| National
|
[
National ] [ Main Menu ] |
|
|
|
441770 |
|
|
Date: October 02, 2024 at 10:12:54
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: DJT spokeswoman furious that debate mods fact-checked Vance |
URL: https://www.rawstory.com/karoline-leavitt-vance-debate/ |
|
(Full title: 'Pretty alarming': Trump spokeswoman is
furious debate moderators fact-checked J.D. Vance)
***
Well, hell...I'd be alarmed, too, if I were her! Imagine
the audacity! Fact-checking the person speaking *while
they're still speaking! Oh NO! What'll we DO? lololol
***
Trump campaign spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt recalled
being alarmed when she heard CBS News debate moderators
Norah O'Donnell and Margaret Brennan fact-checking
Republican vice presidential nominee J.D. Vance.
During an interview on Wednesday, a Newsmax anchor told
Leavitt that Trump had criticized the moderators.
"Well, when they fact-checked Senator Vance and shut off
his mic," Leavitt replied, "I thought that was pretty
alarming, especially since the rules they agreed to were
not to fact-check the candidates on the stage, but they
just could not help themselves because I think they were
getting triggered by Senator Vance speaking the truth so
powerfully and so eloquently, not only effectively
tackling Governor Walz on that stage for his lies, but
also pushing back against the mainstream media's lies on
so many issues."
ALSO READ: He’s a sociopath:' J.D. Vance has
Congressional Democrats freaking out
"It didn't matter though," she added. "Again, Senator
Vance did an incredible job of tackling those anchors'
bias, of relaying the truth about the issues that matter,
and speaking directly to voters at home."
Vance's mic was cut during Tuesday's debate so moderators
could fact-check his claim about the legal status of
Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio.
Watch the video below from Newsmax or click the link
here.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[441792] [441774] [441771] [441775] [441777] [441782] [441778] [441772] [441780] [441783] [441779] |
|
441792 |
|
|
Date: October 02, 2024 at 16:10:18
From: The Hierophant, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: DJT spokeswoman furious that debate mods fact-checked Vance |
|
|
I KNOW! The audacity of actually fact checking! I don't
give a rat's what was "agreed" on - if something was an
outright lie, then call the person on it.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
441774 |
|
|
Date: October 02, 2024 at 11:27:26
From: Redhart, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: DJT spokeswoman furious that debate mods fact-checked Vance |
|
|
at the watch party I was at, when the moderators cut off
Vance's mic, the crowd cheered.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
441771 |
|
|
Date: October 02, 2024 at 10:41:00
From: old timer, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: cbs may not host future debates after not following agreed rules(NT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[441775] [441777] [441782] [441778] [441772] [441780] [441783] [441779] |
|
441775 |
|
|
Date: October 02, 2024 at 11:28:19
From: Redhart, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: cbs may not host future debates after not following agreed... |
|
|
LOL...when did checking fact become a crime?
Trump's post-truth vision of America?
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[441777] [441782] [441778] |
|
441777 |
|
|
Date: October 02, 2024 at 12:09:56
From: old timer, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: cbs may not host future debates after not following agreed... |
|
|
“ LOL...when did checking fact become a crime?”
not a crime, but it was part of the agreed upon rules
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[441782] [441778] |
|
441782 |
|
|
Date: October 02, 2024 at 12:25:15
From: ao, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: cbs may not host future debates after not following agreed... |
|
|
Sounds line whining to me.
Pathetic really.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
441778 |
|
|
Date: October 02, 2024 at 12:13:01
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: cbs may not host future debates after not following agreed... |
URL: http://earthboppin.net/talkshop/national/messages/441772.html |
|
...which brings us full circle to my comment... ;)
(Sorry, Red, couldn't help it...)
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
441772 |
|
|
Date: October 02, 2024 at 10:53:24
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: cbs may not host future debates after not following agreed... |
|
|
Ah dude...lol...do you *truly not realize* just how dead
those words are as you type them?
I'll spell it out just in case.
You *lose*...any claim to *righteous indignation* over
*broken rules*...when...what you're trying to *protect* by
that rule is *a participant's ability to lie through their
teeth*...while the debaite is in progress...and the rule
being *broken* is broken toward ensuring honesty...
Read it over again a few times, maybe. It's pretty simple.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[441780] [441783] [441779] |
|
441780 |
|
|
Date: October 02, 2024 at 12:23:56
From: ao, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: cbs may not host future debates after not following agreed... |
|
|
“It's pretty simple”
For the simpleton it’s nigh impossible to go beyond GOP good Dems bad.
I mean, come on, Vance couldn’t even admit Biden won in ‘20. The guy is
a fucking shill for the overthrow of our democracy.
And simpletons love him for that.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
[441783] |
|
441783 |
|
|
Date: October 02, 2024 at 12:32:48
From: shadow, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: cbs may not host future debates after not following agreed... |
|
|
Okay, so *simple* might not be ideal choice of words...
...and maybe for this, there just isn't one...
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
441779 |
|
|
Date: October 02, 2024 at 12:15:59
From: mitra, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: cbs may not host future debates after not following agreed... |
|
|
Well put.
However in my entire lifetime the GOP has been an
honesty free zone.
I do not believe the word is in their dictionary.
|
|
|
|
|
Responses:
None |
|
[
National ] [ Main Menu ] |