International

[ International ] [ Main Menu ]


  


54923


Date: July 08, 2024 at 09:12:56
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: ‘I’m bored, so I shoot’: IDF's approval of free-for-all violence in Ga

URL: ‘I’m bored, so I shoot’: The Israeli army’s approval of free-for-all violence in Gaza


"Israeli soldiers describe the near-total absence of firing regulations in the
Gaza war, with troops shooting as they please, setting homes ablaze, and
leaving corpses on the streets — all with their commanders’ permission.

By Oren Ziv
July 8, 2024
In early June, Al Jazeera aired a series of disturbing videos revealing what it
described as “summary executions”: Israeli soldiers shooting dead several
Palestinians walking near the coastal road in the Gaza Strip, on three
separate occasions. In each case, the Palestinians appeared unarmed and
did not pose any imminent threat to the soldiers.

Such footage is rare, due to the severe constraints faced by journalists in the
besieged enclave and the constant danger to their lives. But these
executions, which did not appear to have any security rationale, are
consistent with the testimonies of six Israeli soldiers who spoke to +972
Magazine and Local Call following their release from active duty in Gaza in
recent months. Corroborating the testimonies of Palestinian eyewitnesses
and doctors throughout the war, the soldiers described being authorized to
open fire on Palestinians virtually at will, including civilians.

The six sources — all except one of whom spoke on the condition of
anonymity — recounted how Israeli soldiers routinely executed Palestinian
civilians simply because they entered an area that the military defined as a
“no-go zone.” The testimonies paint a picture of a landscape littered with
civilian corpses, which are left to rot or be eaten by stray animals; the army
only hides them from view ahead of the arrival of international aid convoys,
so that “images of people in advanced stages of decay don’t come out.” Two
of the soldiers also testified to a systematic policy of setting Palestinian
homes on fire after occupying them.

Subscribe to The Landline
+972's weekly newsletter
Sign up
Several sources described how the ability to shoot without restrictions gave
soldiers a way to blow off steam or relieve the dullness of their daily routine.
“People want to experience the event [fully],” S., a reservist who served in
northern Gaza, recalled. “I personally fired a few bullets for no reason, into
the sea or at the sidewalk or an abandoned building. They report it as ‘normal
fire,’ which is a codename for ‘I’m bored, so I shoot.'”

Since the 1980s, the Israeli military has refused to disclose its open-fire
regulations, despite various petitions to the High Court of Justice. According
to political sociologist Yagil Levy, since the Second Intifada, “the army has
not given soldiers written rules of engagement,” leaving much open to the
interpretation of soldiers in the field and their commanders. As well as
contributing to the killing of over 38,000 Palestinians, sources testified that
these lax directives were also partly responsible for the high number of
soldiers killed by friendly fire in recent months.

Israeli soldiers from the 8717 Battalion of the Givati Brigade operating in Beit
Lahia, in the northern Gaza Strip, during a military operation, December 28,
2023. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)
Israeli soldiers from the 8717 Battalion of the Givati Brigade operating in Beit
Lahia, in the northern Gaza Strip, during a military operation, December 28,
2023. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)
“There was total freedom of action,” said B., another soldier who served in
the regular forces in Gaza for months, including in his battalion’s command
center. “If there is [even] a feeling of threat, there is no need to explain — you
just shoot.” When soldiers see someone approaching, “it is permissible to
shoot at their center of mass [their body], not into the air,” B. continued. “It’s
permissible to shoot everyone, a young girl, an old woman.”

B. went on to describe an incident in November when soldiers killed several
civilians during the evacuation of a school close to the Zeitoun neighborhood
of Gaza City, which had served as a shelter for displaced Palestinians. The
army ordered the evacuees to exit to the left, toward the sea, rather than to
the right, where the soldiers were stationed. When a gunfight erupted inside
the school, those who veered the wrong way in the ensuing chaos were
immediately fired at.

