| National
|
[
National ] [ Main Menu ] |
|
|
|
442455 |
|
|
Date: October 15, 2024 at 10:05:26
From: old timer, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Trump tops Harris by 1 point in battleground Michigan survey |
URL: Trump tops Harris by 1 point in battleground Michigan survey |
|
Trump tops Harris by 1 point in battleground Michigan survey
BY FILIP TIMOTIJA 10/15/24 12:23 PM ET
(AP Photo/Alex Brandon/Jacquelyn Martin)
Former President Trump is leading his Vice President Harris, by 1 point in
a head-to-head matchup in the battleground state of Michigan just three
weeks before Election Day, according to a new survey.
The AARP poll, released Tuesday, shows Trump edging out his Democratic
rival by 49 percent to 48 percent in the Great Lakes State, well within the
margin of error. Another 1 percent said they would choose another option,
while 2 percent remained undecided.
When the contest was expanded to include independent candidate Robert
F. Kennedy, Jr. and Green Party hopeful Jill Stein, the party nominees
were tied with 46 percent. Kennedy brought in 3 percent support, Stein
received 1 percent and 2 percent were undecided, the poll found.
Broken down by age, the former president led Harris 47 percent to 46
percent with voters between 50 and 65 years old. The vice president
pulled ahead of Trump with young voters ages 18-34, garnering 54
percent support to her GOP rival’s 40 percent. Harris also held the lead
with voters over the age of 65, bringing in 53 percent support to Trump’s
42 percent, the survey shows.
Both White House contenders had strong backing from their party’s base,
but the poll found a large gender gap. Trump led by 21 points among men,
57 percent to 36 percent, while Harris topped him among women,
bringing in 55 percent to Trump’s 36 percent, according to the poll.
Trump had a 7-point lead with independents, 45 percent to 38 percent,
pollsters noted.
As early voting has kicked off in several battleground states, polling also
shows the former president with a minimal lead, 48 percent to 47 percent,
over Harris with early voters in the battleground states, according to a
recent Harvard CAPS/Harris survey.
The Hill/Decision Desk HQ’s aggregate of polls in the state shows Trump
leading the vice president in Michigan by less than 1 point — 48.7 percent
to 48 percent. Harris, however, is leading nationally with 49.8 percent to
the former president’s 46.9 percent, the index shows.
The AARP poll was conducted Oct. 2-8 among 1,382 likely voters and it
has a margin of error was 4 percentage points.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[442469] [442475] [442481] [442495] [442497] [442486] [442488] [442489] [442491] [442477] |
|
442469 |
|
|
Date: October 15, 2024 at 10:35:56
From: Redhart, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Trump tops Harris by 1 point in battleground Michigan survey |
|
|
Time for polls are done. People are voting. Time to fill
out the ballot if you have one, or make a plan to drop
off (know where you have a drop off box if they do that
where you live), or where your polling station is.
This is the poll that actually counts: voting.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[442475] [442481] [442495] [442497] [442486] [442488] [442489] [442491] [442477] |
|
442475 |
|
|
Date: October 15, 2024 at 10:48:25
From: old timer, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Trump tops Harris by 1 point in battleground Michigan survey |
|
|
you’ve spent the last year and a half saying it was too early for polls and
now the time for polls is done? maybe i missed it it all your nonsense but
just when was the time for polls?
and if kamala needs polls to show a close election to get voter turnout
isn’t now the time for polls to show a close election which this article
does?
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[442481] [442495] [442497] [442486] [442488] [442489] [442491] [442477] |
|
442481 |
|
|
Date: October 15, 2024 at 11:16:36
From: Redhart, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Trump tops Harris by 1 point in battleground Michigan survey |
|
|
I've spent the last year pointing out the polls are
untrustworthy. They still are.
The message is don't let other people do your thinking
or interpret information for you. Have your own
thoughts and opinions. Check out the facts for
yourself. Show up..look with your own eyes. Talk to
people themselves. Don't let the internet or the
thousands trying to frame things "for you" do your
thinking for you. These things can be manipulated and
we know that. These "polls" have been off, either by
design or error, in the past. Don't be fooled again.
Think for yourself. Don't be fooled again.
That's the message.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[442495] [442497] [442486] [442488] [442489] [442491] |
|
442495 |
|
|
Date: October 15, 2024 at 14:08:51
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: thank you |
|
|
"The message is don't let other people do your thinking or interpret information
for you."
