National

[ National ] [ Main Menu ]


  


440540


Date: September 01, 2024 at 04:38:49
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: US wants UN Special Rapporteur on Palestine F. Albanese removed

URL: https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/israeli-invasion-west-bank-parallels-gaza


Drop Site News journalist, Jeremy scahill:

Aug 30
The U.S. wants UN Special Rapporteur on Palestine, Francesca Albanese
removed.

Bipartisan group of congresspeople demanded her ouster early this year. Last
month, the U.S. ambassador to the UN said Albanese is “not fit” for any UN post.
I asked Albanese about this. Her response:

https://tinyurl.com/3apv4698
I also spoke to Albanese about Israel’s large scale attack on the West Bank and
some of the parallels to the war against the Palestinians of Gaza.

Story from DropSiteNews:

Israel's Violent Invasion of West Bank Parallels the Early Stages of War on Gaza:
UN Rapporteur on Palestine

JEREMY SCAHILL
AUG 30, 2024

"Beginning in the predawn hours on Wednesday, hundreds of Israeli forces in
columns of armored vehicles and bulldozers backed by drones and helicopters
stormed into refugee camps in Jenin, Tulkarem, and Tubas. Israel also carried out
drone strikes and snipers have reportedly been firing on people inside Jenin.
Internet and cell phone service, as well as water and sewage systems, were shut
down in parts of the West Bank as Israeli forces conducted house raids. Local
residents have reported widespread demolitions of their homes and streets and
the blocking of ambulances and medical workers attempting to reach wounded
people. Israeli forces surrounded the main hospital in Jenin and have reportedly
been searching people entering and exiting the facility.

“This is an incredible scaling up of the violence of the preceding months and in
particular weeks,” said Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur on the
Occupied Palestinian Territories, “with a full military assault, destroying hospitals,
destroying roads, destroying vital infrastructure which had already been severely
damaged during the preceding months, and Voila!, telling the Palestinians to go,
ordering mass evacuations.”

Drop Site News is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and
support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.


Subscribe
In an interview with Drop Site News, Albanese said, “I see a serious pattern
parallel with what is happening in the Gaza Strip”—“patterns of torture, of
destruction, of extrajudicial killings, of uprooting that are very similar to Gaza.”

“It is my responsibility to warn against the risk of the genocide leaking into the
West Bank. There is similar rhetoric, similar patterns, and escalating violence,
ordering similar things.”

Brandishing Israel’s well-worn propaganda ensign of self-defense, foreign
minister Israel Katz has described the operation as “a war in every sense,”
declaring that Tel Aviv would approach its invasion of parts of the West Bank
“exactly as we deal with terror infrastructure in Gaza, including the temporary
evacuation of Palestinian civilians.”

“We are in the post 9/11 era,” Albanese said. “So resistance movements are
naturally considered terrorist first, and then it's very difficult to dismantle this
perception which is so entrenched, so ingrained in ordinary people's mindset. So
if politicians say that—and journalists amplify it—probably this is going to
convince people that they are protecting all of us from these masses of savages.”

Kamala Harris Pledges Unequivocal Support for the Israel

Israel’s threat of waging a Gaza-style war against the Palestinians of the West
Bank comes as the White House has spent weeks assuring the public that it is
working “tirelessly” for a ceasefire deal. The administration’s actions, however,
make such claims appear cynical. Since the end of July, there has been a spike in
U.S. weapons shipments to Israel and August saw the second largest number of
military cargo planes delivering munitions and other equipment at Nevatim Air
Base since the launch of the war last October.

In the midst of the attacks on the West Bank, Vice President Kamala Harris did
her first sit-down interview with a media outlet since she was anointed
Democratic nominee for president. Speaking to CNN’s Dana Bash, Harris affirmed
her ironclad support for Israel, saying she would not withhold weapons
shipments. “Let me be very clear. I’m unequivocal and—and unwavering in my
commitment to Israel’s defense and its ability to defend itself,” Harris said. “And
that’s not gonna change.”