“There was intelligence that Hamas wanted to create panic,” B. said. “A battle
started inside; people ran away. Some fled left toward the sea, [but] some
ran to the right, including children. Everyone who went to the right was killed
— 15 to 20 people. There was a pile of bodies.”

‘People shot as they pleased, with all their might’
B. said that it was difficult to distinguish civilians from combatants in Gaza,
claiming that members of Hamas often “walk around without their weapons.”
But as a result, “every man between the ages of 16 and 50 is suspected of
being a terrorist.”

“It is forbidden to walk around, and everyone who is outside is suspicious,” B.
continued. “If we see someone in a window looking at us, he is a suspect.
You shoot. The [army’s] perception is that any contact [with the population]
endangers the forces, and a situation must be created in which it is forbidden
to approach [the soldiers] under any circumstances. [The Palestinians]
learned that when we enter, they run away.”

Even in seemingly unpopulated or abandoned areas of Gaza, soldiers
engaged in extensive shooting in a procedure known as “demonstrating
presence.” S. testified that his fellow soldiers would “shoot a lot, even for no
reason — anyone who wants to shoot, no matter what the reason, shoots.” In
some cases, he noted, this was “intended to … remove people [from their
hiding places] or to demonstrate presence.”


M., another reservist who served in the Gaza Strip, explained that such
orders would come directly from the commanders of the company or
battalion in the field. “When there are no [other] IDF forces [in the area] … the
shooting is very unrestricted, like crazy. And not just small arms: machine
guns, tanks, and mortars.”

Even in the absence of orders from above, M. testified that soldiers in the
field regularly take the law into their own hands. “Regular soldiers, junior
officers, battalion commanders — the junior ranks who want to shoot, they
get permission.”

S. remembered hearing over the radio about a soldier stationed in a
protective compound who shot a Palestinian family walking around nearby.
“At first, they say ‘four people.’ It turns into two children plus two adults, and
by the end it’s a man, a woman, and two children. You can assemble the
picture yourself.”

Only one of the soldiers interviewed for this investigation was willing to be
identified by name: Yuval Green, a 26-year-old reservist from Jerusalem who
served in the 55th Paratroopers Brigade in November and December last
year (Green recently signed a letter by 41 reservists declaring their refusal to
continue serving in Gaza, following the army’s invasion of Rafah). “There
were no restrictions on ammunition,” Green told +972 and Local Call. “People
were shooting just to relieve the boredom.”

Green described an incident that occurred one night during the Jewish
festival of Hanukkah in December, when “the whole battalion opened fire
together like fireworks, including tracer ammunition [which generates a
bright light]. It made a crazy color, illuminating the sky, and because
[Hannukah] is the ‘festival of lights,’ it became symbolic.”

Israeli soldiers from the 8717 Battalion of the Givati Brigade operating in Beit
Lahia, northern Gaza Strip, December 28, 2023. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)
Israeli soldiers from the 8717 Battalion of the Givati Brigade operating in Beit
Lahia, northern Gaza Strip, December 28, 2023. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)
C., another soldier who served in Gaza, explained that when soldiers heard
gunshots, they radioed in to clarify whether there was another Israeli military
unit in the area, and if not, they opened fire. “People shot as they pleased,
with all their might.” But as C. noted, unrestricted shooting meant that
soldiers are often exposed to the huge risk of friendly fire — which he
described as “more dangerous than Hamas.” “On multiple occasions, IDF
forces fired in our direction. We didn’t respond, we checked on the radio, and
no one was hurt.”

At the time of writing, 324 Israeli soldiers have been killed in Gaza since the
ground invasion began, at least 28 of them by friendly fire according to the
army. In Green’s experience, such incidents were the “main issue”
endangering soldiers’ lives. “There was quite a bit [of friendly fire]; it drove
me crazy,” he said.

