National

[ National ] [ Main Menu ]


  


443796


Date: November 06, 2024 at 21:13:07
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Trump has promised to eject the neocons from MAGA and bring peace ...

URL: https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/trump-iran-hawk-hook-pompeo-israel-netanyahu-russia


Ryan Grim:
"Trump has promised to eject the neocons from MAGA and bring peace to the
region, but is considering Iran war hawk Brian Hook as State Dept transition head.
Does not bode well for Trump's claim to have learned from past mistakes.

"Even the people who would happily orchestrate an overthrow of the Iranian
regime regard him as an absolute idiot," Republican who has worked with him
told me. Story by Maz M Hussain over DropSite News"

____________________________________________
Trump is Eyeing Iran Hawk Brian Hook as First Foreign Policy Pick

"The Iranian view is that Trump wants to make a deal, but it depends on whether
he appoints the same neoconservatives as last time"

MURTAZA HUSSAIN
NOV 06, 2024

Brian Hook, a hawkish fixture of the first Donald Trump administration who
formerly served under George W. Bush, is reportedly getting the call to start
staffing the State Department for a new Trump term. Hook, known as a major Iran
hawk who helped lead the “maximum pressure” campaign of sanctions,
sabotage, and assassinations that characterized Trump’s approach to Tehran, has
been appointed to help oversee the formation of a new foreign policy team,
according to reports from Politico and CNN.

Hook served as U.S. Special Representative for Iran and advisor to Secretary of
State Mike Pompeo during the last two years of Trump’s presidency, which saw
the killing of Iranian general Qassem Soleimani and expansion of crushing
sanctions intended to spur regime change in Iran. That approach ultimately failed
to collapse the Iranian government, or compel it to reduce its support for its
network of armed proxies in the region. Instead, it wound up escalating the
hostility between the two countries while Iran ramped up its nuclear enrichment
following Trump’s withdrawal from the Obama-era nuclear deal.

In addition to his Iran portfolio and work on the Abraham Accords—the set of
agreements spearheaded by Jared Kushner that aimed to “normalize” Israel’s
relationships with the Arab world at the expense of the Palestinians—Hook was
also the head of the State Department’s Policy Planning Staff at the time the
department was producing outlandish documents calling for the Trump
administration to help orchestrate an “Islamic reformation.”

Prior to working for Trump in his first term, Hook had been a critic of his
candidacy. Hook was a co-founder of the John Hay Initiative, a group that sought
to counter alleged “isolationist” trends in the U.S. foreign policy establishment. In
2016, the group issued a letter signed by 121 GOP foreign policy experts
denouncing Trump’s candidacy as a threat to America’s standing abroad. Hook
himself did not sign the letter but had made other statements critical of Trump,
shortly before being appointed to his administration to serve as director of policy
planning under his first Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson.

Hook has also had a longstanding hawkish view of Russia that may place him at
odds with Trump, who has promised a speedy negotiated conclusion to the war in
Ukraine. Since leaving the Trump administration, Hook has worked as vice-
chairman for a New York private equity firm focused on international investments.

Hook’s views on Iran may wind up influencing Trump’s approach to the country.
While both Trump and vice president-elect J.D. Vance have said that war with
Iran is not in America’s interest, Hook has pushed forward policies throughout his
time in office that increase the likelihood of such an outcome. His appointment
may also set up a clash between neoconservatives and the restraint-focused
wing of the Republican Party.

“The Trump administration’s approach towards Iran depends very much on who
he chooses to staff his administration. In his first term he was sold on an idea by
people like Pompeo and John Bolton that Iran could be sanctioned and pressured
into oblivion, but that was an approach more likely to deliver war than an
agreement,” said Trita Parsi, the executive vice president of the Quincy Institute
for Responsible Statecraft. “The Iranian view is that Trump himself wants to make
a deal, but it depends on whether he appoints the same neoconservatives as last
time to his administration.”

For his part, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed to destroy
Iran’s nuclear program, an effort that he will likely try to push the U.S. to join. In an
escalating tit-for-tat cycle of attacks, Iran is soon expected to retaliate against
last month’s Israeli airstrikes that killed four soldiers and a civilian inside the
country.

In the face of this delicate situation, and notwithstanding Trump and Vance’s own
statements about wanting to avoid another military quagmire in the Middle East,
the potential appointment of hawkish officials like Hook is a signal that they may
continue with a policy that drags the U.S. closer to war, regardless.

“There are roughly two months left before Trump comes into office and it is in
Netanyahu’s interest to create a situation where Trump's options are very limited,
and all of them to varying degrees are in support of Netanyahu,” Parsi said.
“Netanyahu may escalate against Iran, but the Iranians themselves also might
decide that they need to hit back now against Israel, because the
neoconservatives, after the last Israeli attack, are arguing that it is pretty easy to
strike Iran, and so Trump should let Israel finish the job.”

“One way to convince Trump it is not easy would be to strike hard now, and send
a message that a war with Iran would be bloody and difficult, which is not what
Trump wants.”"


Responses:
[443797]


443797


Date: November 06, 2024 at 21:25:46
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Trump has promised to eject the neocons from MAGA and bring peace...


"Trump has promised..."

LOL!!! What, after *those words*, is anything anyone could
even begin to take seriously? I mean, even *conceptually,*
enough to bother considering?

Huh?

Or is this just...what some intellects do, joust around all
this obviously irrelevant *information* to pretend
something is actually being *said*?

LOL!


Responses:
None


[ National ] [ Main Menu ]

Generated by: TalkRec 1.17
    Last Updated: 30-Aug-2013 14:32:46, 80837 Bytes
    Author: Brian Steele