“It is my responsibility to warn against the risk of the genocide leaking into the
West Bank. There is similar rhetoric, similar patterns, and escalating violence,
ordering similar things.”

Harris made no reference to the siege of the West Bank. The Biden-Harris
administration has said little publicly about the Israeli invasion there, reiterating
its line that Israel has a right to defend its “very real security needs, which
includes countering terrorist activity in the West Bank.” An administration official
claimed in a statement to reporters that the U.S. opposes “mass displacements of
Palestinians in the West Bank,” but added, “We recognize that localized
evacuation orders may be necessary in certain instances to protect civilian lives
during sensitive counter-terrorism operations.”

At the Pentagon Thursday, spokesperson Sabrina Singh spoke as though the U.S.
and Israel are not in constant contact with Israel about a war that is being
underwritten militarily and politically by the U.S. “We are aware that the IDF is
conducting operations in the West Bank, but again we don’t have an
understanding of what exactly that is,” Singh said. “We are trying to learn more
about their operation.”

In an English-language post on Twitter/X, Katz, the Israeli Foreign Minister,
charged that Iran is smuggling weapons into the West Bank by transporting them
via Syria through its border with Jordan and accused Tehran of “working to
establish an eastern terror front against Israel through special units of the IRGC,
involved in smuggling weapons, funding, and directing terror organizations.”

Katz claimed Jordan needed Western support to confront “Iranian subversion,”
saying that a “security fence along the Israel-Jordan border must be constructed
quickly to prevent an influx of advanced Iranian weapons.”

Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur, rejected this justification, saying it defied
belief that any significant quantity of Iranian weapons would be coming in
through Jordan, a country that participated in defending Israel against an Iranian
missile strike in April. “Israel is making up arguments to legitimize and normalize
its assault. And the U.S. is providing the most important asset. The United States
continues to provide political, even legal justification, economic and military
support to Israel while it has already committed genocide and escalates its
violence against the Palestinians,” she said. “It’s very clear what the U.S. is doing.”

Israeli media outlets have not focused heavily on the Iran angle, instead citing IDF
sources describing the operations in the West Bank as “mowing the lawn”—the
phrase used by Israel for conducting periodic intense military attacks against
Palestinians to assert its dominance. Israel’s Channel 12 reported that the IDF has
defined two main aims for the operation: "destroying Improvised Explosive
Devices and infrastructure for making IEDs" and “killing as many terrorists as
possible.” Hebrew-language media have also cited an effort to stop weapons
smuggling via Jordan but have not particularly emphasized an Iranian
connection.

Hamas Vows to Resume “Martyrdom Operations” Against Israel

Since the invasion began Wednesday morning, armed Palestinian resistance
factions, including Palestinian Islamic Jihad’s Al Quds force, Al Aqsa Martyrs
Brigades, and Hamas’s Al-Qassam Brigades have launched a defensive guerrilla
campaign. On Thursday, Abdel Hakim Hanini, a senior Hamas official, suggested
that the group was preparing to engage in suicide bombings inside Israel, a tactic
that became common during the Second Intifada, which spanned 2000-2005,
but had ended almost entirely after 2006 when Hamas and other groups
announced an end to the practice.

“The resistance in the West Bank has begun changing its tactics and returning to
martyrdom operations to strike at the occupation within the occupied interior,”
Hamas said in a statement outlining Hanini’s announcement. “The resistance's
change in tactics is a result of the settlers and the occupation government
crossing red lines in their crimes against the Palestinian people.” Hanini also
called on the security forces of the Palestinian Authority to participate in a
popular uprising against Israeli occupation forces and settlers.