For Green, the rules of engagement also demonstrated a deep indifference
to the fate of the hostages. “They told me about a practice of blowing up
tunnels, and I thought to myself that if there were hostages [in them], it
would kill them.” After Israeli soldiers in Shuja’iyya killed three hostages
waving white flags in December, thinking they were Palestinians, Green said
he was angry, but was told “there’s nothing we can do.” “[The commanders]
sharpened procedures, saying ‘You have to pay attention and be sensitive,
but we are in a combat zone, and we have to be alert.’”

B. confirmed that even after the mishap in Shuja’iyya, which was said to be
“contrary to the orders” of the military, the open-fire regulations did not
change. “As for the hostages, we didn’t have a specific directive,” he recalled.
“[The army’s top brass] said that after the shooting of the hostages, they
briefed [soldiers in the field]. [But] they didn’t talk to us.” He and the soldiers
who were with him heard about the shooting of the hostages only two and a
half weeks after the incident, after they left Gaza.

“I’ve heard statements [from other soldiers] that the hostages are dead, they
don’t stand a chance, they have to be abandoned,” Green noted. “[This]
bothered me the most … that they kept saying, ‘We’re here for the hostages,’
but it is clear that the war harms the hostages. That was my thought then;
today it turned out to be true.”

Israeli soldiers from the 8717 Battalion of the Givati Brigade operating in Beit
Lahia, in the northern Gaza Strip, December 28, 2023. (Yonatan
Sindel/Flash90)
Israeli soldiers from the 8717 Battalion of the Givati Brigade operating in Beit
Lahia, in the northern Gaza Strip, December 28, 2023. (Yonatan
Sindel/Flash90)
‘A building comes down, and the feeling is, “Wow, what fun”’
A., an officer who served in the army’s Operations Directorate, testified that
his brigade’s operations room — which coordinates the fighting from outside
Gaza, approving targets and preventing friendly fire — did not receive clear
open-fire orders to transmit to soldiers on the ground. “From the moment
you enter, at no point is there a briefing,” he said. “We didn’t receive
instructions from higher up to pass on to the soldiers and battalion
commanders.”

He noted that there were instructions not to shoot along humanitarian routes,
but elsewhere, “you fill in the blanks, in the absence of any other directive.
This is the approach: ‘If it is forbidden there, then it is permitted here.’”

A. explained that shooting at “hospitals, clinics, schools, religious institutions,
[and] buildings of international organizations” required higher authorization.
But in practice, “I can count on one hand the cases where we were told not to
shoot. Even with sensitive things like schools, [approval] feels like only a
formality.”

In general, A. continued, “the spirit in the operations room was ‘Shoot first,
ask questions later.’ That was the consensus … No one will shed a tear if we
flatten a house when there was no need, or if we shoot someone who we
didn’t have to.”


A. said he was aware of cases in which Israeli soldiers shot Palestinian
civilians who entered their area of operation, consistent with a Haaretz
investigation into “kill zones” in areas of Gaza under the army’s occupation.
“This is the default. No civilians are supposed to be in the area, that’s the
perspective. We spotted someone in a window, so they fired and killed him.”
A. added that it often was not clear from the reports whether soldiers had
shot militants or unarmed civilians — and “many times, it sounded like
someone was caught up in a situation, and we opened fire.”

But this ambiguity about the identity of victims meant that, for A., military
reports about the numbers of Hamas members killed could not be trusted.
“The feeling in the war room, and this is a softened version, was that every
person we killed, we counted him as a terrorist,” he testified.

“The aim was to count how many [terrorists] we killed today,” A. continued.
“Every [soldier] wants to show that he’s the big guy. The perception was that
all the men were terrorists. Sometimes a commander would suddenly ask for
numbers, and then the officer of the division would run from brigade to
brigade going through the list in the military’s computer system and count.”

A.’s testimony is consistent with a recent report from the Israeli outlet Mako,
about a drone strike by one brigade that killed Palestinians in another
brigade’s area of operation. Officers from both brigades consulted on which
one should register the assassinations. “What difference does it make?
Register it to both of us,” one of them told the other, according to the
publication.

