Roll & Rock

[ Roll & Rock ] [ Main Menu ]


  


21324


Date: March 24, 2020 at 12:08:55
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: new prediction test


Hi all;

I thought I had a way to show Shan's predictions
were bogus.

I searched the NEIC file looking for locations with
the most quakes. There were 13 that had the highest
count so I used them as locations and searched for
hits in other years.

It seemed like a sure thing but in fact those areas
had very few hits in individual years.

OK I still think he's bogus but that isn't how he's
doing it.

Roger


Responses:
[21325] [21326] [21327]


21325


Date: March 25, 2020 at 10:27:27
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: new prediction test


that seems predisposed to a result roger...no different than trying to show that they aren't bogus...doesn't cast you in the light of an impartial evaluator...


Responses:
[21326] [21327]


21326


Date: March 25, 2020 at 10:52:58
From: Roger Hunter, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: new prediction test


ryan;

You're presuming that I'm ONLY an evaluator.

But I'm a programmer and I like interesting projects.

Keeps my brain from rotting, very important at my age.

I was very surprised when this last one failed.

Roger


Responses:
[21327]


21327


Date: March 25, 2020 at 11:22:22
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: new prediction test


brain rot and crotch rot...2 major banes of man...


Responses:
None


[ Roll & Rock ] [ Main Menu ]

Generated by: TalkRec 1.17
    Last Updated: 30-Aug-2013 14:32:46, 80837 Bytes
    Author: Brian Steele