That's exactly why every should ignore your robotic mediabiasfact.com
reactions. You've finally caught on. Kudos!
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[442497] |
|
442497 |
|
|
Date: October 15, 2024 at 14:26:28
From: Redhart, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: thank you |
|
|
One of the reasons I like mediabias is they have links
to all their claims you can go check out yourself. So
far, they are very accurate on most sources.
"never listen" can be another warning to others.
Just saying, check it out..you can explore their claims
then decide.
As opposed to "how dare anyone claim there's anything
wrong with this source because I agree with it."
Your sourcing of twitter for so many things of late is
problematic. While some sources on there may come from
legitimate sources, others are anonymous or can even be
fraudulently claiming to be something they're not.
But, if they agree with you.. you will use it, despite
the risk to your credibility.
That's on you.
And mind you a warning to check a source and it's
credibility is not the same as banning them. It's an
added layer to help people "think about it". Bopp
doesn't ban them here, but he also doesn't stop
evaluations of where information is coming from...and
with good reason!
You deal mostly with Gaza and information that comes
out of a war zone is historically "at risk' of being
propaganda right off. You, especially, should be very
careful about those sources. That's the same of any
warzone (like Russia and Ukraine). There's propanda
masquarading as news stories all the time, both sides
(but more resources on the Russian side to produce
those).
In politics...propanda is almost certain, even from
usually good sources, hit pieces, opinion pages and
even hit pieces under a "news banner" will be slipped
in from campaigns whenever possible, and now AI created
stuff as well.
All readers need to be especially on their toes.
Source checking are not bad words.
Fact checking is not a bad term... they are only bad to
those who seek to hide things.
People who want to see fact checking banned most
definitely are attempting hide from those facts.
Those who hate to ever have their stories even
questioned by being checked (or the source checked..or
access to a checker given to others) need to ck their
own ego.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
442486 |
|
|
Date: October 15, 2024 at 12:26:43
From: old timer, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Trump tops Harris by 1 point in battleground Michigan survey |
|
|
polls doing anyone’s thinking? what the hell does that even mean??? polls
aren’t supposed to do your thinking lol
you did say for quite a long time that it was too early for polls. more
recently you claimed kamala needed polls that showed a close election in
order to get the turnout she needs. i’m just asking why so inconsistent in
what you say about polls
polls will always be part of the election and it’s a bit weird the way you
keep responding to articles on polls even contradicting yourself
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[442488] [442489] [442491] |
|
442488 |
|
|
Date: October 15, 2024 at 12:31:14
From: Redhart, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Trump tops Harris by 1 point in battleground Michigan survey |
|
|
I've been clear to those that remember, that can hear. I
can't help if it you don't want to hear.
I'm not going to try to persuade you..too late for that.
I think a prayer for your soul would do better at this
point.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[442489] [442491] |
|
442489 |
|
|
Date: October 15, 2024 at 12:44:34
From: old timer, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Trump tops Harris by 1 point in battleground Michigan survey |
|
|
well i wouldn’t be asking about your inconsistency if you didn’t make
inconsistent claims. just a few days ago you claimed kamala needed close
polls but then you complain about close polls. believe the polls or not why
didn’t that make you happy?
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[442491] |
|
442491 |
|
|
Date: October 15, 2024 at 13:02:43
From: Redhart, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Trump tops Harris by 1 point in battleground Michigan survey |
|
|
you seem to have a comprehension issue.
There are no inconsistencies except the ones you're
attempting to create.
The polls aren't trustworthy.
The illusion of a close race is good for her GOTV
strategy, whether they're accurate or not.
False polls and padded polls dropped in the averages to
push Trump's closer serve his needs: claiming the
election will be stolen (and getting out his vote).
I'm pointing these out as campaign strategies.
It doesn't mean the polls are trustworthy, only that
both sides are using them as a tool to benefit
themselves.
It's an explanation.
If you understand what is going on, you may understand
why you need to think for yourself and not allow a poll
to think for you (or the people behind polls).
Were you trying to make me happy, OT?
I'm touched!
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
442477 |
|
|
Date: October 15, 2024 at 10:50:05
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Trump tops Harris by 1 point in battleground Michigan survey |
|
|
|
sure ot...give it a rest...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
[
National ] [ Main Menu ] |