National

[ National ] [ Main Menu ]


  


443591


Date: October 31, 2024 at 22:37:48
From: old timer, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Reports: White House altered official transcript of Joe Biden's 'garba

URL: Reports: White House altered official transcript of Joe Biden's 'garbage' remarks


Reports: White House altered official transcript of Joe Biden's 'garbage'
remarks

Michael Collins
USA TODAY


WASHINGTON – White House press officials reportedly altered the official
transcript of a call in which President Joe Biden appeared to disparage
supporters of former President Donald Trump, according to published
reports.

The change to the official transcript drew objections from the
stenographers who are charged with documenting the president’s
remarks for posterity, the Associated Press reported, citing two
government officials and an internal email obtained by the news agency.
Fox News said it also had confirmed the existence of the email.


The revelation comes as the White House is dealing with the uproar
caused by Biden’s remarks, which sparked a backlash among outraged
Republicans and created a political dilemma for Vice President Kamala
Harris just days before the Nov. 5 election.

Biden made the remark during a Zoom call on Tuesday with Voto Latino,
an organization encouraging Latino and Hispanic youth to become
politically engaged. On the call, Biden denounced offensive jokes that
podcast host Tony Hinchcliffe made about Puerto Rico during Trump’s
Madison Square Garden rally over the weekend.


“Just the other day, a speaker at his rally called Puerto Rico a ‘floating
island of garbage,’” Biden said. He added that the only “garbage” he saw
“floating out there” were supporters, though it was unclear if he was
referring just to Hinchcliffe or all of Trump’s fans.

The White House reportedly altered the official transcript of a call in
which President Joe Biden appeared to disparage supporters of former
President Donald Trump.

The White House released a transcript of Biden’s remarks Tuesday night
that added an apostrophe to Biden’s quote, which made it read
“supporter’s” instead of “supporters.” White House aides insisted the
president was referring to Hinchcliffe, not all Americans who support the
former president.

The change to the transcript was made after the press office “conferred
with the president,” according to an internal email from the head of the
stenographers’ office that was obtained by the AP. The news organization
said it confirmed the authenticity of the email by two government officials
who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal matters.

The supervisor, in the email, said the press office’s handling of the matter
amounted to “a breach of protocol and spoliation of transcript integrity
between the Stenography and Press Offices,” the AP said.

“If there is a difference in interpretation, the Press Office may choose to
withhold the transcript but cannot edit it independently,” the supervisor
wrote, adding, “Our Stenography Office transcript — released to our
distro, which includes the National Archives – is now different than the
version edited and released to the public by Press Office staff.”


The stenographers office is charged with providing accurate transcripts
of the president’s public and private remarks. Those transcripts are
distributed to the public and the National Archives for preservation.

The AP said the two-person stenography team on duty the evening of
Biden’s call – a “typer” and “proofer” – said any edit to the transcript
would have to be approved by their supervisor, the head of stenographers’
office.

The supervisor was not immediately available to review the audio, but the
press office went ahead and published the altered transcript on the White
House website and distributed it to press and on social media in an effort
to tamp down the story, AP reported.

The supervisor, a career employee of the White House, raised the
concerns about the press office action – but did not weigh in on the
accuracy of the edit – in an email to White House communications director
Ben LaBolt, press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and other press and
communications officials, the AP reported.


Biden posted a message on X on Tuesday night attempting to clarify his
remarks.

“Earlier today I referred to the hateful rhetoric about Puerto Rico spewed
by Trump's supporter at his Madison Square Garden rally as garbage –
which is the only word I can think of to describe it,” he wrote. “His
demonization of Latinos is unconscionable. That's all I meant to say. The
comments at that rally don't reflect who we are as a nation.”


White House senior deputy press secretary Andrew Bates posted the
edited version of the quote on X and wrote that Biden was referring “to
the hateful rhetoric at the Madison Square Garden rally as ‘garbage.’”

Asked for comment, Bates provided a statement Thursday night to USA
TODAY that did not address whether the transcript had been changed.

“The president confirmed in his tweet on Tuesday evening that he was
addressing the hateful rhetoric from the comedian at Trump’s Madison
Square Garden rally,” the statement said. “That was reflected in the
transcript.”