The change in strategy was announced Thursday after the killings of resistance
leaders in the West Bank. Most prominent among those killed in the Israeli
operations was Mohammed Jaber, a young Islamic Jihad commander known by
the nom du guerre Abu Shuja’a, Father of the Brave. A well-known resistance
figure whom Israel had previously claimed to have killed in April, Jaber was
reportedly killed Thursday alongside four other Palestinian fighters when Israeli
forces attacked the Nur Shams camp in Tulkarem. The Israeli military claimed
Palestinian resistance forces were storing weapons inside a mosque, but a local
official said Jaber was killed in a nearby house and that Israeli forces took his
body back to Israel. Islamic Jihad, which is a member of the Tulkarem Brigade
that Jaber led, confirmed his death. On Friday, Hamas confirmed that the Jenin
commander of Al-Qassam Brigades was also killed by Israeli forces.

While “the right to kill exists in international law,” Albanese stressed, it can only be
used “as an extreme measure when the person is posing a danger that cannot be
averted. Otherwise, it's an execution.” She added that “targeted assassinations”
of Palestinian resistance figures in occupied territory, including commanders of
armed groups, are illegal.

Albanese, citing international law, UN resolutions, and the Geneva protocols, said
that Palestinians have a right to take up arms against the invading Israeli forces.
“They are in the West Bank and technically they are defending themselves from
an unlawful occupier which takes their land.” Israel, she added, has no claim to
self defense when engaged in an unlawful invasion. In July, the International
Court of Justice issued a ruling reaffirming that Israel’s presence in the West
Bank is illegal.

More than 665 Palestinians have been killed by Israel in the West Bank since
October 7. Since then, Israeli forces have carried out nearly daily raids in parts of
the West Bank. During the past 11 months, some 10,200 Palestinians in the West
Bank have been detained or imprisoned by Israel, according to the Palestinian
Prisoners Society.

Since Israel assassinated Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran earlier
this month and Yahya Sinwar consolidated his control of both the political and
military operations of Hamas, the group has stated that it won’t participate in
ceasefire negotiations under the current U.S. and Israeli imposed framework.
Hamas has charged that the U.S. is deceiving the public on the negotiations,
saying that Washington has backtracked from the proposal Biden first described
publicly in May, which Hamas said it accepted in early July. The group says the
U.S. is supporting Israel’s demand that it be allowed to continue its war on Gaza
after an initial exchange of captives and to continue occupying parts of the Strip.

Israel has named its violent incursion into the West Bank “Operation Summer
Camps.” Palestinian resistance groups have dubbed it “The Horrors of the
Camps” battle. Combined with the unceasing mass killing of Palestinians in Gaza
and the U.S. backing of Israel’s expansion of the war, the attacks on the West
Bank could prove the spark that leads to a Third Intifada. History may show it has
already begun. "


Responses:
[440552]


440552


Date: September 01, 2024 at 10:54:34
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: How the U.S. Enabled Netanyahu to Sabotage a Gaza Ceasefire

URL: https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/netanyahu-sabotage-ceasefire-hamas?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=2510348&post_id=148340330&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=b7ahy&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email


How the U.S. Enabled Netanyahu to Sabotage a Gaza Ceasefire

JEREMY SCAHILL
SEP 01, 2024


After the bodies of six more Israeli hostages of Hamas were found in the Gaza
Strip, pressure in Israel is mounting on the government to secure a ceasefire deal
and free the remaining hostages and soldiers taken captive on October 7. The
announcement Sunday that the captives, including a dual citizen of the U.S., were
discovered in a tunnel in Rafah has further fueled the rage toward Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu, particularly from the families of those held in Gaza. They
have accused the prime minister of sabotaging deals to free their loved ones,
saying "their blood is on his hands."

Senior Israeli officials, most prominently the defense minister, have joined the
public demands for Netanyahu to stop obstructing ceasefire negotiations, while
Hamas has said they will not participate in any process until the U.S. convinces
Israel to accept a negotiating framework Hamas agreed to in early July. Both
Hamas and the families of Israeli captives still held in Gaza have stated that
Netanyahu bears responsibility for continuing the war and preventing the
exchange of prisoners.

The White House clearly hopes the events of the past 24 hours alter the current
course. After being briefed on Saturday evening on the hostages found in Rafah,
President Joe Biden, who is vacationing in Delaware, said, “I think we’re on the
verge of having an agreement,” adding, “We think we can close the deal, they’ve
all said they agree on the principles.”

