JEREMY SCAHILL AND MURTAZA HUSSAIN
SEP 23, 2024
Israel's Bloodbath in Lebanon
Israel launches largest attack on Lebanon since its 2006 invasion, kills
hundreds including children
A quick word before today’s piece on the horrifying situation unfolding in
Lebanon: Drop Site News is looking to expand our coverage of the Middle East
and we can’t do it without our readers. So if you appreciate Drop Site’s analysis
of unfolding events and our original reporting, please consider upgrading. Your
paid subscription has a direct impact on the reporters we are able to hire and
the work we are able to commission. You can also make a one-time tax-
deductible donation to support us here.
Drop Site News is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and
support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Upgrade to paid
Smoke billows from a site targeted by Israeli shelling in the southern Lebanese
village of Zaita on September 23, 2024. Photo by MAHMOUD ZAYYAT/AFP via
Getty Images.
On Monday, Israel engaged in its most deadly attacks in Lebanon since its
2006 invasion of the country, striking heavily populated areas throughout
southern Lebanon—including hitting medical centers and ambulances,
according to the Lebanese health minister—and expanding its attacks to Beirut
and the Bekaa Valley in the east. The Israeli strikes included the targeting of a
high-rise building in the Beirut suburb of Dahieh, reportedly aimed at killing Ali
Karaki, a senior commander in Hezbollah. The group released a statement
saying Karaki was “in full health and wellness and has moved to a safe place.”
By evening local time, the death toll in Lebanon reached 492 people—including
at least 35 children—with more than 1,600 injured, as some Israeli officials
threatened the prospect of a Gaza-style war of annihilation against Lebanon.
Earlier in the day, local residents began receiving text messages and calls with
audio recordings warning them to leave their homes and villages. The Israeli
military maintains that its assault, which it claims hit 1,300 “targets,” is aimed at
destroying Hezbollah's weapons supplies and rocket launch facilities. The
roads out of the south were jammed on Monday afternoon as people attempted
to flee Israel’s bombs. The Associated Press called it “the biggest exodus since
2006.” Schools and universities have closed throughout the country and
Lebanese authorities are opening up educational facilities to shelter the
displaced.
The IDF’s Arabic-language spokesperson Avichay Adraee also posted several
ominous messages on Twitter, also known as X, instructing people to leave
their homes, including in the Bekaa Valley region. “If you are inside or near a
house containing Hezbollah weapons- you must leave it and move away from it
within two hours to a distance of no less than 1,000 meters outside the village,
or go to the central school near you and do not return until further notice,” he
wrote, adding, “Anyone who is near Hezbollah elements, facilities, and weapons
is putting his life and the lives of his family members at risk.” Israeli forces
subsequently bombed the area.
Civilians cannot be expected to know where weapons stores might be—adding
to the sense that Israel is carrying out a “psychological war,” as Lebanon’s
official news agency called it, in addition to a harsh bombing campaign. While
the IDF has portrayed these orders as humanitarian-motivated evacuation
warnings, it has issued identical communications throughout its 11-month war
against the Palestinians of Gaza only to later bomb areas to which it told
residents to flee.
“People have seen what's happened in Gaza and they know that the Israelis are
fully capable and they understand that basically the West has given up even
pretending to do anything about it,” said Karim Makdisi, a professor of
international politics at the American University in Beirut. “There's no reason to
believe that the Israelis will not go ahead and basically try to empty out a large
section of the south and try to make the whole place totally uninhabitable for
the foreseeable future.”
As Israel resumed its attacks on Monday, Hezbollah escalated its own
operations, launching hundreds of rockets at the Ramat David base and other
military sites across northern Israel, while claiming to have attacked an
industrial complex near Haifa. Videos on social media also showed Hezbollah
missiles striking east of Tel Aviv near several illegal settlements in the West
Bank, farther than the group has targeted in any previous conflict. Israel’s Home
Front Command declared an internal state of emergency known as a “special
situation,” citing the “likelihood” of attacks on civilian areas allowing the
government to exert expanded authority over civilian life for the next 48 hours.
