National

[ National ] [ Main Menu ]


  


442490


Date: October 15, 2024 at 12:51:41
From: old timer, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Kamala Harris pledged to prosecute oil companies over emissions.

URL: Kamala Harris pledged to prosecute oil companies over emissions.


Kamala Harris pledged to prosecute oil companies over emissions.
Now, she’s praising their record US production

By Andrew Kaczynski, CNN

Published 2:00 PM EDT, Tue October 15, 2024


CNN

When Kamala Harris ran for president in 2019, she repeatedly warned oil
companies they should be prepared to face hefty fines and even criminal
prosecution under a future Harris administration for their role in
contributing to climate change.

Now, as the Democratic nominee, Harris is highlighting the country’s
record oil and gas production. She rarely talks about climate change, and,
despite having been a vigorous supporter of the Green New Deal, her
campaign’s website is light on climate policy details.

It’s a stark shift that illustrates the delicate politics of energy — but also
how Harris has abandoned a number of progressive positions she held
before joining Joe Biden’s ticket in 2020.


As a presidential candidate in 2019, Harris pledged to eliminate the
filibuster in order to pass a Green New Deal, with strict deadlines for
reducing fossil fuel use. She also signed a pledge to hold all future energy
projects accountable to a “climate test” and promised to cancel two
pipeline construction projects opposed by environmental activists. She
pledged to ban fracking and signed on to niche environmental proposals
such as banning plastic straws. And she ran numerous ads on Facebook
touting her plans to “take on” the oil lobby and pass a Green New Deal.

“You should be really prepared to look at a serious fine or be charged with
a crime,” Harris said in November 2019 when a South Carolina town hall
attendee asked whether she would investigate companies such as
Chevron and Shell for their role in contributing to climate change.

Harris went on to compare the actions of major oil companies to Big
Tobacco, accusing them of knowingly profiting from environmental
damage while concealing the harm caused by their products.

“And, not unlike the tobacco companies, after years — ’cause they’d done
the research — they knew the harm that their product was causing. They
were making so much money that they kept that secret — same thing with
these big oil companies. And they need to pay the price,” she said. “So
yes is the answer.”

Harris made a similar promise when speaking with the liberal Mother
Jones magazine a month earlier, saying, “Let’s get them not only in the
pocketbook, but let’s make sure there are severe and serious penalties for
their behaviors.”

Harris’s shift on energy and climate began after joining the Biden ticket in
August 2020 as the vice presidential pick. That year, she reversed her
position on wanting to ban fracking, something she’d staked out in a 2019
CNN town hall.

In August of this year, a few weeks after Biden ended his bid for
reelection, the Harris campaign said she no longer supports the Green
New Deal. She says that she would not ban fracking and that she no
longer wants to ban plastic straws.

In a local interview last month in Pennsylvania, Harris once again was
forced to defend her record on wanting to ban fracking when asked about
a Republican ad that highlighted her past comments.

“So let me start by saying that that ad as you described it is absolutely a
mischaracterization, which I think is intended to make people afraid,”
Harris replied. “I will not ban fracking. I did not as vice president.”

Record US oil production
Campaigning in Philadelphia last month, Harris pointed to the Biden
administration’s record on increasing domestic oil production, telling
voters, “We have had the largest increase in domestic oil production in
history because of an approach that recognizes that we cannot over rely
on foreign oil.”


The US energy industry is currently producing more oil than any country
in history, though energy advocacy groups have said the surge is driven
by market forces, not Biden’s policies.

A pump jack in Midland, Texas, US, on Thursday, Oct. 3, 2024. Oil
steadied following its biggest one-day jump in almost a year as fears that
Israel may decide to strike Iranian crude facilities in retaliation for a
missile barrage kept the market on edge. Photographer: Anthony
Prieto/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Anthony Prieto/Bloomberg/Getty Images

A pump jack in Midland, Texas, on October 3, 2024.
Meanwhile, the Biden administration has imposed regulatory fines on oil
companies for environmental violations, including a $241.5 million
settlement with Marathon Oil and a $40 million settlement with BP for air
pollution charges. The actions target specific issues, such as methane
emissions, but were driven more by regulatory enforcement than by the
sweeping prosecutions Harris once proposed

At the same time, climate change is not a top priority for many voters.
According to Gallup, only 50% of voters view climate change as
“extremely” or “very important” to their vote, making it one of the least
prioritized issues in this election cycle.

Mia Ehrenberg, a Harris campaign spokesperson, highlighted the
Democratic presidential nominee’s support addressing for climate change
and while also praising American energy production hitting record levels.

“As president, Kamala Harris will be pragmatic to address the threat of
climate change and ensure America does not forfeit the clean energy
economy and industries of the future. She is proud to have been the tie-
breaking vote on the largest climate action in American history, while
seeing American energy production of all kinds hit record levels. As
Attorney General of California, she took on polluters to protect our
environment and will do the same as president.”

A climate hawk
Archived material from Harris’s 2020 campaign found more than a dozen
mentions of prosecuting Big Oil either for pollution or climate change.
Citing climate change as an urgent threat, Harris said aggressive action
was imminently needed.

In one November 2019 campaign event in Iowa, Harris blamed the fossil
fuel industry for the climate crisis, comparing it to Big Tobacco
companies’ history of pushing misinformation despite knowing the harm
they were causing.

“They had done the studies and they knew of the harm that their product
was creating, but they still pushed their product ’cause they were making
a ton of money. That’s the same thing with Big Oil. They’ve known for a
long time what they’ve been doing that is destroying this God-given
planet,” she said.

At times, Harris highlighted her track record as California’s attorney
general, pointing to legal actions she claims she took against oil
companies.

Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris participates in CNN's
climate crisis town hall in New York on September 4, 2019.
During a CNN town hall on climate change in 2019, asked whether she
would sue ExxonMobil, Harris responded, “I have sued ExxonMobil.”

However, this claim was incorrect. While Harris did initiate an
investigation into ExxonMobil for allegedly misleading the public and
shareholders about the risks of climate change, she never filed a lawsuit
against the company.

As her campaign clarified to CNN, Harris’ legal action during her tenure as
California attorney general did result in settlements with other oil
companies.

For example, she secured a $14 million settlement from BP and Atlantic
Richfield Company and an $11.5 million settlement with Phillips 66 and
ConocoPhillips over violations related to underground fuel tanks. But a
lawsuit against ExxonMobil was never filed, and her successor did not
pursue one after she left office to join the Senate in 2017.


Responses:
[442492]


442492


Date: October 15, 2024 at 13:10:07
From: Redhart, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: Kamala Harris pledged to prosecute oil companies over emissions.


"Kamala Harris pledged to prosecute oil companies over
emissions.
Now, she’s praising their record US production"

Uh..these two do not cancel each other out, nor are
these ideas exclusive of each other.

Cleaner production would be the best.

Domestic rather than Opec having us by the balls all
the time, is better.

Better yet, continue to switch to renewables and
continue to invest in its development here in the U.S.,
and slowly wean America off coal and oil in a long term
plan...but yeah, make sure they're using cleaner
methods while they still do so to continue to counter
the effects of climage change and carbon emissions that
help cause it.

Only one side wants to continue the progress to cleaner
energy sources and less emissions.
Hint: it's not the guy who took a billion from the oil
company to "drill baby drill" in exchange for doing
their bidding, or promising to eliminate the epa.


Responses:
None


[ National ] [ Main Menu ]

Generated by: TalkRec 1.17
    Last Updated: 30-Aug-2013 14:32:46, 80837 Bytes
    Author: Brian Steele