By Sunday afternoon, street protests were staged throughout parts of Israel and
the mayor of Tel Aviv announced a municipal strike for Monday. “[W]e will allow
all employees to go out and support the families’ struggle,” he wrote on Twitter/X.

Following a meeting Sunday with an association of family members of Israeli
captives, the head of the Histadrut labor federation, Israel’s largest trade union,
announced a general strike. If that action extends beyond a symbolic strike of one
or two days, it could cascade into a formidable crisis for Netanyahu. “Netanyahu
abandoned the hostages. This is now a fact,” the family association said in a
statement. “We call on the public to prepare. We will bring the country to a halt.
The abandonment is over.”

Drop Site News is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and
support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.


Upgrade to paid

Vice President Kamala Harris released a statement endorsing Israel’s version of
events on the captives discovered in Rafah and echoed Netanyahu’s pledge to
eliminate Hamas. “Hamas is an evil terrorist organization. With these murders,
Hamas has even more American blood on its hands,” she said, referring to the
death of Hersh Goldberg-Polin, a dual citizen whose parents spoke at the
Democratic National Convention in Chicago earlier this month. Goldberg-Polin
was abducted from the Nova music festival on October 7 and lost part of his arm
after a grenade exploded in a shelter he was hiding in. “The threat Hamas poses
to the people of Israel—and American citizens in Israel—must be eliminated and
Hamas cannot control Gaza.”

Hamas has not yet offered a detailed response to Israel’s accusation that Hamas
fighters murdered the six captives, but blamed Israel for their deaths. “We hold
the criminal terrorist Benjamin Netanyahu and the biased American
administration responsible for the failure of the negotiations to stop the
aggression against our people and to release the prisoners in an exchange,” the
group said in a statement. “We also hold him fully responsible for the lives of the
prisoners who were killed by his army's bullets.”

The White House has, in recent weeks, portrayed its efforts at achieving a
ceasefire as boiling down to resolving a handful of technical details, and Harris
has said she is “working tirelessly” with Biden “around the clock” to achieve a
ceasefire in the Gaza war. But as U.S. negotiators have worked to placate
Netanyahu, the Israeli leader has waged a relentless two-month campaign aimed
at thwarting a deal and Hamas has denounced the process and asserted that the
U.S. framework it agreed to in early July should be respected.

A Hamas official involved with the ceasefire negotiations told Drop Site News
that the vice president and other U.S. officials have deliberately misled the public
about the process out of concerns that the Gaza war will hurt the Democrats’
chances of victory in November.

“Kamala Harris is now obsessed with how to defeat Trump, how to win the
election, and she knows that the genocide in Gaza and these massacres are a
crucial element in the campaign,” said Basem Naim, a member of Hamas’s
political bureau. “She wants to create a delusional image that there is something
in process, which is not right.”

In an interview, Naim said that while the U.S.—for political purposes—wants to
achieve a temporary truce that facilitates the release of Israelis held captive in
Gaza and allows aid to reach the besieged Strip, it has given no indication it
would insist on Israel ending its war against the Palestinians of Gaza.

“They are looking for a ceasefire, but they are not for ending the war
permanently,” Naim said. “There is a tactical discussion how to achieve [Israel’s]
goals in a different way which cannot damage the American image internationally
while they are supporting genocide, because they know that it is damaging their
chances to win the election.”

He believes that the U.S. also recognizes that Israel’s wars have made it a pariah
in the eyes of much of the world, threatening the viability of a nation central to
U.S. domination of the region. “The strategic interests of America to preserve
Israel as an advanced base on the front line here are at risk,” Naim said.

Establishing a Framework

In May, Biden laid out what he characterized as “a roadmap to an enduring
ceasefire and the release of all hostages” that had been proposed by Israel itself.
“This is truly a decisive moment. Israel has made their proposal,” Biden said on
May 31. “Hamas says it wants a ceasefire. This deal is an opportunity to prove
whether they really mean it. Hamas needs to take the deal.”

