International

[ International ] [ Main Menu ]


  


56210


Date: October 31, 2024 at 16:45:16
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: BRICS Outreach session

URL: https://x.com/RealPepeEscobar


Pepe Escobar@RealPepeEscobar

KAZAN MAKES HISTORY

THAT is how the new world is being born.

BRICS Outreach session. Putin opens and hands the floor to the leaders and
heads of delegations of 24 nations, most at the highest level, plus the UN Sec
Gen.

Quite a few speeches are nothing short of epic. This is Bandung 1955 on
mega-steroids.

The session lasted 3h25. It will be circulating all across the Global Majority for
weeks, months and years.


Responses:
[56212] [56213] [56211]


56212


Date: October 31, 2024 at 18:32:10
From: ryan, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: BRICS Outreach session


nato/seato vs brics will be the opponents for ww3...


Responses:
[56213]


56213


Date: November 01, 2024 at 05:34:41
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: Re: BRICS Outreach session


more likely it will be Israel/US v. rest of world


Responses:
None


56211


Date: October 31, 2024 at 16:48:07
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: BRICS post-Kazan: A laboratory of the future

URL: https://thecradle.co/articles-id/27486


BRICS post-Kazan: A laboratory of the future
The much-awaited BRICS heads of state meeting in Russia's Kazan did not
disappoint. The multilateral institution has finally brought bite and substance to
many of the global financial and political conundrums that have long-
challenged a genuine reshaping of the global order.


Pepe Escobar
OCT 30, 2024

The Russian presidency of BRICS 2024 could not have chosen a more
multicultural and multi-nodal site to host a summit laden with enormous
expectations by the Global Majority. The southwestern Russian city of Kazan,
on the banks of the Volga and Kazanka rivers, is the capital of the semi-
autonomous Republic of Tatarstan, renowned for its vibrant mix of Tatar and
Russian cultures.

Even though the BRICS summit took place in the Kazan Expo – a sort of multi-
level station connected to the airport and the aero-express link to the city – it
was the Kazan Kremlin, a centuries-old fortified citadel and World Heritage Site,
that imposed itself as the global image of BRICS 2024.

That spelled out, graphically, a continuity from the 10th century onwards
through Bulgar culture, the Golden Horde, and the 15th–16th-century Khanate
all the way to modern Tatarstan.

The Kazan Kremlin is the last Tatar fortress in Russia with remnants of its
original town planning. The global Muslim Ummah did not fail to observe that
this is the northwestern limit of the spread of Islam in Russia. The minarets of
the Kul Sharif mosque in the Kremlin, in fact, acquired an iconic dimension –
symbolizing a collective, trans-cultural, civilization-state effort to build a more
equitable and just world.

It has been an extraordinary experience to follow throughout the year how
Russian diplomacy managed to successfully bring together delegations from
36 nations – 22 of them represented by heads of state – plus six international
organizations, including the United Nations, for the summit in Kazan.

These delegations came from nations representing nearly half of the global
GDP. The implication is that a tsunami of thousands of sanctions imposed since
2022, plus relentless yelling about Russia’s “isolation,” simply disappeared in
the vortex of irrelevance. That contributed to the immense irritation displayed
by the collective west over this remarkable gathering. Key subtext: there was
not a single official presence of the Five Eyes set-up in Kazan.

The various devils, of course, remain in the various details: how BRICS – and
the BRICS Outreach mechanism, housing 13 new partners – will move from the
extremely polite and quite detailed Kazan Declaration – with more than 130
operational paragraphs – and several other white papers to implement a Global
Majority-oriented platform ranging from collective security to widespread
connectivity, non-weaponized trade settlements, and geopolitical primacy. It
will be a long, winding, and thorny road.

Onward drive, from Asia to the Muslim world

The BRICS Outreach session was one of the astonishing highlights of Kazan: a
big round table re-enacting the post-colonial Bandung 1955 landmark on
steroids, with Russian President Vladimir Putin opening the proceedings and
then handing the floor to representatives of the other 35 nations, Palestine
included.

The first round of BRICS expansion last year focused heavily on West Asia and
Northeast Africa (Iran, UAE, Egypt, and Ethiopia, with Saudi Arabia still deciding
its final status). Now, the new “partner” category – 13 members – includes,
among others, four Southeast Asian powerhouses, including Malaysia and
Indonesia, the top two powers in the Heartland, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan,
and NATO member Turkiye.

Muslim-majority nations are all over the place as part of the BRICS drive; in
parallel, Asia as a whole is fast becoming prime BRICS territory.

In-depth debate on how to develop a new global financial and payment system
practically from scratch – a key plank of de-westernization – has been
relentless across the BRICS matrix since February. By early October, the
Russian Finance Ministry announced the launch of BRICS Bridge – inspired by
Project mBridge: a digital payment platform for cross-border trade in national
currencies.

Western hegemons are already scared. The Swiss-based Bank of International
Settlements (BIS) is now mulling to shut down mBridge – backed, among
others, by commercial banks from BRICS members China and UAE, BRICS
partner Thailand, quasi-BRICS member Saudi Arabia, and the Hong Kong
Monetary Authority.

