| National
|
[
National ] [ Main Menu ] |
|
|
|
443583 |
|
|
Date: October 31, 2024 at 18:30:24
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: such a loser... |
URL: https://thehill.com/homenews/media/4964816-trump-sues-cbs-news-60-minutes/ |
|
Rump sues CBS for $10B over Harris’s ’60 Minutes’ interview
by Dominick Mastrangelo - 10/31/24 5:40 PM ET
Former President Trump is suing CBS News over a “60 Minutes” interview it broadcast with Vice President Harris earlier this month that he and his allies have claimed was edited to cast her in a positive light.
The lawsuit, which seeks $10 billion in damages and was filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in the Northern District of Texas alleges the network engaged in “partisan and unlawful acts of election and voter interference through malicious, deceptive, and substantial news distortion.”
“To paper over Kamala’s ‘word salad’ weakness, CBS used its national platform on 60 Minutes to cross the line from the exercise of judgment in reporting to deceitful, deceptive manipulation of news,” the lawsuit reads.
In a statement to The Hill late Thursday, a spokesperson for the network said the former president’s “repeated claims against 60 Minutes are false.”
“The Interview was not doctored; and 60 Minutes did not hide any part of the Vice President’s answer to the question at issue. 60 Minutes fairly presented the Interview to inform the viewing audience, and not to mislead it,” the spokesperson said. “The lawsuit Trump has brought today against CBS is completely without merit and we will vigorously defend against it.”
Trump and his allies have railed against CBS for weeks over the wide-ranging interview with Harris, pointing to an answer the vice president gave to a question about the war in Gaza that was not included in the full broadcast and instead published by the outlet online.
It is standard practice for broadcast outlets to edit questions and answers during interviews with major newsmakers for clarity, accuracy and time.
Sign up for the Morning Report
The latest in politics and policy. Direct to your inbox.
By signing up, I agree to the Terms of Use, have reviewed the Privacy Policy, and to receive personalized offers and communications via email, on-site notifications, and targeted advertising using my email address from The Hill, Nexstar Media Inc., and its affiliates
Trump initially agreed to sit for a similar interview with “60 Minutes,” the network said at the time it broadcast its conversation with Harris, but the former president backed out after the program said it would fact-check him.
Trump first teased a potential lawsuit against CBS earlier this month, saying the network “should lose their license and take ’60 Minutes’ off the air.”
CBS is one of several mainstream news networks Trump has threatened to use the federal government to crack down on because of coverage that is critical of him.
Trump’s lawsuit was filed in federal court in Amarillo, Texas, which guaranteed it would be assigned to U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk. His single-judge division has become an attractive forum for Republican-led lawsuits challenging Biden administration actions.
Kacsmaryk, a Trump appointee, last year suspended the federal approval of the abortion pill mifepristone before he was overturned by the Supreme Court and in 2021 reinstated the Trump “Remain in Mexico” asylum policy.
Zach Schonfeld contributed
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[443608] [443584] [443587] [443589] [443595] [443596] [443592] [443597] [443613] [443623] [443628] [443631] [443654] [443634] [443638] [443633] [443629] [443625] [443627] [443585] [443590] |
|
443608 |
|
|
Date: November 01, 2024 at 09:34:48
From: Redhart, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: such a loser... |
|
|
he'll lose, and his "donors" will pay the legal fees.
Want to buy some more gold sneakers?
Yes, a loser.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
443584 |
|
|
Date: October 31, 2024 at 18:39:16
From: old timer, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: such a loser... |
|
|
what are your thoughts about a network editing answers in an interview
like that? most people watched it and didn’t realize cbs wasn’t actually
airing her full and complete answers
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[443587] [443589] [443595] [443596] [443592] [443597] [443613] [443623] [443628] [443631] [443654] [443634] [443638] [443633] [443629] [443625] [443627] [443585] [443590] |
|
443587 |
|
|
Date: October 31, 2024 at 19:40:24
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: such a loser... |
|
|
|
it was just standard editing...nothing nefarious...course you believe anything rump says...that's your level of intelligence...lol...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[443589] [443595] [443596] [443592] [443597] [443613] [443623] [443628] [443631] [443654] [443634] [443638] [443633] [443629] [443625] [443627] |
|
443589 |
|
|
Date: October 31, 2024 at 22:27:44
From: old timer, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: such a loser... |
|
|
you’re just repeating what cbs is saying, which would be true for
some subject matter expert. but people were not aware this was
an edited interview until it was noticed kamala’s answer in the
broadcast and online versions didn’t match. people thought they
were seeing an actual interview. it took cbs weeks to admit the edits and
they refuse to release either the transcript or actual interview footage.
why do you think they won’t?
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[443595] [443596] [443592] [443597] [443613] [443623] [443628] [443631] [443654] [443634] [443638] [443633] [443629] [443625] [443627] |
|
443595 |
|
|
Date: October 31, 2024 at 23:31:03
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: such a loser... |
|
|
|
even if cbs did edit the show what standing does rump have to sue? he was not hurt by it...and they have the right to edit their own shows any way they want...fox anyone? hopefully rump and his lawyers will get sanctioned for another frivolous lawsuit and wasting the court's time...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[443596] |
|
443596 |
|
|
Date: October 31, 2024 at 23:33:01
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: such a loser... |
|
|
and note where they filed it...lock him up!