On June 10, the UN Security Council approved a resolution affirming the
framework. On July 2, Hamas announced that it had agreed to restart ceasefire
talks based on the framework. “We are ready for negotiations that achieve a
cessation of aggression and a complete withdrawal from the Gaza Strip,” said
senior negotiator Khalil Al-Hayya, a deputy of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar. “We
are ready for genuine negotiations if Netanyahu adheres to the principles outlined
by President Biden.”

At the time, Hamas negotiators indicated they were open to a three-phase deal
that would not require an immediate commitment to a permanent ceasefire and
complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza as a precondition to move
forward with the process. Prior to this, Hamas had insisted any agreement must
include clearly defined steps that ensure an end to Israel’s war.

Drop Site News has reviewed internal documents from the negotiations showing
that on July 2 Hamas formally informed international mediators that it had
accepted the framework, which Hamas says it was told had been amended by
the U.S. and approved by Israel on June 24. This amendment removed language
Hamas had previously insisted on that called for negotiations no later than 14
days into the first phase of a deal on the “necessary arrangements for the return
of a sustainable calm (permanent ceasefire),” according to a draft seen by Drop
Site News. Hamas believed this compromise was strong evidence of their desire
to reach a deal.

“If you draw a timeline for the negotiations along the last 10 months, you will
observe a consistent pattern of the Israelis: each time we are near to reach an
agreement, either they commit new massacres or backtrack from the deal and
add new conditions,” said Naim.

The Israeli government did not respond to a request for comment.

Netanyahu’s “Coup” Against His Own Ceasefire Proposal

Since early July, Netanyahu has intensified Israel’s attacks in Gaza, repeatedly
added new terms to the framework, and assassinated Ismail Haniyeh, Hamas’s
political leader and its lead negotiator, in Tehran. Among the new demands put
forward by Netanyahu is the right to continue occupying the Philadelphi corridor
along the border with Egypt, to maintain control of the Rafah border crossing and
to position Israeli troops in central Gaza along the Netzarim axis where IDF forces
would establish checkpoints to search Palestinians seeking to return to their
homes in northern Gaza.

Egypt has objected to Israeli proposals to remain in the Philadelphi corridor. Israel
asked Cairo to amend a 2005 agreement, a security annex to the Camp David
Treaty signed in 1979, barring Israel from stationing its forces there. Egypt
rejected this, saying, “Opening a discussion about amending the Camp David
Treaty may lead to new crises that the treaty may not withstand, especially in light
of the growing anger in Egypt over the Israeli practices [in Gaza].” Meanwhile, the
independent Egyptian news site Madr Masr recently published satellite imagery
showing Israel has fortified its presence along Netzarim. The IDF began
bulldozing areas along that axis five months into the war and insists it wants to
maintain a presence there as part of any agreement with Hamas.

“No one in Hamas can accept any form of Israeli presence in the Netzarim
corridor and investigating the people while they are returning home. And no one
accepts this and accepts the military presence in the Philadelphi corridor and the
Rafah crossing,” said Naim. “I think the only way to reach a deal is to lift these
points from any deal,” otherwise “it means that we are accepting a permanent
occupation of the Gaza Strip.”

Naim also said that Israel was insisting on new veto powers over the release of
Palestinian prisoners held by Israel, which would prevent the release of high value
political prisoners, including those from Hamas and other resistance groups
serving multi decade prison sentences. “[Netanyahu] totally changed the terms
about the prisoner exchange, which has already been agreed upon and
negotiated for months,” said Naim. “I think it would be shameful for any
Palestinian to accept such a deal.”

Rather than insisting on upholding what Biden said was Israel’s own proposal in
May, the U.S. has appeased Netanyahu’s efforts to allow an indefinite presence of
Israeli forces in Gaza and an open-ended campaign of military attacks. Since
Haniyeh’s assassination and the selection of Sinwar, the Gaza leader of Hamas, to
replace him, Hamas has said it will not participate in what it has described as a
rigged process masquerading as negotiations. “The new conditions [Netanyahu]
is adding is a coup against his own proposal,” Naim said.