After an entire day of intense and sustained attacks, Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu released a video on social media. In his “message for the people of
Lebanon,” Netanyahu claimed that “Hezbollah has been using you as human
shields” as it fires rockets at Israel. The Israeli prime minister also characterized
the massive bombings in Lebanon Monday as defensive. The “IDF has warned
you to get out of harm's way,” he said in the tenor of a governor issuing a
warning about a hurricane, rather than the leader of a nuclear power overseeing
a massive bombing of villages. “I urge you – take this warning seriously. Don't
let Hezbollah endanger your lives and the lives of your loved ones. Don't let
Hezbollah endanger Lebanon.”
Israel has launched numerous brutal military campaigns in Lebanon in prior
decades. Its claim today that it is aiming to protect civilian life with evacuation
messages was widely rejected by Lebanese and other observers—and fed
suspicion that Israel is attempting to ethnically cleanse southern Lebanon of its
residents to establish a military buffer zone inside Lebanese territory.
“This is not the first time Israel has warned hundreds of thousands of civilians in
Lebanon to flee before ruthlessly bombarding them,” said Sarah Leah Whitson,
an international humanitarian law expert, and the executive director of the
human rights group DAWN. “Warning civilians to flee does not free Israel from
the most basic rule of the laws of war, and that is not to deliberately or
indiscriminately fire on civilians. As the death toll in Lebanon has made clear,
this is not a rule that Israel is willing to follow.”
Leave a comment
Green Light
There is no indication that the U.S., Israel’s major military backer, has any plans
to pull back the Israeli government in its expanding attacks in Lebanon, Gaza,
and the West Bank.
The Pentagon announced on Monday that the U.S. is deploying an unspecified
number of American troops in addition to the 40,000 troops already in the
region. In the readout of a call with Israel’s defense minister Yoav Gallant,
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin reiterated the U.S.’s standard posture that Israel
is acting in self-defense. “The Secretary expressed his support for Israel's right
to defend itself as Hizballah extends its attacks deeper into Israel, and stressed
the importance of finding a path to a diplomatic solution that will allow
residents on both sides of the border to return to their homes as quickly and
safely as possible,” it stated.
Makdisi said the Israelis would not have launched such large scale attacks
without a “green light” from the U.S. “I think they've been given a kind of clear
understanding that they have until the elections to do what they want,” he told
Drop Site News.
Over the past several weeks, U.S. officials have made public statements
claiming that they would like to see a “diplomatic resolution” to the standoff
between Israel and Hezbollah that began after October 7 of last year. Some
officials have also claimed that the U.S. has been working to prevent an
escalation, with U.S. National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby telling
ABC News on Sunday that the U.S. was trying to prevent “all-out war” between
the two sides and that the Biden administration disagreed with Israel’s policy of
expanding the conflict into Lebanon.
Meanwhile, Barak Ravid, a journalist for Axios known for his insider access to
Israeli and American officials, reported over the weekend that U.S. officials had
privately said that they supported an Israeli policy of “de-escalation through
escalation” – a contradictory stance that would permit Israel to ramp up the
destruction of Lebanon and open the path to a broader conflict.
“Israel’s shocking attacks on Lebanon over the past week are the entirely
predictable result of the Biden administration’s continued coddling of the
unhinged Netanyahu administration, rewarding him with a bottomless supply of
weapons no matter how often he rebuffs American pleas to rein in the conflict,”
said Whitson, the former director of the Middle East and North Africa division of
Human Rights Watch.
A Single Front
Israel has said it will announce its “next phases” for its Lebanon operations in
the coming days. On Monday, Daniel Hagari, the IDF spokesperson, was asked
if the military was prepared for a ground invasion. “Is the army prepared? Yes,
the army is in full readiness and we will do whatever is necessary to bring back
home all our citizens to the northern border safely,” he said.