The excuse is “geopolitical risks” – a euphemism for mBridge making it harder
to enforce unilateral, illegal US and EU sanctions. That ties up, for instance, with
global banking giant HSBC officially joining China’s interbank cross-border
payment system (CHIPS), which is similar to the Russian SPFS. From
CHIPS/SPFS to BRICS Bridge is just a short step.

The key issue – a serious worry for the Global Majority – is how to settle trade
surpluses and deficits. When it comes to initiatives such as BRICS Bridge and
BRICS Pay – the test run of the BRICS Pay card took place a week before Kazan
– that’s not a technical issue.

What matters is not so much how to send a currency but what to do with that
currency at the other end. It’s an eminently political affair, but there are ways
around it, as the predominant, western-controlled SWIFT system is very
primitive.

The BRICS working groups also paid close attention to facilitating investment;
these are open systems, good for BRICS members and partners. Once
companies from whatever latitude start joining, critical mass for
growth/investment will be just a shot away.

All of the above embodies the spirit of BRICS starting to function in 2024 –
driven by the Russian presidency – as a global laboratory, testing every
possible model, old and new, to be applied in a multi-nodal way. Diplomatically,
the Kazan Declaration stated that new approaches should be presented to the
UN and the G20; yet, realistically, there’s no evidence the collective western
bloc will receive them with open arms.

The de-dollarization nitty-gritty

Apart from establishing the 13 new partners – constituting a large,
transcontinental, de facto BRICS zone – Kazan advanced two key platforms:
BRICS Clear and the BRICS (Re)Insurance Company.

BRICS Clear is a multilateral settlement/clearing system for both BRICS trade
and trade between BRICS and their partners (as it stands, applying to 22
nations). The key aim, once again, is to bypass SWIFT.

BRICS Clear will use national currencies for international trade. Everything will
be transacted via a stablecoin – a unit of account – managed by the NDB, the
Shanghai-based BRICS bank.

As top French economist Jacques Sapir has pointed out, “trade requires
insurance services (for both the contract itself and transportation); these
insurance services involve reinsurance activities. With the BRICS (Re)Insurance
Company, BRICS is building its independence from western insurance
companies.”

BRICS Clear and BRICS (Re)Insurance, in the short to middle term, will have
enormous consequences for global trade and the use of US dollars and euros.
Trade flows, intra-BRICS and between BRICS partners – already at least 40
percent of the global total – may rise exponentially. In parallel, western-
controlled insurance and reinsurance companies will lose business.

That’s de-dollarization in practice – arguably the BRICS Holy Grail. Of course,
India and Brazil never refer to de-dollarization in the manner of Russia, China,
and Iran, but they do support BRICS Clear.

Sapir predicts that up to 2030, the BRICS Clear effect may result in the dollar
share in Central Bank’s reserves falling “from 58 percent to around 35-40
percent.” Significantly, that would imply “massive sales of Treasury bonds,
causing a collapse of the public bond market and significant difficulties for the
US Treasury in refinancing United States debt.” The Hegemon will not take that
lightly, to say the least.

Lab experiments counter-acting arrogance

These BRICS geoeconomic breakthroughs – call it lab experiments – mirror
diplomatic coups such as India and China, mediated by Russia, announcing on
the eve of Kazan their drive to settle bilateral troubles in the Himalayas to
advance the unifying, pan-cooperation BRICS agenda.

Solving geopolitical issues among member-nations is a key BRICS priority. The
China–India example should translate to Iran–Saudi Arabia when it comes to
their involvement in Yemen and Egypt–Ethiopia when it comes to the
controversial building of a major dam in the Nile. BRICS sherpas openly admit
that BRICS needs an internal institutional mechanism to solve serious problems
among member-states – and, eventually, partners.

And that brings us to the ultimate incandescent tragedy: Israel’s military
offensives in Gaza, Palestine, Lebanon, Yemen, Syria, and Iran.

BRICS sherpas revealed that two scenarios were being actively discussed in
the closed sessions, as well as the bilateral meetings. The first foresees an
Iran–Israel Hot War, with Lebanon turned into a major battleground, leading to a
“chain reaction” involving several Arab actors.

The second scenario foresees a pan-West Asia crisis, involving not only
neighboring nations but what would coalesce into coalitions – one pro-Arab,
the other pro-Israeli. One wonders where dodgy actors such as Egypt and
Jordan would fit in. It’s unclear how BRICS, as a multilateral organization, would
react to both scenarios.

Dreadful realpolitik did not stop in its tracks to watch the BRICS high-speed
train leave the Kazan station. Israel staged its puny strike on Iran immediately
afterward, and the collective west pronounced the elections in Georgia null and
void because they did not like the result – even though the OSCE issued a
rational report about it.

The collective west’s incomprehension of what transpired in three historic days
in Kazan only highlighted their astonishing arrogance, stupidity, and brutality.
That’s precisely the reason why the BRICS matrix is working so hard to come
up with the lineaments of a new, fair international order, and despite an array of
challenges, will continue to flourish.

The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of The
Cradle.


Responses:
None


[ International ] [ Main Menu ]

Generated by: TalkRec 1.17
    Last Updated: 30-Aug-2013 14:32:46, 80837 Bytes
    Author: Brian Steele