During the first weeks after the Hamas-led October 7 attack, A. recalled,
“people were feeling very guilty that this happened on our watch,” a feeling
that was shared among the Israeli public writ large — and quickly
transformed into a desire for retribution. “There was no direct order to take
revenge,” A. said, “but when you reach decision junctures, the instructions,
orders, and protocols [regarding ‘sensitive’ cases] only have so much
influence.”

When drones would livestream footage of attacks in Gaza, “there were
cheers of joy in the war room,” A. said. “Every once in a while, a building
comes down … and the feeling is, ‘Wow, how crazy, what fun.’”

Palestinians at the site of a mosque destroyed in an Israeli airstrike, near the
Shaboura refugee camp in Rafah, southern Gaza Strip, April 26, 2024. (Abed
Rahim Khatib/Flash90)
Palestinians at the site of a mosque destroyed in an Israeli airstrike, near the
Shaboura refugee camp in Rafah, southern Gaza Strip, April 26, 2024. (Abed
Rahim Khatib/Flash90)
A. noted the irony that part of what motivated Israelis’ calls for revenge was
the belief that Palestinians in Gaza rejoiced in the death and destruction of
October 7. To justify abandoning the distinction between civilians and
combatants, people would resort to such statements as “‘They handed out
sweets,’ ‘They danced after October 7,’ or ‘They elected Hamas’ … Not
everyone, but also quite a few, thought that today’s child [is] tomorrow’s
terrorist.

“I, too, a rather left-wing soldier, forget very quickly that these are real homes
[in Gaza],” A. said of his experience in the operations room. “It felt like a
computer game. Only after two weeks did I realize that these are [actual]
buildings that are falling: if there are inhabitants [inside], then [the buildings
are collapsing] on their heads, and even if not, then with everything inside
them.”

‘A horrific smell of death’
Multiple soldiers testified that the permissive shooting policy has enabled
Israeli units to kill Palestinian civilians even when they are identified as such
beforehand. D., a reservist, said that his brigade was stationed next to two
so-called “humanitarian” travel corridors, one for aid organizations and one
for civilians fleeing from the north to the south of the Strip. Within his
brigade’s area of operation, they instituted a “red line, green line” policy,
delineating zones where it was forbidden for civilians to enter.

According to D., aid organizations were permitted to travel into these zones
with prior coordination (our interview was conducted before a series of Israeli
precision strikes killed seven World Central Kitchen employees), but for
Palestinians it was different. “Anyone who crossed into the green area would
become a potential target,” D. said, claiming that these areas were
signposted to civilians. “If they cross the red line, you report it on the radio
and you don’t need to wait for permission, you can shoot.”

Yet D. said that civilians often came into areas where aid convoys passed
through in order to look for scraps that might fall from the trucks;
nonetheless, the policy was to shoot anyone who tried to enter. “The civilians
are clearly refugees, they are desperate, they have nothing,” he said. Yet in
the early months of the war, “every day there were two or three incidents with
innocent people or [people] who were suspected of being sent by Hamas as
spotters,” whom soldiers in his battalion shot.

The soldiers testified that throughout Gaza, corpses of Palestinians in civilian
clothes remained scattered along roads and open ground. “The whole area
was full of bodies,” said S., a reservist. “There are also dogs, cows, and
horses that survived the bombings and have nowhere to go. We can’t feed
them, and we don’t want them to get too close either. So, you occasionally
see dogs walking around with rotting body parts. There is a horrific smell of
death.”

Rubbles of houses destroyed by Israeli airstrikes in the Jabalia area in the
northern Gaza Strip, October 11, 2023. (Atia Mohammed/Flash90)
Rubbles of houses destroyed by Israeli airstrikes in the Jabalia area in the
northern Gaza Strip, October 11, 2023. (Atia Mohammed/Flash90)
But before the humanitarian convoys arrive, S. noted, the bodies are
removed. “A D-9 [Caterpillar bulldozer] goes down, with a tank, and clears
the area of corpses, buries them under the rubble, and flips [them] aside so
that the convoys don’t see it — [so that] images of people in advanced
stages of decay don’t come out,” he described.