Makdisi assesses that the U.S. wants to separate the Gaza and Lebanese fronts
in an effort to force Hezbollah to end its attacks against northern Israel.
Hezbollah has maintained that it will not do so until a ceasefire is reached in
Gaza—a point which Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah’s secretary general,
emphasized in a speech last Friday. “Whatever the sacrifices, whatever the
consequences, whatever may happen, we will not cease our support for Gaza,
and Lebanon's front with Israel will not stop until the aggression on Gaza
stops,” Nasrallah said.
It was Nasrallah’s first speech following Israel’s surprise attacks last week, when
thousands of pagers exploded simultaneously, killing more than a dozen people
and wounding hundreds more. Last Wednesday, walkie-talkies used by
Hezbollah forces detonated in similar fashion killing more people, followed by a
massive air strike on Friday in the Beirut neighborhood of Dahieh that killed at
least 45 people. Hezbollah confirmed that the air attack killed senior
commander Ibrahim Aqil and 15 other significant officials from its elite Radwan
force. The U.S., which denies any involvement or foreknowledge of these
strikes, had placed a $7 million reward for information about Aquil for his
alleged role in the bombing of the U.S. embassy in Beirut in 1983. “Nobody
sheds a tear for him,” said Brett McGurk, President Biden’s Middle East envoy.
“That said, we have disagreements with the Israelis on tactics.”
Makdisi said the recent Israeli attacks represented “a severe blow, but not a
critical one” for Hezbollah. He said the group’s relatively muted military
responses of the past week are “not necessarily an indication of weakness, but
more that it is still disciplined, that they still have that discipline that they're not
going to be sucked in and drawn into what Netanyahu wants, as of now
anyway.”
Israel has said its stated objective in attacking Lebanon is to ensure the return
of tens of thousands of Israelis evacuated from the north of the country since
October 7. “You will not be able to return the settlers and usurpers of land to the
north,” Nasrallah said Friday. “The only way to return them is ending the
onslaught and aggression on Gaza and the West Bank.”
Makdisi said that since its 1982 invasion of Lebanon, Israel has aimed to
demilitarize the south of that country, including through its 2006 ground war.
Hezbollah is widely seen as having defeated Israel in the 2006 conflict by
forcing it into a ceasefire. Makdisi assesses that Israel – with U.S. backing –
believes that it can achieve its goal this time by smashing Hezbollah’s military
capabilities in the south and imposing its will on the region.
“They can't coexist with any country around them or any people around them
without them accepting defeat. That just is a prerequisite. So this just has to be
contextualized not just in the history of Lebanon, but Zionism itself,” Makdisi
said. Israel “needs the Palestinians to give up, needed the Egyptians to give up.
It needed the Jordanians to give up and it needs the Lebanese to give up. That
is the context.”
Upgrade to paid
How Strong Is Hezbollah?
In the years since the 2006 war, Hezbollah’s military capacity has strengthened
and the size of its fighting force has grown. Hezbollah is considered the most
powerful non-state military force in the world, with an estimated stockpile of
between 150,000 and 200,000 short and long-range missiles, a rapidly
expanding fleet of unmanned vehicles, an advanced network of tunnels and
underground facilities, and tens of thousands of trained fighters.
Hezbollah also enjoys extensive military and logistical support from Iran and
relationships with regional governments and networks of allied militias. The rise
of the Axis of Resistance—a loose coalition of nations and armed resistance
factions, including Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas, Ansarallah in Yemen, and others
who have vowed to confront Israel militarily—also presents a new dynamic that
Israel must consider as it weighs what type of wars it believes it can fight and
win.