U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken meets with Egyptian President Abdel
Fattah el-Sisi in El-Alamein on August 20, 2024. Photo by KEVIN
MOHATT/POOL/AFP via Getty Images.
Blinken’s Loss of Credibility

In early August, the White House insisted that a ceasefire was within reach and
had put forward what it called a “final bridging proposal” to resolve outstanding
issues. “We are closer than we’ve ever been,” Biden said on August 16. Four days
later, Secretary of State Antony Blinken was in Tel Aviv meeting with Netanyahu.
“He supports it,” Blinken told reporters after their meeting. “It’s now incumbent on
Hamas to do the same.” Within hours of Blinken departing Israel, Netanyahu’s
people were leaking stories contesting those assertions and saying the Israeli
prime minister had in fact convinced Blinken to accept Israel’s continued
occupation of parts of Gaza. The U.S. denied that happened.

“Blinken has damaged the whole process because he lost all his credibility as a
serious mediator,” said Naim. “We see today the worst example of a secretary of
state of a superpower. Very weak, very weak. He’s a big failure.”

Naim said that the so-called bridging proposals largely advocated for Hamas to
accept some aspects of the new demands Netanyahu inserted after Hamas
agreed to the Biden and UN framework.

“We are ready to sit for negotiations if we are discussing an executive plan to
implement what we have agreed upon on July 2,” said Naim. “We are not ready to
negotiate a new proposal because [Netanyahu] added new conditions which has
nothing to do with the old.”

The White House insists it is making progress. “Senior level talks in Cairo over
recent days have been constructive and were conducted in a spirit on all sides to
reach a final and implementable agreement,” said a State Department official in a
statement to Drop Site News. “The process continues through working groups to
further address remaining issues and details. We underscore the urgency of an
agreement for all sides.”

Hamas maintains it has not directly participated in any negotiations or “working
groups,” only receiving updates from Egyptian and Qatari mediators and then
offering their responses. “We weren’t part of the negotiations,” Naim said. “The
last round of negotiations, it was only between the mediators, the Americans and
[Israel].”

He added that mediators have told Hamas that the Israeli delegations do not
appear empowered by Netanyahu to make any decisions and that often, when
progress appears possible, Netanyahu vetoes the suggestions of his own
delegation. “They are not authorized to negotiate seriously [on] any point,” Naim
said. “It is only negotiations between the mediators and the Israelis. Or to be more
accurate, it is negotiations between the mediators, the Americans and
Netanyahu. And in this case, the mediator is the Israeli delegation.”

On Thursday, the Israeli security cabinet voted to support Netanyahu’s insistence
that its forces remain entrenched along the Philadelphi corridor between Gaza
and Egypt. According to media reports on the meeting, Netanyahu’s own defense
minister Yoav Gallant objected. “The significance of this is that Hamas won’t
agree to it, so there won’t be an agreement and there won’t be any hostages
released,” Gallant reportedly said. “You’re running the negotiations on your own,”
he added, “we hear everything after the fact.” Netanyahu’s proposal was
approved with only Gallant voting against it.

Naim said that the optimism expressed recently by U.S. officials for a deal that
ends the war is an attempt to obfuscate an increasingly dire reality, the stakes of
which have been devastatingly punctuated by Israel’s violent invasion of parts of
the West Bank, which began Wednesday.

“What's happening in Gaza and what's happening in the West Bank is a clear
sign, a clear indication that this conflict needs a political solution. And
Palestinians have all the rights to achieve their national goals of dignity, freedom
and independence, self sovereignty,” Naim said. “Leaving these fascist leaders in
Israel, they will destabilize not only the situation here, but the situation in the
whole region. Because day after day, they are converting this political conflict into
a religious conflict.”


Responses:
None


[ National ] [ Main Menu ]

Generated by: TalkRec 1.17
    Last Updated: 30-Aug-2013 14:32:46, 80837 Bytes
    Author: Brian Steele