"Trump’s lawsuit was filed in federal court in Amarillo, Texas, which guaranteed it would be assigned to U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk. His single-judge division has become an attractive forum for Republican-led lawsuits challenging Biden administration actions
Kacsmaryk, a Trump appointee, last year suspended the federal approval of the abortion pill mifepristone before he was overturned by the Supreme Co."
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
443592 |
|
|
Date: October 31, 2024 at 23:18:15
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: such a loser... |
|
|
|
probably because it was/is a nothing burger and they will use the transcripts in court to slaughter rump's claims......it's like most of the crap you post...endless diversions and deflections...the desparation is palpable...see ya tuesday...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[443597] [443613] [443623] [443628] [443631] [443654] [443634] [443638] [443633] [443629] [443625] [443627] |
|
443597 |
|
|
Date: November 01, 2024 at 00:17:16
From: old timer, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: such a loser... |
|
|
“probably because it was/is a nothing burger”
so you are saying cbs is withholding the transcript and video because it’s
a nothing burger??? you are becoming the butt of your own joke dude
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[443613] [443623] [443628] [443631] [443654] [443634] [443638] [443633] [443629] [443625] [443627] |
|
443613 |
|
|
Date: November 01, 2024 at 10:21:04
From: ao, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: such a loser... |
|
|
"you are becoming the butt of your own joke dude"
And you're defending the indefensible.. Cheney, firing squads?
Literally man after the Cheney comment if you don't speak out against
Trump you don't belong here.. anywhere where adults gather. Go away.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[443623] [443628] [443631] [443654] [443634] [443638] [443633] [443629] [443625] [443627] |
|
443623 |
|
|
Date: November 01, 2024 at 12:17:21
From: old timer, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: such a loser... |
|
|
“Literally man after the Cheney comment if you don't speak out against
Trump you don't belong here.. anywhere where adults gather. Go away.”
i have suggested to bopp for many years he should update his rules page
to show this is a place only for democrats and you should have to toe the
damn democrat party line or else. you know, only allow like minded people
since some of you feel so threatened by the other half of americans. hell
many of you can’t stomach a true progressive liberal like akira because
she puts her ideology ahead of party politics. if you feel so threatened talk
to bopp and limit this place to the handful of people who agree with you
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[443628] [443631] [443654] [443634] [443638] [443633] [443629] [443625] [443627] |
|
443628 |
|
|
Date: November 01, 2024 at 13:34:19
From: etc., [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: such a loser... |
|
|
Look old timer, you backed yourself into a corner with Trump, willing to
hold your nose to give him your vote while decent caring compassionate
republicans have bravely stood up against Trump as his vile vicious violent
shaping of his intent blew up like a nuclear mushroom cloud. Those
republicans all saw this coming, but you didn’t?
Or is it because deep down you support the authoritarian racist direction
Trump is moving? The misogynist view of ruling women? Or is it the white
supremacy segment you lean towards? The racism? The fascism?
Trump put a hit on Liz Cheney’s head. No person of any name should be
able to continue a run for president after that action.
As I have stated for years, democrats republicans independents, all, have
fought against Trump and all the alternative facts, misdirection, and
misinformation that has been brought to this site for a decade.
To make this a democratic position is demeaning the integrity of fellow
republicans and independents alike. It is you who stand here bare and
naked with only your own words to cover yourself. You have had plenty of
chances to retract your position. So here you stand…
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[443631] [443654] [443634] [443638] [443633] [443629] |
|
443631 |
|
|
Date: November 01, 2024 at 14:16:56
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: such a loser... |
|
|
why is trump still allowed to run for prez? who has
contributed to that evil?
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[443654] [443634] [443638] [443633] |
|
443654 |
|
|
Date: November 01, 2024 at 18:45:51
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: such a loser... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
443634 |
|
|
Date: November 01, 2024 at 14:56:14
From: etc., [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: such a loser... |
|
|
|
Who are you implying/blaming?
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[443638] |
|
443638 |
|
|
Date: November 01, 2024 at 15:54:23
From: pamela, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: such a loser... |
|
|
don't know- actually- who allows criminals to run for
anything? something really wrong with this gov'ment
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
443633 |
|
|
Date: November 01, 2024 at 14:21:25
From: old timer, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: such a loser... |
|
|
sad we had nothing but bad choices this year. hopefully future elections
we will have better choices
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
443629 |
|
|
Date: November 01, 2024 at 14:05:26
From: old timer, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: such a loser... |
|
|
well look what the cat dragged in. happy to see you still with us
and sorry, but nobody puts baby in a corner lol
but feel to imagine i support whatever it is you oppose if it provides you
with comfort
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
443625 |
|
|
Date: November 01, 2024 at 12:22:38
From: ao, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: such a loser... |
|
|
Rules? Trump literally puts out a contract on Liz’s life and you think
speaking out against that is partisan politics? Go fuck yourself OT.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[443627] |
|
443627 |
|
|
Date: November 01, 2024 at 12:25:19
From: old timer, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: such a loser... |
|
|
this coming from the guy who was disappointed the sniper bullet didn’t
kill trump
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
443585 |
|
|
Date: October 31, 2024 at 19:36:48
From: chaskuchar@stcharlesmo, [DNS_Address]
Subject: nothing but politics. both sides. nt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[443590] |
|
443590 |
|
|
Date: October 31, 2024 at 22:28:43
From: old timer, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: agreed(NT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
[
National ] [ Main Menu ] |