
Regards to all,
EQF
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
21668 |
|
|
Date: November 10, 2020 at 23:31:02
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Message from EQF |
|
|
Agreed.
This site and software is old-school. Ancient by internet
standards. I've seen the code this site is based on.
It's difficult to be helpful since we've been given no
information to go on. We aren't even sure of the exact
nature of Ed's inability to access the site. Is it only
that he can't post? Can he access the site at all? Is it
only this site or are other's affected? What error
messages if any?
Brian
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
21667 |
|
|
Date: November 10, 2020 at 20:56:36
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Message from EQF |
|
|
Ryan;
It seems to be a problem with his internet provider.
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[21669] |
|
21669 |
|
|
Date: November 11, 2020 at 10:04:15
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Message from EQF |
|
|
|
they probably don't like that i don't have a google security seal of approval...and no ssl...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
[
Roll & Rock ] [ Main Menu ] |