“I saw a lot of [Palestinian] civilians – families, women, children,” S.
continued. “There are more fatalities than are reported. We were in a small
area. Every day, at least one or two [civilians] are killed [because] they
walked in a no-go area. I don’t know who is a terrorist and who is not, but
most of them did not carry weapons.”

Green said that when he arrived in Khan Younis at the end of December, “We
saw some indistinct mass outside a house. We realized it was a body; we saw
a leg. At night, cats ate it. Then someone came and moved it.”

A non-military source who spoke to +972 and Local Call after visiting
northern Gaza also reported seeing bodies strewn around the area. “Near the
army compound between the northern and southern Gaza Strip, we saw
about 10 bodies shot in the head, apparently by a sniper, [seemingly while]
trying to return to the north,” he said. “The bodies were decomposing; there
were dogs and cats around them.”

“They don’t deal with the bodies,” B. said of the Israeli soldiers in Gaza. “If
they’re in the way, they get moved to the side. There’s no burial of the dead.
Soldiers stepped on bodies by mistake.”

Last month, Guy Zaken, a soldier who operated D-9 bulldozers in Gaza,
testified before a Knesset committee that he and his crew “ran over
hundreds of terrorists, dead and alive.” Another soldier he served with
subsequently committed suicide.



‘Before you leave, you burn down the house’
Two of the soldiers interviewed for this article also described how burning
Palestinian homes has become a common practice among Israeli soldiers, as
first reported in depth by Haaretz in January. Green personally witnessed two
such cases — the first an independent initiative by a soldier, and the second
by commanders’ orders — and his frustration with this policy is part of what
eventually led him to refuse further military service.

When soldiers occupied homes, he testified, the policy was “if you move, you
have to burn down the house.” Yet for Green, this made no sense: in “no
scenario” could the middle of the refugee camp be part of any Israeli security
zone that might justify such destruction. “We are in these houses not
because they belong to Hamas operatives, but because they serve us
operationally,” he noted. “It is a house of two or three families — to destroy it
means they will be homeless.

“I asked the company commander, who said that no military equipment
[could be] left behind, and that we did not want the enemy to see our fighting
methods,” Green continued. “I said I would do a search [to make sure] there
was no [evidence of] combat methods left behind. [The company
commander] gave me explanations from the world of revenge. He said they
were burning them because there were no D-9s or IEDs from an engineering
corp [that could destroy the house by other means]. He received an order
and it didn’t bother him.”

“Before you leave, you burn down the house — every house,” B. reiterated.
“This is backed up at the battalion commander level. It’s so that
[Palestinians] won’t be able to return, and if we left behind any ammunition or
food, the terrorists won’t be able to use it.”


Before leaving, soldiers would pile up mattresses, furniture, and blankets,
and “with some fuel or gas cylinders,” B. noted, “the house burns down
easily, it’s like a furnace.” At the beginning of the ground invasion, his
company would occupy houses for a few days and then move on; according
to B., they “burned hundreds of houses. There were cases where soldiers set
a floor alight, and other soldiers were on a higher floor and had to flee
through the flames on the stairs or choked on smoke.”

Green said the destruction the military has left in Gaza is “unimaginable.” At
the beginning of the fighting, he recounted, they were advancing between
houses 50 meters from each other, and many soldiers “treated the houses
[like] a souvenir shop,” looting whatever their residents hadn’t managed to
take with them."


Responses:
[54925]


54925


Date: July 09, 2024 at 05:13:57
From: akira, [DNS_Address]
Subject: “It’s permissible to shoot everyone, a young girl, an old woman.”(NT)


(NT)


Responses:
None


[ International ] [ Main Menu ]

Generated by: TalkRec 1.17
    Last Updated: 30-Aug-2013 14:32:46, 80837 Bytes
    Author: Brian Steele