Amal Saad, an expert on Hezbollah told Drop Site recently: “Basically
everything that Iran has, all the weapons Iran has, you can be certain Hezbollah
has them, too. That's what we know. And that's aside from the things that
Hezbollah is manufacturing domestically, like it's drone technology—it's
manufacturing its own drones now. So, we're talking here about a vastly
different military creature than 2006.”
Makdisi said that, to date, Hezbollah has not deployed its most advanced
weaponry, nor launched large strikes at major civilian targets, such as Ben
Gurion airport in Tel Aviv or the large port in Haifa. If that happens, he said, it
could be an indication that Hezbollah is shifting into all-out war mode.
“They're not going to panic. And they can see that what the Israelis want to do
in terms of trying to empty out the south and hit this kind of infrastructure in the
south, that itself will also have several stages. So they're going to wait and see
what's going to happen,” he said. “If they launch a massive attack on civilian
areas or on the airports, if they change the way in which they're launching and
if they unleash the [more advanced] technological capabilities that they have,
then that would be an indication. But I think that would be towards the end of
their tether and their tether is a lot longer than what we think.”
The role that Iran may play amid an escalation of the war is a major concern of
all parties, as questions arise in Lebanon over why Hezbollah’s major backer
has remained passive despite the spread of the war. “There is now more of this
kind of sentiment like, ‘Where the hell is Iran?’ They keep on coming up and
threatening this and threatening that. But when Lebanon is now under this
condition, nothing has happened yet,” Makdisi said.
In particular, Tehran has not responded militarily to the killing of Hamas leader
Ismail Haniyeh in August. Haniyeh was killed in a guest house controlled by
Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guard Corps. Despite heavy promotion of the notion
of an Axis of Resistance, Tehran has not overtly attacked Israel since April when
it launched a large-scale—though largely symbolic—series of air attacks.
In comments given to reporters ahead of the United Nations General Assembly
in New York this week, newly-elected Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian
said that the killing of Haniyeh would “not go unanswered,” but added that Iran
did not wish to have a larger regional war at Israel’s instigation. The Iranian
president, who represents the reformist bloc inside Iran, also struck a
conciliatory note by suggesting that Iran would deescalate in the region if the
U.S. also tempered its support for Israel. “We are willing to put all of our
weapons aside, so long as Israel is willing to do the same,” he said. “But we
cannot have outside actors come in, arm one side to the teeth and prevent the
other side from having the means to defend themselves.”
Iran’s regional foreign policy is largely considered to be the domain of the
country’s hardline security establishment, and particularly the Islamic
Revolutionary Guards Corps. In his own comments to reporters, Pezeshkian
referred to Israel as committing “genocide” in the Gaza Strip. In response to a
question as to whether Iran would intervene to defend Hezbollah from Israeli
attacks, he said that Iran "will defend any group that is defending its rights and
itself.”
One day into Israel’s expanded aerial campaign, hundreds of Lebanese civilians
have already been killed and thousands more wounded. Those numbers will
almost certainly rise in the days to come.
Israeli officials have made repeated statements in the past months indicating
that they view the population of Lebanon as synonymous with Hezbollah itself
and threatening violence against Lebanese civilians.
In July, Israel’s education minister Yoav Kisch said that “Lebanon, as we know,
will not exist,” after a future war, adding that “there is no difference between
Hezbollah and Lebanon,” and that the country faced “annihilation.” Israel’s
minister of diaspora and combating antisemitism Amichai Chikli called this
week for the creation by the Israeli military of a buffer zone in South Lebanon,
“free of enemy population,” adding that Israeli military control over Lebanon
“must be expanded and the enemy population removed from the area.”
"Hezbollah=Lebanon,” former Israeli prime minister Bennett wrote, even more
bluntly, on social media. “Hezbollah controls the Lebanese government, and
cannot survive without popular support.”
Thanks for reading Drop Site News. This post is public so feel free to share it.
Share
Subscribe to Drop Site News
Thousands of paid subscribers
Independent news on politics and war
Upgrade to paid
|
|