Biden's comment was met with outrage by Republican lawmakers and
Trump himself. Trump, speaking Tuesday at a rally in Allentown,
Pennsylvania, described Biden’s remarks as “terrible” and compared them
to Hillary Clinton's comments calling some of Trump's supporters
"deplorables" in 2016.

In Wisconsin on Wednesday, Trump rode in the cab of a garbage truck to
draw attention to Biden’s remarks.

Harris also took issue with Biden’s comments, telling reporters that while
the president clarified his remarks, she does not agree with criticisms of
voters based on whom they're supporting.


Meanwhile, House Republicans raised concerns the White House may
have violated the Presidential Records Act by revising the transcript of
Biden’s remarks.

House Republican Conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., and
Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., who chairs the House Committee on Oversight
and Accountability, sent a letter Wednesday to White House Counsel
Edward Siskel demanding that all documents and internal communications
related to Biden’s statement and the inaccurate transcript be retained and
preserved. The lawmakers also called on the White House to issue a
corrected transcript containing the accurate wording.


“White House staff cannot rewrite the words of the President of the
United States to be more politically on message,” the letter said. “Though
President Biden’s relevance continues to diminish, his words continue to
matter, even as they become increasingly divisive and erratic.”


Responses:
[443593] [443609] [443601] [443598] [443602] [443610] [443603] [443604] [443606] [443607]


443593


Date: October 31, 2024 at 23:19:42
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Reports: White House altered official transcript of Joe Biden's...


outrage...lol...what's joe running for again? oh, the same thing hunter is? lol....


Responses:
[443609] [443601] [443598] [443602] [443610] [443603] [443604] [443606] [443607]


443609


Date: November 01, 2024 at 09:37:42
From: Redhart, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Reports: White House altered official transcript of Joe Biden's...


exactly.

I'm so outraged i'm going to go do laundry and then make
a sandwich.


Responses:
None


443601


Date: November 01, 2024 at 06:13:05
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Joe who?(NT)


(NT)


Responses:
None


443598


Date: November 01, 2024 at 00:23:57
From: old timer, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Reports: White House altered official transcript of Joe Biden's...


he’s the current president. a bad one and no one will be surprised his
administration edited an official transcript to cover up one of his gaffes. i
feel sorry for kjp, you can see on her face she hates standing in front of
the nation’s press day after day saying things she knows no one believes


Responses:
[443602] [443610] [443603] [443604] [443606] [443607]


443602


Date: November 01, 2024 at 06:15:45
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: a 'gaff' vs. suggestion of shooting cheney by firing squad ..thoughts?(NT)


(NT)


Responses:
[443610] [443603] [443604] [443606] [443607]


443610


Date: November 01, 2024 at 09:52:02
From: Redhart, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: a 'gaff' vs. suggestion of shooting cheney by firing squad...


I'll take the "gaff" for the $100, Alex.


Responses:
None


443603


Date: November 01, 2024 at 08:34:16
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: a 'gaff' vs. suggestion of shooting cheney by firing squad...


What "gaffe"?


Responses:
[443604] [443606] [443607]


443604


Date: November 01, 2024 at 08:40:53
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: a 'gaff' vs. suggestion of shooting cheney by firing squad...


what's salient about this thread is that OT is upset over a apostrophe. Maybe
read it.


Responses:
[443606] [443607]


443606


Date: November 01, 2024 at 08:44:51
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: a 'gaff' vs. suggestion of shooting cheney by firing squad...


Ah. Got it. How silly, to be upset over an apostrophe...


Responses:
[443607]


443607


Date: November 01, 2024 at 08:57:12
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: a 'gaff' vs. suggestion of shooting cheney by firing squad...


But then, knowing Old Timer, if DJT threatened Liz Cheney
in writing, and spelled something wrong, Old Timer would
say "But he didn't really mean it! See, he spelled that
word wrong, that's obviously a sign he was just joking, why
don't you see that?" lol


Responses:
None


[ National ] [ Main Menu ]

Generated by: TalkRec 1.17
    Last Updated: 30-Aug-2013 14:32:46, 80837 Bytes
    Author: Brian Steele