National

[ National ] [ Main Menu ]


  


446783


Date: March 12, 2025 at 03:32:41
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: When anti-war protesters are called national security threats

URL: https://responsiblestatecraft.org/free-speech-khalil-green-card/


Mahmoud Khalil
When anti-war protesters are called national security threats

"Is this what VP Vance meant by free speech 'in retreat'? Case of detained
green card holder shows how 'brittle' our rights are here, too.
ANALYSIS | LATEST

Vice President JD Vance stunned Europe at the Munich Security Conference in
February by calling the continent out for serious backsliding on core
democratic principles.

He cited annulled elections when the wrong candidate appeared slated to win,
digital censorship of opinions that run afoul of the majority or established
perspective, and the policing of silent thought (prayer) as exhibits A, B, and C.
“In Britain, and across Europe, free speech, I fear, is in retreat.”

After acknowledging similar trends in President Biden’s America, Vance
boasted that, “In Washington, there is a new sheriff in town. And under Donald
Trump’s leadership, we may disagree with your views, but we will fight to
defend your right to offer it in the public square, agree or disagree.”

Unless you are a green card holder talking about Israel.

At an Oval Office memo signing/media spray the day of Vance’s Munich
speech, the New Sheriff said he completely agreed with Vance’s assessment
about the importance of free speech. Less than a month later, though,
President Trump dispatched Department of Homeland Security immigration
agents to arrest and abduct Mahmoud Khalid, a permanent and lawful resident
of the United States, married to an American citizen, when he and his wife
returned home from dinner.

His “crime”: participating in the non-violent demonstrations at Columbia
University that inspired students across the country to stand up and demand
that the U.S. government stop aiding and abetting mass killing in Gaza,
including of tens of thousands of women and children.

While anti-war demonstrations have almost always been viewed as — and are
— squarely protected by the First Amendment’s free speech and right of
assembly guarantees, Trump is painting demonstrations against the Gaza war
as “pro-terrorist, anti-semitic, anti-American activity.”

The pro-Israel Free Press quoted an unnamed White House official as
acknowledging that “the allegation here is not that he was breaking the law,”
but that Khalil “is a threat to the foreign policy and national security interests of
the United States.”

Newsletter
Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite
RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news
promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.
Invalid emailEnter your email
Subscribe

This was echoed in remarks by White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt,
who said Tuesday in an answer to a question about the administration's basis
for deporting Khalil that, "under the Immigration and Nationality Act, the
Secretary of State has the right to revoke a green card or a visa for individuals
who … are adversarial to the foreign policy and the national security interests of
the United States of America.” She added then that Khalil “sided with terrorists”
by organizing protests that disrupted classes and harassed Jewish-American
students and made them “feel unsafe.” She also accused protesters of handing
out fliers “with the logo of Hamas.”

Jewish groups were among those protesting in New York City against Khalil’s
pending deportation on Tuesday. Reports dating back to last year indicate that
Khalil was not an organizer, but had served as a negotiator on behalf of
students who had erected an encampment on campus.

Quite the opposite of strengthening free speech and our democracy, Trump
appears to be leading us into a new McCarthyism. The president blasted out on
his Truth Social account that, “this is the first of more [arrests and deportations]
to come…We know there are more students at Columbia and other Universities
across the Country…We will find, apprehend, and deport these terrorist
sympathizers from our country — never to return again.”

Leavitt also ominously foreshadowed a looming clash on Columbia’s campus,
saying that university officials are refusing to help DHS identify a list of other
individuals on campus the administration has identified — reportedly through a
search of students’ social media accounts. “[A]s the president said very
strongly in his statement yesterday, he is not going to tolerate that.”

Meanwhile, Khalil was whisked far away from his wife in New York, who is eight
months pregnant, to the LaSalle Detention Facility in Jena, Louisiana, a private
prison, according to reports. He would likely have been deported already if not
for a fast-acting federal judge in New York who blocked his removal from the
United States until after a hearing, expressly forbidding deportation without
approval by the court. The initial hearing is slated for Wednesday. Critics worry
the administration “shopped” for a judge more sympathetic to its case.

We still do not know what he has been charged with, if anything, or any of the
evidence against him.

The prohibition of free speech by student visa holders and permanent citizen
green card holders in the United States is a clear and fundamental assault on
our democracy — an effort to squelch and chill freedom of speech. It sends the
same signal to the rest of the world that Vance and Trump accused Europe of
sending: weakness and fear. If peaceful protest by students against a policy
poses such a threat to our “national security,” how strong can we really be?

Back at the Munich Security Conference, Vance said: “the good news is that I
happen to think your democracies are substantially less brittle than many
people apparently fear, and I really do believe that allowing our citizens to speak
their mind will make them stronger still.” The Vice President was right. And now
is the time for vehement and loud assertion that free speech is not in retreat in
America."


Responses:
[446785]


446785


Date: March 12, 2025 at 08:39:09
From: The Hierophant, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: When anti-war protesters are called national security threats


for an administration that claims to want to protect
'free speech', they certainly are placing a lot of limits
and restraints on such 'free speech'... don't they see
their own hypocrisy?


Responses:
None


[ National ] [ Main Menu ]

Generated by: TalkRec 1.17
    Last Updated: 30-Aug-2013 14:32:46, 80837 Bytes
    Author: Brian Steele