Roll & Rock

[ Roll & Rock ] [ Main Menu ]

  

21548

Date: July 22, 2020 at 07:50:16
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Alaska 7.8


Anyone predicting quakes who did not predict today's
7.8 quake near Alaska should quit claiming they can
predict quakes.

just saying.

Roger


Responses:
[21551] [21553] [21549] [21550] [21552] [21556] [21555] [21576] [21577] [21578]

21551

Date: July 22, 2020 at 08:32:41
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Aren't we supposed to be ignoring you?


Ed certainly didn't predict it.

Brian


Responses:
[21553]

21553

Date: July 22, 2020 at 10:55:17
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Aren't we supposed to be ignoring you?


Skywise;

Nope and neither did anyone else.

Roger


Responses:
None

21549

Date: July 22, 2020 at 08:24:15
From: karen, [DNS_Address]
Subject: did you predict it? not seeing the orig post. probably missed it(NT)


(NT)


Responses:
[21550] [21552] [21556] [21555] [21576] [21577] [21578]

21550

Date: July 22, 2020 at 08:31:56
From: Skywise, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: did you predict it? not seeing the orig post. probably missed...


You missed the point.

No one predicted it with any remote accuracy*. And with
all the numbers of 'quake predictors' how did they all
miss such a large quake? Surely such magnitudes give off
many precursary signals? No?

Brian

*accuracy beyond vague, loose, open ended references
involving weasel words and phrases such as "maybe",
"possibly", "Alaska", "big". Well, how "maybe"? How
"big"? Where in "Alaska". Might as well predict "possibly
a lot of rain somewhere in the 48 states."


Responses:
[21552] [21556] [21555] [21576] [21577] [21578]

21552

Date: July 22, 2020 at 08:42:35
From: karen, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: did you predict it? not seeing the orig post. probably missed...


thank you ... just asking as the threads are most likely
off the chart .. I do notice shan is gone .. wonder if he
caught it ..


Responses:
[21556] [21555] [21576] [21577] [21578]

21556

Date: July 23, 2020 at 08:04:41
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: did you predict it? not seeing the orig post. probably missed...


Karen;

No I didn't predict it. I don't predict quakes, I
evaluate predictions.

So far they're all worthless.

Roger


Responses:
None

21555

Date: July 22, 2020 at 22:10:43
From: David Morrell, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: did you predict it? not seeing the orig post. probably missed...


“It’s really very simple to predict earthquakes, and
anyone could do it. The hard part is being right.” - Jim
Berkland


Responses:
[21576] [21577] [21578]

21576

Date: July 25, 2020 at 22:37:31
From: EQF, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: did you predict it? not seeing the orig post. probably missed...


Posted by EQF July 26, 2020

Jim's forecasting method that I understand was based on news reports of lost pets was I believe likely valid. I believe that a version of it is used in the People's Republic of China.

To date I have not seen anything that suggests to me that he did any research on the nature of the signals or whatever were causing the pet animals to get disoriented. I have also never heard that he was able to get his method widely used.

Regards,

EQF


Responses:
[21577] [21578]

21577

Date: July 26, 2020 at 01:24:18
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: did you predict it? not seeing the orig post. probably missed...


he did use lost pets, but mostly was big on syzygy...lunar cycles and high tides...


Responses:
[21578]

21578

Date: July 26, 2020 at 07:29:43
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: did you predict it? not seeing the orig post. probably missed...


And his results were no better than chance.

Roger


Responses:
None

[ Roll & Rock ] [ Main Menu ]

Generated by: TalkRec 1.17
    Last Updated: 30-Aug-2013 14:32:46, 80837 Bytes
    Author: Brian Steele